Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:09]

>> MEETING, DECEMBER 2ND, 2020 TO ORDER.

THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK, SHOULD HAVE SIGNED IN AT THE DOOR.

IF YOU HAVE NOT DONE SO, PLEASE DO SO AT THIS TIME, WHILE WE CONCLUDE OUR PRELIMINARIES. THE FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS

[MINUTES]

THE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 4TH MEETING.

ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS? HEARING NONE, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE -- ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THE NOVEMBER 4TH MINUTES OF THE ABILENE BUILDING OF BUILDING STAP DARDS. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE

RECORD? >> SEEING NO ONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. IS THERE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL?

>> I'LL SECOND. >> MOTION BY MR. ALLRED.

SECOND BY MR. MCCOLUM, THAT THE MINUTES BE APPROVED AND WRITTEN.

ROLL CALL. >> DOCTOR PARIS?

>> AYE. >> MR. ALLRED?

>> YES. >> MR. MCCOLUM?

>> YES. >> MR. WEB?

>> MR. TURNER? >> YES.

>> MR. SCHROEDER? >> I'LL WITHSTAND.

>> MR. BEARD? >> YES.

>> MOTION CARRIES. >> THANK YOU.

>> IN ALL CASES, EXCEPT FOR SPECIFICALLY STANDS OTHERWISE, BUILDINGS MUST BE SECURED IN THE LOCK CLEAN AND MODE BY THE OWNER WITHIN TEN DAYS OF RECEIVED OF THE NOTICE OF THE RESULTS OF THE HEARING. IF THIS IS NOT DONE, THE CITY MAY DO SO AND BILL THE OWNER. IN ANY CASE, WHERE THE BOARD ORDERS THE OWNER TO DEMOLISH A STRUCTURE OR STRUCTURES, BUT THE OWNER FAILS TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL TO THE BOARD'S ORDER, THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. ANY APPEAL MUST BE FILED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE AGREED PARTY RECEIVES NOTICE OF THE BOARD'S DECISION.

AT THE HEARING, YOU SHOULD BE PREPARED TO PRESENT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION SPECIFIC TIME FRAME NEEDED TO COMPLETE REPAIRS, SPECIFIC SCOPE OF REPAIR WORK TO BE COMPLETED, AND COST ESTIMATES FOR THE WORK TO BE DONE BY LICENSED, BONDED CONTRACTORS, SUCH AS ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING CONTRACTORS. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT YOU AT THE HEARING, THE RIGHT TO INSPECT THE FILE ON THE PROPERTY AT THE OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRIOR TO THE HEARING AND THE RIGHT TO REQUEST PRESENCE OF CITY STAFF FOR THE PURPOSE OF QUESTIONING AT THE HEARING. THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THE ANY CASE TODAY, SHOULD RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

SEEING NO ONE, I GUESS WE'RE -- DO YOU SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU ARE ABOUT TO GIVE IS THE TRUTH THE WHOLE TRUTH AND

NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? >> YES, IT IS.

>> THANK YOU. YOU COULD BE SEATED.

COULD WE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, PLEASE? THANK YOU.

[A. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition or Civil Penalties - Case No. 11-044: 2926 Beech (NORTH PARK ADDN, BLOCK IS, LOT S75 N319 OF £138.5). Owner: Flores, Joel Public Hearing]

READY FOR THE FIRST CASE >> GOOD MORNING..

I'M JOSH WRIGHT. >> MEETING SUPERVISOR.

>> AND WE HAVE THREE CASES IN OUR AGENDA TODAY.

TODAY'S MEETING. THIS IS A PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED FOR TODAY'S MEETING RECORDING THREE CASES.

FIRST, CASE OF THE AGENDA IS ITEM NUMBER 3A, CASE NUMBER 11-044, LOCATED AT 2926BEECH STREET.

IT SHOWS THE QUITCLAIM DEAN, NAMING JOEL FLORES TO BE THE OWNER. COUNTY SHOWS JOEL FLORES TO BE THE OWNER. TAX RECORDS, ARE NOT APPLICABLE.

INACTIVE SINCE 2016. IT SHOWS JOEL FLORES TO BE THE OWNER. THIS IS THE FRONT EAST SIDE OF THE MAIN STRUCTURE. THERE ARE TWO STRUCTURES IN THE PROPERTY. THIS IS THE MAIN SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. THIS IS THE WEST SIDE OF THE

[00:05:05]

MAIN STRUCTURE. THIS IS THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. SO THE PHOTO ON THE LEFT WAS A PHOTO FROM 2017 AND THE PHOTO ON THE RIGHT IS A MORE CURRENT PHOTO TAKEN ON NOVEMBER 9TH OF 2020.

AND THEY DID THIS FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPARISON TO SHOW THE PROGRESS MADE ON THE STRUCTURE.

AGAIN, THIS IS THE EXTERIOR, MORE PART OF THE EXTERIOR STRUCTURE THAT'S MORE COMPLETE. THIS IS FROM 2010 AND THIS IS FROM 2020. THERE'S INCOMPLETE FOUNDATION.

AND PHOTOS ON THE LEFT ARE FROM 2017 AND PHOTOS ON THE RIGHT ARE FROM 2020. SAME DIFFERENCE.

INCOMPLETE EXTERIOR PLUMBING. AND, AGAIN, DEALING WITH THE SAME TIME SPAN, INCOMPLETE STRUCTURE, INTERIOR STRUCTURE.

AND SOME MORE INTERIOR STRUCTURE, MORE OF THE STRUCTURE THAT'S INCOMPLETE. THIS IS THE SECONDARY STRUCTURE.

BOTH SIDES OF THE SECONDARY STRUCTURE.

WE HAVE SOME ELECTRICAL ISSUES. YOU HAVE POWER RUNNING FROM THE SECONDARY STRUCTURE INTO THE MAIN STRUCTURE.

ANOTHER CORD RUNNING FROM THE METER BOX INTO THE SECONDARY STRUCTURE. SO THE TIME OF EVENTS, THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN CONDEMNED PSI. IT WAS PRESENTED TO BOBS ONE TIME UNDER THE PREVIOUS OWNER. ON MARCH 25TH, 2014, THERE WAS NEW OWNERSHIP, MR. JOEL FLORES. SO I'M JUST GOING TO HIGHLIGHT, I'M GOING TO ADDRESS THE HIGHLIGHTED DATES.

