Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:12]

>>WE THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE OUR COUNTRY AND NEIGHBORS.

WE ASK THAT YOU GIVE US WISDOM AND GUIDANCE AND BE RESILIENT. AND THE WITH ALL THE DIFFERENT CITY OFFICIALS. WE WANT TO ASK FOR SPECIAL PRAYER OVER THE POTENTIAL INCOMING WEATHER. AND WE ASK THAT YOU BE WITH OUR POLICE, OUR FIRST RESPONDERS, OUR FIREFIGHTERS, AS THEY HELP TO NAVIGATE AND PREPARE OUR CITY WORKERS AS THEY HELP WITH THE OVERPASSES AND JUST ALL OUR CITIZENS AS WE PAY ATTENTION AND BE SAFE AND PROTECT ONE ANOTHER THROUGH SMART DECISIONS. WE LET YOU WE PRAY AMEN.

COMMISSIONS WILL THAT WORK IS AS WARM THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH THE OFFICE NO LATER THAN 10 DAYS AND DISSIPATING ALL APPEALS MUST BE IN WRITING. THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO SPEAK ON THE ITEM OF DISCUSSION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AFTER RECEIVING BY THE CHAPTER THIS WISH TO BE HER CHILD PUTS THE PODIUM TO STATE YOUR NAME AND PURPOSE FOR THE HEARING.

EACH SPEAKER IS REQUIRED TO LIMIT THEIR PRESENTATION TO NO MORE THAN FIVE MINUTES.

THE DESCRIPTION OF THE CHAIR AND OUR FIRST AND WITH BUSINESS HAD A CHANCE TO LOOK AT THOSE IN THE PACKET. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS.

[INDISCERNIBLE] >>I'LL MOVE TO ACCEPT THE AMENDMENTS.

>>ALL IN FAVOR? >>I. >>WE ARE APPROVED.

>>JARED PLATTS? >>GOOD AFTERNOON. >>WAIT A MINUTE, SORRY.

[MINUTES]

I NEED TO OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. GUYS, CAN WE BACKUP? IS IT OKAY FOR BACKUP?

>>YES. >>GO AHEAD AND SEE IF ANYONE HAS ANYTHING TO SAY.

WORKS OPEN FOR PUBLIC HEARING ANYTHING WE COULD SAY ABOUT THE MINUTES OF THE LAST HEARING?

[PLATS]

I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HERE AND OUR MOTION APPROVAL WILL STAND AS IT IS.

NOW, WE HAVE THE PLAQUES. >>GOOD AFTERNOON, MY NAME IS JOE SMITH AND ON WITH THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OFFICE. THERE ARE THREE PLOTS FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION THIS AFTERNOON FOR THE FIRST PLOT IS SALARY JUST STATES. THE FINAL PLAT CREATING 25 RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN THE NORTHWESTERN MOST EXTENT OF EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.

THE NEXT PLAT FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION IS THE GUIDANCE SUBDIVISION.

THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT IS TO COMMERCIALLY SUBPLOTS AT THE SOUTH CORNER OF GREAT STREET IN COLLINS AVENUE. AN FINAL PLAT FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION THIS AFTERNOON IS COLONY HILLS EDITION SECTION 1. THE FINAL PLAT CREATING ONE LOT, WHICH FOR WHAT WILL BE A MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT. ON THE NORTH SIDE OF COLONY HILL ROAD.

JUST NORTH OF WHITING EAST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. I'M SORRY.

THESE PLANTS WERE REVIEWED AS DEVELOPED IN THE REVIEW COMMITTEE AND FAMILY WERE CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 3 ARTICLE 2 OF OUR LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ARE THE SUBDIVISION STANDARDS. AND APPROVAL TO YOU ALL THIS AFTERNOON SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. PRIOR TO APPROVAL AND RECORDING OF THE SUBDIVISION PLAT SPIRIT CITY STAFF MUST BE FIRST WITH TITLE OPINIONS OR TITLE COMMITMENT LETTERS ESSENTIALLY OWNING OWNERSHIP OF THESE PROPERTIES IN ADDITIONALLY, CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OR DRAINAGE PLANS SUBMITTED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER.

AND ULTIMATELY ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBDIVISION PLATS MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE FINAL RECORDING OF THE SUBDIVISION PLATS.

I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE REGARDING THESE AT THIS TIME.

>>ANY QUESTIONS FOR JARED? THANK YOU JERRY. I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ABOUT ANY ONE OF THESE THREE PLOTS? SEEING NO ONE. I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IT WE HAVE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR MOTION? >>NO MOTION TO APPROVE.

>>MOTION TO APPROVE. >>I SECOND. >>I SECOND.

>>WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PLAT. MR. DENHAM?

>>MR. NUNEZ? >>MS. FLEMING? >>AND MR. ROMAN BOMB?

[ZONING]

>>YES. >>AND THE MOTION TO APPROVE CARRIES.

