[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:06]
>>> SO I WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE MEETING HERE.
BRAD, WOULD YOU PROCEED. >> LORD, GOD, WE THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE HERE TODAY.
WE ASK YOU BLESS THIS COMMUNITY AND THIS REGION AND GIVE WISDOM TO THOSE WOULD ARE HERE TO SPEAK AND THOSE WHO ARE HERE TO DIS-- DISCERN. WE THANK YOU FOR THE LEADERSHIP IN TOWN AND THOSE WHO STEP UP IN FOR POSITIONS AND INFORMAL WAYS TO LEAD AND TAKE CARE OF OUR NEIGHBORS.
WE LOVE YOU AND ASK FOR YOUR GUIDANCE AND PROTECTION.
IN YOUR SON'S NAME WE PRAY. AMEN.
>> PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ARE ON PLATS AND RECOMMENDED TO ZONING. THE DECISION OF THIS BOARD MAY BE APPEAL HAD THROUGH THE OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY NO LONGER THAN 10 DAYS FROM THE DAY THIS MEETING.
ALL APPEALS MUST BE IN WRITING. THE MUST BE SIN SRAOEUTED TO SPEAK -- IS INVITED TO SPEAK UNDER ANY ITEM IN THE AGENDA.
THOSISH WISHING TO BE HEARD SHOULD APPROACH THE STADIUM AND STATE YOUR REASON FOR APPEARING. EACH SPEAKER IS LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN FIVE MINUTES AND ADDITIONAL TIME COULD BE GRANTED
[MINUTES]
AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIR. THE FIRST ITEM ARE THE MINUTES FROM THE PREVIOUS MEETING. HAS EVERYBODY HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW THOSE AND ARE THERE ANY CHANGES OR DISCUSSION ITEMS IN THAT? IF I CAN HAVE A MOTION TOAPPROVE. >> WE HAVE TO DO PUBLIC HEARING.
>> YOU'RE RIGHT. >> THIS ITEM CALLS FOR PUBLIC HEARING. I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO ADDRESS ANYTHING FROM THE PREVIOUS MEETING? SEEING NO ONE I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND NOW I CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
>> MOVE TO APPROVE. >> AND SECOND.
>> MOTION TO APPROVE AND A SECOND.
[PLATS]
>> OUR NEXT ITEM IS PLATS. ADAM, ARE YOU DOING THE PLATS
I AM ADAM HOLLAND AND I WORK FOR THE CITY OF ABILENE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. FIRST UP IS PRELIMINARY PLAT 921, CIMARRON MEADOWS. IT IS CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 3 AND ARTICLE 2 AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.
NEXT UP IS PRELIMINARY PLAT 822 AND THIS -- 8022.
THIS HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 3 AND ARTICLE 2 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. HERE IS FINAL REPLAT 7422, RAINY CREEK ADDITION SECTION 3. IT IS CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 3 AND ARTICLE 2 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS.
CITY STAFF MUST BE FURNISHED WITH A TITLE OPINION OR TITLE COMMITMENT LETTER PRIOR TO RECORDING WITH THE COUNTY CLERK AND ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS AND INSPECTED BY PUBLIC WORKS.
OR WE MUST BE FURNISHED WITH A FINANCIAL GUARANTEE PRIOR TO RECORDING. UP NEXT IS FINAL PLAT 7522, HOLLOWAY FARMS. THIS HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 3 AND ARTICLE 2 WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. CONDITIONS THAT THEY MUST HAVE A TITLE OPINION OR TITLE COMMITMENT LETTER AND ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE COMPLETED OR A FINANCIAL GUARANTEE MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO RECORDING. I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS YOU HAVE FOR ME. >> ANYBODY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR ADAM? THANK YOU, ADAM.
EYE DASH I WOULD OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO ADDRESS THESE PLATS? SEEING NO ONE WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR A MOTION?
>> A MOTION TO APPROVE AS STATED THE TWO WITH CONDITIONS AND THE
TWO WITHOUT. >> MOTION TO APPROVE WITH
>> AND A SECOND. >> MR. BARNETTE.
[ZONING]
>> I WILL MAKE A STATEMENT BEFORE WE OPEN THE ZONING CASES.