AND OCTOBER 23RD, 2014, HE RECEIVED A NOTICE OF FEBRUARY 19, 2015. HE WAS GIVEN TWO MONTHS FOR PERMITS. AND BUILDING PERMIT WAS OBTAINED. NOVEMBER 12TH, HE WAS SENT A 6060 LETTER. MARCH 14, 2017, HE WAS SENT A NEW NOTICE OF CONDEMNATION. MAY 1ST, 2017, 90 DAYS TO OBTAIN ALL REFERENCE INSPECTIONS. ON THAT DATE WAS BOB.

AND NOVEMBER 19, 2019, PERMITS WERE RENEWED.

FEBRUARY 19TH, 2019, PERMITS WERE EXTENDED SIX MORE MONTHS.

NOVEMBER 25TH, 2020, PERMITS WERE RENEWED AND SET TO EXPIRE IN AUGUST, WHICH THEY DID OCTOBER 1ST, LEFT A PHONE CALL AND LEFT A VOICE MESSAGE TO THE OWNER AND NEVER GOT A CALL BACK.

NOVEMBER 12TH, SENT A NOTICE TO DECEMBER, AND AS OF RIGHT NOW, PERMITS HAVE NOT BEEN RENEWED. SINCE PERMITS WAS RENEWED IN FEBRUARY OF 2020, THERE HAS BEEN NO INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED OR COMPLETED ON THE PROPERTY AND THAT'S WHY THEY EXPIRED.

SO STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE PROPERTY, DEFINE THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY AND WELFARE. AND CHECK 8 TO MAKE SURE FOLLOWING EXISTS, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING, HAZARDOUS PLUMBING. AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO ORDER THE OWNER TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER WITHIN 30 DAYS, OR THE

CITY MAY DEMOLISH. >> ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. MORRIS? THANK YOU MR. MORRIS. AT THIS TIME, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CASE NUMBER 11-044.

OPEN THE FORUM FOR DISCUSSION. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.

>> MY NAME IS JOEL FLORES. >> YOU COULD STATE YOUR ADDRESS.

>> ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY, SIR >> NO, WHERE YOU LIVE.

>> 5727 CHUCKLOT. >> THANK YOU.

I FIRST OBTAINED THIS PROPERTY, WE HAD -- INFORMATION WE NEED

[00:10:03]

AND RECEIVED, AS FAR AS ELECTRICAL, IS.

WE HAVE PIECE BY PIECE, TAKEN THE PROPERTY APART.

AND WE CALLED FOR THE INSPECTION FOR THE ELECTRICAL.

ONE OF THE ROOMS IN THE BACK. WE PULLED THAT DOWN.

THERE'S ONLY ONE PIECE OF THE STRUCTURE WE CAN GET TO.

THE PROPERTY. AND EVERY PIECE OF WOOD HAS BEEN REDONE EXCEPT FOR ONE BEAM, WHICH IS WE HAVE MASS FOR INSPECTION, SO WE HAVE ANOTHER SIX MONTHS.

WE ARE TRYING TO FIND SOMETHING, CAME OUT SO WE'RE TRYING TO STILL WORK ON THAT. WE HAVE BUILT THIS PROPERTY WITH OUR OWN MONEY. AND ALSO THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR.

SINCE WE'RE RUNNING LOW ON FUNDS, WE DECIDED TO GO AHEAD AND -- THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR. AND THERE'S 30-45,000.

AND NOW WE HAVE THE PANDEMIC. ALL THAT I HAVE, TO MOVE THE PROPERTY OVER, STILL ON THE PROPERTY.

AND LIKE TO THE POINT, WHERE I HAVE EQUIPMENT AND POSSIBLY, BY MYSELF OR HAVE SOMEONE, TO PAY SOMEONE AT THIS POINT.

IT'S NOT LIKE I LEFT THE PROPERTY UNATTENDED.

I HAVE TOO MUCH INVESTED IN THE PROPERTY.

OTHER THAN THAT, THE PANDEMIC, LIKE I SAID, I AM SELF-EMPLOYED.

I HAVE WORKED A GOOD JOB SINCE APRIL.

I DON'T GET PAID VERY MUCH. I MAXED OUT MY CREDIT CARDS JUST TO PAY BILLS. I TURNED IN, WHAT I WAS GOING TO DO TO THE PROPERTY. OTHER THAN THAT, WE'RE STILL TRYING TO GET THIS PROPERTY, THE HOUSE HAS MOVED TO 2036, 2034.

EVEN IF I WANT TO SETTLE THE PROPERTY, I COULDN'T.

THERE'S NO WAY TO MOVE THE HOUSE BUT TO TURN IT DOWN.

I'M STILL TRYING THE BEST I CAN TO CHARGE THE PROPERTY BACK TO

THE STILL WANTS. >> DO YOU HAVE A FEEL FOR THE TIME LINE IN WHAT YOUR GOAL IS TO HAVE IT FINISHED? NOT FINISHED BUT HAVE IT COME TO CONDEMNATION?

>> WE HAVE TRIED BEFORE. I KEEP GETTING TURNED DOWN.

THE PROPERTY IS SO OLD, THAT EVERY TIME I TOUCH SOMETHING, IT WOULD FALL. WE DECIDED TO TEAR IT DOWN PIECE BY PIECE. WE SHOULD HAVE PROBABLY DONE WITH THIS PROBABLY YEAR AND A HALF AGO.

EVERY TIME I GET AN INSPECTOR OR GET SOMEONE TO ANSWER A QUESTION, I GET NO RESPONSE. M

MUCH. >> WELL, I THINK ONE OF THE CONCERNS I HAVE IS THAT YOU HAVE OWNED IT SINCE '14, SIX YEARS.

>> AND TWO YEARS, SIR, WITH NO INFORMATION ON HOW TO GO ABOUT THE RULES OF CONDEMNATION. I NKNOW -- LIKE I SAID, IN THE 3RD FLOOR, THERE'S NOTHING TO DO WITH CONDEMNATION.

[00:15:06]

THAT'S WHY I'M SAYING, I'M TRYING TO WORK AS BEST AS I CAN, ON WHO IS ABLE TO HELP ME. LIKE I SAID.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. FLORES? FLORES I'M A LITTLE UNCLEAR. YOU SAID YOU HAD A TORNADO ON THE HOUSE ON THE FOUNDATION, AND YOU TALKED ABOUT MOVING EIGHT FEET. I'M A LITTLE BIT UNCLEAR.