>>ZONING CASE Z 22Ä3, REQUEST TO COLLECT UNDER PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS HERRMANN SLANEY TO CHANGE THE DESIGN FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO RESONATE IN THE

DISTRICT IN THE ÃTHIS DISTRICT. >>ONCE AGAIN, MY NAME IS JERRY SENT. PLAT DEVELOPING SERVICES. OF PRESENTING Z 22Ä3.

THE APPLICANT ARE ALL COLLECTIVE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTIES IN THE AIRMAN'S LANDING SUBDIVISION BUT REPRESENTED BY JACOB MARTIAN. REQUEST FOR PLANNED ADULT

[00:05:05]

DEVELOPMENT DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. ESSENTIALLY THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST IS THE ONE OF THE APPLICANTS WOULD LIKE TO CONSTRUCT A TRIPLEX WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION, WHICH WILL NOT BE PERMITTED BY THE RIGHT GIVEN THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CURRENT PD DISTRICT. IMPLICATIONS 18.2 ACRES OF THE SAMUEL REICHERT SURVEY 45 TO INCLUDE ALL SUBDIVISIONS KNOWN AS AIRMAN'S LANDING. APPLICATION LETTERS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THIS SUBDIVISION.

AND WE DID RECEIVE ZERO THIS IS ACTUALLY INCORRECT AS OF RECENTLY JUST AS WE DID CREATE ONE RESPONSE IN FAVOR IN ZERO AND OPPOSITION. HIS AN AERIAL IMAGE LOCATION MAP SHOWING THE EXTENT OF THE REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE. AS YOU CAN SEE, IT EMBRACES ALL SUBDIVISIONS THAT ARE CURRENTLY KNOWN AS AIRMAN'S LANDING. , CURRENT ZONING SHOWN TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES FOLLOW THE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND IS A MIXTURE OF ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS WITHIN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. INCLUDE MULTIFAMILY SOME COMMERCIAL ZONING ALONG THE BRIGHT BOULEVARD AND THEN THERE IS SINGLE-FAMILY PATIO HOMES IN NAMELY TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBDIVISION. AS WELL AS AO TO THE EAST.

FLOOD MAP SHOWING THE EXTENT OF THE FLOODPLAINS AND IS IN THE AREA.

THIS IS ACTUALLY AS ADOPTED. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES HAVE A LONGER LETTER ON FILE.

A LETTER OF MAP REVISION FOR FEMA. SO, SIGNIFICANT PORTIONS OF THESE LOTS ACTUALLY HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THE FLOODPLAIN AND SINCE THE CURRENT DATA OF WHAT WE HAVE TO ILLUSTRATE FLOODPLAINS IN THIS AREA. HERE'S A PRIESTS SLIDE SHOWING THAT WE ALLOWED INSIDE THE MD ZONING CLASSIFICATION. IT WAS TO BE APPROVED.

A FEW PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS WELL AS SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.

THE NUMBER TWO TOP HALF DENTIST PHOTOS WERE ACTUALLY PHOTOS OF EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS TODAY AND THEN THE AUTOMOTIVE'S BOTTOM LEFT-HAND PHOTOS ACTUALLY A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE APARTMENT BUILDINGS.O THE WEST AND THE BOTTOM RIGHT-HAND PHOTO IS A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE TO THE NORTH. NOTIFICATION MAP SHOWING THE EXTENT OF THE FOOT NOTIFICATION BUFFER. ONCE AGAIN, THE CITY STAFF DID SEND OUT NOTIFICATION LETTERS TO ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTIES IN THIS 200 FOOT IMPLICATION AREA.

AND WE DID RECEIVE ONE IN FAVOR, AS INDICATED ON THIS MAP.

ON THE GREEN DOT. >>>STAFF DID FIND THIS REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPANY TO PLAN AND FUTURE LAND USE IN DEVELOPING PLANE. IT WAS REVIEWED IN SECTION 4.14 AND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. WHICH IS A CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL AND CITY STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO YOU TODAY. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY

QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE AT THIS TIME. >>SO, I GOT A LITTLE LOST AND A LITTLE BIT OF THE STUFF THAT WAS IN THE PACKET. SO, I THINK SIMPLY THIS IS ÃÃ THIS PROPERTY WAS IN THE PEE DEE AND WE ARE PULLING IT OUT OF THE PEE DEE AND MAKING IN

THE MEDIUM DENSITY SECTION? IS THAT CORRECT? >>THAT IS CORRECT.

SO, THIS EXCESS THE ENTIRE SUBDIVISION FALLS WITHIN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.

