[CALL TO ORDER]
[INVOCATION]
[00:00:29]
COME ASKING YOU TO SHOWER YOUR FAVORS UPON US AND HELP THOSE FROM INCLEMENT WEATHER.
WE'RE ASKING TO YOU BLESS THEM IN A SPECIAL WAY. GOD, WE PRAY HE WILL TOUCH ALL OUR HEARTS. WE WILL COME TO REALIZE ONCE YOU MESSED US YOU BLESSED US AND WE CAN BLESS OTHERS. GOD ASK YOU TO CONTINUE TO MESS THE CITY AND ALL THE LEADERS AND GOD WE ASK YOU TO BE A PART OF THIS GATHERING HERE THIS AFTERNOON.
MAY WE DO THE THINGS THAT WOULD BE PLEASING IN YOUR SIGHT AND BETWEEN WE ASK TO YOU CONTINUE TO PROTECT US. KEEP US SAFE AND HEALTHY AND SILENT FROM THIS VIRUS.
THIS BLESSING AND OTHERS WE ASK IN YOUR SWEET SON JESUS PRAY AMEN.
>> IS THERE NIING ANYONE HERE FOR ZONING CASE THAT WAS PULLED IT WAS OUT ON MEMORIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. THAT'S BEEN PULLED AND IT WILL NOT BE DISCUSSED TODAY GENTLEMEN. THANK YOU ALL FOR COMING AND WE KNOW WHEN IT WILL BE
RESCHEDULED FOR YET? >> STAFF NEEDS TO HAVE A APPLICATION WITH THE APPLICANT
BEFORE THEY DECIDE TO BRING IT FORWARD. >> IT MAY NOT BE NEXT MOVEMENT BUT THAT CASE WAS PULLED. THANK YOU FOR COMING. FIRST ITEM ON AGENDA IS
[MINUTES]
MINUTES FROM THE PREVIOUS MEETING IS EVERYBODY HAD A CHANCE TO TAKE A LOOK AT THTHOSE? HEAR A MOTION TO APPROVE. >> MOTION TO APPROVE.
>> SECOND. >> ALL IN FAVOR. >> AYE
[PLATS]
THE APPROVAL OF PLATT ACT RECOMMENDED OF CITY COUNSEL OF ZONING MAY AB PEELED CITY COUNCIL THROUGH OFFICE SECRETARY NO LATER THAN TEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF MEETING AND ALL APPEALS MUST BE IN WRITING AND PUBLIC IS INVITED TO SPEAK UNDER ANY ITEM OF DISCUSSION OF PLANNING COMMISSION AFTER SITTING RECOGNITION BY THE CHAIR.THOSE WISHING TO BE HEARD SHALL APPROACH STATE YOUR NAME AND PURPOSE FOR APPEARING.
EACH IS REQUESTED TO LIMIT PRESENTATION TO NO MORE THAN FIVE MINUTES ADDITIONAL TIME MAY BE GRANTED AT THE DISCRETION OF CHAIR AND WE BEGIN WITH PLATS.
>> JARED SMITH I WORK FOR ABILENE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICE FOUR FLATS FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION THIS AFTERNOON. FIRST PL AAT IS HERITAGE PARK FINAL MRAT 62 SINGLE FAMILY HOME SITES. THIS PLAT WAS REVIEWED BY THE COMMITTEE CHAPTER 3 ARTICLE 2 OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RECOMMEND AGO APPROVAL TO YOU UL TODAY SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: PRIOR TO RECORDING THIS PLAT CITY STAFF MY, ENTITLED TO A TITLE COMMITMENT OR LETTER ENSURING OWNER SHCHT PROPERTY AND PRIOR TO RECORDING PLAT THEY MUST FURNISH CITY ENGINEER WITH CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND THEY MUST BE APPROVED DETAIL BE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND ULTIMATELY ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PLAT HAVE TO BE IN PLACE OR FINANCIAL GUARANTEE PROVIDED PRIOR TO RECORDING THIS FLAT. 5421 SGRIVITH LAKES ESTATES SECTION 2 LAYING OUT 27P SINGLE FAMILY HOME SITES CONTINUATION OF EXISTING GRIFITH LAKES SUBDIVISION AND THIS PLAT WAS REVIEWED BY ABILENE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE THAT FOUND IT WAS CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER THREE ARTICLE 2 SUBDIVISION STAND ARIZONA AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO YOU ALL TODAY SUBJECT TO FOLLOWING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO RECORDING PLAT THEY MUST SUBMIT TITLE OPINION OR TITLE LETTER MUCH LIKE PREVIOUS CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND DETAILING ALL NECESSARY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND ULTIMATELY THOSE IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO RECORDING PLAT OR FINANCIAL GUARANTEE MUST BE PROVIDED AND ULTIMATE -- AND FINALLY PRIOR TO RECORDING PLAT STREET NAMES NEED TO BE DECIDED ON THIS SUBDIVISION. THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO COME TO A CONCLUSION ON WHAT TO NAME THE STREETS. AND THOSE STREETS MUST BE APPROVED. STREET NAMES MUST BE APPROVED BY 911 ADDRESSING APARTMENT PRY OUR TO RECORDING THIS P PLAT. NEXT PLAT FOR CONSIDERATION IS FP-5721 FINAL PLAT OF HUNTERS LANDING SECTION 2 IT A CONTINUATION OF EXISTING HU HUNTDERS LANDSING IN ABILENE EXTRA TERRITORY JURISDICTION. THIS PLAT IS LAYING OUT 44 SINGLE FAMILY HOME SILTS IN THE TJ. IT WAS 'VIEWED -- NEXT NOT IS
[00:05:05]
HUNTERS LANDING SECTION 3 WITH ANOTHER CONTINUATION OF HUNTER LANDING SUBDIVISION.ONCE AGAIN FINAL PLAT CREATING 22 SINGLE FAMILY HOME SITES IN ABILENE ETJ.
AND THESE TWO PLATS WERE REVIEWED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ROW VIEW COMMITMENT FOUND THEY CONSIDER COULD BE SIGNATUREEN CHAPTER 3 ARTICLE 2 SUBDIVISION STANDARD AND CITY STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO YOU ALL TODAY SUBJECT TO CONDITION THAT A TITLE OPINION OR TITLE COMMITMENT LETTER BE PROCEEDED TO CITY STAFF PRIOR TO RECORDING.
WITH HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE REGARDING THESE FOUR PLATS AT
>> THANKS JARED. >> THANK YOU.
>> PLATS CALL FOR PUBLIC HEARING ALL OPEN PUBLIC HEARING NIP LIKE TO ADDRESS ANY OF THESE 12346 SEEING N NONE. I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC
HEARING AAND ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >> MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE
CONDITIONS STATED. >> MOTION TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS.
>> SECOND. >> AND SECOND. >> MR. BARNET.
>>> YES. >> MR. BINHAM, YES. >> RUSTLE.
>>> YES. >> KNEW THAN. >>> YES.
>> FLEMING. >>> YES. >> ROSE BAUM.
>>> YES. >> MOTION TO APROOVR WITH CONDITIONS CARRIES.
. >> I'LL MAKE ANNOUNCEMENT AGAIN POTENTIAL ZONING CASE FOR OUT AT MEMORIAL FOR AAAL USE FOR MULTIAEYE FAMILY THAT CASE WAS PULLED FOR THIS IT MEETING AND SO IT WON'T BE AADDRESSED IT WILL BE POTENTIALLY NEXT MONTH IF YOU'RE HERE FOR THAT WE WON'T BE DISCUSSING THAT CASE.
[ZONING]
ZONING CASE Z 2021-22 A REQUEST FROM THE CONDER COMPANY TO CHANGE AGRICULTURALOPEN SPACE TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. >> GOOD AFTERNOON I'M JARED SMITH I WORK FOR ABILENE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OFFICE.
TODAY I'M PRESENTING Z 20 2021-22. ONE OF THE PROPERTIES CONDER COMPANY FROM JAKE MARTIN LLC REQUEST AGRICULTURAL OPEN TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 173.