>> IT'S PROBABLY THE LIBERTY SET ON SINDER BLOCKS.

AND WE'VE BEEN BACK AND DUG AND THERE WAS SOME ROUND FOOTINGS THAT WERE THERE. SO WE WENT AHEAD AND USED THOSE AND PUT IT ON SINDER BLOCKS. NOTHING BROKE.

IT JUST PUSHED IT OVER TO THE PROPE

PROPERTIES. >> THE PHOTOGRAPHS APPEAR TO SHOW THE CONCRETE BLOCKS THERE. IS THAT NOT THE CONDITION RIGHT

NOW >> THAT'S THE CONDITION, SIR.

THAT'S WHERE THE ORIGINAL HOUSE STOOD.

BLOCKS THAT WERE THERE IS WHERE THE ORIGINAL HOUSE STOOD.

>> IS THAT, IS THAT WHERE IT IS N

NOW. >> THIS IS, IF I'M READING IT WRITE, MONDAY, NOVEMBER 20TH, RECENT PHOTOGRAPH THERE.

>> AND THOSE THAT YOU SEE ON THE RIGHT HAND, TOP CORNER, THERE'S

A BEAM RIGHT THERE. >> I SEE THAT.

>> AND I PUT THE BEAM, TO PUT THE HOUSE TOGETHER AND IN THE NORTH SIDE OF IT. AND IT'S TILTING, SO I JACKED IT

BACK UP. >> WHICH DIRECTION ARE YOU

TRYING TO MOVE? >> SOUTH.

>> TWISTED IT, WHEN THE PROPERTY FELL.

IT PROBABLY WOULD HAVE CAME DOWN, THERE WAS A PICTURE, SCAFFOLD. AND THAT'S WHERE, IT STUCK.

IF YOU NOTICE IN THE PICTURE LEFT, IN THE LEFT SIDE, THERE'S A SINDER BLOCK THERE THOSE ARE THE BROWN FOOTINGS YOU FOUND.

AND THERE'S ADDITION AL UNDERNEATH THE HOUSE MUCH THE PROPERTY HAS NOT MAINTAINED SINCE, I GUESS THEY HAD IT.

AS YOU COULD TELL IN THE LOWER LEFT HAND.

[00:21:04]

>> BUILDING TO THE SIDE >> THE WAY THE PROPERTY --

>> AND IT IS A PROPERTY. >> AND TO SEE THE SCAFFOLDING ON THE RIGHT-HAND CORNER. THE LEG ON THE SCAFFOLD, HAS PULLED THE FENCE DOWN AND HAS STOPPED THE PROPERTY FROM COMING OVER AND HAS TWISTED THE FRONT OF THE STRUCTURE, TOWARDS THE FRONT OF MY HOUSE. THAT LOOKS TOK PRETTY MUCH,

SETBACKS FROM. >> THERE'S A 6 FOOT ASSOCIATED TO STRICTURE. AND FOR ONE SERVICE PROPERTY, THOSE SETBACKS ARE DESIGNED TO KEEP THE STRUCTURES APART.

YOU START TALKING ABOUT TORNADO, AND YOU NEED TO MOVE IT BACK.

I'M BEGINNING TO UNDERSTAND, YES, YOU NEED TO MOVE THE BUILDING BACK. IT ALMOST APPEARS TO ME, THE

ENTRY DOOR IN THE PHOTOGRAPH. >> WHAT YOU SEE, IS WHERE THE

ACTUAL EASEMENT. >> YES.

>> AND WE HAVE TO MOVE, BECBECAUSE

-- >> SO I CAN'T.

>> AND IN FRONT OF THE HOUSE, IS WYE IS NEXT DOOR.

BOTH OF THE PROPERTY >> SO YOU KNOW, IS TO MOVE THE STRUCTURE, AND YOUR INVESTMENT CERTAINLY, IS SAD TO SAY, YOU HAVE A LOT INVESTED IN IT AND YOU NEED TO FIND THE RIGHT PEOPLE WHO NEED TO MOVE HOUSES. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF IT'S 20 MILES. TO LET THE PROPERTY MOVE OVER EIGHT FEET, THAT'S THE CHEAPEST. I THINK BEFORE THAT, I HAVE DONE MY RESEARCH AND I'VE SEEN -- FOUND A WAY TO MOVE IT.

[00:25:01]

ROTORS AND BEAMS TO MOVE THE PROPERTY BACK FROM THE ORIGINAL PLACE, EXACTLY WHERE IT WAS. LIKE I SAID, WHERE THERE'S SOME

PROPERTY, THAT WAS THERE. >> JUST SAYING, WE NEED A PLAN OF ACTION, WE UNDERSTAND AND FEEL FOR YOU AND THE INVESTMENT THAT YOU HAVE THERE, STILL HAVE THE BUILDING SETTING WHERE IT IS IS RIGHT UP NEXT TO ANOTHER PROPERTY, WHOEVER OWNS IT.

YOU MAY OWN IT, BUT YOU MAY HAVE TO -- IF YOU WANT TO GO NEXT TO THE BUILDINGS TOGETHER. YOU NEED BACK TO MOVE IT.

THAT'S ANOTHER PROCESS ALTOGETHER.

PROBABLY HAVE A LOT INVESTED IN THIS.

MOVE THE HOUSE, WHETHER YOU MOVE IT TO THE OTHER SIDE OF TOWN BASICALLY -- YOU'RE ALMOST GOING TO HAVE THE $6,000 INVESTED IN ADDITIONAL, BEFORE YOU COULD GET ANYWHERE IN THIS STRUCTURE.

MY RECOMMENDATION TODAY, IS HAVE THE STRUCTURE -- I RECOGNIZE SOMETIMES LENIENCY COULD BE MORE TIME TO GET THE STRUCTURE AND GET IT MOVED THAN IN THE LENGTH OF TIME WE SEE ON THE TIME LINE.

WE'VE GOT -- I DON'T HAVE CONFIDENCE THAT THIS TIME LINE IS GOING TO IMPROVE. AND A LOT OF YOUR INDECISIONS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE ARE NOT IN YOUR FAVOR.

YOU HAVE A LOT OF TIME. WHAT GIVES US THE -- YOU COULD HAVE THE BUILDING MOVED IN EVEN 30 DAYS AND START GETTING.

