Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[CALL TO ORDER ]

[00:00:10]

>> MAY 4, 2,022 ABILENE BOARD OF BUILDING STANDARDS, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK TODAY WILL SIGN IN AT THE DOOR, IF YOU HAVE NOT

[MINUTES ]

DONE SO PLEASE DO SO AT THIS TIME WHILE WE COMPLETE ROLE IN OUR DUTIES. FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 6 MEETING, AT THIS TIME I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THAT.

PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. SEEING NO ONE I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR ARE THERE ANY

ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS,. >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I WOULD LIKE TO BRING TO INATTENTION, THAT IT APPEARS OUR MINUTES DO RECORD ALL OF THE FINDINGS AND ANNOTATIONS OF WHAT WE WERE RESPONDING WITH. I SEEK NOT MUCH DETAIL AND DISCUSSIONS, AND I JUST WANT TO BE SURE FOR THE RECORD, IF OUR AUDIO AND VIDEO RECORDINGS SUFFICE, FOR THIS KIND OF

DOCUMENT? >> YES THIS IS FINE, WE DO NOT HAVE TO PUT EVERY WORD THAT IS SPOKEN IN THE MINUTES.

IF IT SPEAKS AND IT IS A SUMMARY, AND THEN WE DO HAVE TO ADMIT THE COATINGS ARE AVAILABLE AS WELL.

>> I JUST WANT TO RAISE A QUESTION BECAUSE I FELT LIKE WE HAD MANY PLACES OF DISCUSSION, THAT COULD BE PERTINENT TO THE

DIALOGUE. >> IF THERE IS EVER ANYONE THAT SPEAKS THAT YOU BELIEVE SPOKE, AND THAT WAS NOT LISTED, PLEASE BRING THAT UP, AND YOU MAKE A MOTION TO AMEND, AND INCLUDE THAT, AND WE GET EVEN POSTPONE THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES AND WE CAN CHECK ON SOMETHING LIKE THAT IF THERE'S EVER SOMETHING SOMETHING THAT YOU THINK WAS LEFT OUT.

>> OKAY THANK YOU. >> ALL RIGHT, IF THERE IS ANY

MORE DISCUSSION. >> I HAVE ONE ADDITION, MR. MORRIS NAME IS OMITTED FROM THE STAFF PRESENT.

I DON'T KNOW HOW DETAILED THAT PROBLEM MIGHT CAUSE.

BUT HE OBVIOUSLY WAS HERE. SO I THINK WE NEED TO ADD HIS

NAME FOR THIS. >> I MOVE THE MOTION FOR THE MINUTES TO BE ACCEPTED AS CORRECTED.

>> A MOTION. >> I WAS SECOND, A SECOND BY MRE APPROVED AS CORRECTED. ROLL CALL PLEASE.

>> AS A STATEMENT OF POLICY IS SET WERE SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE, THE BUILDING MUST BE SECURED AND A LOT CLEANED BY THE MOMENT WITHIN TEN DAYS OF RECEIVING OF THE NOTICE OF THE RESULTS OF THIS HEARING. IF THIS IS NOT DONE, THE CITY MAY DO SO AND BUILD THE OWNER. IN ANY CASE WHERE THE BOARD ORDERS THE OWNER TO DEMOLISH A STRUCTURE OR STRUCTURES, BUT THE OWNER FAILS TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE BOARD'S ORDER, THE CITY OR, IF THAT OWNER FAILS TO DO SO WILL APPEAL TO BOTH OWNERS, THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. ANY APPEAL MUST BE FILED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE AGGRIEVED PARTY RECEIVES NOTICE OF THE BOARD'S DECISION.

AT THAT HEARING, YOU SHOULD BE PREPARED TO PRESENT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. SPECIFIC TIMEFRAME NEEDED TO COMPLETE REPAIRS, SPECIFIC SCOPE OF A PAIR OF WORK TO BE COMPLETED. AND COST ESTIMATES FOR THE WORK TO BE DONE BY LICENSED BONDED CONTRACTORS, SUCH AS ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, OR HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING CONTRACTORS.

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT YOU AT THE HEARING. THE RIGHT TO INSPECT THE FILE ON THE PROPERTY AT THE OFFICE OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRIOR TO THE HEARING. AND THE RIGHT TO REQUEST THE PRESENCE OF CITY STAFF FOR THE PURPOSE OF QUESTIONING AT THE

[00:05:01]

HEARING. WITH THAT BEING SAID, IS THERE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TODAY? TO ANY CASE PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND? SEEING NO ONE, I GUESS WE ARE

[A. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case No. 20-000431: 1326 Burger St. (CRESCENT HEIGHTS, BLOCK A, LOT 4, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Marshall, Robert Ondra ]

READY FOR THE FIRST CASE MR. MORRIS.

>> GOOD MORNING, JOSH MORRIS AND TODAY WE HAD A HAVE A TOTAL OF FOUR CASES ON THE AGENDA. THIS IS OUR PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS SENT OUT FOR TODAY'S MEETING.

THE FIRST CASE ON THE AGENDA IS CASE NUMBER 20 -- 000431 LOCATED AT 1326 BERGER STREET. FOR THE RECORD IT SHOWS THE ACCOUNTING RECORDS OF WARRANTY DEED MEMBER ROBERT ANDRA MARSHALL AS AN OWNER, TAYLOR COUNTY SHOWS ROBERT ANDRA MARSHALL TO BE THE OWNER. SECRETARY OF STATE SAYS NO ENTITY UNDER THE NAME. TAX RECORDS OF THEM AS PALADINO NOT APPLICABLE. UTILITY RECORDS OF THEM IS A PALADINO SHOW THE INACTIVITY SINCE THE APRIL OF 2018.

AND SHOWS ROBERT ANDRE MARSHALL TO BE THE OWNER.

THIS IS A PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE FOR TODAY'S HEARING. THIS IS THE FRONT EAST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. THE REAR WEST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE, THE NORTH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE, AND THE SELL SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. THESE OTHER SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS IDENTIFIED ON THE STRUCTURE.

AND AT THE SANITATION NUISANCE, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING, HAZARDOUS PLUMBING, AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.

THIS WAS AN ADEQUATE SANITATION VIOLATION AS YOU CAN SEE THE TOP TWO PICTURES, THERE IS NO MAINTENANCE OF PROPER FACILITIES, THE BOTTOM PHOTOS THE BOTTOM RIGHT, YOU SEE SOME FECAL MATTER, FROM RODENTS AND THEN ON THE BOTTOM LEFT, THERE ARE SYRINGES AND POSSIBLY SIGNS OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA AND DRUG ACTIVITY. NUISANCE CHAPTER 19 VIOLATION, DILAPIDATION OF INTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURE, WE HAVE SEVERAL AREAS WHERE THEY IS HOLES IN THE ROOF HAS COLLAPSED.