THIS PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WILL FUNCTION LIKE A PATIO HOME ZONING DISTRICT WITH FEW MODIFICATIONS SPECIFICALLY TO THE MINIMUM LOT AREA AND THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
WHAT THOSE ARE IS OPPOSED TO TRADITIONAL 45 OWE 0 SQUARE FET YOU FIND IN PATIO HOME ZONING MINIMUM LOT SIZE IN THIS PD WILL BE 5,000 SCARE FEET AND AS FAR AS SETBACK ALTERATIONS GO IN TRADITIONAL PATIO HOME ZONE WAEING ALLOW ZERO LOT LINE SO LONG AS TEN FEET OF SEPARATION IS PROVIDED BETWEEN NEIGHBORING RESIDENCES AND THIS PATIO HOME -- IN THERE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT THEY WILL BE REQUIRED 5 FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK AND THERE'S MOD IN ADDITIONS TO SOME REAR FROM THE ORDINARY 20 FOOT TO A 15 FOOT.
I HAVE A GRAPHIC THAT HIGHLIGHTS THAT LATER IN THIS PRESENTATION.
THE LOCATION OF THIS REQUEST IS THE 7700 AND 7900 BLOCKS EVER HARD WICK ROAD ON WEST SIDE SERVICE HARDWICK ROAD. CITY STAFF SENT OUT INFORMATION LETTER ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET AND ZERO SPONSS IN FAVOR AND ZERO IN ON SIXINGTS A LOCATION MAP SHOWING ARIEL IMANNUAL OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ONCE AGAIN ON THE LEFT SIDE OF HARDWICK ROAD EAST OF WHILELY WEST ELEMENTARY AND WHILELY WEST INTERMEDIATE SCHOOLSMENT CURRENT SDOPING MAP SLOWING THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS PRESENTLY IN AN AGRICULTURAL OPEN ZONING DISTRICT IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SINGLE FAMILY HOME THAT IS LOCATED IN A AO ZONE DECEMBER STRIINGT AND RE REMAINING ZONING THAT SURROUNDING THIS PROPERTY IS RS 6 WHICH AGAIN ARE THE SCHOOL SITES. HERE'S THE GRAPHIC CONCEPT PLAN I MENTIONED A BIT EAR EARLIER. SO THIS IS SHOWING A PRELIMINARY LAYOUT OF WHAT THE SUBDIVISION WILL LOOK LIKE INSIDE THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.
THE IMPORTANT THING TO NOTE ON THIS ARE THE WHAT WE CALL KEYED LOTS OR HALF CUL-DE-SAC LOTS ALL HAVE A 15 FOOT SETBACK FROM THE REAR PROPERTY LINE OPPOSED TO THE 20 FOOT SETBACK THAT WOULD ORDINARILY BE REQUIRED WITHIN PATIO HOME ZONING.
SO AGAIN IT'S JUST THAT 15 FOOT SETBACK ONLY APPLIES TO LOTS 8 THROUGH 11 AND 16 THROUGH 19. THE REST WILL BE REQUIRED 20 FEET FROM THE REAR PROPERTY
LINE. >> WHAT'S THE REASON FOR THAT JARED?
>> SO, PRO BONE EPT IS HERE TO SPEAK IF YOU LIKE TO TALK TO THEM.
IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING OWNER OF BROUGHTTY HAS A -- HAS A MINIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT THEY WOULD LIKE TO PUT ON EACH LOT AND IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THAT MINIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT THEY NEED THOSE FIVE ADDITIONAL FIGHT ON THOSE ODDLY SHAPED KEYED LOTS
[00:10:02]
PERMITTED USE SLIDE SHOWING ALL THE USES THAT WOULD AB LOUED IN AO ZONING WHAT IT PRESENT THINK IS AND PERMITTED USE SLIDE THAT SHOWS EVERYTHING ALLOWED WITHIN PATIO HOME ZONING. THIS PD HAS A BASE ZONING OF PATIO HOMES.IT ALLOWS ANYTHING ORDINARILY AALLOWED WITHIN PATIO HOME ZONING.
HERE ARE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS WELL AS NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
NOTIFICATION MAP ONCE AGAIN CITY STAFF SENT OUT NOTIFICATION LETTERS TO ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTIES WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE SUBJECT -- OF THESE TWO SUBJECT PROPERTIES WE RECEIVED ZERO RESPONSES IN FAVOR AND ZERO IN OPPOSITION. THIS REQUEST WAS REVIEWED BY STAFF THAT FOUND IT WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FUTURE LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP PURSUANT TO SECTION 414 OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL AND CITY STAFF IS RECOMMEND AGO APPROVAL TO YOU ALL TODAY.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE AT THIS TIME.
>> IF I'M ASKING A QUESTION IT WAS ADDRESSED EARLIER I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND 10 FOOT VERSUS FIVE
FOOT TEN FOOT SEPARATION VERSUS 5 FOOT. >> RIGHT IN TRADITIONAL PATIO HOME ZONING WE ALLOW A ZERO LOT LINE SETBACK MEANING YOU CAN PUT A HOME ON ONE OF YOUR PROPERTY LINES THERE'S NO MINIMUM SETBACK. THE BIGGEST THING THERE YOU HAVE TO HAVE TEN FEET OF SEPARATION FROM NEIGHBORING RESIDENTS.
THAT'S IN PRADITIONAL PATIO HOME SDOPING YOU'RE AALLOWED TO BE ON ONE OF YOUR PROPERTY LINES. THIS PD THEY WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE AT LEAST AFEET FROM
EITHER BROUGHTTY LINE. >> SO YOU GET YOUR TEN FEET.
>> EXACTLY. EXACTLY. SO THE WAY WE DO THINGS NOW WITH PATIO HOMES IT PROVIDES A SMALL WINDOW OF WHERE WE COULD MAKE A MISTAKE IN HOMES MAY NOT BE TEN FEET AAPART. WE TRY OUR BEST TO AVOID THAT FROM HAPPENING BY LOOKING AT NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES WHEN EVER WE GET A PERMIT WE CHECK EVERYONE ELSE TO MAKE SURE NOT CREATING ANOMALY HERE REQUIRED TO BE FIVE FEET THAT WILL NEVER BE THE CASE.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> ANYTHING ELSE THANKS JE JARED.
>> THANK YOU. >> OPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO ADDRESS
THE CASE? >> OKAY TON FAIR OWE JACOB AND MARTIN JARED DID A GOOD JOB OF WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO. SING M FAMILY REZ DEP THAT.
LOOKED AT STARTING RF 6 AND MODIFYING THIS AND BASED ONSET BACKS AND LOT SIZES AND ALL THAT PATIO HOME WAS A BETTER FIT. IT WILL STILL BE WHAT YOU WOULD CONSIDER NORMAL TRADITIONAL SINGLELE FAM FAMILIARLISM THE PAD WOULD BE CENTERED ON THE LOT WITH A 5 FOOT SETBACK AND INSTEAD OF SIX FOOT IN RF 6 AS EXAMPLE AND TEN FOOT SETBACKS BECAUSE OF MINIMUMS IN PLACE AND PAD SHAPE QUESTION THAT CAME UP EARLIER SO THE DEVELOPER DOES HAVE A PRODUCT HE WANTS TO PUT ON THE PADS AND BY IF YOU GO BACK TO THESIDE SITE PLAN THANK YOU WHERE WE BULB OUT AROUND THE 9 OWE DEGREE TURNS WE DO THAT TO CREATE FRONTAGE ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EACH LOT TO HAVE SINLLY A WIDE ENOUGH FRONTAGE AT THE STREET. BUT BY DOING THAT OBVIOUSLY YOU SHALLOW UP YOUR LOT DEPTH WE'VE TRIED TO GET CHRIST HOW TO MAKE THAT WORK WITH MINIMIZING IMPACT ON LOT DEPTH BUT JUST ON HANDFUL WR OF LOTS WITH THE SMAE THIS -- WITH THE SHAPE OF THIS PROPERTY, IT REQUIRED A REQUEST TO DROP THE REAR YARD SETBACK ON THOSE HANDFUL OF LOTS ANY OTHER QUESTIONS I'M HAPPY TO ADDRESS.
>> THANKS. >> THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE CARE TO ADDRESS
THE ZONING CASE? >> I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR MOTION. >> SO 34506D.
>> MOVE TO APPROVE. >> MOTION TO APPROVE. >> SECOND.
>> AND SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION TO APP APPROVE.
MR. BAR NET. >>> YES. >> MR. BENHAM.