AND THE FOOTINGS THAT ARE EXISTING, I STILL DON'T KNOW WHERE THINGS ARE. MOVE IT BACK TO THE ORIGINAL FOOTINGS, THAT REALLY PUTS THE RIGHT SETBACK FROM THE TIME LINES. OF THAT'S YOUR GOAL TO MOVE IT BACK WHERE IT WAS, EVEN IF THE SETBACKS ARE.

SO THIS IS THE TIME OF DISC DISCU DISCUSSION.

>> LIKE I SAID BEFORE, ENTER THE PANDEMIC, IT'S HARD FOR ME TO FIND WORK. I HAVE PUT MY CREDIT CARDS.

I CAN'T TELL YOU WHEN THE PANDEMIC -- SERVICES.

SO MUCH HAS BEEN ACTING. >> MR. FLORES, I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS FOR YOU. EXACTLY HOW MANY TIMES IN SIX YEARS HAVE YOU BEEN TO THE MEETING TO DISCUSS?

>> I'VE BEEN TWICE. >> TWICE, OKAY.

>> YOU'VE HAD AT LEAST ONE CITATION THAT I SEE.

[00:30:04]

YOU'VE HAD MORE THAN ONE OCCASION WHERE YOU HAVE BEEN GIVEN INFORMATION AND AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE CHANGES SO EARLIER YOU INDICATED THAT YOU HAVE NOT HAD DIRECTION FROM THE CITY ABOUT WHAT NEEDED TO OCCUR. I WILL CHALLENGE THAT PART OF YOUR TESTIMONY THAT YOU HAVE NOT BEEN GIVEN ADEQUATE INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTION ABOUT WHAT NEEDED TO BE DONE.

YOU HAVE HAD SIX YEARS, CITATIONS, INFORMATION, RECOMMENDATIONS, OPPORTUNITIES TO PULL BUILDING PERMITS, ET CETERA. SO I WOULD DISAGREE WITH YOU ON THE POINT ABOUT THE ISSUE AS THE PANDEMIC AND THE TORNADO.

THE ISSUE, YOU HAVE HAD ADEQUATE INSTRUCTION AND ADVICE AND RECOMMENDATION FROM THE CITY IN THE SIX YEARS YOU'VE OWNED THE

PROPERTY. >> LIKE I SAID, THAT'S WHEN I WENT DOWNSTAIRS, ANSWER MY QUESTIONS AND THAT'S WHEN I WAS GIVEN INFORMATION THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.

THE CITY OF ABILENE DOES NOT GIVE YOU A PAMPHLET, BOOKLET.

THE PROPERTY IS CONDEMNED, DOESN'T FOLLOW ANY OTHER THAN CONDEMNATION PROPERTIES. THOSE ARE SPECIAL RULES I HAVE TO FOLLOW. WITHOUT THOSE RULES, WITHOUT THOSE RULES, ANYTIME I COME HERE TO GET AN INSPECTION, I TRY AND TRY AGAIN, TO TRY TO GET SOMEONE WORK WITH ME ON THIS PROPERTY. AND REMIND ME THAT CAN'T COME DOWN THERE. AND THIS PROPERTY, WOULD HAVE BEEN -- INSPECTOR CAME OUT, TO SUPPORT THE PROPERTY AND MOVED IT. IT ALREADY LAPSED TWO WEEKS.

I UNDERSTAND THAT. >> I UNDERSTAND THAT.

YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT MINUTIA, SIR.

AND MY CONCERN, WE HAVE MULTIPLE INDIVIDUALS MEETING AFTER MEETING THAT COME DOWN AND HAVE THE SAME ISSUE AND THEY UNDERSTAND THAT YOU NEED A CONTRACTOR AND THERE ARE FOLKS WHO COULD EXPLAIN THAT TO YOU. AS MY COLLEAGUE MENTIONED, WE HAVE CONCERN AND UNDERSTAND ABOUT YOUR DILEMMA OF TRYING TO DO THIS YOURSELF, BUT YOU'VE HAD SIX YEARS TO DEVELOP SOME APPRECIATION THAT THERE ARE STANDARDS AND THERE ARE LICENSED INDIVIDUALS WITHIN THE CITY WHO COULD GIVE YOU INSTRUCTIONS AND HELP YOU PREPARE FOR THAT. SO MY CONCERN IS VERY SIMILAR TO MY COLLEAGUE THAT YOU'VE HAD SIX YEARS HERE AND WE STILL HAVE MAJOR PROBLEMS THAT NEED TO BE DEALT WITH.

>> WE ASKED FOR THE FIRST INSPECTION -- IN THE BACK OF THE HOME -- I CALL MY ELECTRICAL, THAT IT WAS GOING TO COST TOO MUCH MONEY TO PULL ALL THE WIRES DOWN.

I THEN CAME BACK AND ASKED THEM WHY AM I NOT GRANDFATHERED IN FOR THE PROPERTY? WE TORE DOWN THAT ROOM AND REBUILT IT. AND HERE WE GO AGAIN.

SO AS FAR AS SAYING THERE'S NOT BEEN IMPROVEMENTS, TO PULL APART A PROPERTY LIKE THIS, IT'S LIKE EASY, TO INSTALL IT BY YOURSELF.

I THINK WHAT NEEDS TO BE -- >> I WOULDN'T QUESTION THAT

[00:35:01]

THERE'S BEEN IMPROVEMENTS, SIR, IS WHAT I'M SUGGESTING, YOU'RE ASKING US TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DELAYS AND THE PROBLEMS THAT HAVE OCCURRED. WE CAN'T CONTROL THAT EITHER.

>> I'M ASKING -- TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS

PROPERTY. >> YOU UNDERSTAND OUR CONCERN, YOU DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO DO WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.

WHAT ADVANTAGE IS GIVING YOU ADDITIONAL TIME POINT? I MEAN, THAT'S BEEN THE EXPLANATION YOU'VE GIVEN ABOUT

MULTIPLE ISSUES HERE. >> YOU SAYING,

>> MR. FLORES, YOU MENTIONED YOU HAD ALL THE EQUIPMENT, PURCHASED

ALL THE EQUIPMENT FOR THE HO US. >> WE HAVE TWO TON ROTORS, WE HAVE I-BEAMS, THEY COST ME ABOUT $178 A PIECE.

WE HAVE ALL THE ROTORS. I PLANNED ON PUTTING THE I-BEAMS

IN THE HOUSE, WE HAVE A BOBCAT. >> SO YOUR ROAD BLOCK NOW IS JUST GETTING THE HELP, IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING?