HAZARD ELECTRIC IS -- HAZARD ELECTRICAL WIRES, LOOSE WIRES THAT ARE HANGING THAT ARE EXPOSED.

HAZARDOUS PLUMBING EXPOSED PLUMBING UNTAPPED PIPES, ON THE LEFT AND ON THE RIGHT YOU HAVE AN EXPOSED AREA WHERE IT APPEARS TO BE THE DRAIN TO THE BATHROOM SINK.

FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION, AS YOU CAN SEE THERE IS DAYLIGHT COMING THROUGH THE SIDE THAT PHOTO IS IN THE LIVING ROOM.

AND ON THE LEFT IS WHERE THE STRUCTURE FIRE HAD OCCURRED TO AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO THE HOME, AND IT LEFT A LITTLE BIT OF EXPOSURE THERE. SO THIS WAS BROUGHT TO THE BOARD BEFORE, BUT THE STRUCTURE FIRE OCCURRED IN JULY OF 2018.

IN IN DECEMBER OF 2018 DAY CASE WAS A DILAPIDATED STRUCTURE, AND FEBRUARY 2020, THE PROPERTY WAS MOVE TO THE CONDEMNATION PROGRAMMED BY A LACK OF PROGRESS WITH THE OWNER.

SKIP UP TO SEPTEMBER 2020, WE MAY CONTACT WITH THE OWNER AND HE NEEDED TO SUBMIT A COURSE OF ACTION AND HE WOULD PRESENT THE CASE OF THE BOARD, HE SAID HE WAS NOT BE ABLE TO COMPLETE EVERYTHING IN 30 DAYS, APPARENTLY THERE IS A MISUNDERSTANDING IT WAS EXPLAINED IT DID NOT BE COMPLETED IN 30 DAYS SO WE EXPLAIN THE PLAN OF ACTION AND THE RECOVERY PROCESS TO HIM. ON OCTOBER OF 2020, AN INDIVIDUAL WHO STATED IS GOING TO HELP THE OWNER WITH THE PROJECT AT THE TIME AND IS SUBMIT THE POINT OF ACTION, AND EVERYTHING WAS US PLAINTIFF REGARDING THAT PART OF ACTION, AND IT WAS BUILDING A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION AS WELL AND IT WAS REMINDED THAT THE CONTRACTOR NEED TO BE BONDED WITH THE CITY. HE SAID HE PROMISE HE TURNED EVERYTHING IN THE PROPER FOLLOWING.

DECEMBER 2020 WE POSTED THE NOSE FOR JENNY 2021.

ALSO MET WITH THE OWNER AT THE PROPERTY.

HE DID ALLOW US TO ENTER THE STRUCTURE AND TAKE PHOTOS AT THE TIME. IN DECEMBER OF 2020, DECEMBER 17, 2020 WE HAD A PHONE CALL FROM THE INDIVIDUAL WHO STATED HE WAS GOING TO BE HELPING MR. MARSHALL WITH THE DEMOLITION. AND THAT HE WOULD COME IN AND PROVE A PERMIT. DO TO ACTION BEING TAKEN WE DID PRESENT THE CASE TO THE BOARD JANUARY 6, 2021, AND MMAY 13,

[00:10:02]

2021 WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE OFFICIAL IT DID ALLOW THE OWNER TO ATTEND A DEMOLITION WITH NO PERMIT FEES.

NOVEMBER 2021, THE PERMIT EXPIRED.

IN NOVEMBER 9 OF 2021, DUE TO THE IN ACTION BEING TAKEN AND WE STILL HAD NO CONTACT FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER.

ON NOVEMBER 15, 2021 RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE MARSHALL DIVISION SHOWING AT LEAST 37 CALLS TO THE RESIDENCE BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. AND AGAIN NO WORD FOR DEMOLITION HAD BEGUN. AS OF APRIL 14 OF 2022, WE DID OBSERVE THAT THE DEMOLITION OF THE STRUCTURE HAD REMAINED AND WAS UNFINISHED. AND SO ON THE 18TH WE MAILED A NOTICE FOR TODAY'S BOARD OF STANDARDS HEARING.

NOW AS YOU CAN SEE SINCE THE 14TH, AND THE PHOTO, THAT ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WAS REMOVED. AND THAT IS WHY IT THAT THE SITE OF THE HOME WAS EXPOSE THE WAY IT IS.

BECAUSE HE DID FINALLY DEMOLISH THE STRUCTURE THAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO DEMOLISH. THE REST OF IT STILL REMAINS IN THE COURT AND THE CONDITION IT STILL IS.

DUE TO THE TIMELINE AND THE ALLOTTED TIME THAT IS HAD TO COMPLETE EVERYTHING, THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO FIND THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND A HAZARD TO PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE AND REPAIR OF THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE. STAFF RECOMMENDS TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE CITY MAY

DEMOLISH. >> ANY QUESTION MR. MORRIS?

>> AND VIEWING THE PROPERTY THE OTHER DAY, THE DUMPSTER IS OUT THERE, SO OBVIOUSLY THERE IS BEEN SOME WORK.

BUT THE YARD WAS FULL OF VEHICLES AND EVERYTHING LIKE THAT, IT MAY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE QUESTION.

WHAT ARE THEY ACTIVELY DOING WORK OVER THERE? I AM SURE WITH A YARD FULL OF PICKLES, I LITERALLY COULD NOT

SEE THE HOUSE. >> SO, THE DUMPSTER WAS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY AT THE REQUEST OF THE OWNER TO CLEAN UP AND TO REMOVE THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. THE VEHICLES ARE A SEPARATE VIOLATION THAT IS GOOD CURRENTLY BEING WORKED BY THE CODE OFFICER

WORKING THAT AREA. >> OKAY THANK YOU.

>> YES, SIR. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF MR. MORRIS? THANK YOU MR. MORRIS.

AT THIS TIME I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 20 -- 000431. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. WOULD YOU PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT ANSWER. DO YOU SWEAR THE TESTIMONY ARE ABOUT TO GIVE TODAY IS A TRUTH THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT

THE TRUTH? >> YES, I DO.

>> THANK YOU. >> STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE

RECORD. >> ROBERT MARSHALL ON THE OWNER

OF THE PROPERTY. >> WHAT IS YOUR ADDRESS?

>> 13188 BURGER, 1326 BURGERS NEXT DOOR.

THE CARS AND QUESTION OUR CARS ARE BEING WORKED ON, THOSE CARS ARE IN 1318 AT 1326. THE CARS ART NEXT DOOR THEY ARE NOT ON THAT PROPERTY. IN THE HOUSE IS BEING DEMOLISHED YOU'VE GOT IT ALL UP IN THERE, FOR BEING OUTSIDE THE OTHER DAY, I SPOKE TO THE OFFICES A COUPLE OF TIMES ABOUT SOMEONE SO MY PICKUP I AM DISABLED, SO I COULDN'T AFFORD TO PAY SIMPLY TO HAUL IT. AND THEY HAD THE CONTAINER OVER, THE HOUSES HAD AN ELECTRICAL FIRE ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE.