>> MR. NEW THAN. YES. >> REVEREND LANG FORD.
YES. >> MISS FLEMMING. >>> YES.
>> MR. ROSEEN BAWN. >>> YES. >> MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIES.
>> REQUEST FROM DON'TING CASE Z 2021 LIVE 24 REQUEST FROM BROOKLYN CHRISTIAN KHUR OF TO CHANGE ZONING FROM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY TO A NEIGHBORHOOD REAL TAIL
DISTRICT. >> THANK MUST CHAIRMAN I'M BRADLEY STONE A PLANNER ON THE CITY STAFF I'LL BE HE CAN BRENTING THIS CASE THIS AFTERNOON.
THIS REQUEST IS TO REZONE APPROXIMATE LAWYER 1 IS.7P 6 ACRES OF LAND FROM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY TO MD TO A NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL OR NR DISTRICT.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES INCLUDE ALL CONTINUOUS PROPERTIES NOW OWNED BY BROOKLYN CHRIS TAP
[00:15:05]
CHURCH AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH 2 IT 3RD AND SOUTH WILLOW STREETS.SINCE 1960 THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES AS WELL AS MOST OTHER LOTS ON THE SAME CITY BLOCK HAVE BEEN EMBRACED WITHIN A RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY OR MD ZONING DISTRICTS OR ITS PRED SES ORRM 3 ZONING. AGAIN SINCE 1960.
PLACES OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP ARE ALLOWED IN ALL RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT OF ABILENE.
RELIGIOUS WORSHIP INCLUDES INCIDENTAL ACTIVITY ORDINARILY CONSIDERED ACCESSORY TO SUCH USE. THAT INCLUDES RELIGIOUS EDUCATION, FELLOWSHIP GANL AREING AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES AND ALL THAT INCIDENTAL ACTIVITY MUST INDEED BE SUBORDINATES TO THE PRINCIPLE USE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP IN ORDER TO BE ALLOWED IN A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. THE EXISTING FACILITIES ON THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE PROPOSED TO BE CONVERTED TO DAYCARE FOR CHILDREN AND COUNSELING SERVICES AMONG OTHER USES. RELIGOUS WORSHIP WOULD NO LONGER BE PRINCE PAP PAL USE OF THESE FACILITIES AS HAS BEEN PROPOSED.
AS A RESUT, THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ZONING WILL NO LONGER BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES PROPOSED CONVERSION. THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THESE PROPERTIES MUST BE CHANGED TO SOME SUITABLE NON RESIDENTIAL ZONING.
PROPONENTS HAVE SELECTED A NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL OR NR DISTRICT FOR THE PROPOSED NEW ZONING OF THEIR PROPERTIES. AND OUR ZONING WOULD ALLOW SCI A GOOD CARE CENTER AND WIDE VARIETY OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICES INCLUDING OFFICES DEVOTED TO COUNSELING SERVICES. THIS SLIDE INDICATES THE USES ALLOWED BY THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES PRESENT MD ZONING. HOWEVER, PLACES OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP -- WELL, EXCUSE ME.
THE EXISTING MD ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THESE PROPERTIES IS GENERALLY INTENDED FOR MIDDLE DENSITIES OF HOUSING IN ONE, TWO, THREE AND FOUR FAMILY DWELLINGS.
AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, PLACES OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP ARE ALSO ORDINARILY ALLOWED AND CAN, OF COURSE, INCLUDE ACTIVITIES, INCIDENTAL AND ACCESSORY TO RELIGIOUS WORSHIP AS I MENTIONED LIKE RELIGIOUS EDUCATION OR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES.
ON THIS TABLE AS WELL AS THE ONE WHICH FOLLOWS THE LETTER P INDICATES A USE WHICH IS ORDINARILY ALLOWED OR PERMITTED. THE LETTER C INDICATES A USE WHICH IS ALLOWED CONDIT CONDITIONALLY. THAT IS ONLY WITH A SPECIFIC PERMISSION OF CITY COUNSEL I ILL AND AFTER A PUBLIC HEARING AND RECOMMENDATION BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. THIS SLIDE SHOWS THE RANGE OF USES ALLOWED WITHIN THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL ZONING.
AS THE NAME IMPLIES NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL ZONING ALLOWS A LIMITED RANGE OF RETAIL TRADE AND DVRSS NEEDED TO SERVE A NEIGHBORHOOD AREA. SPECIFIC TERMS OF NR ZONING ALSO INCLUDE LIMITATIONS ON THE INTENSITY AND SCALE OF DEVELOPMENT INTENDED TO PROMOTE SOME REASONABLE DEGREE OF COMPATIBILITY WITH NEARBY RESIDENCES.
FOR EXAMPLE NO NON RESIDENTIAL USE IN NR DISTRICT MAY OPERATE LATER THAN 11:00 P.M. NOR EARLIER THAT BE 6:00 A.M. HERE ARE SUBJECT PROPERTIES -- HER ARE PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. WE SEE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN THE TOP LEFT DIRECTLY AT THE CORNER OF SOUTH WILLIS AND SOUTH 23RD STREETS. IN THE UPPER RIGHT WE'RE LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SOUTH 23RD STREET AND LOOKING IN THE DIRECTION OF SOUTH 27TH ST STREET. THE LOWER LEFT INCLUDES THE SUBJECT PROPERTY VIEWED FROM WILL IS IN LOOKING WEST. AND IN THE LOWER RIGHT WE'RE LOOKING AT THE EXISTING RETAIL ZONING ACROSS SOUTH WILLOW STREET FROM THE SUBJECT
[00:20:07]
PROPERTY. INCIDENTALLY BEHIND THE COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES WE SEE RIGHT IN THE LOWER RIGHT FEET PHOTO AND THEN IS -- BEYOND THAT SAY MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEXAND THEN BEYOND THAT IS THE BROOK HOLLOW SHOPPING CENTER. >> HERE WE HAVE THE RESULTS OF OUR NOTIFICATION. CITY STAFF NOTIFIED 28 OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN A 2 IT 00 FOOT RADIUS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES FOR WHICH NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL ZONING HAS BEEN REQUESTED. AND ONE RETURNED WRITTEN COMMENTS FAVOR AND EIGHT RETURNED WRITTEN COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION. SEVEN OF THOSE WRITTEN COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION APPEAR ON A PARTITION CIRCULATED BY ONE OF THOSE NEARBY PROPERTY OWNERS. THAT SAME POSITION IS SIGNED BY SIX ADDITIONAL RESIDENTS OF PROPERTY IN THE NOTIFICATION AREA BUT THOSE SIX ADDITIONAL RESIDENTS ARE NOT INDINDICATED TO BE OWNERS OF THOSE PROPERTIES. ACCORDING TO THE TAYLOR COUNTY AAPPRAISAL DISSTRICT. FINALLY THAT PETITION IN OPPOSITION INCLUDES THE SIGNATURES OF ONE OWNERP PROPERTY THERE IN THE LOWER LEFT LOCATED JUST OUTSIDE THE 2 IT 00 FOOT NOTIFICATION AREA IN THE NOTIFICATION AREA WE GOT ONE RESPONSE IN FAVOR, EIGHT RESPONSES IN OPPOSITION. I MENTION THE PETITION THAT WE RECEIVED AND THAT PETITION INDICATES THAT THE SAYING TOREYS ARE NOT NECESSARILY OPPOSED TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SPECIFIC PROPOSED USE FOR COUNSELING SERVICES AND DAY FOR FOR CHILDREN.
THE SAYING TOREYS ARE INTEAD SKEPTICAL OF NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL STONING AND ALL THE MANY USES THAT SUCH ZONING COULD POTENTIALLY BRING TO THIS LOBE LOCATION.
LET ME GO AHEAD AND CIRCULATE THAT PETITION TO YOU. AB LIEN COME PEN RECEIVE PLAN RECOMMENDS SUITABLE INTEPINGZ BETWEEN COMMUNICATE SHALL ACTIVITY ASEN LOW DENSERY RESIDENCES LOCATED NEARBY. THIS PARTICULAR PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL DISTRICT IS IS WEDGED BETWEEN A MORE INTENSIVE GENERAL RETAIL DISTRICT OCCUPYING ALMOST ALL OF THE CITY BLOCK LOCATED DRERLINGTLY TO THE EAST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES.