>> YES, SIR AND SOME MONEY SO I COULD GET SOME PEOPLE TO MOVE THE PROPERTY. I CAN'T DO THAT BY MYSELF.

>> THAT'S THE FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS, AS I SEE IT.

ANYTHING ELSE, ANY OTHER EFFORTS YOU EXTEND OR EXTENT YOU EXTEND IN THE PROJECT WILL BE WASTED UNTIL YOU GET IT MOVED, ON QUSLY. IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS,

MR. FLORES? >> ARE YOU A LICENSED

CONTRACTOR? >> YES, I AM.

>> COULD I ASK YOU ONE OTHER QUESTION.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR ANSWERING MY QUESTIONS.

AS A LICENSED CONTRACTOR, ARE YOU NOT FAMILIAR WITH BUILDING

STANDARDS FOR THE CITY? >> SIR, THE BUILDING, ARE MINIMUM. WE HAVE STRETCHED OUT, TO BUILD

THE PROPERTY, BECAUSE -- >> MY QUESTION IS VERY SIMPLE.

YOU INDICATE YOU DIDN'T GET DIRECTION ON WHAT NEEDED TO BE DONE, BUT AS A LICENSED CONTRACTOR, WOULDN'T YOU

EXPECTED TO HAVE THAT KNOWLEDGE? >> NO, SIR BECAUSE IT'S ASSESSOR. WHEN I GO TO A HOME YOU LIVE IN, IT'S TOTALLY DIFFERENT WHAT THE CITY EXPECTS, CONDEMNED HOME.

SO I DIDN'T HAVE THAT KNOWLEDGE. AND THAT'S WHAT I WAS TRYING TO OBTAIN ON HOW TO GO ABOUT AND GETTING THE PROPERTY -- AND TOLD

ME WHAT TO DO. >> THANK YOU.

>> MR. FLORES, DO YOU HAVE ANY RESOURCES, FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO MOVE THIS BUILDING? DO YOU HAVE THE EQUIPMENT, OBVIOUSLY. YOU HAVE THE FINANCIAL RESOURCES? NO, SIR, I DO NOT.

I HAVE TO RENT SOME EQUIPMENT. >> THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, MR. FLORES? THANK YOU, MR. FLORES.

[00:40:03]

ANY OTHER PERSON TO SPEAK TO THE CASE PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR A

DISCUSSION OR A MOTION. >> IF I MAY, JUST TO REITERATE A FEW THINGS, THAT DOCTOR PARIS WAS MENTIONING.

IN THE NOTICE, THERE'S DETAILED INFORMATION AS FAR AS WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE, SUCH AS THE MOST RECENT ONE WHICH WAS THE ORDER FOR THE MASS MEETING, PRIOR TO THIS ONE.

IT WAS, AUGUST 15, AS A GENERAL CONTRACTOR, MOST OF YOU TO KNOW THE REFERENCES REQUIRE, AND THE FACT THAT PERMITS WERE RENEWED, TO TOTAL, RIGHT OFF THE BAT.

WE HAVE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH MR. FLORES, ANY INFORMATION NEEDED, AND JUST A PHONE CALL TODAY AND TO KIND OF REMIND THE BOARD THAT DURING THIS PANDEMIC, WE HAVE NOT SHUT DOWN AS FAR AS PERMIT AND CONTRACTORS, PERMITS, CONTINUE TO WORK.

SO JUST IN CASE MR. FLORES IS NOT AWARE OF THAT.

>> WELL, ANY INSPECTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN DONE OR ARE PLANNED ARE PRETTY MUCH NOL AND VOID, IS THAT CORRECT MR. LITTLEJOHN, UNTIL HE LEAVES THE BUILDING? ANY DISCUSSION OR MOTION?

>> YOU KNOW, I SYMPATHIZE, THESE ARE HARD TIMES.

IT'S NOT GOING TO GET BETTER FOR A WHILE.

I THINK -- HE'S BEEN GONE FOR A BIT.

JUST BECAUSE HE SAYS IT'S NOT THERE, SOMETIMES ESPECIALLY YOU HAVE TO HELP UNDERSTAND. SO WHEN WE READ IT, BECAUSE WE'RE FAMILIAR WITH IT, WE HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING.

AND SO TO BE HONEST, WE BOTH HEARD THIS AND HE HAS AN UNDERSTANDING, THIS IS ALL THAT HE NEEDS TO DO AND GET DONE.

AND THEN, IF HE COMES UP WITH A PLAN, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN HELP WITH. I KNOW WE KEEP LOOKING AT THE PAST BUT SKIP FORWARD TO THE FUTURE.

>> YES, SIR. AND I AGREE, JUST TO KIND OF REITERATE. WE DON'T USUALLY ALLOW PERMITS WITHOUT ACTION. AND ANYTIME WE ISSUE

CONDEMNATION. >> MR. LITTLEJOHN, WOULD HE HAVE TO BE A LICENSED HOUSE MOVER TO MOVE THIS BUILDING?

>> ONLY IF HE WAS MOVING OFF SITE.

TO REMAIN IN THE SAME PROPERTY. >> THANK YOU.

>> MR. CHAIRMAN, I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT AS CONCERNED AS I AM ABOUT HIS DESCRIPTION OF NO UNDERSTANDING, THE FACT HE'S A GENERAL CONTRACTOR, AND HAS NO KNOWLEDGE THAT THIS IS BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND NOT FINITE INFORMATION.

IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, SINCE HE HAS THE EQUIPMENT, I THINK I WOULD RECOMMEND AND I WOULD PUT A MOTION, PUT A MOTION THAT WE GIVE HIM 30 DAYS TO MOVE THE PROPERTY AND THEN WE IT BACK TO THE BOARD ABOUT MAKING THE DECISION.

HE SAYS HE HAS THE EQUIPMENT BUT IT SHOULD NOT REQUIRE MUCH MONEY, IF HE HAS THE EQUIPMENT. HOPEFULLY, HE WILL HAVE SOME FRIENDS OR COLLEAGUES OR SOMETHING THAT HE COULD DO TO GET SOME HELP TO MOVE THE PROPERTY, TO GET HIM 30 DAYS TO MOVE THE PROPERTY AND WE REVISIT THIS QUESTION, AGAIN, TO GIVE HIM EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO SAVE HIS INVESTMENT, GIVE HIM AN

[00:45:04]

OPPORTUNITY TO POTENTIALLY SAVE THE INVESTMENT.