WE ONLY HAVE FOUR FOLKS UP HERE, SO TO APPROVE THESE AND MOVE THEM FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL, IT WILL TAKE ALL FOUR OF US -- IT TAKES A VOTE OF FOUR OR MORE. IT WILL HAVE TO TAKE A UNANIMOUS VOTE TO MOVE THOSE FORWARD. IF THERE IS ANYBODY THAT WOULD LIKE TO REMOVE ONE OF THE ZONING CASES FROM THAT JUST IN CASE, YOU ARE WELCOME TO DO THAT. WE WILL HEAR THEM.
THE FIRST IS Z-2022-22. ZONING -- CHANGE ZONING ON APPROXIMATELY 3.57 ACRES FROM MEDICAL USE TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL AT THE CORNER OF ANTLEY ROAD AND MEMORIAL.
[00:05:05]
>> MY NAME IS CLARISSA WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF ABILENE AND PRESENTING CASE NUMBER Z-0200-22.
THEY SUBMITTED A REQUEST TO REZONE FOR MEDICAL -- FROM MEDICAL USE TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL.
THE LOCATION IS THE 101 -- LOT 101 AND BLOCK A OF THE KAMERO -- OF THE CAMERON ADDITION. WE SENT OUT NOTIFICATIONS AND WE RECEIVED ONE IN FAVOR AND ONE OPPOSED.
P -- HERE YOU CAN SEE A LOCATION MAP OF WHERE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ON THE CORNER OF ANTLEY ROAD AND MEMORIAL DRIVE.
IN THE ZONING MAP YOU CAN SEE A BETTER PICTURE OF WHAT THEY ARE PROPOSING TO REZONE. YOU CAN SEE THE LIGHT PURPLE, BLUISH COLOR, THAT'S THE MEDICAL USE.
THEY ARE WANTING TO GO TO THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL.
YOU CAN SEE TO THE LEFT THERE IS AGRICULTURAL OPEN SPACE AND TO THE EAST THEY HAVE A PLAN DEVELOPMENT SENT TO THE SOUTH.
YOU CAN SEE ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER AND I GUESS IT IS CATTY-CORNER TO THE PROPERTY THERE IS SOME GENERAL COMMERCIAL AS WELL. HERE YOU HAVE A LIST OF THE PERMITTED USES IN MEDICAL USE ZONING.
THIS IS WHAT THEY CURRENTLY HAVE AND THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE PROPOSING TO REZONE TO, YOUR GENERAL COMMERCIAL.
AND HERE YOU CAN SEE VARIOUS -- AND MORE, PERMITTED USES FOR THIS PROPERTY. HERE YOU CAN SEE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES. ON THIS MAP YOU CAN SEE THE NOTIFICATION AREA THAT WE SEND OUT NOTICES TO.
WE RECEIVED ONE IN FAVOR AND ONE OPPOSED.
THERE WASN'T A SPECIFIC LETTER SAYING WHAT THE REASONS WHY, BUT WE DID RECEIVE AN OPPOSED AND AN IN FAVOR.
THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE SURROUNDING USE AND ZONING IS GENERALLY SENT THROUGH PLANNING PRINCIPALS AND THE CRITERIA OF APPROVAL IN THE LLC.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS. >> CLARISSA, I THINK MR. INGRAM HAD ONE. IS THAT INCLUDED IN THOSE OR IN
ADDITION TO THE COMMENTS? >> THAT'S AN ADDITION.
>> WHAT IS IT? IN FAVOR? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR CLARISSA?
>> I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. >> THANK YOU.
>> ACTUALLY, THAT PD THAT IS THERE ADJACENT TO IT, IT HAS SOME GENERAL COMMERCIAL AS PART OF THAT PD, IS THAT CORRECT?
>> IT ALLOWS FOR OFFICE, GENERAL RETAIL AND NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL.
>> I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO COME UP AND DISCUSS THIS ZONING CASE
BJ PRITCHARD. MAIN HRAOER -- MAINLY HERE JUST TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED HERE IS A SMALL LITTLE RETAIL STRIP CENTER WITH FOUR LEASABLE SPACES.