AND TO THE WEST THERE IS, OF COURSE, A LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT.
AND IN THE OPINION OF CITY STAFF THE LIMITED RANGE OF RETAIL, TRADE AND SERVICES IN THE PROPOSED NR DISTRICT WILL PROVIDE A SUIT ANNUAL TRANSITION IN THE INTENSITY OF USE BETWEEN DIFFERENT ES EXTENSIVE RETAIL ON ADJACENT CITY BLOCK OCCUPIED BY BROOKLYN SHOPPING CENTER AND LOW DENSITIES OF FINGERLE S SAMLY HOMES TO THE WEST.
FURTHERMORE TWO OF THE THREE STREEINGTS ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE OF COURSE, SOUTH 2 IT 3RD AND SOUTH WILLOW STREETS. BOTH OF WHICH ARE CLASSIFIED AS COLLECTOR TYPE STREETS FOR FUNCTIONAL PURPOSES. AS THE NAME IMPLIES A COLLECTOR TYPE EVER STREET COLLECTS TRAFFIC FROM MANY LOCAL STREETS AND COLLECT THAT NETWORK OF THOROUGHFARES. INTERSECTION OF TWO COLLECTIVE STREETS IS OFTEN VIEWEDED AS A SUITABLE LEX FOR NEIGHBORHOOD OR YEPTSED TRADE AND SOCIAL SOCIAL SECURITIES GIVEN ITS EXPOSURE TO NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC FLOW. CITY STAFF THERE BY RECOMMENDS APPROVING THIS REQUEST FOR NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL ZONING ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES.
I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. DID YOU PUT -- WAS YOUR --
YEAH I DIDN'T SEE THAT ONE. >> OH, HERE'S A FLOOD HAZARD MAP.
>> BUT THE ZONING MAP IS NOT IN THERE IS IT? >> NO IT IS NOT.
>> THE ZONING ACROSS THE STREET WHAT'S THE ZONING ON THE -- YEAH I SEE IT THINK THOUGHT I REMEMBERED THAT IN THE PACKET WHAT'S THE ZONING ON THE EAST SIDE.
>> ON THE EAST SIDE OF WILL IS? GENERAL RETAIL THE ENTIRE CITY
[00:25:07]
BLOCK IS SDOPD GENERAL RETAIL EXCEPT FOR THE SITE OF THE APARTMENT COMPLEX.>> WHAT ABOUT SOUTH EVER THE PROPERTY ON THE WEST SIDE OF WILL IS?
>> DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF THIS PROPERTY IS OFFICE ZONING DISTRICT.
>> WHICH IS MORE INTENSE THAN NEIGHBORHOOD. >>> WELL IN SOME RESPECTS
YEAH. >> OKAY. >>> AAND SOME RESPECTS NO. THE OFFICE ZONING DISTRICT ALLOWS TALL OFFICE BUILDINGS BUT THEY'RE LIMITED JUST TO OFFICE
USE. >> BUT THEIR HOURS ARE NOT LIMITED.
>> THEIR HOURS ARE NOT LIMIT SGLD LIKE NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL S.
>> NOW THE ENTIRE CITY BLOCK WHERE THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED IS WITHIN THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONINGING DISTRICT EXCEPT WHAT I SAID ON THE WEST SIDE OF
WILL IS. >> THANK YOU. >> I OPEN PUBLIC HEARING.
WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS CASE PLEASE COME FORWARD.
>> GOOD AFTERNOON ANY NAME IS ERIC JOHNSON WITH THE FIRM PAUL JOHNSON ASSOCIATES I REPRESENT THE PARTIES IN THIS ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY YOU MIGHT HAVE ABOUT THE USE, INTENDED USE, WITH AT OF OPPOSITION THERE SEEING THE SIGN THAT SAZ NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL OBVIOUSLY THAT WOULD SEND MORNING FL FLAGSFY LIVER IN THE FPT I'M SURE HE WANTED TO ATTEND THIS HEARING TO FIND OUT EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS AS FAR AS INTENDED USE OF THE PROPERTY. AND I'LL SAY THAT YOU KNOW THE CHURCH IS SELLING AND ANOTHER CHURCH IS BUYING AND THAT CHURCH AMBULANCE TO HAVE -- PROVIDE CHILDCARE SERVICES AS WELL AS COUNSELING SERVICES. CHILDCARE THE PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH WHERE THE LARGE PARKING LOT IS THERE'S A PLAY GROUND IN THE BACK AND PART OF THE SEARCH AND SANCTUARY ON IT 3 PREPONDERANCE AND TRADLS THE WHOLE BLOCK THERE. THAT WOULD BE BUILT OUT INTO OFFICES FOR COUNSELING SERVICES. AND SO, THE ZONE NR WAS SUGGESTED BY THE CITY STAFF JUST AS MR. STONE WAS SUGGESTING THAT IT WAS A TRAINGSZAL COMING FROM ENTIRE BLOCK OF GENERAL RETAIL WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN MY FIRST GO-TO FOR THE USES BUT NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL SEEMS VIA APPROPRIATE FOR THIS LOCATION BEING THAT THERE'S HOMES ON THE WEING SIDE AND THEN THERE'S NO MORE OFFICES TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF THAT. DELAYS DENTAL CLINIC ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY ON THE WEST SIDE JUST SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SO, IT DOESN'T SEEM APPROPRIATE.
I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ME. >> QUESTIONS?
>> OKAY. APPRECIATE IT. ANYTHING P ANYONE ELSE?
>> MY NAME IS VAN LIINGIAN 2 IT 401 IVANHO AUTHOR EVER THE LETTER YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU IF SPEAKING WITH THE NEIGHBORS NOBODY WAS REALLY CONCERNED AT ALL ABOUT THE PROPOSED USE EVER THE PROPERTY IT IS IN FACT LONG TERM SHOULD THE CHURCH IN QUESTION CHOOSE TO ABANDON THAT PROPERTY DOWN THE ROAD WE WOULD JUST LIKE TO SEE SOME PROTECTION FROM THE POTENTIAL OF MORE INSTEN RECEIVE RETAIL USES ON THE WEST SIDE WILL IS BEHIND MY HOME IS A PROPERTY USED TO BE A DENTAL PROMPTTY. I'M NOT SURE IF IT STILL IS OR NOT I DON'T THINK SO. AND THEN EVERYTHING ELSE DOWN THAT SIDE IS OFFICES.
THE AREA JOND IT MAY BE NOT THAT MAYBE THE ZONING BUT IT'S WHAT'S THERE PROFESSIONAL OFFICES, TRAVEL AGENCIES THAT SORT OF THING. I THINK THERE'S MEDICAL
FACILITIES IN THERE. >> WE HAVE A SIGNIFICANT BUFFER BETWEEN AUTO BROOK HALL AND US AND RESIDENTS AND ALONG SOUTH 23. WITHOUT EXCEPTION NEIGHBORS I SPOKE WITH WERE ALL JUST CONCERNED ABOUT THE LONG TERM POTENTIAL AND WERE HOPING YOU COULD POSSIBLY CONSIDER US -- AN OPTION OTHER THAT BE NR TO GET THE COUNSELINGING TOGETHER WITHOUT. AND ONEN PROPERTIES LONG THE ROAD AND IF THEY DID --
[00:30:05]
>> DO YOU HAVE A SUGGESTION WHAT THAT WOULD BE. >> I KNOW ENOUGH ABOUT PLANNING AND ZONING TO BE REALLY DANGEROUS A FROM PDD OR PERHAPS I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ALL HAVE THE ABILITY TO ISSUE CONDITIONAL USE ON SOME OTHER ZONING, I REALLY DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT. THIS IS JUST A REQUEST FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND HE YES SOME OF THE OWNERS -- SOME. THE PEOPLE THAT SIGNED WERE NOT OWNERS UNFORTUNATELY.
WE DEPOSIT GET OUR LETTER UNTIL THE 31 ISST AND WITH LABOR DAY HOLIDAY INN THINK DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH TIME TO TRACK DOWN THE OWNERS AND GET IN TOUCH WITH THEM.
>> INY NOTICED IN YOUR JETER THAT YOUER AND BOTH ARE LISTED AS CONDITIONAL USE.