THAT'S MY MOTION, TO GIVE HIM 30 DAYS TO MOVE THE PROPERTY AND BRING IT BACK TO THE COMMITTEE FOR CONSIDERATION.

>> WOULD YOU CONSIDER 60 DAYS, INSTEAD OF A 30 DAYS

>> YES. >> IS THAT MOTION 60?

>> YES, SIR >> ANY OTHER COMMENTS.

>> JUST DETERMINE THAT THE PROPERTY TO THE STRUCTURE, IT IS -- REMIND TO MOVE THE PROPERTY, MOVE THE STRUCTURE OF

THE PROPERTY >> GOOD POINT

>> 60 DAYS TO MOVE THE STRUCTURE AND IF THAT IS DONE, WE BRING IT BACK TO SEAT. THAT WILL REQUIRE A ROUGH INSPECTION OF SOME TIME. THE FACT THAT PHYSICALLY MOVING THE STRUCTURE -- WHAT DOES THAT ENTAIL HIM?

IS THERE AN INSPECTION REQUIRED? >> YES, ONCE THE STRUCTURE IS MOVED, BASED ON THE EXISTING PERMITS.

>> JUST TO BE CLEAR, TO MOVE THIS STRUCTURE BACK TO REALLY THE LOCATION, WHEREVER IT IS DETERMINED, IS THAT GOING TO

REQUIRE ANY PERMIT? >> NOT TO SLIDE IT OVER, NO.

ITS IN THE SAME PROPERTY. I DO HAVE SOME CONCERNS IN FACT, IT'S GOING TO --

>> ONLY OTHER QUESTION I HAVE, IS TO MOVE IT BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL. THE ORIGINAL.

AND THE ORIGINAL. >> AND THE ORIGINAL, WE VISITED,

THE ORIGINAL LOCATION. >> THANK YOU.

>> THERE'S A MOTION ON THE FLOOR THAT WE GRANT MR. FLORES 60 DAYS TO MOVE THE STRUCTURE. IS THERE A SECOND?

>> I'LL SECOND. >> MOTION BY DOCTOR PARIS THAT WE GRANT 60 DAYS FOR HIM TO MOVE THE STRUCTURE AND AT THAT TIME, IF HE DOESN'T, IT WILL COME BACK TO US, CORRECT, MR. FLORES? AND HOPEFULLY, THAT WILL GIVE HIM THE BEST TIME TO DEAL WITH SOME INCLEMENT WEATHER ISSUES. SECOND BY MR. SCHROEDER.

ROLL CALL, PLEASE. >> DR. PARIS?

>> FINE. >> MR. ALLRED?

>> YEAH. >> MR. MCCOLUM?

>> YES. >> MR. WEB?

>> YES. >> MR. TURNER?

>> YES. >> MR. SCHROEDER?

>> YES. >> MR. BEARD?

>> YES. >> MOTION CARRIES.

[B. Case for Rehnbilitation, Demolition or Civil Penalties - Case No. 17-033: 1233 S. Crockett St. (ELMWOOD WEST SEC II, BLOCK N, LOT 21) Owner: Coddinglon, Sharon D Public Hearing]

>> GOOD LUCK, JOEL FLORES. >> I BELIEVE THE NEXT CASE WAS

ON TABLE. >> I MOTIONED IT.

UNTABLE THE NEXT CASE >> MOTION BY MR. MCCOLUM.

SECOND BY MR. ALLRED THAT WE UNTABLE CASE NUMBER 17-033.

>> ROLL CALL? >> DR. PARIS RJTS AYE.

>> MR. ALLRED? >> YES.

>> MR. MCCOLUM? >> YES.

>> MR. WEB? >> YES.

>> MR. TURNER? >> YES.

>> MR. SCHROEDER? >> YES.

>> MR. BEARD >> YES.

>> MOTION CARRIES. >> NEXT ITEM, WAS UNTABLED IN THE NEXT MEETING, 17-033, 1233 SOUTH CROCKET DRIVE.

IT SHOWS, SHARON D CODINGTON. AND SECRETARY OF STATE, SHOWS NO INTEREST IN THE NAME. AND TAX RECORDS ARE NOT APPLICABLE. SEARCH OF SHARE D CODINGTON.

[00:50:08]

THIS IS THE EAST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE.

THIS IS THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE.

AND THE NORTH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE.

AND THE WEST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE.

AND FROM THE LAST MINUTE, SAME ISSUES, WITH EXISTING, FORMAL ISSUES. AND EXTERIOR ISSUES AS WELL.

AND THE LEFT, EXISTING ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY.

AND ON THE TOP, ON THE BOTTOM, ARE SHOWING, OPEN SWIMMING POOL.

AND INTERIOR STRUCTURES, ON THE STRUCTURE, SOME ACCESS, THERE'S SOME MOLD IN THE CEILING. CURRENT PHOTOS WERE TAKEN ON MONDAY. YOU COULD SEE IT REMOVED, EXPOSING ELECTRICAL ISSUES. BOTTOM RIGHT PHOTO, THERE'S ALSO AN OPEN ELECTRICAL OUTLET BOX. SO THE TIME LINE OF EVENTS, TECHNICIAN NOTICED, IT WAS SENT ON JANUARY 2017, SOMEONE FULFILLING APARTMENTS AS WELL. FEBRUARY 17TH, MR. ASHWOOD OBTAINED A PLAN OF ACTION AND ADVISED HIS MOTHER, ADVISED US HIS MOTHER IS LIVING WITH HIM AND SENT A NOTICE TO THE ADDRESS. AND STARTED SKIPPING DOWN, I DID HAVE A PHONE CALL WITH THE DAUGHTER-IN-LAW, THEY ARE TRYING TO, GIVE A CURRENT ADDRESS. INFORMED FOR ADVISORY OF NOVEMBER. OCTOBER 14TH, 2020, NOTICE OF NOVEMBER BOBS WAS SENT. OCTOBER 30, PHONE CALL, SHE STATED THE MOTHER, PROPERTY WAS SOMEWHERE.

NOVEMBER 4TH, BOBS MEETING, BOARD ORDERED TO TAKE THE CASE.

