A. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition or Civil Penalties - Case No.l 1-044: 2926 Beech St. (NORTH PARK ADDN, BLOCK 15, LOT S75 N319 OF E138.5), Owner: Flores, Joel

[A. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition or Civil Penalties - Case No.l 1-044: 2926 Beech St. (NORTH PARK ADDN, BLOCK 15, LOT S75 N319 OF E138.5), Owner: Flores, Joel]

>> THANK YOU. WITH THAT, I GUESS WE ARE READY FOR OUR FIRST CASE.

>>> GOOD MORNING. I AM COURT OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF ABILENE DIVISION CONDEMNATION PROGRAM. TODAY WE HAVE A TOTAL OF FIVE CASES ON OUR AGE AGENDA.

THIS WAS THE POLK NOTICE WAS POSTED FOR TODAY'S MEETING -- PUBLISHED FOR TODAY'S MEETING.

AND THE FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS CASE NUMBER 11-44, LOCATED AT 2926 BEECH STREET.

COUNTY RECORDS SHOWS QUITCLAIM DEED NAMING JOEL FLOOD AS THE OWNER. TAYLOR COUNTY SHOWS JOFA LINE AS TO BE THE OWNER. SECRETARY OF STATE SHOWS NO ENTITY UNDER ITS THIS NAME ON THE TAX RECORDS OF THE MUNICIPALITY NOT APPLICABLE 10 UTILITY BECAUSE OF MISSION VALLEY SHALL BEING INACTIVE SINCE AUG AUGUST 6TH 2016.

THIS FOR THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE FOR TODAY'S PORTABILITY STANDARDS MEETING. SO, AGAIN, I AM GOING TO REPRESENT A TIMELINE OF THE STRUCTURE SINCE THE LAST TIME I WAS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD AS WELL.

AND AS OF FEBRUARY 8TH 2021 AND AS OF JULY 14TH, 2021, YOU SEE THERE IS NO CHANGE TO THE STRUCTURE.

THIS IS THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE.

THIS IS THE NORTH SIDE OF THE MAIN STRUCTURE.

THERE ARE TWO STRUCTURES ON THI PROPERTY BUT ANYWAY WE HAVE THE WEST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE AND THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE MAIN STRUCTURE. THIS IS THE TIMELINE OF THE EXTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURE. THE FULL ON TOP LEFT IS FROM 2014 AND IT GOES IN NUMERICAL ORDER FROM THE RIGHT LUNG AND THE BOTTOM PHOTOS YOU SEE THE CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY AS OF 2018. SAME THING ON THIS NEXT TIM TIMELINE, 2018, THERE IS A CONDITION OF PROPERTY.

AND AS OF JULY 14, 2021, THAT'S THE CURRENT CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY. BOTTOM RIGHT PHOTO.

FOUNDATION MEANS THE SAME. THE EXTERIOR PLUMBING HAS REMAINED INCOMPLETE. IT SAYS YOU CAN TELL AS OF THE DATE AND TIME STAMP ON THE FIRS PHOTO TOP LEFT, 2017, ALL THE WAY UP TO JULY OF 2021. SAME THING WITH THE INTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURE, TOPLIFF PHOTO INDICATES THE STATUS IS OF -- STATUS AS OF MARCH OF 2017, THE BOTTOM RIGHT AS OF FEBRUARY, 2021. SOME ADDITIONAL PHOTOS OF THE INTERIOR SHOWING IT TO BE INCOMPLETE OR BOTTOM RIGHT PHOT IS APPARENT CONDITION AS OF JUL. AS YOU CAN SEE THERE, THERE IS SOME VEGETATION GROWING UNDERNEATH THE STRUCTURE.

>> THIS IS THE EXTERIOR OF THE SECONDARY STRUCTURE.

AND THERE IS SOME ELECTRICAL ISSUES IDENTIFIED WITH THE

[00:10:04]

SECONDARY STRUCTURE. MOST STRUCTURE ISSUES.

YOU CAN SEE THE ROOF LOOKS TO B IN BAD SHAPE.

SO TIMELINE OF EVENTS, IN ESSENCE OF SAVING TIME, I WILL HIGHLIGHT PRIMARILY THE AMOUNT OF TIMES SPENT BEFORE THE BOARD WHICH I BELIEVE THIS MAKES THE SIX OR SEVEN TIME IT WAS PRESENTED. AND FROM THE LAST MEETING THAT IT WAS PRESENTED ON APRIL 7TH O 2021, THE BOARD ORDERED A 3060.

AND AT THAT TIME APPROXIMATELY WEEK LATER, MR. FLOYD COMMITTEE STATED PLAN OF ACTION TO STATE HE IS GOING TO DEMOLISH THE STRUCTURE AND A DEMOLITION PERMIT WAS PULLED AS OF JU JULY 14TH. THE PROPERTY WAS INSPECTED BY COURT OFFICERS AND NO SENSORY DEMOLITION PROCESS HAD STARTED.

ON JULY 15TH WE SET NOTICE TO THE PORTABILITY STANDARDS FOR TODAY'S MEETING SPONSOR THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO FIND THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC, HEALTH, SAFETY AND REPAIR, AND REPAIR OF THE STRUCTURE WILL BE UNREASONABLE. PURSUANT TO CHAPTER EIGHT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS EXIST: INADEQUATE SANITATION, STRUCTURAL HAZARDS, NUISANCE, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING, HAZARDOUS PLUMBING, FAULTY LIGH OR PROTECTION.

ZACH GOINS OWNER TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OR THE CIT MAY DEMOLISH.

>>> ANY QUESTIONS, MR. MARSH? >>> THANK YOU, MR. MARSH.

AT THIS TIME I'LL OPEN THE CASE. I WILL A PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NUMBER 11-44. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME ADDRESS FOR THE

RECORD. >>> I AM JOEL FLORES, 5726 CHOCOLATA. TODAY I'M HERE TO ASK THE BOARD FOR EXTENDED TIME TO PULL DOWN THE STRUCTURE.