THEY WON'T AUTOMATICALLY BE PERMITTED TO BE ON THE SITE. >> I SAW THAT.
RESTAURANT IN GENERAL IS NOT CONDITIONABLE IS THAT CORRECT. >> RESTAURANTP OUR STANDARD IS
PERMITTED. >> OKAY. I THINK IT'S JUST A MATTER OF MOST PEOPLE WERE CONCERNED ABOUT PROPERTY VALUES AS WELL AS TRAFFIC.
MY HOME IS -- WE'RE -- IP THE ONLY LONG-TERM RESIDENTS IN THERE.
I'VE BEEN THERE SINCE I WAS A KHIXTD ONLY CHILD, INHERITED THE PROPERTY AND DECIDED TO LIVE THERE BACK IN THE '60S WHEN IT WAS REIMMEDIATE TO I KNOW THIS CLEAR AS A BELL BECAUSE I REMEMBER THE CONVERSATION. WE WERE PROMISED A DIVE EYING WELL ALONG THAT PROPERTY TO INSULATE THE RESIDENCES FROM WILL IS FROM THE TRAFFIC AND FROM THOSE OFFICES. THE ZONING WAS CHANGED WITHOUT ANY CONDITIONS AND THAT WALL NEVER HAPPENED. AND I DON'T -- MOIST OF THE PEOPLE ARE DECEASED.
I THINK ROY WALTS MAY HAVE DIED. SO IT'S JUST AND GENERAL CONCERN ABOUT THE FUTURE NOTHING ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR UNITED STATES AT ALL NOOV
NOOVRMENT. >> ANY QUESTIONS, ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS.
>> I HAVE A QUESTION FOR BRADLEY. >> OKAY.
THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. >> CAN WE WAIT -- OR DO YOU
NEED -- >> NO, NO. HANG ON, BRAD, ANYBODY ELSE LIKE TO SPEAK? ON THE CASE? I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HAEVRMINGT BRAD, COME BACK UP. OFF OFF I'M CURIOUS ABOUT THE N.
ALLOW WHAT THE CHURCH IS ASKING FOR. >> WELL, ANY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IS A KUING ONLY MADE ZONINGITION APP THIS APPLICATION COULD AT YOUR URGING BE CONVERTED TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. IT WOULD REQUIRE RENOTIFICATION AND ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER. BUT YOU COULD IN YOUR RECOMMENDATION OF COURSE DENY THE REQUESTED DON'TING, APROOVT REQUESTED ZONING TO NEIGHBORHOOD REL STALE AND ASK THAT IT BE PLANNED MRAWTIONAL FIRM SOME LIMITS COMPANIES ON A LOUD USE AND BE BROUGHT BACK FOR ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER.
>> WAS THAT CONSIDERED WHEN YOU ALL WORKED WITH THE APPLICANT OR THIS WAS A FOOT
THAT WORKED AND HELPED ACCOMPLISH THE GOAL. >> I'M NOT SURE THAT WAS
DISCUSSED, NO. >> OKAY. BUT YOU KNOW WE TRY TO DPAI STAY AAWAY FROM FROM
PDS. >> THIS IS A GOOD FIT FOR THE PROPERTY AND ANY MORE INTENSE.
>> I AGREE ON ALL ACCOUNTS. THAT MANY RESIDENTS OPPOSING SEEMS WORTH A CONVERSATION.
>>. >> ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR A MOTION?
VRNL I'LL MOTION TO APPROVE THE NR ZONING. >> MOTION TO APPROVE.
>> SECOND. >> AND SECOND. >> MOYX TO PROOF.
>> MR. NOONIAN. >>> YES. >> REVEREND LANG FORD.
>>> YES. >> MISS FLEMMING. >>> YES.
[00:35:01]
>> AND MR. ROSEBAUM. >>> YES. >> MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIES.
>> ZONING CASE Z 2021-25 REQUEST FROM CHRISTIAN EVEN SON TO CHANGE ZONING FROM
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL. >> THANK MUST CHAIRMAN MY NAME IS BRAD ZONE PLANNER ON THE STAFF AND I'LL BE PRESENTING THIS PARTICULAR CASE.
THE THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE AN ACRE AN A HALF OF NOW VACANT LAND FROM A HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO A HEAVY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS HIGHLIGHTED BY THE YELLOW STRIPING SHOP IN THE VERY CENTER OF THIS SLIDE.
THIS LAND IS NOW VACANT AND HAS BEEN VACANT SINCE THESE LOTS AND ADJOINING STREET WERE CREATED BY A SUBDIVISION PLANT MORE THAN 40 YEARS AGO. THIS SLIDE SHOWS CURRENT SDOPING OF THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY. NOT ONLY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ITSELF BUT IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA SUBURB OUNDING THAT SUBJECT PROPERTY.
THE GRAY INDICATES HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING AND THE RED HEAVY COMMERCIAL SDOPING THE SAME AS THAT WHICH PROPONENT IS REQUESTING. AS YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY LAND IN A HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR AT LEAST 212 FEET IN ANY DIRECTION AT A LOCATION APPROXIMATELY 212 FEET NORTHEAST FROM THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY A TRACT WAS REZONED TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL FROM HI LESS THAN TWO YEARS AGO GOVERNMENT THAT HC ZONE TRACK IN RED IS NOW THE LOCATION OF C 4 FUELS WHICH AMONG OTHER THINGS IS A RETAILER OF GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUELS. AARD COG TO THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE APPLICATION THE OWNER OF THIS PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS REQUESTING THE REZONING BECAUSE AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR AND SERVICE SOCIAL SECURITY NO LONGER ALLOWED IN HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONEPING DISTRICTS AS IT WAS BEFORE 2010.
PRO POPE ENTER APPLICATION PLANS TOYPD INDICATE HE PERHAPS TO USE PROPERTY FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE OF BOATS AND OTHER RECREATIONAL VEHICLES WHICH IS ALSO NO LONGER ALLOWED IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT. ALL THESE SPECIFIC ACTIVITIES THAT IS AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR, OUTDOOR STORAGE OF BOATS AND RVS, THESE ARE ROUTINE LAY
LOUED IN THE HEAVY COMMERCIAL XLAS FICTION. >> THIS SLIDE INDICATES ALL THE THE USE AS LOUED BY THE SUBJECT SOPT YOU. THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL SOAPING GAS APPLICATION IS EP TENDED FOR THE MOST -- WHOSE NUISANCE AFFECTS ARE ORDINARILY GREATER THAN THAT OF MOST OTHER INDUSTRIES. THAT INCLUDES FABRICATION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS AND MATERIALS WHICH ARE UNDERTAKEN OUTSIDE OF AN ENCLOSED BUILDING. CONCRETE BATCHING PLANTS AND AUTO -- AUTO? ANIMAL AUCTION YARDS ARE ALSO CON FIND TO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISSTRAIKTS LOUED NO OR NRAES ABILENE. OF COURSE, ON THIS TABLE AS WELL AS THE ONE THAT FOLLOWS THE LETTER P INDICATES THE USES ORDINARILY ALLOWED OR PERMITTED, THE THE LETTER C INDICATES IT IS -- USE SOCIAL SECURITY ALLOWED CONDIT CONDITIONALLY. THAT IS WITH THE SPECIFIC PERMISSION OF CITY COUNCIL AND
ONLY AFTER A PUBLIC HEARING AND RECOMMENDATION. >> THIS SLIDE SHOWS RANGE OF USE AS LOUED BY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THE HEAVY COMMERCIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION SIN TENDED FOR SLING AND SERVICE IS COMMODITIES AND EQUIPMENT WHICH BY THEIR NATURE MAY NOT BE COMBATIBLE WITH OTHER RP CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR YARD AND LARGE SCALE REHOUSING ARE GOOD EXAMPLES. SUFFICIENT CAN SOME CONSUMER OR YNED RETAIL TRADE AND SERVICES ARE ALSO ALLOWED IN HEAVY COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS IF SOMEONE WERE TO ASK ME WHAT IS THE MOST LIBERAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION I WOULD HAVE TO SAY IT'S THIS HEAVY COMMERCIAL CLASSIFICATION. IT ALLOWS A WIDE RANGE OF RETAIL TRIED AND SERVICES OF
[00:40:03]
ORDINARY NATURE. BUS PLUS, IT ALLOWS MORE HEAVY COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES AS THE NAME IMPLIES THINGS THAT MAY NOT BE SUITABLE IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL DISTRICTS OR EVEN JUROR GENERAL RETAIL DISTRICTS. BUT IT IS A VERY LIBERAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION. HERE'S ARE PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND ITS SURROUNDINGS. IN THE UPPER LEFT WE SEE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS VACANT AS IT HAS BEEN FOR A VERY LONG TIME. AND IN THE UPPER RIGHT WE'RE LOOKING AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO THE LEFT AND WE'RE LOOKING DIRECTLY TO THE WEST AND IN THE DIRECTION OF SOUTH TREAD AWAY BOULEVARD. TO THE LOWER LEFT EVER HADE COMMERCIAL USE. ON THE NORTH SIDE DUNHAM DRIVE AND IN THE LOWER RIGHT WE'RE LOOKING AT WHAT YOU SEE AT THE VERY EAST END OF DUNHAM DRIVE WHERE IT DEAD AENDZ TO A BIG GRASSY FIELD. HERE WE HAVE A RESPONSE FROM OUR NOTIFICATION AS I RECALL WE NOVD A TOTAL OF 11 OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN A 200 FOOT RADIUS OF THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY. FROM WHICH WE RECEIVED THREE RESPONSES FALL FAVOR UP WHICH ININDICATED NO SPECIFIC COMMENTS IN THEIR RESPONSE.ACCORDING TO THE MAP FUTURE LAND USE AND NEXT ABILENE'S 2004 THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED IN AN AREA DESIGNATED SIMPLY AS -- WHILE NOT ALLOWED IN HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AT ACTIVITY AS LOUED IN HEAVY COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS WILL NOT NECESSARILY SUFFER IN PROPERTY VALUE OR USE HER COMFORT FROM THEIR CLOSE IMIMTY TO A HEAVY
INDUSTRIAL DISSTRICHBLINGT. >> NOR WILLOW TEN RECEIVE USES ALLOW HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS FROM -- THEY WON'T SUFFER FROM CLOSE IMIMTY TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS.