MR. ASH WAS PRESENT. AND THEY WERE TRYING TO GET THE DEED TRANSFERRED. AND NOVEMBER 2020, NOTICE OF BOBS MEETING. AND PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 8, ALL CONDITIONS EXIST. AND SANITTATION, STRUCTURAL HAZARD, NUISANCE, HAZARDOUS WIRE.

AND FURTHERMORE, THE OWNER TO DEMOLISH, WITHIN 30 DAYS OR THE

CITY MAY DEMOLISH. >> ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. MORRIS?

>> I SEE THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED.

>> NO, SIR. THE NOVEMBER BOBS MEETING, THE DAUGHTER, SON-IN-LAW, THAT WAS GOING TO BE THERE.

TO GET THE DEED TRANSFERRED TO SOMEBODY.

AS OF RIGHT NOW, THERE'S NO DEED TRANSFER.

I DID A RECORD SEARCH THIS MORNING.

THERE'S NO DEED TRANSFER. >> COULD YOU GO BACK TO THE RECORD, I THOUGHT I SAW SOMEWHERE, ONE ITEM.

>> AND MS. SHARON. >> OH, OKAY, I'M SORRY.

STILL SEE SHARON ON TITLE. >> YES.

>> THANK YOU, MR. MORRIS. AT THIS TIME, I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 17-033. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THE CASE, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD? SEEING NO ONE. I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 17-033. AND I'LL OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR A MOTION. WE HAVE THE RECOMMENDATION

BEFORE YOU? >> SEEING WE HAVE NO ONE FORWARD TO SPEAK ON THE CASE, WE TABLED IT TO GRANT AN ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS FOR THE TITLE TO BE SWITCHED OVER TO SOMEONE ELSE.

I DEEM THIS PROPERTY CONDEMNATION.

[00:55:01]

I WILL MAKE A MOTION, WE FOLLOW THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION.

THIS PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND THAT IT'S A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE AND STRUCTURE DEEMED

UNREASONABLE. >> MOTION.

>> MOTION BY MR. MCCOLUM. SECOND BY MR. ALLRED, THAT THE PROPERTY IS DECLARED A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND IT'S A HAZARD FOR PUBLIC SAFETY AND WELFARE DECLARED THE STRUCTURE UNREASONABLE. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?

ROLL CALL PLEASE. >> DR. PARIS?

>> AYE. >> MR. ALLRED?

>> YES. >> MR. MCCOLUM?

>> YES. >> MR. WEB?

>> YES. >> MR. TURNER?

>> YES. >> MR. SCHROEDER?

>> YES. >> MR. BEARD?

>> YES. >> MOTION CARRIES.

>> I'LL FOLLOW-UP THE MOTION WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION THAT THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLISH OR REPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH.

>> MOTION BY MR. MCCOLUM AND SECOND BY MR. ALLRED, TO DEMOLISH TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. ROLL CALL PLEASE.

>> DR. PARIS? >> AYE.

>> MR. ALLRED? >> YES.

>> MR. MCCOLUM? >> YES.

>> MR. WEB? >> YES.

>> MR. TURNER? >> YES.

>> MR. SCHROEDER? >> YES.

>> MR. BEARD? >> YES

. >> MOTION CARRIES.

>> THANK YOU. >> I BELIEVE THE NEXT CASE WAS

[C. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition or Civil Penalties - Case No. 20.002282: 1517 N 16th St. (COLLEGE HEIGHTS. BLOCK 26, LOT 3 & W12 OF 2), Owner: Jones, Gregan ET AL, Gregorio Hernendez Public Hearing]

ALSO TABLED, CASE 20-002282. >> I MOTION WE UNTABLE IT.

>> MOTION BY MR. ML1CL0COLL LIMB.

SECOND BY MR. ALLRED, UNTABLE. ROLL CALL, PLEASE.

>> DR. PARIS? >> AYE.

>> MR. ALLRED >> YES.

>> MR. MCCOLUM? >> YES

>> MR. WEB? >> YES.

>> MR. TURNER? >> YES.

>> MR. SCHROEDER? >> YES.

>> MR. BEARD? >> YES.

>> MOTION CARRIES. >> LAST CASE OF THE AGENDA IS ITEM NUMBER DC CASE NUMBER 200-2282, 1517 NORTH 16TH STREET. THE RECORDS SHOW, GREGORY JONES, AS AN OWNER. CARE OF THE GREGORIO HERNANDEZ TO BE THE OWNER. SECRETARY OF STATE SHOWS NO ENTITY OF THE NAME. UTILITY RECORDS, HAVE BEEN INAC INACTIVE.

AND THIS IS A PUBLIC NOTICE FOR TODAY'S MEETING.

THE FRONT PART OF THE STRUCTURE. THERE'S TWO STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY. THERE'S THE MAIN STRUCTURE.

AND THE WEST SIDE OF THE MAIN STRUCTURE.

AND EAST SIDE OF THE MAIN STRUCTURE.

THIS WAS A FIRE REPORTED. WE HAVE SOME EXTERIOR FIRE DAMAGE. INTERIOR FIRE DAMAGE TO THE MAIN STRUCTURE. AND INTERIOR SMOKE, IN THE MAIN STRUCTURE AS WELL. THIS IS THE SECONDARY STRUCTURE.

WE HAVE SOME EXTERIOR ISSUES. YOU SEE SOME FALLING, FOUNDATION ISSUES, LEAKING ISSUES AS WELL. SO THE TIME LINE, REPORTED BY THE FIRE MARSHALL BACK IN SEPTEMBER 2019.

SEPTEMBER 2018, SEPTEMBER 2019, AND MR. TURNER AND MYSELF INSPECTED THE PROPERTY. AND JULY 9TH, 2020, PROPERTY TO BE SECURE, NO PROGRESS MADE, CONDEMNED ON THAT DAY.

AND WAS SET TO THE OWNER. AND SEPTEMBER 8TH, 2020, PERMITS WERE INTERRUPTED. OCTOBER 7TH, THE BOBS MEETING ORDERED TO BE TABLED, MR. LUPE HERNANDEZ, STATED SHE HAD AN APPOINTMENT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL. AND OCTOBER 14TH, 2020, SENT NOTICE FOR THE NOVEMBER BOBS. NOVEMBER 3RD, 2020, PHONE CALL FROM THE ELLIS HERNANDEZ, WHO IS THE DAUGHTER OF LUPE HERNANDEZ, MEETING WITH THE ATTORNEY, RESCHEDULED DUE TO COVID AND ENCOURAGED HER TO ATTEND THE BOBS MEETING.