I SPOKE WITH TIM WHEN I FIRST SPOKE TO YOU, AND WE THOUGHT THAT TWO MONTHS IS GOING TO BE SUFFICIENT LONG AS I'M TRYING T PULL THE STRUCTURE DOWN, THE CHEMICALS THEY USE -- IF YOU TURN BACK TO THE PAGE, WHERE TH PINK STUFF IS BETWEEN THE FOUR BY EIGHT SHEETS. DIDN'T KNOW THAT PRODUCT WAS SO STRONG. IN ORDER TO PULL DOWN THE STRUCTURE -- AND I SPOKE WITH TIM -- IF I COULD AT LEAST TRY TO SALVAGE I'VE ALREADY PUT INT THE STRUCTURE.

I FOUND IT VERY HARD TO REMOVE THAT PINK STUFF.

I COULDN'T GET TO THE SCREWS. WE HAVE PULLED -- THEY'RE NOT COMPLETELY OFF WHILE THEY ARE STILL HANGING ON THE STRUCTURE, BUT WHEN THIS PRODUCT HAS BEEN APPLIED TO WAS HARD TO REMOVE.

IT TOOK ME HOLDING TO GET 4 4 INCHES OF THIS PRODUCT OFF.

THE REST OF THE DAY IT TOOK ME ANOTHER FOUR HOURS TO PULL DOWN OR REMOVE THE SCREWS FOR THIS PRODUCT WAS APPLIED.

IN ORDER FOR ME TO BE ABLE TO DUMP WHATEVER I CAN'T USE, I HAVE EXPRESSED TO MR. MARES THA THIS IS NOT GOOD FOR ME AND I TOOK TWO YEARS, ONE HALF YEARS, TO PULL THE STRUCTURE DOWN AND TO REBUILD. AND TWO MONTHS IS NOT JUST ENOUGH TIME. I WANT TO ASK THE BOARD IF THEY'LL GIVE ME AT LEAST SIX MONTHS, BECAUSE I'M HAVING TO WORK AND PUT TIME INTO THE BULLYING OF THIS DOWN.

I'M NOT GOING TO SAY WE ARE NOT GOING TO PUT DOWN.

WE AGREED TO PULL IT DOWN. I JUST WANT TO BE ABLE TO ACQUIRE SOME OF THE MATERIAL THAT WE PUT IN FROM THAT 20, $25,000. I AM WILLING TO COMPLY.

THE STRUCTURE HAD BEEN SO LONG THAT MOST OF THAT MATERIAL THAT'S THERE IS PROBABLY NOT EVEN ANY GOOD, WHEN WE RESUME FOR ME TO CONTINUE TO BUILD. OTHER THAN THAT, JUST HELPING T DISPOSE OF THE MATERIAL THAT IS THERE MAKE OUR BACK GARAGE.

I DON'T HAVE THE FUNDS, SO I'M HAPPY TO WORK TO ACQUIRE SOME MONEY TO GO AHEAD AND DO IT. DO WHAT MR. MERRITT WANTED TO DO. OTHER THAN THAT, I JUST NEED

MORE TIME. >>> ANY QUESTIONS, MR. MARES.

>>> THANK YOU, MR. MARES. THANK YOU.

[00:15:01]

>>> MARSY FLORES. >>> ANY OTHERS WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE PLEASE STAND FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD ALL. NO ONE, I'LL CLOSE THE CASE ON 11-44 AND OPENED THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR A MOTION.

MITCH MAIER WHEN YOU PUT THE TIME MY BACKUP THERE AGAIN I GO

PLEASE, FOR ME? >> WEATHER: WOULD YOU LIKE THE

FIRST OR THE SECOND PAGE. >>> PARDON?

>>> FIRST OR SECOND PAGE. >>> HE THAT'S THE FIRST PAGE.

THE THIRST 2060 WAS IN 2015, CORRECT?

>>> YES, SIR. >>> THAT WAS USING A.

>>> OKAY. SO THEN WE GO ON TO IN 2018 WHE

PERMITS WERE RENEWED. >>> YES, SIR PD OKAY, SO THERE WAS WORK DONE ON IT. THEN WE GO TO 2020.

IN DECEMBER OF 2020 WE MOVED TH STRUCTURE BACK.

AND THEN IN APRIL WE HAD ANOTHE 3060 ORDER.

SO WE'VE HAD TWO 3060 ORDERS IN THE LAST FIVE AND HALF YEARS P PCS. AND I BELIEVE THE PERMIT HAD BEEN RENEWED TWICE, YES, TO REPAIR THE STRUCTURE.

>>> OKAY. THANK YOU PCS ARE.

>>> MR. WATSON, COULD YOU ADDRESS FOR US THAT TIMEFRAME THAT HE HAS ALLOWED FROM APR APRIL 13TH ON THE DEMOLITION PERMIT WAS PULLED FROM THE DOES HE HAVE SIX MONTHS TO CHANGE 18

DAYS, YES, SIR. >>> OKAY.

AND IF THERE WERE SOME WORK DON ON THAT, IS THAT EXTENDED?

>>> THE EXTENSION IS DONE WHEN THERE'S AN INSPECTION MADE.

SO WE COULD GO OUT AND DO AN INSPECTION ARE TYPICALLY ON DEMOS WE HAVE ONE INSPECTION AN THAT'S THE FINAL INSPECTION PD OKAY, IF THE BOARD DECIDES -- ANOTHER QUESTION -- IF THE BOAR DECIDES TO ACTIVATE THIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION, DOES HE GET A NEW SIX MONTHS PERIOD BEGINNING TODAY, OR IS THE PERMIT

SELECTIVE? >>> IF YOU ALL ACT ON HIS

REQUEST SIX MONTHS? >>> NO, IF WE FOLLOW STAFF GRADATIONS TO DEMOLISH THE STRUCTURE, WHAT DOES HE GET A NEW SIX MONTHS. DOES NOT GET A NEW SIX MONTHS.

>>> OKAY, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSIONS? IS THERE A MOTION?

>> STAFF LIQUIDATION IS TO DECLARE IT A NUISANCE.

HE'S ALREADY GOT A DEMOLITION ORDER.