CITY STAFF THERE BY RECOMMENDS APPROVING THE REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE TO A HEAVY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. BEHALF PI TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT V.
>> DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR BRAD. >> THANK YOU BRAD.
>> YOU'RE WELCOME. >> I OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO ADDRESS
THIS CASE. >> I'M CHRIS EVANS OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND I WAS GOING TO SAY THAT THE NAME IS ACTUALLY CHRISTOPHER NOT CHRISTIAN IF THAT MATTERS AT
ALL. >> I DON'T THINK THAT MATTERS I PROBABLY SAID IT LONG.
>> IT SAYS CHRISTIAN ON THE PAPER IT'S CHRISTOPHER THAT WAS.
IT THANK YOU APPRECIATE. IT ANYONE ELSE? I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC
HEARING AND ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR A MOTION. >> MOVE TO APPROVE.
>> SEVRJTD. >> MOTION TO APPROVE AND SECOND.
MOTION TO APPROVE. MR. BAR NET. >> YES.
>> MR. BINHAM. >> YES. >> MISS RUSTLE.
>> YES. >> MR. NONEIAN. >> YES SGL REVEREND.
>> AND MOTION CARRIES. >> Z 2021 24EU6 6 OF REQUEST FROM DEWAYNE BLAIR TO CHANGE MANUFACTURED SPACE TO MANUFACTURED MOBILE HOME.
>> I'M NICK WATTS I'LL BE PRESENTING THIS CASE Z 2021-2 IT 6 ON BEHALF OF OWNER DEWAYNE BLAIR REZONE AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE TO MANUFACTURED MOBILE HOME.
IT'S LOCATED 158 CHAPEL HILL ROAD. THIS IS LOCATION MAP INDKAIINGT PROPERTY SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT'S APPROXIMATELY 58 ACRES AND IN WHICH ALL IS UNPLATED FIVE ACRES IS DEAD INDICATED TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE. 53 ACHE CERTIFIES VAIK PRESIDENTIAL AND APPLICANT DOES NOT PLAN TO ESTABLISH A MOBILE HOME PARK. THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO PLACE A MOBILE ON M HOME ON THE PROPERTY FOR ELDERLY PARENTS TO RESIDE N AS AN ACCESSORY USE TO THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL USE WHICH IS TYPICALLY PERMITTED IN
[00:45:02]
AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPAIXTS THIS IS ZONING MAP INDINDICATING ZONING OF PROPERTY.YOU CAN SEE THAT LARGE AREA OF IT IS STILL AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE.
THERE ARE MOBILE HOME DISTRICTS OR MANUFACTURED HOME DISSTRICT TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE EAST. ALONG KHAEM HILL ROAD. THIS IS PART MUCH OF THE MOBILE HOME DISTRICTS HERE ARE PART OF THE WESTERN HILLS SUBDIVISION AND KHAEM HILL SUBDIVE IING AS WELL AND AT THOSE ESTATES IS LOCATED TO THE EAST OF THIS PROPERTY THERE'S HEAVY COMMERCIAL ALONG THE FREEWAY ALONG HIGHWAY 80 TO THE NORTH.
AND THIS IS SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE PROPERTY. PROPERTIESPROPERTIESTY LIKE I SAID IS CURRENTLY FOR SINGLE FAMILY USE. COULDN'T HAVE A PHOTO OF THAT BECAUSE THE HOUSE IS LOCATED TOO FAR BACK ON PROPERTY PROPERTY.
ALL YOU CAN SEE ON THE LEFT HAND PHOTO THE WEST VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TT GATE IN QUESTION. AND THEN ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT CORNER IS THE EAST NEIGHBORING PROPERTY YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE ARE MOBILE HOMES CAN'TLY PLACED THERE.
IN THE EVENT THAT THE PROPERTY OWN WE'RE LIKE TO ESTABLISH A MOBILE HOME XHUBTY THERE OR VILLAGE THEY'LL BE SUBJECT TON PLATING AND SUBJECT TO SITE PLAN REVIEW IN WHICH THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE WILL REVIEW EVERY STANDARD TYPICALLY APPLIED WITHIN P PLATING AN SITE PLAN IS THERE -- THIS SAY NOTIFICATION MAP INDICATING THAT WE SENT OUT PROPERTY SENT OUT NOTIFICATION LETTERS OF THIS REZONE REQUEST TO EVERYONE WITHIN A 200 FOOT BUFFER AND WE RECEIVED ZERO IN FAVOR. AND ZERO IN ON SIXINGTS I WATCHED TO SAY THAT WITH THIS WE TOOK A LOOK AT THIS AS FAR AS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FUTURE LAINGT LAND USE PLAN MAP AND IT DIDN'T MENTION THAT THIS AREA SHOULD BE RESERVED FOR MOBILE HOME DISTRICT. WE FOUND THAT ONCE AGAIN IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND AND REVIEWED PURSUANT TO SECTION 1414 OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND STAFF IS RECOMMEND AGO APPROVAL.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> SO YOU CAN'T PUT A MANUFACTURED HOME IN A AO
AREA? >> CORRECT. YOU CAN PUT A MODULAR HOME WITHIN A MOST RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. BUT THERE ARE CERTAIN
STIPULATION FORCE THAT. >> WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES IN THAT DEF SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN
A MOBILE HOME AND MODULAR H HOME. >>> MODULAR HOME HAS A STAMP OF APPROVAL FROM AN ENG ENGINEERING SAYING THAT THIS BULLING MEETS ALL INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODES OR BUILDING CODES. IT ALSO HAS A STAMP FROM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND STANDARDS ON THE PLAN. AND IT WILL HAVE A DECALL ON
THE SIDE OF THE HOUSE AS WELL. >> WHAT THEIR INTENTIONS FOR THIS THIS IS ACCESSORY TO THE
CURRENT RESIDENTIAL USE THERE. >> AND THAT IS CURRENTLY NOT
>> WHAT ABOUT THE 20 ACRE EXEMPTION. >> CORRECT.
>> WOW. >> I MIGHT ADD THAT THE MOST IMPORTANT THICK TO REMEMBER IS THAT A MOBILE HOME NOR A MANUFACTURED HOME MEETS ANY NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED BUILDING CODES. NOT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE.