REALLY ONLY PERMITS, ZONING. DUE TO OVERSIGHT THE PREVIOUS STAFF IN THE ADMINISTRATION PLANNING THAT EFFECTIVELY, WITH THEIR TODAY HEART DUPLEXES. SO, THEY ARE ACTUALLY IN VIOLATION OF THE ZONING DISTRICT. THIS IS ACTUALLY OUR BEST CASE SCENARIO TO CORRECT SOMETHING THAT WAS DONE INCORRECTLY IN THE PAST.

ALSO, WHILE ALLOWING THEM TO DO WHAT THEY WANT TO DO WITH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BY ALLOWING TRIPLEX. WHICH WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE CURRENT PD DISTRICT.

>>AND ME, SO AGAIN, IT'S NOT STAYING IN THE PEE DEE. THE ACTUAL BALANCE OF THE PD

HAS CHANGED? >>NO. THE BALANCE OF PD AND THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE ORDINANCE IS A COPY AND PASTE OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FROM THE INITIAL PD

DISTRICT. >>AND THEN INSIDE THAT PD, WE SAID THIS DESIGNATED AREA IS THE MD PERIOD? WE DIDN'T CHANGE THE WHOLE OVERLAY WITH THE WHOLE PD IS

INDEED? >>THE ENTIRE PD IS EFFECTIVELY BEING VACATED AND REPLACED WITH AN MD ZONING DISTRICT. THERE WILL BE NO PD FOLLOWING THIS REZONING REQUEST.

>>THE PEE DEE WAS ONLY FOR THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT?

>>AND EVERYTHING THAT IS CROSSHATCHED IN THIS PATIENT HAS LEFT.

>>OKAY. I WAS IN THERE TIME TO TIME AND STUFF TO THE LEFT AND I SAW

TIME TO THE LEFT. >>EVERYTHING YOU SEE THAT'S CROSSHATCHED IS THE EXTENT OF

THAT PLAN DEVELOPED DISTRICT. >>THAT'S MY CONFUSION. I WAS TRYING TO TIE THE STUFF

ON THE LEFT. >>OKAY. >>ALL RIGHT.

>>ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR JERRY? >>ARE THEY REQUIRED TO SUPPLY THAT LETTER TO THE CITY ON THE ADJUSTMENTS ON THE FEMA MAPS BEFORE THIS GOES THROUGH?

>>WE ACTUALLY HAVE TESTED AND DID NOT EVEN INCLUDE THAT LONGER LETTER, BUT WE HAVE THAT LETTER OF MAP REVISION AND HOW IT AFFECTED THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES.

[00:10:03]

AND WE'VE BEEN ISSUING PERMITS FOR THESE LOTS BASED OFF OF THAT ONE THAT WE RECEIVED.

>>OKAY. >>ANYTHING ELSE FOR JARED? THANK YOU JERRY.>THANK YOU.

>>OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO COME SPEAK TO THIS?

>>CLAYTON AND JACOB MARTIN. AGENT ESTES [INDISCERNIBLE] SO AS I MENTIONED, THIS IS PROBABLY THE BEST WAY TO PUT IS CLEANING UP THE ORIGINAL ZONING. THIS ZONING IS PROBABLY THE FIRST ITERATION OF TRYING TO SPLIT DUPLEXES DOWN THE MIDDLE OF PROPERTY LINES. WE STARTED OFF DOING THE PEE DEE BASED ZONE TOWNHOME AND ULTIMATELY USING THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS.

GOING THROUGH DIFFERENT WAYS TO ATTACK THAT PROBLEM. SINCE THERE'S NOT WILL GREATLY DO THAT IN THE ZONING DISTRICTS. BUT, HAVING SAID THAT OVER TIME, IT'S ESSENTIALLY DEVELOPED IN THE STANDARD DUPLEXES THERE.HEY'RE NOT SPLIT DOWN THE PROPERTY. AND MY CLIENT WANTS TO BE ABLE TO BULLY TRIPLEX, WHICH IS NOT ALLOWED IN THE TOWNHOME THE WAY TOWNHOMES ARE WRITTEN. SO, THIS IS JUST TRYING TO RECTIFY THE PROBLEM THIS CREATED A COUPLE YEARS AGO AND ALSO EVERYTHING UP IN THE PROCESS. THAT'S ALL I HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR ME?

>>ANY QUESTIONS? >>NO, THANKS CLAYTON. I APPRECIATE IT.

>>ANYBODY ELSE LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE? >>I AM SAYING NOBODY.

I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF THERE'S ANY FURTHER

DISCUSSION, DO WE HAVE A MOTION? >>I WILL MOVE TO APPROVE.

>>MOTION TO APPROVE. >>THANK YOU. >>OKAY, GOOD.

>>I SECOND. >>MR. BENHAM? >>MR. NUNO?

>>MR. FLEMING AND MR. ROSENBAUM? >>MOTION CARRIES.

>>YES. >>THAT WAS PRETTY QUICK. I'M GLAD EVERYBODY SHOWED UP.

THE BOARD AND THANK YOU ALL FOR COMING AND WE ARE ADJOURNED.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.