>>> MR. CHAIRMAN I MOVE THAT WE GO WITH THE RECREATIONAL STAFF THAT THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE, AND THAT IT IS A HAZARD TO PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY WELFARE AND REPAIR OF THE

STRUCTURE WILL BE IN REASONABLE. >>> MOTION BY MR. ALLRED THAT THE PROPERTY BE DECLARED A PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN THAT IT IS HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, AND REPAIR OF THE STRUCTURE WILL BE IN REASONABLE -- UNREASONABLE.

IS THERE A SECOND? >>> I'LL SECOND.

>>> SECOND BY DOCTOR PARRISH. ROLL CALL PLEASE.

>>> DR. PARIS. >>> AYE.

>>> MR. ALLRED. >>> YES.

>>> MR. MCCALL. >>> YES.

>>> MR. SCHMITZ PCS. >>> MR. TURNER PCS.

>>> MR. BEARD. >>> YES.

>>> MOTION CARRIES. >>> ALSO MAKE THIS ORDER TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER TO THE DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30

DAYS OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. >>> MOTION BY MR. ALLRED THAT THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLIS OR REPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OR THE CIT MAY DEMOLISH.

[00:20:08]

>>> SECOND. >>> I'LL SECOND.

>>> BY DR. PARIS. ROLL CALL PLEASE.

>>> TO PARIS. >>> E-IPC MR. ALLRED PCS.

>>> CHRISTA MCAULIFFE PCS. >>> MR. SCHMITZ PCS.

>>> MR. TURNER PCS. >>> MR. BEARD PCS.

>>> MOTION CARRIES. >>> GOOD LUCK, MR. FLORES

[B. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition or Civil Penalties - Case No.21-000188: 3017 Newman Rd. (A0681 SUR 45 B A L NW/4, ACRES 2.0), Owner: Callaway, WHma Rae Excum]

DESARNO CASE ON THE AGENDA IS CASE NUMBER 21-00188, LOCATED A 317 NEWMAN ROAD. CHECK OF RECORD SHOWS COUNTY RECORDS DEED OF TRUST NAMING JAMES AND WILMA CALLOWAY AS OWNERS. TAYLOR COMPTON SHOWS WILMA RAY EXUM CALLOWAY TO BE THE OWNER. SECRETARY AS THEY SHOW NO ENTIT UNDER THIS NAME. TAX RECORDS OF THE MESA COUNTY ARE NOT APPLICABLE. TO THE RECORDS OF THE MR. PERRY SHALL BE AN ACTIVE THIS NUMBER THIRD, 2017.

THE STRUCTURE SHOWS WILMA RATE EXUM CALLOWAY TO BE THE OWNER.

THIS IS A PARK NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE FOR

TODAY'S MEETING. >> HERE WE HAVE THE FRONT NORTH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. HERE IS THE REAR SOUTH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. THE WEST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE, AND TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE.

IS SOME EXTENSIVE EXTERIOR DAMAGE THROUGHOUT THE STRUCTURE.

AND YOU CAN SEE THE CURRENT CONDITION OF THE FOUNDATION.

THERE IS SOME MORE SOME MORE ANGLES AND MORE AREAS OF THE FOUNDATION CURRENT CONDITION. SOME UNIDENTIFIED EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL ISSUES. THIS IS AN INTERIOR PLUMBING ISSUES. HERE ARE SOME MORE ELECTRICAL ISSUES ON THE INTERIOR. SOME INTERIOR DAMAGE CRACKING THROUGH SEVERAL AREAS INSIDE TH STRUCTURE.

HERE'S SOME MORE IMAGES AND DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE INTERIOR.

SO FEBRUARY 2ND, 2021, THIS PROPERTY WAS CONDEMNED AND THE INITIAL NOTICE AND 60 DAY LETTERS WERE SENT TO AND THEN W SHUT OFF UTILITIES ON MARCH 9TH. MARCH 16TH WE MET WITH A LADY NEXT OF KIN OF THE LISTED OWNER WHO IS DECEASED.

MISSED COMPLAINANT STATED SHOUL BE WILL DESIGN A CONSENT TO DEMOLISH THE STRUCTURE AND ASKE IF WE -- MS. TEMPLIN WAS ASKED IF SHE HAD OBTAINED OWNERSHIP O THE PROPERTY, WHICH SHE HAD STATED THAT SHE HAS NOT. SHE WAS INFORMED THAT SHE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO LEGALLY SIGN A CONSENT TO THEM UNLESS SHE HAS OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY. SHE REQUESTED TIME AND EXPENSE INTO A LONGER TIME TO TRY TO GE THE DEED UNDER HER NAME.

ON APRIL 16TH FOR ANOTHER PHONE CALL TO MS. TEMPLIN, SHE REQUESTED ANOTHER EXTENSION STATING SHE HAD BEEN ILL AND WA DELAYED IN TRYING TO OBTAIN OWNERSHIP, SO SHE WAS GRANTED A EXTENSION TO TRY TO GET OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY AS OF JUNE 8, 20 TONY ONE BECAUSE THERE HAD BEEN NO FURTHER CONTACT OR PLAN FROM MISSED TEMPLIN.

ON JULY 15, 21, WE SENT A NOTIC OF THE BOARD OF BUILDING STANDARD MEETING. ON THE 23RD NO CONTACT FROM M MS. TEMPLIN GO HOWEVER A COURT OFFICER DID ATTEMPT TO CONTACT BY PHONE. VOICEMAIL WAS LEFT TO REQUEST A CALL BACK. AND SHE DID FINALLY CALL, I BELIEVE, IT WAS JULY THE 28TH, AND STATED HE STILL HAD NOT BEE ABLE TO OBTAIN OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY.

SHE HAS NO FINANCIAL MEANS TO REPAIR IT, IF SHE DID, AND SHE WASN'T REALLY SURE WHAT TO DO A THIS TIME.

AND THERE ARE NO PERMITS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT FROM ANYBODY EXPECTING A CHANCE TO TRY AND REPAIR IT.