STANDARD BUILDING CODE. UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. NONE EVER THEM.
IT DOES NOT MEET ANY OF THOSE DIFFERENT CODES. AS A RESULT CITIES ARE ALLOWED TO TREAT THEM DIFFERENTLY THAN OTHER SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. AND SO IN ABILENE MOBILE AND MANUFACTURED HOMES ARE AWE LOD ONLY WITHIN THE MH ZONING DISTRICT BECAUSE AGAIN THEY DON'T MEET ANY OF THE NAT NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED BUILDING CODES.
>> WE GO BY INTERNATIONAL NOW INTERNATIONAL BUILDING OR INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL SO
. . . >> ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR NICK? THANK YOU. I'LL OPEN PUBLIC HEARING WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS
CASE? >> I'M DWAYNE BLAIR THE LANDOWNER. AS YOU ALL NOTICED THAT'S PRETTYTY RIDICULOUS THAT YOU CANNOT HAVE A MOBILE HOME WHEN YOU HAVE 58 ACRES OF LAND. I HAVE TWO PAR SEVLZ LAND.
ONE IS FIVE ACRES AND ONE IS 53 AIRKZ. YOU'RE ALLOWED A DWELLING IN AO ON EACH PAR SELF LAND. BUT A MOBILE HOME IT NOT CONSIDERING A DWELLING
[00:50:03]
ACCORDING CITY STANDARDS. AND THE HOMES DO HAVE A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL INSPECTION AND ALL THAT FOR BEING CONSTRUCTED. IT IS ON THE OUTSIDE EVER THEHOME. >> YES, IT IS A METAL STAMP THAT INDICATES IT MEETS HUD
CODES FOR A MANUFACTURED HOME. >> YES, YES, SIR. YOU'RE CORRECT.
THAT IS EXACTLY RIGHT. SO IT IS A MANUFACTURED HOME SO I PLAN ON PUTTING ONE HOME ON MY LAND FOR MY ELDERLY PARENTS THAT I'M MOVING HERE FROM SAN BERNINO HOPEFULLY BY NEVER IF I CAN GET EVERYTHING APPROVED. SO BECAUSE OF THAT I HAD TO
SUBMIT THIS SDOPING REQUEST. AND PAY THE FEE. >> MR. PLAYER I'LL APOLOGIZE I CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND YOUR DISSATISFACTION THERE. AND I WOULD NOT HAVE EXPECTED THAT EITHER. BUT THAT -- THE WAY BRAD HAS EXPLAINED IT IS CORRECT AND
WE'RE CAUGHT IN BETWEEN WE'RE CAUGHT IN A GAP. >> YES, SIR IT'S A REQUI
REQUIREMENT. >> YES, SIR. >> I WANTED TO EXPLAIN I'M JUST PUTTING ONE HOME. THERE ANYTHING BEYOND THAT WOULD HAVE TO GO TO THE
PLANNING AND ALL OF THAT. >> SURE. >> SO THAT'S AIL PLAN ON
PUTTING OUT THERE. >> WE APPRECIATE YOU WORKING WITH US.
>> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU.
>> ANYBODY ELSE? >> I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
SOMEBODY MAKE A MOTION PLEASE. >> I'LL MOTION TO APPROVE. >> I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE IN VIOLATION WITH THIS WITHOUT KNOWING I'LL SECOND SGL MOTION AND SECOND.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION TO APP APPROVE. MR. BAR NET SGL YES.
>> MR. BINHAM. >> YES MISS RUSTLE YVRJTS HE. >> MR. NOON YN AN.
>>> YES. >> REVEREND. >>> YES.
>> AND MISS VRNL YES. >> MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIES. >> Z 2021-27 REPORT REQUEST FROM KPLBLLC AGENT JACOB MARTIN TO REZONE FROM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY
DISTRICT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. >> GOOD AFTERNOON CHERYL SAWYERS PLANNING SERVICE MANAGER CASE Z 2021-27 OWNER IS CALL PAUL CONSTRUCTION AND RESPECTRESPECTED BY JACOB AND MARTIN LLC REQUEST TO RESDOB FROM MEDIUM DENSITY TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOCATION 1826 COLONY HILL ROAD AND STAFF SENT OUT INFORMATIONS TO EVERYONE WITHIN THE 200 FOOT BUFFER AREA ONE IN FAVOR AND ZERO IN OPPOSITION.
THIS IS A LOCATION MAP AS YOU CAN SEE COLONY HILL IS TO THE SOUTH.
MAPLE IS TO THE BEST. THIS IS THE ZONING MAP THE PROPERTY BORDERS FUTURE ARTERIAL ROAD AND THEN ALSO IS IN VERY CLOSE PROXIMITY TO MAPLE STREET FUTURE AR EARIAL.
YOU. MAY REMEMBER REZONING THIS PROPERTY IN DECEMBER 2020 DECEMBER OF LAST YEAR. COUNSEL APPROVED REZONING FROM THE PROPERTY FOR PAT YES HOME TO MEDIUM DENSITY. PRIOR TO THE REZONE STAFF MET WITH THE APPLICANT AND DISCUSSED A PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF THIS AREA IN ANOTHER PART OF YOU THAT HAD A MEDIUM DENSITY AND MELT WITH THE TWELVE ACRES BUT NOT FOUR UNITS PER LOT.
AT THAT TIME THE PLANNING DIRECTOR SAID THAT WOULD BE OKAY TO APPLY TO THIS PROPERTY AND SINCE THEN THE APPLICANT HAS COME BACK AND ASKED DURING THE SITE PLAN POSSIBLE SITE PLAN PROCESS IS FAT WAS STILL THE RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF. IT IS NOT.
THE CURRENT RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF. AND IT WAS DETERMINES THAT THE PLANNING DIRECTOR AT THE TIME DID NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO INTERPRET MEDIUM DENSITY IN
THAT WEIGHTY. >> SO STAFF RECOMMENDED A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO COME UP WITH THE PRODUCT I'LL SHOW YOU NEW A MINUTE THAT SHOWS ALL OF THE TWELVE UNITS PER ACRE ON ONE SINGLE LOT WHICH VERY MUCH MIRRORS SOME TYPE OF MIDWAY BETWEEN A MEDIUM DENSITY PRODUCT THAT YOU'RE NORMALLY USED TO SEEING AND A MULTI-FAMILY.
HOWEVER, THE MULTI-FAMILY DENSITY AND INTENSITY WAS NOT SOMETHING THAT THE APPLICANT WAS LOOKING FOR. SO, THIS IS HOW WE'VE COME UP WITH THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AS YOU CAN SEE ON GRAPHIC CONCEPT PLAN THAT ACCOMPANIED APPLICATION THERE'S NO MORE THAN TWELVE UNITS A ACRE BUT THEY'RE ALL SENT RI RALLY LOCATED ON ONE LOT.
THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR THIS OF DEVELOPMENT EXCEPT IN MULTI-FAMILY. AFTER REVIEWING THE CASE STAFF DETERMINED THAT THE BASE ZONING OF MULTI-FAMILY WOULD BE A BETTER FIT FOR CHARACTERISTICS OF THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
BUT KEEP THE MEDIUM DENSITY DENSITY AND HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS.
[00:55:05]
SO APPLICATION WAS FOR MEDIUM DENSITY BASE HOWEVER STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THEY CHANGE THE MEDIUM DENSITY BASE TO THE MULTI-FAMILY BASE TO ALLOW FOR WHAT YOU SEE HERE.ONE SINGLE LOT WITH ONE SINGLE OWNERSHIP AND IT HAS SOLID WASTE RESTEP TECHALS MEANT FOR THE ENTIRE GROUP AND LOTS OF PARKING TO ACCOMMODATE FOR THIS TYPE OF UNITS.
HOUCH IT'S GOING TO KEEP TWELVE UNITS PER ACRE AND THEN ALSO IT CANNOT BE USED LIKE IN A MULTI FAMILY HEIGHT REQUIREMENT OF 35 FEET. PERMITTED USES AND MEDIUM DENSITY ARE LOCATED ON THIS SLIDE AND IN MULTI-FAMILY. AND AS YOU CAN TELL THERE'S ONLY ONE MORE ALLOWABLE USE MY RIGHT IN MULTI-FAMILY THAN DIFFERENCES YOU WOULD NORMALLY SEE IN MULTI-FAMILY AND MEDIUM DENSITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
AS FAR AS USE GOES THERE'S ONLY ONE MORE USE IN MULTIMULTI-FAMILY DENSITY.