AND AN ADDITIONAL AREA, IT IS NOT ALL ABOUT THE WATER OR ELECTRICITY, WATER ELECTRICITY IS ON THE BACK, THE HOUSE ON THE OTHER SIDE. THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH THE PHONE THE HOUSE IS SOLID. THEY WENT TO THE OTHER DAY WITH ME AND WE DID A WALK-THROUGH, AND HE SAID IT WAS IN THERE.

THE HOUSE IS NOT BAD, IT JUST NEEDS WORK, WHICH DUE TO COVID-19, IN VARIOUS REASONS, I'M TRYING TO GET A HOMEOWNER OUR FIRST HOUSE SO I CAN PAY FOR THE SECOND HOUSE OF JESSICA FOR A BANK TO TAKE THE DEED SO I CAN RETIRE IT.

IT'S ALL I CAN SAY ABOUT THE HOME.

[00:15:06]

IT IS BETTER THAN THE HOME I LIVE IN ACTUALLY.

SO I WILL NEED MORE TIME, AND IT WILL GET RESOLVED.

DOES THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?

>> SIR, THIS CASE HAS BEEN KNOWN TO THE BOARD SINCE 2018.

THAT WAS APPROXIMATELY FOUR YEARS AGO.

>> YES OR. >> AND WE HAVE NOT SEEN A GREAT DEAL OF ACTION IN THOSE FOUR YEARS.

WHAT IN WHAT WAY COULD YOU CONVINCE US THAT ANY ACTION WILL

OCCUR IN THE NEXT FOUR YEARS? >> WELL,.

THE HOUSE FROM THE REST OF THE HOUSE, BECAUSE I JUST COULDN'T HOLD IT ALL. I DIDN'T WANT TO PUSH IT OVER AND HAVE ALL THAT RUBBISH ADDED TO THE PROBLEM.

BY PUSHING IT DOWN AND CALLING IT OUT, IT HAS SLOWED DOWN A LOT. THERE WAS VANDALISM OF THE CAR EVANGELISM OF THE HOUSE. THERE'S A COUPLE NEIGHBORS OVER THERE THAT I SEEM DON'T SELECT PERSONALLY.

AND AS HE WAS CALL, AND HARASS. >> CAN YOU UNDERSTAND WHEN I VISIT THE PROPERTY AND TAKE A LOOK, AND THE YARD HAS A DUMPSTER IN FRONT OF IT THAT HAS BEEN THERE FOR QUITE A WHILE.

AND WE HAVE A VEHICLES THAT FILL THE YARD WHERE I CANNOT SEE THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE. AND WHERE YOU HAVE HAD THE NUMBER OF PHONE CALLS THAT YOU HAVE HAD, AND CLEAR DRUG PARAPHERNALIA THAT IS THERE. THERE'S NOT A QUESTION, AND ALL OF THE POLICE CALLS THAT HAVE OCCURRED OUT THERE CAN YOU UNDERSTAND WHY THE NEIGHBORS MIGHT BE A LITTLE BIT CONCERNED?

>> DRUG PARAPHERNALIA? THERE'S BEEN NO REPORT OF THAT?

>> THERE WAS A CLEAR PICTURE OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA THAT M

MR. MORROW JUST SHOWED US. >> I DID NOT SEE THAT PICTURE, YOU GOTTA REMEMBER A WHOLE MUST WALK THROUGH THAT AREA THEY GOING TO HOMES ALL THE TIME AND EVERYTHING ELSE.

>> THE LOWER LEFT-HAND CORNER. >> I HAVE NEVER SEEN THAT, THAT IS THE RESTROOM AREA IT LOOKS LIKE, BECAUSE I'M WORKING ON THE OUTSIDE WORKING ON ONE SIDE I DON'T HAVE NO HISTORY OF DRUGS.

I DON'T SELL DRUGS. THAT IS VAGRANTS.

THAT IS NOT ME. YOU CAN'T FIND THAT ANYWHERE.

>> MAY ASK A QUESTION? >> YES, SIR.

>> WHAT IS YOUR PLAN? WHAT DO YOU PLAN TO DO?

>> THE FIRST THING I PLAN TO DO IS FINISH WITH THAT WALL PUT UP GET IT SEALED OFF, I HAVE DOORS SITTING OUT THERE NOW THAT I CAN PUT ON THE FRONT AND THE BACK. AND TALK TO ELECTRICIAN BECAUSE THAT'S THE ONLY THING THAT HOUSE NEEDS IS ELECTRICITY.

>> WHEN YOU HAVE THAT PLAY INTO THE FIRST STEP DONE BY?

>> WITHIN TEN DAYS. >> THEN WHAT YOU PLAN TO DO?

>> THAT I WILL CONTACT ELECTRICIAN BECAUSE I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THE CITY TO THE ELECTRICAL BOX.

THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT.

>> WHEN YOU HAVE THAT PLAN TO HAVE THAT DONE BY?

>> AS SOON AS I GET THE WALL UP AND TALK TO ELECTRICIAN AND TALK TO THE CD TO SEE WHAT THE DEAL IS WITH THE BOX.

BECAUSE ELECTRICAL BOX THERE WAS NOT AN ELECTRICAL FIRE ANYTHING DUE TO THE HOUSES. SO, I WILL ASK THEM WHAT THE DEAL IS WITH THAT AND TO PUT THE BOX BACKS.

HE WENT IN THERE THE OTHER DAY AND WE DID A WALK-THROUGH I DIDN'T SEE NOTHING IN THE HOUSE WITH THAT YOU'RE SHOWING THE THE PICTURES. DID YOU RACE ANYTHING OF THAT? I DIDN'T SEE IT, LIKE I SAID I'M WORKING ON BOTH HOUSES, I'M JUST

[00:20:13]

MAKING SURE THE HOUSE IS SOLID. I WISH HE WAS SENT SOMETHING.

>> SO IS IT YOUR INTENT TO DEVOTE MORE OF YOUR TIME NOW ON

THIS HOUSE. >> YES, SIR.

>> OKAY. >> IS THE HOUSE THAT I LIVE IN I WILL PUT INSULATION IT AND ALL THAT STUFF.

I WILL REDO THE SHEET ROCK, ABOUT THE FLOORS IN IT.

IN THIS HOUSE IT WOULD TAKE. I PUT THE WALL UP THEN THE ELECTRICAL BOX BACK IN IT, THE HOUSE IS EMPTY.

IT SOLID. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?