SO DUE TO THE FACT THAT IF SHE DID HAVE OWNERSHIP WAS WILLING TO SIGN CONSENT TO 1:00 O'CLOCK YOU RECOMMEND TO FIND THAT THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND THAT IS A HAZARD TO PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, AND REPAIR OF THE STRUCTURE WILL BE IN REASONABLE BUT PURSUANT TO CHAPTER RATE, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS EXIST: INADEQUATE SANITATION, STRUCTURAL HAZARD, NUISANCE, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING, HAZARDOUS PLUMBING, AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION. WE INFORMED THE OWNER TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE DECISION TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAY

OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. >>> ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. MEARS?

>>> MR. MARES, DID SHE KNOW THA HIS CHIEF FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESS SHE IS TO GO THROUGH TO OBTAIN OWNERSHIP?

>>> YES, SIR, BUMP ON THE DATE BE MET WITH HER MARCH 16TH, WE EXPLAINED TO HER THAT SHE WOULD HAVE TO OBTAIN LEGAL OWNERSHIP

[00:25:01]

BY HAVING THE DEED TRANSFERRED TO HER NAME AND YOU'RE NOT IN ORDER TO NOT GET INTO ANY LEGALITY ISSUES, THAT'S THE BES

INFORMATION WE CAN GIVE HER. >>> DO YOU KNOW HOW BIG THIS TRACT IS? IT'S OBVIOUSLY AN ACREAGE.

IS NOT A CITY LOT. >>> YES, I BELIEVE IT'S

APPROXIMATELY 2 ACRES. >>> HOW MANY?

>>> 2 ACRES. 2 ACRES.

AND IT HAS THIS EAST HIGHWAY 80 FRONTAGE ACCUSED?

>>> YES, SIR, P IS SHE AWARE WHAT THAT VALUE MIGHT BE?

YES, SHE IS. >>> TO GET IT TRANSFERRED INTO

HER NAME? >>> YEARS.

WE MADE HER AWARE OF ALL OF HER OPTIONS, AS FAR AS REPAIRING AS WELL, GAVE HER POSSIBILITY TO I SHE DID OBTAIN OWNERSHIP SHE COULD SELL IT ALSO. BUT SHE'S JUST STRUGGLING TO TR

AND GET THAT ACCOMPLISHED. >>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF MR

MR. MARES? >>> I DON'T KNOW IF IS A QUESTION FOR MR. MARES ARE NOT, BUT IF WE GO AHEAD AND FOLLOW THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION, DOES THAT THEN GIVEN HER FROM -- ACHIEVING OWNERSHIP AND THEN SELLING IT?

>>> SHOULDN'T. MR. BIGELOW CAN HELP US WITH

THAT. >>> I BELIEVE I CAN SEE THAT WITHOUT CROSSING LEGAL BOUNDARIES GO SO WHAT THE CITY DEMOLISH THE PROPERTY, WE DO NO TAKE POSSESSION OR OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY IS STILL UNDER THE CURRENT LISTED OWNER'S NAME, WHETHER THEY ARE DECEASED OR N NOT. AND IF MS. TEMPLIN IS THE NEXT OF KIN, SHE CAN STILL OBTAIN OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY, EVEN

IF THE STRUCTURE IS DEMOLISHED. >>> OKAY.

BECAUSE THE IMPORTANCE OF THAT QUESTION FROM ME IS WE ARE NOT DOING ANYTHING THAT WOULD INFLUENCE, OR NEGATIVELY INFLUENCE, OR POTENTIAL RIGHTS ON THE PROPERTY.

WE ARE SIMPLY PROTECTING THE PUBLIC IF YOU FOLLOW THE STAFF

RECOMMENDATION. >>> YES OR.

>>> WHICH MEANS THIS REALLY A WIN-WIN AND NOT --

>> WEATHER: WE DON'T GET INTO DETERMINING WHO IS THE HAIR, WH WOULD RECEIVE UNDER IT OWNE OWNERSHIP, OR PROBATE, OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, OR TRANSFER OF EVEN PROPERTY TO WAIT DEED.

ALL THIS FOR DETERMINING, WHETHER OR NOT THE PROPERTY IS NUISANCE AND WHETHER IT SHOULD BE ORDERED MUSCULAR FIGURES WHO THE OWNER IS OR WHO MAY HAVE RIGHTS WHILE OFTEN TIMES THAT'S

DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE. >>> THANK YOU.

>>> THANK YOU. >>> AT THIS TIME I OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NUMBER 21-00188 ON ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND

ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. >> SEEING NO ONE, I'LL CLOSE TH PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 21-00-18 AND OPENED THE FLOOR FOR MOTION

FURTHER DISCUSSION. >>> I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY THAT I THINK THAT THIS IS ONE O THOSE RARE INSTANCES WHERE WE CAN PROTECT THE INDIVIDUAL OWNERS RIGHTS AT THE SAME TIME, BECAUSE IT POTENTIALLY HAS SOME VALUE AS A PIECE OF PROPERTY.

BUT THE SECOND THING IS, SAY, FOR THE -- WELL WE CAN'T SAY FO THE ISSUE OF FINDING THE MONEY TO ESTABLISH OWNERSHIP -- BUT THEN WE CAN PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH.

SO TO MY MIND FOLLOWING THE STAFF LIQUIDATION IS THE IDEAL WAY TO GO IN THIS CASE. SO I PERSONALLY WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT THE PROPERTY BE DECLARED A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND THAT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, AND THAT REPAIR THE STRUCTURE WILL BE IN REASONABLE.

>> WEATHER: MOTION BY DOCTOR PARRISH.

>>> I'LL SECOND. >>> SECOND BY MR. -- THAT THE PROPERTY IS DICTATED PUBLIC NUISANCE AND THAT IT IS A HAZAR TO PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, AND REPAIR OF THE STRUCTURE WILL BE IN REASONABLE. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?

ROLL CALL, PLEASE. >>> DOCTOR PARRISH.

>>> AYE. >>> MR. ALLRED.

>>> YES. >>> WES MCCOLLUM.

>>> HE IS. >>> MR. SCHMITZ.

>>> YES. >>> MR. TURNER.

>>> YES. >>> MR. BEARD.

>>> YES. >>> MOTION CARRIES.