HERE ARE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY VIEWS AND ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY.
THERE'S AN EAGLE VIEW OF KIND OF THE -- HOW THE PROPERTIES ARE LAID OUT ON YOUR TOP RIGHT-HAND CORNER AND THEN ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT-HAND CORNER YOU CAN SEE THAT IT IS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM WHILELY EAST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
>> THIS IS NOTIFICATION MAP. 51 IN FAVOR AND ZERO OPPOSITION.
STAFF REVIEWED THIS REQUEST PURSUANT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP AND SECTION 1414 OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WITH THE CHANGE FROM BASED DENSITY MEDIUM DENSITY TO MULTI-FAMILY ONLY TO ALLOW TWELVE UNITS PER ACRE AND HEIGHT LIMIT OF 35 FEET AND TYPE A LAND USE BUFFER DEPICTED IN THE GRAPHIC COMMENT PLAN. THIS CHANGE BETTER ENCOMPASSES PLANNED USE.
I WOULD BE HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE AT THIS TIME.
>> ANY QUESTIONS FOR CHERYL. >> WHY ISN'T A PPD USED IN THIS RATHER THAN MODIF
MODIFICATIONS. >> THIS IS A PD. >> IT IS I'M SORRY.
>> YES. >> THIS IS THE ONLY REASON WE CAN MAKE THE MODIFICATIONS
YEAH. >> THAT'S WHAT I WAS A LITTLE CONFUSED ABOUT THANK YOU.
SO ARE WE CAUGHT IN THIS FOUR UNITS AND TWELVE UNITS PER ACRE.
>> SO FOUR UNITS PER LOT IS WHAT HAPPENS IN MEDIUM DEN DENSITY.
IT'S STILL TWELVE UNITS A E ERIC. THERE'S ANOTHER PD IN TOWN THAT HAS VERY LOOSE INTERPRETATION OF THIS. SO IT STILL MEETS UNIT PER
ERIC BUT NOT FOUR UNITS PER LOT. >> I'M TALKING ABOUT MD ISN'T
THERE LOT SIZE IN MD. >>> MINIMUM LOT SIZE IS 6,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT 60 BY 100.
>> ALL RIGHT. YOU SAID THEY COULDN'T MEET THAT.
>>> DESIRE OF APPLICANT WAS NOT TO PLAT OFF INDIVIDUAL LOTS AND MAKE BUT WHAT WOULD BE A TOWN HOME STYLE WHERE INDIVIDUAL LOTS FOR EACH AND EVERY SINGLE UNIT AND MORE OF MULTI-FAMILY AND DENSITY THING KEEPS IT FROM BEING MULTI-FAMILY ZONING DENSITY PER ACRE. MULTI-FAMILY DENSITY ARE ALLOWED.
AND UNITS PER ACRE AND NUMBER OF UNITS A LOT ARE WHAT KEEP MEDIUM DENSITY TO DUPLEX,
QUARTER PLEXS AND ET CETERA. >> THANK YOU.
>> NOR LISH TO ADDRESS THE CASE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MARTIN FOR THE DEVELOPER CHERYL SUMMARIZE TODAY. STORIED HISTORY THROUGH ZONING SIX TIMES IN THE LAST THREE YEARS WHAT IT FEELS LIKE. IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED MD.
DEVELOPER HAS MET WE MET WITH STAFF A YEAR AND A HALF AGO MAYBE TWO YEARS AGO AND TO GET THEIR INTERPRETATION ON SIMILAR PROJECT ELSEWHERE IN TOWN AS SHE MENTIONED TO DO THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT. IT'S ESSENTIALLY SINGLE FAMILY APARTMENTS.
HE DOESN'T INTEND TO SELL OFF INDIVIDUAL UNITS. AND WE WOULD ALL BE UNDER ONE OWNERSHIP COMMON AREAS NONE OF THAT IS PUBLIC NO PUBLIC INSFRA STRUCTURE OTHER THAN WATER LINES SEWER LINES STAFF RECOMMENDATION AT THE TIME WAS TO KEEP IT ND THAT WOULD ALLOW -- WE WOULD BE ALLOWED TO DO THAT. OUBIOUSLY SINCE THEN THAT HAS CHANGED AND THAT INTERPRETATION CHANGED. AND I TALKED TO CHERYL WE SPOKE THIS MORNING ABOUT THEIR RECOMMENDATION TO CHANGE IT FROM BASE ZONING MD.
[01:00:01]
MY CLIENT IS FINE SWAICHING IT BASE ZONING AND OBVIOUSLY WE THOUGHT MD WAS MORE CORN SE SERVETIVE. BUT IF YOU ALL CITY COUNCIL FEEL EMF IS APPROPRIATE WE'RE WILLING TO ALONG WITH THAT WITH THE RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF.IN ADDITION ELSE I CAN ANSWER THAT. >> THANK YOU.
>> ANYONE ELSE? >> ANYONE ELSE?
>> MY NAME IS JOE LI Y LINE WITH WHILELY I DON'T NECESSARILY THINK THAT THAT IS A BAD SITUATION TO HAVE AND SOME HOUSING MY CONCERN IS TRAFFIC CERTAIN TIMES A SOMEDAY TWO TIMES AND IT'S FOR THOSE FOLKS MORE THAN ANY ANYTHING.
IF YOU WERE TO GO FROM 7:308 THAT IS A REALLY BUSY ROAD AND THEN FROM 2:45 TO 3:45 BECAUSE OF JUNIOR HIGH I THINK THAT'S A CONCERN THAT ANYBODY HASEN BEEN OUT THERE DURING THOSE
TIMES WILL TELL YOU THAT'S REALLY A LOT OF CON JUST JOHN. >> HOPEFULLY CONNIE HILL GOES OUT THERE IS A LOT OF TRAVTION ON IT AND IF YOU'RE LEVERING THERE GOING TO WORK BETWEEN 7:30 AND THAT'S A WHAT'S TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS A LOT OF FOLKS GOING TO WORK.
AND THAT'S THE ONLY THING I WOULD SAY I KNOW THEY'VE DONE A LOT OF WORK.
BUT THAT WOULD BE A KEVRNLT. >> THANK YOU ALL APPRECIATE IT.
>> SURE. >> JOEY IS NOT WRONG THAT WILL BE A LOT OF UNITS COMING OUT AT ONE PLACE CONNIE HILL ROAD. UNFOR NATALIE WE DID APPROACH WITH OWNER TO THE NORTH TO TRY TO MAKE ANY KIND OF SECOND CONNECTION CERTAINLY WOULD HELP HIS DEVELOPMENT AS WELL.
AS WELL AS I THINK IT WOULD HELP ADJACENT DEVELOPMENTS TO HELP CIRCULATION.
THERE WAS NO TRACTION WITH THOSE KNKSZ. SO THIS IS BEST USE OF LAND
BASED ON CURRENT OWNER. >> THANKS. >> SURE.
>> ANYONE ELSE WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR MOTION? THE PD WRITTEN IN HERE HAD MD RIGHT?
>>> THE PD YOU HAVE IS STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF PDMF BASE. >> IN OUR PACKET.
>> YES I DIDN'T -- I DID NOT PERSONALLY WRITE THE MD ONE BECAUSE OF BECAUSE IT WAS NOT
STAFF RECOMMENDATION. >> NOT ANYTHING. >> SEPARATE CONDITION YEAH.
>> OKAY. >> I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PD AS RECOMMENDED
BY STAFF. >> WITH PD CONDITIONS. >> WITH PD CONDITIONS.
>> SECOND. >> MOTION AND SECOND. SGL.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.
MR. BAR NET. >> YES. >> MR. BEN HAM.
>>> YES. >> MR. NOONAN SGLEVRJTS REVEREND LANG FORD.
YES. >> MISS FLEMMING. >>> YES.
>> MR. RONS BAUM. YES. >> MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIES.
>> I BELIEVE THAT'S IT THANK YOU EVERYBODY FOR COMING UP AND WE'RE ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.