FROM THE BOARD? >> THIS BOARD IS USUALLY WHAT WE ARE ABOUT, IS UNDERSTANDING THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS SAFE AND SECURE, FROM DILAPIDATED OR PROPERTIES THAT HAVE BEEN CONDEMNED. THEY DO NEED TO BE SECURE.

FROM THE OUTSIDE. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THE BOARD NEED YOU TO DO, IS ESTABLISH YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH MR. MORRIS, AND THEN A PLAN OF ACTION AND SOME TIMELINES FOR HIM TO LOOK OVER WITH YOU, AND TO HELP YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS WE HAVE GOT TO DO TO MAKE YOUR PROPERTY WHERE YOU CAN'T WORK ON IT AND YOU ARE NOT AFFECTING YOUR NEIGHBORS.

THAT IS KIND OF WHERE THIS IS ABOUT.

>> OKAY THE FENCE THAT SEPARATES MY HOUSE FROM 1318 AND 1326 WAS RUNS ALL THE WAY DOWN THE PROPERTY LINE, FROM 5026 AND MY NEIGHBOR ON THE OTHER SIDE WHICH TOTALS IN BOTH AREAS.

>> OKAY I THINK WHAT YOU ARE DESCRIBING YOU HAVE SOME PLAN THAT WE NEED THAT PLAN TO BE AN ACTION.

WE NEED IT IN WRITING. TO GET YOUR PROPERTY SECURE.

THEN, THAT PROPERTY IF IT IS CONTAINED IT WILL NOT NECESSARILY BE THE NUISANCE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND THEN IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU WANT TO HAVE SOME TIME TO WORK IT, AND WE ARE NOT JUST STRAIGHT UP SAYING NO, YOU DON'T HAVE THAT OPTION YOU GOT TO DEMO IT, AND YOU SHOULD TEAR DOWN.

WE ARE NOT HERE TO NECESSARILY DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT, IF YOU ARE SHOWING AN INTENSE AND DESIRE TO TAKE CARE OF IT.

>> LET ME JUST SAY, ALL OF YOUR IDEAS, THEY NEED TO BE SOMEWHAT IN A PLAN OF ACTION AND THOSE PLANS OF ACTIONS MR. MORRIS CAN HELP YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THOSE ACTIONS CAN BE, AND NOT SO DETAILED, AND AT LEAST GET YOU IN SOME STEP-BY-STEP PROCESSES, TO BRING THIS ALONG SO WE ARE NOT IN IT FOR ANOTHER X AMOUNT OF MONTHS OR YEARS. THAT IS KIND OF WHAT THIS IS ABOUT. WE WOULD LIKE TO YOU KNOW, IF YOU HADN'T BEEN HERE TODAY, IF YOU HAD NOT REPRESENTED THE PROPERTY, WE PROBABLY WOULD HAVE DECLARED IT A NUISANCE AND FOUND THAT IT NEEDED TO BE DEMOLISHED, THEN YOU WOULD JUST BE TOLD YOU GOTTA TEAR IT DOWN. OR APPEAL.

BECAUSE YOU ARE SHOWING INTEREST THAT REALLY IS GOOD FOR YOU AND

[00:25:04]

THE PROPERTY. WE RATHER SEE THE PROPERTY IMPROVED. AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD RATHER SEE THE PROPERTY IMPROVED.

I THINK ONE OF THE REAL HARD PHOTOS TO NETWARE IS THE BOARD IS WHEN WE SEE EVIDENCE OF THE ABUSE THAT VAGRANTS GETTING INTO THE HOUSE, THAT JUST SAYS IT IS WIDE OPEN, AND THAT IS LACK OF CONTROL AND LACK OF SAFETY AND SECURITY TO THE NEIGHBORS.

IF YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF VAGRANTS OR RIFFRAFF COMMAND, IN-AND-OUT, AND THAT IS EVIDENCE OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA.

THAT IS NOT GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE WITHIN HOUSES OF THIS PROPERTY. SO I WOULD LIKE FOR YOU TO BE AWARE AS WE MOVE ALONG, THAT WE ARE LOOKING TO HOLD YOU RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE A PLAN, AND DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. IF I AM SEEING THAT YOU ARE WILLING TO DO SOMETHING, AND YOU UNDERSTAND THAT, I THINK I CAN ENCOURAE US TO GIVE YOU ONE OF THOSE WE NEED A PLAN OF ACTION, WILL GIVE YOU 30 DAYS TO GET THAT SORT OF THING WORKED OUT, NOW THAT IS REALLY ALREADY BEEN DONE ONCE.

BUT DUE TO ALL OF THE LACK OF WHAT EVER, AND THE ELEMENTS OF TIME, AND IT IS TRUE THE PANDEMIC HAS REALLY DISTURBED A LOT OF CYCLES OF PEOPLE'S AMBITIONS AND GOALS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. I THINK TO DATE REPRESENTS A GREAT DAY, THAT SHOWS YOU CARE ABOUT THIS PLACE.

YOU WALK THROUGH IT AND YOU DECLARE IT THAT THE FLOOR SEEMS SOLID TO YOU, I MEAN, I HAVE NOT BEEN THERE, I HAVE NOT SEEN IT, SOME HAVE BEEN DRIVEN BY. BUT IF YOU CAN MAKE SOME PROMISES, YOUR WORD AS YOU SAID, WE NEED TO GO AHEAD AND START THE PROCESS TO SEE WHERE THIS THING CAN GO.

I HOPE THAT IT IS NOT A MONEY PIT WHERE IT IS GOING TO COST YOU MORE THAN YOU REALLY CAN AFFORD.

OF THOSE DECISIONS CAN BE HELP BY STAFF.

PART OF THAT IS BEING REASONABLE TO REPAIR AND FIX IT.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU SIR.

>> THANK YOU. >> ANYBODY ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. SEEING NO ONE I WILL CLOSE THE

PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NUMBER 2. >> CAN I ASKED MR. MORRIS ONE

QUESTION? >> SURE.

>> OKAY, ON THESE 37 CALLS FROM THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ARE THOSE CURRENT OR ARE THOSE OVER THE FOUR YEARS THAT YOU KNOW?

>> SINCE THE OWNERSHIP WAS TAKEN BY MR. MARSHALL OF OCTOBER 2018

SO YES OVER FOUR YEARS. >> IS THIS PROPERTY HAD A 3060?

>> YES JANUARY 2020 WHEN IT WAS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD.

>> MR. MORRIS THAT DEMOLITION THAT YOU HAD HE HAD A DEMOLITION PERMIT AT ONE TIME IS THAT CORRECT?

>> ESSARY DID. >> THE DEMOLITION THAT HE DID WAS THAT DONE AFTER THE PERMIT EXPIRES?

>> YES. >> IS THERE A MOTION?