>>> I LIKE TO FURTHER MAKE A MOTION THAT IT BE ORDERED THAT THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO THE MOS OR REPEAL THE ORDER TO THE DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS O THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH.

>>> MOTION BY DR. PARIS. SECOND?

>>> I SECOND THE MOTION. >>> SECOND BY MR. TURNER, THAT

[00:30:01]

THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLIS OR REPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS, OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH.

ROLL CALL PLEASE. >>> DOCTOR PARRISH.

>>> AYE. >>> MR. ALLRED.

>>> YES. >>> MR. MCCOLLUM.

>>> YES. >>> MR. SCHMITZ.

>>> YES. >>> MR. TURNER.

>>> YES. >>> MR. BEARD.

>>> YES. >>> MOTION CARRIES.

>>> I BELIEVE OUR NEXT CASE WAS TABLED LAST MEETING.

I GUESS WE NEED A MOTION TO GET OFF THE TABLE, PLEASE.

>>> I MOVE TO REMOVE IT FROM TH TABLE.

>>> I'LL SECOND. >>> MOTION BY MR. ALLRED, SECON BY MR. MCCOLLUM THAT CASE NUMBE 21-001109 BE TAKEN OFF THE TA TABLE. ROLL CALL, PLEASE.

>>> DOCTOR PARRISH. >>> AYE.

>> WEATHER: MR. ALLRED. >>> YES.

>>> MCCOLLUM. >>> YES.

>>> MR. SCHMITZ. >>> MR. TURNER.

>>> YES. >>> MR. BEARD.

>>> YES. >>> MOTION CARRIES.

>>> SO THE NEXT CASE IS CASE NUMBER 21-01109 LOCATED 9033

[C. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition or Civil Penalties - Case No.21-001109: 1933 Vogel Av. (WEST UNIVERSITY PLACE, BLOCK 4, LOT 5), Owner: Remmcrs, Bobby Lee % Megan Remmcrs]

VOGEL STREET. 1933 VOGEL STREET ON RECORD SHOWS WARRANTY DEED DEED. MILLIONS AND SHOWS MR. REMMERS CARE OF AND MAKING REMMERS TO B THE OWNER, SECRETARY OF STATE SHOWED THE ENTITY UNDER THIS NAME PARTAKES BECAUSE OF THE MUSICALITY ARE NOT APPLICABLE. HE CITY RECORDS OF THE MUSIC PUBLISHER TO BE INACTIVE SINCE APRIL 17TH, 2018.

SEARCH OF'S BOB HEALEY REMMERS TO BE THE OWNER.

SO THIS WAS A PUBLIC NOTICE WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE FOR TODAY'S MEETING. HE WE HAVE THE FRONT NORTH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. HERE'S THE REAR SOUTH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. AND THE EAST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. AND HERE IS THE WEST SIDE OF TH STRUCTURE. HERE WE HAVE, THIS WAS A STRUCTURE FIRE AND EXTERIOR DAMAGE AND TREPIDATION PRESENTE IN THE LAST CASE -- LAST MEE MEETING, EXCUSE ME.

HERE WE HAVE SOME MORE INTERIOR FIRE DAMAGE.

AND CEILING MOLD AND RENT GO MATTER WAS IDENTIFIED.

SOME INTERIOR PLUMBING ISSUES. AND IS A RESPONSE IS THE CURREN CONDITION OF THE EXTERIOR OF TH STRUCTURE.

>>> SO A TIMELINE OF EVENTS SO THAT THE STRUCTURE FIRE OCCURRE SUMMER 22ND, 2017, AND NOVE NOVEMBER 23RD, 2020 FOR THE CAS IS OPEN FOR DILAPIDATED STRUCTURE.

THE SUMMER SECOND FOR 2020, WAS A PHONE CALL TO MISSES REMMERS WHERE SHE WAS TOLD THAT HER PARENTS, HOMER WAS THAT SHE TOL HER PARENTS, THE HOMEOWNERS, AR DECEASED AND SHE IS NOT SURE

WHAT TO DO WITH THE PROPERTY. >> ON DECEMBER 2020, THE HOME WAS SECURED BY THE CITY. ON MAY 10TH 2021 FOR THE PROPERTY WAS OFFICIALLY CONDEMNED.

SKIPPING TO THE FIRST BORDER BUILDING STANDARDS MEETING THAT WE HAD FOR THIS CASE IN JULY, THE BOARD ORDERED IT TO BE TABLED BY AND AS OF JULY 15, 2021, WE SENT NOTICE FOR TODAY' MEETING. ON AUGUST 1ST THE POTENTIAL BUYER WHO WAS PRESENT AT THE LAST MEETING DID PROVIDE A COPY OF THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT THAT ALLOWS THE CURRENT OWNER UP TO AUGUST 15TH TO SELL THE PRO PROPERTY.

AND I APOLOGIZE, THIS STAFF RECREATION WAS SUPPOSED TO BE CHANGED TO A 3060 INSTEAD OF TH PUBLIC NOTICE OR EMOTIONAL REQU TO THE FACT HE DID PROVIDE A COPY OF THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT.

SO WE ARE RECOMMENDING 36 TO 33. ENZYMES ARE, THREE DAYS TO SUBMIT A PLAN OF ACTION AND PUL PERMITS.

AND IF THIS IS DONE, 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN ALL ROOF INSPECTIONS.

AND IF THAT IS DONE, ALL REMAINING INSPECTIONS TO BE PASSED FOR THE REMAINING TIME O THE PERMITS ON THIS WILL ALLOW THEM TO CLOSE OFF ON THE AGREEMENT.

IF IT DOESN'T MEET THAT REQUIREMENT, THEN WE CAN BRING IT BACK TO PRESENT IT FOR ANOTHER RECOMMENDATION.

>>> ANY QUESTIONS, MR. MARES? >>> THANK YOU, MR. MARES.

AT THIS TIME ALBA PARK HEARING ON CASE NUMBER 21-001109.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

>>> MORNING AGAIN, EVERYBODY. MY NAME IS RICHARD TURMAN, I LIVE AT 809 WASHINGTON BOUL BOULEVARD.