NOVEMBER 4TH, 2020, BOBS MEETING TOOK PLACE AND ORDERED TO TABLE THE CASE UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING AND I DID COME IN CONTACT WITH THE OWNER AFTER THE MEETING. AND THEY SAY, THEY HAD ARRIVED SHORTLY AFTER THE MEETING WAS OVER.

I EXPLAINED TO THEM THE BOARD DECISION AND IT WAS RECORDED,

[01:00:02]

THEY ARE STILL MEETING WITH THE ATTORNEY AND TO SHARE THE INFORMATION. AND NOVEMBER 12TH, 2020, NOTICE OF BOBS OF TODAY'S MEETING. THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION, TO DECLARE THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND, DECLARE THE STRUCTURE IS UNREASONABLE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 8, CONDITIONS EXIST, SANITTATION, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING, HAZARDOUS PLUMBING. AND ORDER THE OWNER TO DEMOLISH,

WITHIN 30 DAYS, >> ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. MORRIS.

>> HAVE YOU HAD ANY CONTACT WITH THE LADY, MEETING IN THE HALL?

>> NO, NOT SINCE THE NOVEMBER BOBS MEETING.

I EXPLAINED TO HER THE DECISION AND TOLD HER TO MAKE SURE.

OTHER THAN THAT, NO PHONE CALLS. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. MORRIS? THANK YOU MR. MORRIS.

AT THIS TIME, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NUMBER 20-002282. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THE CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. SEEING NO ONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 20-02282. OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION.

MOTION? >> GIVEN THEY DID NOT MEET THE AGREEMENT AND THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXTEND THE TIME AND FOLLOW-UP COMMUNICATION REGARDING THE MATTER, I WOULD PROPOSE THAT WE DECLARE THE PROPERTY AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND IT'S A HAZARD TO

THE PUBLIC WELFARE. >> SECOND.

>> BEFORE WE GO FORWARD, PEOPLE ARRIVED AFTER ARBITORIUM.

>> IS ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON 1517 NORTH 16TH STREET? ANY RELATION TO MS. LUPE HERNANDEZ?

IT DOESN'T APPEAR, SIR >> MOTION BY DR. PARIS.

SECOND BY MR. MCCOLUM. THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND A HAZARD TO PUBLIC HEALTH SAFETY AND WELFARE AND DEEM THE STRUCTURE UNREASONABLE. ANY OTHER FURTHER DISCUSSION?

ROLL CALL, PLEASE. >> DR. PARIS?

>> AYE. >> MR. ALLRED?

>> YES. >> MR. MCCOLUM?

>> YES. >> MR. WEB?

>> YES. >> MR. TURNER?

>> YES. >> MR. SCHROEDER?

>> YES. >> MR. BEARD?

>> YES. >> MOTION CARRIES.

>> I WILL ALSO LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLISH AND APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OR

THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. >> SECOND.

>> MOTION BY DR. PARIS, SECOND BY MR. ML1CL0COLL LULL.

THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO APPEAL OR THE CITY WILL DEMOLISH.

>> DR. PARIS? >> AYE.

>> MR. ALLRED >> YES.

>> MR. MCCOLUM >> YES.

>> MR. WEB? >> YES.

>> MR. TURNER? >> YES.

>> MR. SCHROEDER? >> YES.

>> MR. BEARD? >> YES.

>> MOTION CARRIES. >> I BELIEVE THAT COMPLETES THE

[D. Clay Door - Staff Presentation Condemnation Program Statistics Review-FY2020]

CASELOAD. I BELIEVE CLAY HAS A

PRESENTATION. >> DIVISION MANAGER.

I'D LIKE TO GO WITH SOME STATISTICS FOR FY2020.

AND IT'S THE PREVIOUS, AND NEW CONDEMNATION CASES, FY2019, DUE TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DILAPIDATED STRUCTURE PROGRAM, CONDEMNATIONS. AND WE COMPLETED 34 CASES, 34, BROUGHT BEFORE THE BOARD, BUILDING STANDARDS, AN INCREASE OF 12 CASES. AGAIN, THAT'S BRINGING UP OLD CASES AND RESOLVING SOME NEW ONES.

WE HAVE 13 CITY DEMOLITIONS. 35 RESULT, WITH THAT BEING TO

[01:05:07]

THE BOARD BUILDING STANDARDS, DUE TO JOSH WORKING FOR THE OWNERS, IN TRYING TO GET SOME RESULTS.

AND 13 CITY DEMOLITIONS, OVER BY CONSENT.

AND AVERAGE OF ABOUT $7,000 PER DEMOLITION.

10 DEMOLITIONS WERE COMPLETED. AND IT'S DOWN THIS YEAR BECAUSE A LOT OF THE OWNERS, CONSIDERING DOING THEIR OWN DEMOLITION AND HAVE THE CITY DO IT, AND PAY US BACK.

THAT KIND OF REDUCES THE BURDEN. >> AND YOU COULD GIVE US SOME INSIGHT INTO THE DILAPIDATED STRUCTURE PROGRAM?

>> THAT'S PART OF THE PUBLIC NUISANCE.

ALL THE COURT OFFICERS DO. AND IF WE GET A CASE, MINOR ISSUES AND WE DON'T WANT TO CONDEMN THE PROPERTY, IT GIVES THE OWNERS THE OPPORTUNITY TO REPAIR.

IF IT'S NOT REPORTED OR REPAIRED, IT CONTINUES TO DETERIORATE, AND CONDEMNATION CASE.

OFTEN TIMES, IT MAY RESULT AT THE LEVEL, TURNS INTO A FILE.

>> AND THE PROGRAM? >> ABOUT THE TIME I STARTED, TWO YEARS AGO. 3-8 YEARS AGO

>> AND WHAT WILL THE -- IT WAS IN THE NEWS YESTERDAY ABOUT CITY BUDGET ISSUES AND CUTBACKS, ET CETERA, ET CETERA.

HOW WILL THE CITY CUTBACKS, CONDEMNATION PROGRAM AND

INSPECTION -- >> SO FAR THIS COMING BUDGET YEAR, IT'S BEEN SET. WE ALSO HAVE A CBG PROGRAM.

WE CAN GET FEDERAL FUNDS, LOCATED AND THAT'S HELPED WITH

CONDEMNATION. >> THANK YOU.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU,

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.