>> I WILL JUST SAY THAT I, WE HAVE BEEN THROUGH THIS BEFORE, IT IS BEEN FOUR YEARS, AND WE HAVE NOT REALLY SEEN ANY

[00:30:02]

ACTIONS, WE HAVE THE CITY, DOES EVALUATION, THAT THIS PROPERTY IS NOT FIXABLE, AND I JUST DON'T SEE HOW WE WOULD BENEFIT FROM GIVING THIS GENTLEMAN MORE TIME. ESPECIALLY SINCE HE HAS ALREADY AGREED TO DEMOLISH THE PROPERTY AT ONE POINT.

SO YES, I PROPOSE THAT THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLICLY ACCEPT THE CITY'S RECOMMENDATION, THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE, AND IT IS A HAZARD TO PUBLIC HEALTH SAFETY AND WELFARE.

AND REPAIR THE STRUCTURE IT WOULD BE UNREASONABLE.

>> I SECOND THAT MOTION. >> WAS A DEMOLITION PERMIT ON

JUST ACCESSORY BUILDING? >> YES OR.

>> SO IT WAS ON THE WHOLE PROPERTY?

>> IS NOT FOR THE WHOLE PROPOSITION.

>> THANKS FOR THE CODIFICATION MR. CHAIRMAN.

>> MOST BY DR. PARIS AND THE SECOND BY MR. ALL RIGHT, THAT THE PROPERTY D BE DECLARED A PUBLIC NUISANCE.

AND IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HOUSE SEAT SAFETY AND WELFARE REPAIR THE STRUCTURE WILL BE UNREASONABLE.

ROLL CALL.

>> OKAY, THE MOTION PASSED. >> THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER TO THE DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30

DAYS OF THE CITY MADE NOTICE. >> I SECOND THAT MOTION ALSO.

>> MOTION BY DR. PATTERSON SECOND BY MR. ALL RIGHT THAT THE OWNER IS ADVISED OR APPEAL WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE CITY ME DEMOLISH. ROLL CALL PLEASE.

>> NEXT CASE,. >> CAN I SAY SOMETHING AT THIS TIME? JUST BECAUSE THE MOTION PASSED, YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO SUBMIT A PLAN AND GET THIS THING DONE.

THIS IS A FORCING FUNCTION TO YOU TO GET IT DONE, SO THAT TIMELINES ARE NOT PUSHED ON THE ROAD.

SO YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO SUBMIT THE PLAN THAT YOU TALKED ABOUT

AND GET IT DONE. >> KNOW THAT IS 30 DAYS TO

DEMOLISH IT? >> OR APPEAL.

>> OR APPEAL RIGHT, SO THIS TIME FOR A PLAN OF ACTION IS GONE, EITHER DEMOLISH IT, THEMSELVES OR THEY CAN APPEAL IT.

>> THE PROCESS WOULD NOT BE TO SUBMIT A PLAN?

>> THAT IS CORRECT NOT TO THE BOARD.

>> OKAY THANK YOU. >> AT THIS TIME I WILL REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NUMBER 20 -- 00,043.

>> I'VE NEVER SEEN THE CARS IN THE YARD SINCE I BEEN THERE CURRENTS I'VE NEVER HAD A CAR IN THE YARD.

THAT IS 1318 WITH THE CAR IN THE ARE NOT 1326.

DOES NOT A SINGLE CURRENTLY YARD.

SO HOW CAN YOU SAY THERE IS A NUISANCE WHEN THERE IS NEVER BEEN NOTHING THERE BUT THE HOUSE I DON'T UNDERSTAND? THERE IS NO CARS THERE. WHATEVER CALL YOU SO WE DROVE BY THE KAISER 1318. WHY WOULD ANYBODY CALL AT 1326 AND NOBODY WAS THERE. SO THERE IS NO NUISANCE, THE CARS DON'T YOU GO OVER THERE. I'VE BEEN GETTING A LOT OF THIS WAY AND THAT WAY, FROM THIS GENTLEMAN HERE.

WHEN THEY TOLD THE TRUCKS.

>> MR. MARSHALL, THE REASON FOR THE NUISANCE IS THE HOUSE IS NOT

THE CARS. >> I DON'T SEE IT.

[00:35:05]

>> IT DOES MEET THE GUIDELINES. >> DOES NOTHING BUT THE HOUSE AND THE HOUSE ARE SITTING THERE, THAT'S WHAT WE GOT THE TROUBLE FROM HIS 1318 NOT 1326. THOSE CARS WERE NOT ON 1326.

>> THE NUISANCE IS 1326. I'M SORRY ABOUT THAT.

>> OKAY. SO WITHIN THE NEXT 30 DAYS AND

WILL BE GOING FORWARD THERE? >> YOU CAN APPEAL THE DECISION

TO THE BOARD. >> OKAY I THINK I WILL.

>> THANK YOU. >> NO PROBLEM THANK YOU.

>> AT THIS TIME I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 20 -- 000431

[B. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case No. 21-003622: 2118 Poplar St. (BOWYER ADDN, BLOCK 2, LOT 3, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Meono Claudia Ivette Diaz Et Al % Rafael Diaz ]

AND THE NEXT CASE PLEASE. NEXT CASE ON THE 20 ON THE AGENDA IS 21 -- 003622 LOCATED AT 2118 POPLAR STREET.

CHECKLIST FOR THE RECORD SHOWS THE COUNTY RECORDS IS A QUICK CLAIM DEED, NAMING ME KNOW YOUR CLAUDIA YVETTE DIAZ AND OTHERS, CARE OF RAPHAEL DIAZ AS THE OWNER.

COUNTY SHERIFF'S OWES CLAUDIA YVETTE DIAZ AND OTHERS CARE OF RAPHAEL DIAZ TO BE THE OWNER. SECRETARY OF STATE SHOWS NO ENTITY UNDER THE NAME. TAX RECORDS AND ADMISSIBILITY ARE NOT ACTIONABLE. UTILITY RECORDS OF THEM IS A PALI SHOW INACTIVE SINCE OCTOBES MAYO KNOW CLAUDIA YVETTE DIAZ AND OTHERS CARE OF RAPHAEL DIAZ TO BE THE OWNER.

THIS IS A PUBLIC NOTICE OF THE STRUCTURE OF TODAY'S HEARING.

THESE ARE FROM WEST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE, AND VERY EAST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE, AND SELL SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE, AND THE NORTH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. AND THESE ARE SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS IDENTIFIED UPON INSPECTION, INADEQUATE SANITATION AND STRUCTURAL HAZARD, NUISANCE HAS A CULTURAL WIRING, HAZARDOUS PLUMBING, AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.

SO THIS IS A HEDGES ELECTRICAL WIRING IS EXTERIOR STRUCTURE YOU SEE EXPOSE CUT AND LOOSE WIRES. HAZARDOUS PLUMBING, YOU HAVE SOME OPEN AND SOME UNCAPPED PVC PIPE.

FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION, SEVERAL WINDOWS ON THE EXTERIOR THAT ARE SHARED IN OPEN. INADEQUATE SANITATION, YOU SEE NO PROPERTY MAINTAIN FACILITY IN KITCHEN SINK AND THE BATHTUB.

BOTTOM TWO PHOTOS YOU SEE FECAL MATTER FROM INTO DIFFERENT AREAS FROM EITHER RODENTS OR ANIMALS. STRUCTURAL HAZARD YOU SEE SOME WATER DETERIORATED, THE FLOOR JOISTS THAT THE WATER DID DETERIORATE. NUISANCE CHAPTER 19 OF DILAPIDATION OF THE EXTERIOR, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRE OF THE INTERIOR AND LOOSE WIRES ON THE LEFT AND ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT AS YOU CAN SEE LARGE WIDE THAT IS ATTACHED TO THE OUTLET BOX THAT IS COMPLETELY EXPOSED. AT HAZARDOUS PLUMBING YOU HAVE SEVERAL OF THAT NOT CONNECTED AND EXPOSED AGAIN TO THE RIGHT WITH A TOILET IS POSTED BE IT THAT IS OPEN AND EXPOSED.

SO THE TIMELINE OF EVENTS AS WE PRESENT TO THE BOARD SEWED FAST FORWARD TO THAT. FEBRUARY 2, 2022 THE BOARD OF BUILDING STANDARDS ORDERED A 3060, AND FEBRUARY 8, 2022 THE DECISION LETTERS WAS MAILED TO THE HOMEOWNER BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL. AS OF APRIL 14, 2022, WE HAVE NO CONTACT FROM ANY PARTIES OF INTEREST IN THE PLANE OF ASHES THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO FULL PERMITS, SO APRIL 19, WE MAILED NOTICE FOR THE BUILDING STANDARDS HEARING, UNABLE 22ND I DID RECEIVE A PHONE CALL FROM MS. DIAZ IS STATING THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY LIVED IN MEXICO, AND WAS NOT ABLE TO OBTAIN OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY. SHE STATED THAT THE OWNERS HAD EXPRESSED THAT THEY HAVE NO INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY, AND SHE STATED SHE WAS TRYING TO FIND A WAY, GET THE OWNER TO TRANSFER OWNERSHIP TO HER, AND EXPLAINED TO HER THE TIMELINE THAT OF THE BOARD MEETING, WOULD TAKE PLACE AND IF SHE COULD TAKE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY, SHOULD THE BOARD ORDER DEMOLITION. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND IS AT HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND WELFARE AND REPAIR OF THIS STRUCTURE WOULD BE USELESS. THEY WOULD ORDERED TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL WITHIN DISTRICT COURT OR 30 DAYS WITH THE CITY MAY

DEMOLISH. >> ANY QUESTIONS OR MR. MORRIS? THANK YOU MR. MORRIS. AT THIS TIME I WILL OPEN THE

[00:40:03]

PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 21 -- 003622.

AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 21 -- 003622.

AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR EMOTION.

YOU HAVE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION BEFORE YOU.

>> WELL I WOULD SAY IN A CASE LIKE THIS, THIS PROPERTY LIKEWISE IS IN IN A BAD WAY. AND ONE OTHER ADDITIONAL CAVEAT TO THIS ONE WOULD BE THAT IT SEEMS LIKE WE HAVE AN OWNERSHIP QUESTION BUT THAT IS IRRELEVANT TO THIS FINDING.

THAT THE PROPERTY IS IN A BAD WAY.

SO I MAKE THE MOTION TO THAT FINDS THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE, AND THAT IT IS A HABIE PUBLIC SAFETY AND WELFARE.

AND REPAIR OF THIS STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE.

>> MOTION BY MR. SCHRADER THAT THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC MOTION AND IS AT HAZARD TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND WELFARE IN REPORT THAT THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE.

IS THERE A SECOND. >> I SECOND THAT MOTION.

>> SECOND ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ROLL CALL PLEASE.

>> THE MOTION PASSED. >> OKAY I WOULD LIKE TO ALSO ORDER, THAT PART OF MY ORDER, IS THE QUESTION ABOUT THE OWNER? I DO NOT KNOW IF WE ARE GOING TO THROW THIS ON YOU GUYS, BUT THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER IN DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS. OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH.

THAT BEING SAID, I STILL WONDER WHO IS THE OWNER, WHO IS GOING TO DEMOLISH IS WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND IRREGARDLESS OF THOSE QUESTIONS, THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH IT.

>> MOTION BY MR. SCHRADER THAT THE OWNER IS ORDER TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS.

OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. IS THERE A SECOND?

>> I SECOND. >> SECOND BY MR. TURNER, ROLL CALL PLEASE.

[C. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case No. 21-003928: 1334 Poplar St. (K B LEGGETT, BLOCK 12, LOT 5, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Logston, Mike ]

>> THE MOTION PASSED. >> CASE NUMBER 2021-003928.

LOCATED AT 1334 POPLAR STREET. THE CHARACTER RECORD MAY MAKE MY AS A OLDER. THE COUNTY SHOWS MIKE LOGSDON TO BE THE OWNER, SECRETARY OF THE STATE SHOWS NO ENTITY UNDER THIS NAME, CHECK RECORDS ON THIS PRINCIPALITY AND NOT APPLICABLE.

IT IS BENT IT INACTIVE SINCE DECEMBER OF 2010, AND IT SHOWS MIKE LOGSDON TO BE THE OWNER. THE PUBLIC NOTICE ON THE STRUCTURED FOR TODAY'S HEARING. THIS IS THE WEBSITE OF THE STRUCTURE. THIS IS THE REAR EAST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. AND THE SELL SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. AND THE NORTH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. UPON INSPECTION THIS IS A SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS IDENTIFIED INADEQUATE SANITATION, STRUCTURAL HAZARD, NUISANCE CHAPTER 19, AND HAS A WIRING AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.

SO THIS IS A STRUCTURAL HAZARD, IN VIOLATION OF THE EXTERIOR SO YOU CAN SEE IN BOTH PHOTOS, WHERE THE STRUCTURE IT SEEMS TO

[00:45:05]

BE SPLITTING, YOU CAN TELL IT IS NARROW AT THE TOP AND IT SEEMS TO BE WIDENING AS IT GOES UP SO THAT THE POSSIBLE INDICATION OF A FOUNDATION ISSUE. THIS IS A NUISANCE, DILAPIDATION, YOU SEE IN SEVERAL AREAS OF THE EXTERIOR OF THE ROOF WE HAVE CEMETERY ASIAN AND DILAPIDATION AND ROOFING ISSUES, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING SINGLE AREAS OF THE STRUCTURE IDENTIFIED. LOOSE WIRES HANGING LIGHT FIXTURES, WITH EXPOSED WIRES AS WELL.

FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION AND SHATTERED WINDOW, ON THE WAY IN THE BOTTOM LEFT IS PART OF THE EXTERIOR STRUCTURE THAT IS COMPLETELY OPEN AND DETERIORATED.

TO WHERE THERE IS A HOLE BEING EXPOSED.

ALLOWING ACCESS FOR ANY KIND OF VAGRANTS.

INADEQUATE SANITATION AS YOU CAN SEE THE BOTTOM LEFT, THERE APPEARS TO BE SOME POSSIBLE MOLD, FROM THE EXTERIOR WALL.

AND BOTTOM RIGHT, IS LOW MAINTENANCE AND KITCHEN SINK IT FACT IT LOOKS LIKE TO BE COLLAPSE.

AND STRUCTURAL HAZARDS AS YOU SEE, AT THE TOP LEFT, I'M SORRY THE LEFT SIDE OF THE PHOTO, THAT IS A ROOF, AND IT LOOKS TO BE COMPLETELY SUNK IN OR CAVED IN, AND THE BOTTOM RIGHT IS THE EXTERIOR OF THAT SECTION OF THE ROOF, AND YOU CAN SEE IT IS COMPLETELY CAVED IN AND THERE IS DAYLIGHT COMING THROUGH.

THIS IS INTERIOR DILAPIDATION'S AND A COLLAPSING LINK EMMA AND LOTS OF GRAFFITI AGAIN SIGNS OF VAGRANTS GOING IN AND DOING VANDALISM. SO THE TIMELINE OF EVENTS, THIS WAS BROUGHT BY THE BOARD AS WELL AND FEBRUAY OF 2022, FEBRUARY 22, 2022, SO BEFORE THAT WAS A 3060 AND THOSE WERE MAILED TO THE OWNER, BY REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL.

AS OF APRIL 14, 2020 WE HAVE NO CONTACT WITH ANY PARTIES OF INTEREST AND A PLAN OF ACTION HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED, SO APRIL 18, 2022, WE MAIL THE NOTES FROM TODAY'S HEARING.

THE STAFF RECOMMENDS TO FIND THAT THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE AND REPAIR OF THAT STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE.

WE FURTHER ORDER OF THE OWNER TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THAT VERDICT TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH.

>> ANY QUESTIONS OR MR. MORRIS? THE UTILITIES HE HAD BEEN

OFFERED 12 YEARS? >> YES ACCORDING TO THE WATER UTILITY COMPANY IT HASN'T BEEN ANY WATER SOURCE THERE SINCE

2010. >> COULD YOU REMIND ME OF THIS

PROPERTY HAVING BACK TAXES? >> I CAN LOOK THAT UP BUT I DON'T HAVE ANY INFORMATION ON THAT RIGHT NOW.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR MR. MORRIS?

THANK YOU MR. MORRIS. >> YOU HAD NO CONTACT A RESPONSE FROM THE OWNER WHATSOEVER IS THAT CORRECT?

>> KNOWS NOT SINCE WE HAVE BEEN WORKING THE CASE.

>> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU MR. MORRIS, AT THIS TIME I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING 21 -- 003928, ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NUMBER 2R FOR DISCUSSION. OR A MOTION.

>> THANK YOU CHAIRMAN AFTER SEEING THE CONDITION I MAKE A MOTION TO THAT PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC AND HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE WELFARE OF THE PUBLIC AND REPAIR THE STRUCTURE IS UNREASONABLE.

>> MOTION BY MR. ALLRED THAT THE PROPERTY IS A NUISANCE AND IS A HAZARD TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND REPAIR OF THE

STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE. >> I WILL SECOND THAT.

>> SECOND BY MR. SCHRADER. ROLL CALL PLEASE.

[00:50:02]

>> MR. ALLRED, WE GET A MOTION? >> YES THERE ARE THE ORDER OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL TO THE DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30

DAYS OF THE CITY. >> MOTION BY MR. ALLRED,.

>> I SECOND THAT. >> SECOND BY MR. SCHRADER THEY OWNER IS WILLING TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL TO THE DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS. OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH.

ROLL CALL PLEASE.

[D. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case No. 22-000094: 2009 Over St. (G W MURFEE, LOT 9, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Rodriguez, John Robert ]

>> THE MOTION PASSED. >> MEDSCAPE -- NEXT CASE

MR. MORRIS. >> SO THE FINAL CASE ON THE AGENDA IS CASE NUMBER 22 -- 0 000094.

LOCATED AT 2,009 OVERSTREET. SO THE RECORD SHOWS COUNTY RECORDS WARRANTY DEED NAME AND ROBERT RODRIGUEZ IS THE OWNER.

TAYLOR COUNTY SHOWS JOHN ROBERT RODRIGUEZ TO BE THE OWNER.

SECRETARY OF STATE SHOWS NO ENTITY UNDER THIS NAME.

TAX RECORDS OF THE RESPECT COUNTY IS NOT APPLICABLE.

AND THE RECORDS HAVE BEEN ACTIVE SINCE JANUARY 21.

SEARCH REVEALS JOHN ROBERT RODRIGUEZ TO BE THE OWNER.

THIS IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS PUBLISHED ON THE STRUCTURE FOR TODAY'S HEARING. THIS IS THE FRONT NORTH SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. THE REAR SELL SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE, THE WEST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE, AND THE EAST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. ON INSPECTION THE A SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS IDENTIFIED INADEQUATE SANITATION, STRUCTURAL HAZARD, NUISANCE, HAS A SUCH A WIRY, HAZARDOUS PLUMBING, AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.

THIS IS A STRUCTURAL HAZARD, A VIOLATION IDENTIFIED AS YOU CAN SEE THE ROOF IS COMPLETELY COLLAPSED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STRUCTURE. THAT IS THE EAST AND WEST SIDE.

HERE IS, I'M SORRY LET ME BACK UP THIS IS THE EAST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE WHERE THE ROOF HAS COLLAPSE, AND THIS IS A SHOT OF THE WEST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE, THERE IS A LARGE HOLE THAT HAS BEEN CAVED IN. SO NUISANCE ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURE DILAPIDATION WHERE THE SIDING IS JUST COMPLETELY ROTTED AND DETERIORATING, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING, LOOSE WIRES ON THE LEFT AND THE BOTTOM RIGHT AND EXPOSED POWER BOX BEING ATTACHED TO A WIRE THAT IS HANGING ON THE EXTERIOR.

INADEQUATE SANITATION AS YOU CAN SEE TO THE BOTTOM LEFT, THERE APPEARS TO BE MOLD THE PHOTO ON THE RIGHT THERE IS A LARGE HOLE IN THE ROOF THERE AS WELL. STRUCTURAL HAZARD, YOU WILL SEE THE SUPPORT AND THE BEAMS IN THE ROOF ARE COMPLETELY COLLAPSED, OR SPLIT AND THAT IS WHERE THE WEST SIDE OF THE HOME IS COMPLETELY BOWDEN AS SEEN IN THE PREVIOUS PHOTOS.