AFTER A LOT OF WORK LAST MONTH, MY WIFE CONTACTED BOTH -- THERE

[00:35:04]

WAS TWO DAUGHTERS OF THESE DECEASED DONORS.

MY SON MADE A GOOD POINT, THEY WERE BOTH PRETTY YOUNG WHEN THE PASSED AWAY. THE MOTHER WAS SIX YEARS OLD, S I SEE THERE'S A BUNCH OF IN MY MIND EMOTIONAL STUFF WITH HER TWO DAUGHTERS, YOU KNOW, LOSING THEIR PARENTS.

ONE LIVES IN HOLLY, SHE IS OLD AND MEGHAN REYES IS ENABLING.

MY WIFE AND SON MET WITH THEM THURSDAY AND GOT THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT. AND THE NEXT DAY REPORTED IT TO OUR -- FORWARDED IT TO OUR TITL COMPANY, FIRST TEXAS TYLER, AND CHRIS WESTBROOK IS THE GUY HANDLING IT.

SO THE ONLY -- I GUESS THE ONLY THING RIGHT NOW THAT'S KIND OF UP IN THE AIR IS -- EXCEPT WITH THE CRAZINESS OF THE REAL ESTAT MARKET THAT IS TAKING A LITTLE LONGER TO GET TITLES SEARCHED AND, YOU KNOW, CLOSED ON HOUSES ET CETERA.

BUT THAT'S WHERE WE ARE NOW. I HAVE NO IDEA HOW LONG THAT'S GOING TO TAKE TO PROCESS. BUT THE BALL IS DEFINITELY ROWING. WE ARE WILLING TO, ALTHOUGH HAVING TAKEN OVER OWNERSHIP OR ANYTHING, TO GO CLEAN UP THE YARD AND GET THE HOUSE SECURED. BECAUSE I FEEL WE'VE ALREADY GO A LOT OF LEGAL FEES, KIND OF PU SOME MONEY IN THE LEGAL PROCESS SO WE ARE WILLING TO PUT BOTH FEET IN.

WE TALKED WITH, YOU KNOW, THE NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR HERE AND TOL THEM WE ARE TRYING TO GET IT, YOU KNOW, CLEANED UP AND GET EVERYTHING, YOU KNOW, GOOD SH SHAPE.

DON'T KNOW, WE JUST KIND OF -- THAT'S ALL THE HARD INFORMATION I'VE GOT. WE -- LIKE I SAID LAST TIME, I'VE DONE ANOTHER HOUSE OR TWO ON THE STREET, AND WE HAVE OUR ELECTRICIANS, OUR PLUMBERS AND HVAC GUYS LINED UP, AND THEY AR VERY ACCESSIBLE. AND ONCE WE GET THE GO-AHEAD, W WILL GO AHEAD AND QUICKLY GET EVERYTHING GOING.

>>> SO THE PRECIOUS YEAR IN NOW IS BASICALLY TITLE EXAMINATION?

>>> YES. >>> HE DIDN'T FORESEE ANY PROBLEMS, BUT HE JUST -- YOU KNOW, THERE IS NO SECRET RELATIVES OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. THEY JUST DIDN'T LEAVE A WILL, THE PARENTS. AND WE ARE JUST -- YOU KNOW, WE JUST GOT TO, YOU KNOW, MAKE SUR WE ARE COVERED ON ALL THIS ST

STUFF. >>> SURE.

>>> IN I THINK YOU ARE ABSENT ATTORNEY LAST TIME SAID MARKET COULD TAKE UP TO, YOU KNOW, 90 DAYS.

HOPEFULLY WHOLE PROCESS WOULDN' TAKE MORE THAN -- I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S GOING TO TAKE 30 MORE O POSSIBLY A LITTLE MORE BUT Y'AL PROBABLY KNOW A LOT MORE ABOUT THAT THAN I DO, AND I KNOW TODA IS JUST THE REAL ESTATE MARKET IS PRETTY BUSY, SO THAT IS MAYB ONE LITTLE NICHE IN THEIR SOMETHING.

>>> BUT CONTRACTS AND ALL THAT, EVERYBODY SIGNED, AND THAT PART

IS OVER? >>> YES, YES.

WE'VE GOT -- WELL, WE TECHNICALLY, YOU KNOW, HAVE TO COME BACK AND DO A LEGAL, ACTUA REAL ESTATE CONTRACT AND THE TITLE CLEARS. BUT, YOU KNOW, THEY ARE BOTH, YOU KNOW, ON BOARD. WE GET A PRICE AGREED TO AND, YOU KNOW, I THINK THERE'S A LOT OF -- A LOT OF IT IS EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT, MAY BECOME BUT THEY KNOW THEY CAN'T REALLY FIX IT UP. AND MY SON MENTIONED TO YOU WIL WANT TO FIX IT UP OR DO ANYTHIN THEY SAID, THOUGH, WE CAN.

SO THEY ARE READY TO TURN LOOSE OF IT.

>>> SO THEY HAD NOT PROBATED TH PROPERTY OR ANYTHING FORWARD,

OKAY. >>> MR. CHAIRMAN, COULD I ASK YOU A QUESTION, BECAUSE I'M NOT CERTAIN THIS IS AN APPROPRIATE QUESTION TO ASK, SO I'LL ASK YO AND OUR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE.

AND, IF THIS IS AN INAPPROPRIAT QUESTION: BUT GIVEN THE INFLATION RATES AND THE PRICES OF BUILDING MATERIALS, IS REPAI AND RECONSTRUCTION OF THIS PARTICULAR HOUSE A VIABLE OPTIO WITH THE COSTS INFLATION THAT W HAVE SEEN IN THE LAST FEW MO MONTHS. AGAIN, I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S A APPROPRIATE QUESTION TO ASK OR NOT.

>>> WELL, THIS KIND OF RACE ACTIVE VIEW.

>>> OKAY. >>> WHAT IS REASONABLE TO ME MA

NOT BE REASONABLE TO HIM AND . >>> BECAUSE I'M RELUCTANT TO AS THAT QUESTION OF HIM, BECAUSE I IS SO SUBJECTIVE, AND THE SECON

[00:40:05]

PART THAT MAY IMPLY, WHICH IS CERTAINLY DO NOT WANT MY A SUGGESTION THAT HIS WORK, BOTH ON THAT BLOCK AS WELL AS HIS INTERESTS IN THIS HOUSE IS NOT DEEPLY APPRECIATED AND RESP RESPECTED, AND APPRECIATED VERY MUCH.

SO I WILL NOT ASK THE QUESTION. >>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU, SIR, APPRECIATE IT. NO PROBLEM.

ANY OTHERS WISHING SPEAK TO THI CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD ND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

>>> I WAS WONDERING WHEN THIS TIME WOULD ARRIVE.

>>> RHON CANDOR. MY DAUGHTER HAS OWNED THAT HOUS NEXT DOOR TO THE EAST. HE'S ALREADY DONE THE HOUSE ON THE EAST SIDE OF OUR HOUSE, SO HE GETS THROUGH WITH THIS, HE'S GOING TO HAVE DONE BOTH HOUSES. HE'S DOING NOTHING BUT MAKING THE VALUE OF MY HOUSE APPR APPRECIATE.

AS FAR AS THE VALUE OF WHAT NUMBER AND ALL THAT, BELIEVE ME I KNOW WHAT IT'S DOING. BUT THAT'S HIS DECISION, NOT

YOURS. >>> YES, SIR.

>>> I DON'T SEE HOW THAT WOULD BE INVOLVED IN ANY ELSE DEC DECISION. I WOULD SAY THAT IN MY THOUGHTS HE NEEDS TO RUN WITH THIS THING. OTHERWISE YOU'RE GOING TO TELL THE HOUSE DOWN AND IT'S GOING T SIT THERE MAKE IT PART OF THE LOT'S GOING TO SIT THERE. IT'S EITHER GOING TO GET OVERGROWN OR I'M GOING TO BUY I OR PUT IT IN WITH MINE.

BUT I THINK RIGHT NOW IS TO TUR HAS FINALLY GOT SOMETHING OFF DEAD CENTER, AND LET'S SEE, BECAUSE THE THREE V'S HAVE TAKE OVER THAT HOUSE. THAT'S VAGRANTS, VERMIN AND VARMINTS. SO LET'S SEE IF WE CAN GET IT CHANGE. THANK YOU ALL.

STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.

>>> I AM RHON CANDOR. AND I USE THAT ADDRESS, 1318

SILVER. >>> THANK YOU, SIR.

MR. CHAIRMAN, MR. KITTY, I'D LIKE TO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR COMMENTS, BECAUSE YOU WERE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, THAT EVEN THE CONSIDERATION OF THAT QUESTION WAS INAPPROPRIATE.

AND I THANK YOU PERSONALLY FOR YOUR COMMENTS.

THANK YOU. >>> AND OTHERS WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD IN SECURING NAME AND

ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. >> SEEING THE WILL, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 2 21-01109, AND OPENED THE FLOOR FOR A DISCUSSION. STAFF SPECULATION IS A 3061

ISN'T THAT CORRECT, MR. MARSH? >>> YES THAT'S CORRECT.

>>> IS THE FIRST 30 LONG ENOUGH IN VIEW OF THE FACT THEY ARE IN A TITLE EXAMINATION STAGE THAT MIGHT TAKE THAT MUCH LONGER?

>>> SO IN REGARDS TO BRING IT BACK TO THE BOARD, YOU PROBABLY MIGHT LOOK AT NOT THE NEXT MEETING BUT THE MONTH AFTER AS FAR AS ALLOWING THEM 30 DAYS ON THE DATE THAT THE NOTICE WAS RECEIVED. AND THEN WE GO FROM THERE.

SWITCH WILL PROBABLY GIVE THEM ANOTHER MONTH OR TWO TO TRY AND

GET THAT PAPERWORK IN ORDER. >>> MR. ALLRED, HE GET ANY INSIGHT TO WHAT TYLER DANISH AN TIMEFRAMES ARE THESE DAYS?

>>> THE FIRST TEXAS TITLE IS OVERWHELMED WITH TITLE SEARCHES RIGHT NOW. I THINK PROBABLY THEY CAN GET I DONE WITHIN 30 DAYS, BUT IT'S A TIGHT SCHEDULE FOR THEM, THEY'V GOT SO MANY REFINANCE AND REMODEL.

SO BUT I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE GIVE THEM 30 DAY TO OBTAIN ALL PERMITS AND SUPPL PLAN OF ACTION, INCLUDING A TIMEFRAME FOR REPAIRS AND COST ESTIMATES ON AND IF THIS IS D DONE, 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN ROUGH INSPECTIONS.

IF THIS IS DONE WITH THE FINAL INSPECTION WILL BE COMPLETED BY

THE EXPIRATION OF PERMITS. >>> MOTION BY MR. ALLRED THAT THE OWNER BE GRANTED THREE DAYS TO OBTAIN ALL PERMITS AND PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION INCLUDING A TIMEFRAME FOR REPAIRING COST ESTIMATES , 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN ROUGH IN INSPECTIONS, AN THAT IS DONE ALL FINAL

[00:45:06]

INSPECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE EXPIRATION OF ALL PER PERMITS. IS THERE A SECOND.

>>> I'LL SECOND. >>> SECOND BY MR. MCCOLLUM.

ROLL CALL, PLEASE. >>> DR. PARIS.

>>> E-I MR. ALLRED PSP MR MR. MCCOLLUM.

>>> YES. >>> MR. SCHMITZ.

>>> YES. >>> MR. TURNER.

>>> YES. >>> MR. BEARD.

>>> YES. >>> MOTION CARRIES.

>>> GOOD LUCK TO ALL OF YOU, THANK YOU.

[D. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition or Civil Penalties - Case No.21-00I110: 2158 Lillius St. ( SEARS PARK, BLOCK 35, LOT 3), Owner: Dulaney, Alan]

>> MR. MARES. >> WEATHER: THIS ONE WAS ALSO

TABLED. >>> AT THIS NEXT CASE WAS ALSO TABLED LAST MEETING. IS THERE A MOTION ON TABLE?