INTERIOR DILAPIDATION, IDENTIFIED THROUGHOUT THE STRUCTURE. IN HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING IDENTIFIED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURE.

WE HAVE A POWER BOX OR OUTLET BOX THAT LOOKS TO BE JUST A LOT OF WIRES MIXED UP AND TANGLED UP IN EXPOSED ON THE LEFT YOU HAVE A LIGHT SWITCH WITH EXPOSED WIRES HANGING AS WELL.

HAZARDOUS PLUMBING IDENTIFIED YOU CAN SEE THE PHOTOS TO THE RIGHT THERE ARE PIPES JUST COMPLETELY EXPOSED AND SAME THING ON THE LEFT AND THE PVC PIPE THERE AS WELL.

FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION, AS YOU SEE OBVIOUSLY WITH THE HOSE, THERE IS NO PROTECTION FOR FAMILIARIZATION.

THE TIMELINE OF EVENTS THIS PROPERTY WAS SOLD AND THE NEW OWNER MADE CONTACT WITH THE CITY UPON PURCHASING IT ON SEPTEMBER 18 OF 2020, TO REQUIRE THE PROCESS TO OBTAIN PERMITS AND PREPARES. BETTER THAN 2021, 30 OWNER DID OBTAIN A GENERAL PERMIT FOR REPAIRS, ON JULY 24 TO 2021 THE PERMIT EXPIRED IN THE PROJECT WAS CLOSED BY THE SEAT DUE TO LACK OF PROGRESS. NO INSPECTIONS WERE REQUESTED BY THE OWNER TO BE COMPLETED JANUARY 13, 2022, STOP WORK ORDER WAS PLACED ON THE STRUCTURE TO ENSURE THAT THE INITIAL ALTERATIONS OR REPAIRS WERE PERFORMED WITHOUT PERMITS.

FEBRUARY 14, 2022 THE PROPERTY WAS APPROVED FOR CONDEMNATION, THE INITIAL NOTE WAS SENT TO THE OWNER BY REGULAR CERTIFIED MAIL 2022. APRIL 12, 2022 THE PROPERTY HAD TO BE SECURED BY THE CITY SINCE THERE WAS NO RESPONSE FROM THE OWNER AND APRIL 18, 2022 THE NOTICE OF BOARD BUILDING

[00:55:01]

STANDARDS WAS SENT BY REGULAR CERTIFIED MAIL.

SO EVEN THE CONDITION OF THE STRUCTURE AND THE WEIGHT THE STRUCTURAL HAZARD IS PRESENTED, WE MOVED TO FIND THAT THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE, AND IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SAFETY AND WELFARE AND REPAIR OF THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE WE ORDERED THE OWNER TO DEMOLISH AND APPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE CITY MAY

DEMOLISH. >> ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. MORRIS.

CAN YOU GIVE US AN IDEA OF WHAT KIND OF WORK WAS GOING ON IS IT ON THE ROOF? HONESTLY DUE TO THE FACT THAT THERE WERE NO INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE OWNER IT DOES NOT APPEAR LIKE THERE WAS OR IS MUCH WORK DONE TO THE STRUCTURE ITSELF, MOSTLY IT WAS CLEANED OUT.

>> OKAY ANY QUESTIONS OR MR. MORRIS?

>> HAS THERE BEEN ANY CONTACT I THINK IT SAID THERE HAD NOT BEEN

ANY CONTACT ON IT. >> THAT IS CORRECT.

THANK YOU MR. MORRIS. >> ESSER.

>> AT THIS TIME I WILL OAKEN PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NUMBER 2.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE PLEASE STEP FORWARD IN STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

SEEING NO ONE I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NUMBER 2.

AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION.

AND A MOTION. >> MR. CHAIRMAN I GO WITH THE OPTION AS THE PROPERTY AS A PUBLIC MISSION IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SAFETY AND WELFARE AND FIND THE STRUCTURE

TO BE UNREASONABLE EFFECTS. >> MOTION BY MR. ALL RIGHT, THAT THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE, AND IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND WELFARE AND REPAIRABLE STRUCTURES WOULD BE UNREASONABLE.

IS THERE A SECOND? >> I WILL SECOND.

>> SECOND BY MR. PARRISH. ROLL CALL PLEASE.

>> MR. CHAIRMAN I ALSO MAKE A ANOTHER MOTION THAT THE OWNER IS ORDER TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER TO THE DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS WITH THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH.

>> MOTION BY MR. ALL RIGHT. THAT THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL TO THE DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OR

THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. >> I WILL SECOND.

>> A SECOND BY DR. PARIS. ROLL CALL PLEASE.

>> I GUESS THAT COMPLETES OUR CASE STUDY TODAY, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK SINCE WE HAD IN ALL OF OUR CASES DEMOLITION, COULD YOU REVIEW FOR US THE PROCESS AND THE COST INVOLVED IN APPEALING TO THE COURT? IF WE HAD THE PERSON HERE?

>> FOR NEXT TIME? OR WOULD YOU LIKE ME TOO PREPARE SOMETHING FOR NEXT TIME FOR MAYBE EXECUTIVE SESSION?

>> DOESN'T HAVE TO BE ON THE AGENDA?

IT. >> WELL YES IT SHOULD BE RELATED TO A CASE IN THE AGENDA. BUT WE CAN PUT SOMETHING YOU KNOW LIKE A GENERAL WORKSHOP ITEM ON THE AGENDA EVEN WHAT LET'S TALK ABOUT WHAT YOU WANT AND HOW YOU WANT ON THE AGENDA AND WE CAN MAKE SURE WE ARE GOOD TO GO.

>> RICK JUST A FOR THE BOARD AND WHAT THE PROCESSES.

DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANYTHING OR ANY SUGGESTIONS?

THANK YOU. >> I KNOW THAT IN THE DAYS ACTIONS, IT IS PROBABLY PUT A LOT OF DEMOLITION COST FROM THE

[01:00:01]

CITY AND I BELIEVE I AGREE WITH OUR CHAIRMAN THAT IT WOULD BE CURIOUS FOR THIS BOARD TO UNDERSTAND WE ARE THE IMPLICATIONS GO OF WHAT WE DO BY OUR FINDINGS.

>> AND WE SHOULD NOT DISCUSS, WE SHOULD NOT GOING TO DISCUSSION IF IS NOT RELATED TO AGENDA ITEM SO I WOULD JUST MAKE NOTE OF THAT AND I WILL BE IN CONTACT WITH MR. WEBB, I MEAN, MR. BEARD, SO WE CAN FIND THAT FOR NEXT TIME.

>> I GUESS WE ARE ADJOURNED THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.