>>> SECOND. >>> MOTION BY MR. MCCOLLUM, SECOND BY MR. ALLRED THAT WE U UN-TABLE CASE NUMBER 21-01110.

ROLL CALL PLEASE. >>> DR. PARIS.

>>> E-IPC MR. ALLRED. >>> YES.

>>> MR. MCCOLLUM. >>> YES.

>>> MR. SCHMITZ. >>> YES.

>>> MR. TURNEY YES. >>> MR. BEARD.

>>> YES. >>> MOTION CARRIES.

>>> THANK YOU. >> WEATHER: CASE NUMBER 21-0111 LOCATED AT 2158 LILLY US. THIS IS A RECORDS CHECK SUBSPECIALTY WANT NEED THIS WARRANTY DEED WITH ANDY LEE BEING THE OWNER BY THE COUNTY O OKEECHOBEE COUNTY LENTI, SECRETARY STATE SHOWS THE ENTIT UNDER THIS NAME.

TEXT BECAUSE OF THE PRINCIPALIT ARE NOT APPLICABLE.

UTILITY RECORD ADMISSIBILITY SHORTS TO BE ENACTED SINCE APRI SEARCH REVEALS ELLEN DELANEY TO BE THE OWNER.

AND THIS PROPERTY HAS SINCE BEE DEMOLISHED AND IS CLEARED.

SO JUST TO GO TO THE TIMELINE O EVENTS BRIEFLY FROM THE LAST PORTABILITY STATUS MEETING WHEN THE CASE WAS TABLED FOR APPROXIMATELY A WEEK LATER COUR OFFICERS WENT TO INSPECT THE PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTY WAS DEMOLISHED.

AND IN THE PROCESS OF HAVING TH DEMOLITION DEBRIS REMOVED, DUE TO IT BEING TABLED, WE STILL SE NOTICE OF THE PORTABILITY STATU MEETING FOR AUGUST, AND ON JU JULY 20TH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT WAS COLD AND FINAL INSPECTION WAS PASSED, AND CONFIRMATION OF THE DILUTION BEING COMPLETE WAS DONE ON JULY 22ND 02 TO THE PROPERTY NO LONGER BEING PRE PRESENT, OR THE STRUCTURE NO LONGER BEING PRESENT, OUR STAFF RECREATION AT THIS TIME IS THAT NO ACTION BE REQUIRED AT THIS TIME BY THE BOARD.

>>> SO. >>> HE COMPLETED THE DEMOLITION AS HE -- SO DUE TO IT BEING TABLED WE WERE REQUIRED TO BRIN

IT BACK AND PRESENT. >>> OKAY, SO WE CAN GO TO THE NEXT CASE. I'M NOT SURE IF A MOTION HAS TO

BE MADE. >>> MOVE ON.

>>> OKAY, THANK YOU. >> SO CASE NUMBER 21-001200

[E. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition or Civil Penalties - Case No.21-001200: 1149 Houston St. (COLLEGE DRIVE REPLAT, BLOCK 19, LOT 26 (JC REESE REP), Owner: Viles, Willis]

LOCATED AT 1149 HOUSTON STREET. CHAPTERS WILL RECORD SHOWS WARRANTY DEED NAME WAS MILES AN ARMADA TAYLOR COUNTY SHOWS WILLIS MILES TO BE THE OWNER. SECRETARY OF STATE SHOWS NO ENTITY UNDER THIS NAME, TAX RECORDS OF MR. PERRY ARE NOT APPLICABLE. YOU TO THE RECORDS OF MS. POLIS VILLAGE TO BE INACTIVE SINCE APRIL 21ST, 2021.

AND SEARCH REVEALED WILLIS FILE TO BE THE OWNER.

SO THIS WAS THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTUR FOR TODAY'S PORTABILITY STANDARDS MEETING.

HERE WE HAVE THE FRONT WEST SID OF THE STRUCTURE.

THAT IS THE REAR EACH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE.

HE WE HAVE THE NORTH SIDE OF TH STRUCTURE, AND THAT IS THE SOUT SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. WE HAVE SOME IDENTIFIED EXTERIO ELECTRICAL ISSUES. SIGNIFICANT INTERIOR CEILING DAMAGE. SOME INTERIOR DAMAGE AND DETERIORATION TO THE CEILING, WALLS, THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE OF THE INTERIOR. MADE SOME UNIDENTIFIED INTERIOR ELECTRICAL ISSUES. HERE'S THE ELECTRICAL HAZARD THAT WAS IDENTIFIED, AND OBSCEN NUMBER OF WIRES RUNNING OFF OF ONE POWER STRIP. HERE ARE SOME INTERIOR PLUMBING ISSUES. SO THE TIMELINE OF EVENTS IS A CODE OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OBTAINED PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER TO INSPECT THE PROPERTY O MAY 14TH OF 2021.

ON THAT DATE THE PROPERTY WAS CONDEMNED.

MAY 17TH ANTHONY WAS FILED AND UTILITY SOFTWARE IS AN INITIAL NOTICE WAS SENT ON A PLAN OF ACTION VIOLATION LIST THE PROPERTY OWNER. AS OF JUNE 1ST, THE HOUSE WAS PLANS TO BE SOLD ON THAT DATE. INSTRUCTOR THE CURRENT OWNER TO HAVE THE NEW OWNER CALL CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICE WITH THEIR

[00:50:05]

CONTACT INFORMATION SO THEY CAN RECEIVE NOTICES.

ON JUNE 2ND A COPY OF THE CONDEMNATION NOTICE WAS E-MAILE TO THE POTENTIAL BUYER JUST OUT OF COURTESY FOR HIM TO BE AWARE OF THE PROCESS. ON JUNE 30TH I ANSWERED THE PHONE CONTACT WITH POTENTIAL BUYER TO CONFIRM THE SALE.

THERE IS NO CALL. WE AWAITED CALL BACK ON ON JU JULY 8TH WE WERE FINALLY INFORMED BY THE OWNER THAT THE PROPERTY WAS NOT SOLD. THE OWNER FURTHER STATED THAT H IS NOT SURE WHAT HE WANTED TO D WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS ON JUL THE ORDER OF BUILDING STANDARDS MEETING.