WE ARE STILL WORKING OUT SOME OF THE FINER DETAILS, BUT THAT'S REALLY ALL THAT IS INTENDED HERE WE WENT WITH THE GC TO MAINTAIN MEDICAL USE IN THERE. I DON'T THINK FOR WHATEVER REASON THE RETAIL ALLOWED THAT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?
>> THANK YOU, BJ. >> YES, MA'AM?
>> ANNETTE COLLINS. I LIVE ON 55 WHOLE LOW PRESSURE LAKE -- WHOLE LAKE. I WANT TO KNOW WHAT WILL THIS DO, THIS PROPERTY YOU PLAN ON DOING, WHAT WILL IT DO TO OUR HOMES? WILL IT TAKE ANY OF OUR PROPERTY AWAY FROM OUR HOME WHERE WE ARE AT?
IT IS JUST FOR THAT CORNER THERE FROM ANTLEY ROAD TO K*PL MEMORIAL ON THE EASTSIDE. YOU CAN SEE -- CAN YOU SEE WHAT
[00:10:02]
WE CAN SEE, THE BLUE UP THERE? >> YES.
I CAN SEE THE BLUE. >> SO IT JUST AFFECTS THAT ONE STRIP RIGHT THERE, THAT GREEN GRASS BEHIND YOUR HOUSE.
>> CORRECT. >> THAT WILL STILL BE THERE.
IT IS ON THE OTHER SIDE. >> OKAY.
>> IT IS THERE WHERE THE EYE DOCTOR IS AT.
>> IT IS RIGHT BEHIND THAT DR. MCADAMS FACILITY.
>> I AM LIAM INGRAM AND I OWN THE PROPERTY IN THE GREEN RIGHT THERE. WHEN THAT WAS INITIALLY -- WE PAID FOR THE ROAD AND ALL OF THE DEVELOPERS IN THERE PAID FOR MEMORIAL COULD COME IN AND SO SAM'S COULD COME IN.
THE OTHER OWNER IN THERE -- IT IS REAL INTERESTING.
THEY SAID THEY HELD THAT PROPERTY FOR 15 YEARS, AND THEY SAID THERE IS A TIME TO BUY AND THERE'S A TIME TO SELL.
THEY WAITED A LONG, LONGTIME TO BE ABLE TO SELL THAT PROPERTY.
I'M FOR THIS ZONING CHANGE BECAUSE IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO GO IN THERE AND DO SOMETHING IT'S GONNA BE A LOT OF THE CRITERIA HAS WITH IN-FILLING WITH THESE AREAS.
I KNOW IT WILL BE WELL DONE. I KNOW THE PEOPLE THAT ARE DOING IT, AND I KNOW IT WILL BE WELL DONE.
>> WE ARE DISCUSSING ZONING CASE Z-2022-22.
IT IS THE PROPERTY OF MEMORIAL AND ANTLEY ROAD.
ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY -- WOULD LIKE TO HAVE ANY DISCUSSION WITH US? SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO WE HAVE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?
MOTION TO APPROVE? >> I'LL SECOND.
>> MOTION TO APPROVE AND A SECOND.
>> MR. ROSENBAUM. >> CASE Z-2022-23.
ZONE OF APPROXIMATELY .83 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE.
>> I AM ADAM HOLLAND AND WORK FOR THE CITY OF ABILENE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THIS IS CASE Z-2022-23 AND THIS IS OWNED BY FAUD HAMED. IT IS A CHANGE FROM AO AND MF TO MF. WE SENT OUT NOTIFICATIONS AND RECEIVED 0 IN FAVOR AND THREE OPPOSED.
HERE IS A LOCATION MAP SHOWING THE PROPOSED REZONING.
YOU CAN SEE IT IS ON THE 2900 BLOCK OF OLD ANSON ROAD.
THE ADDRESS IS 2910. HERE IS THE CURRENT ZONING MAP FOR THE PROPERTY. THE EXISTING ZONINGS NEARBY ARE MF TO THE NORTH AND WEST AND AO TO THE SOUTH AND EAST AS WELL AS MD FURTHER SOUTH AND RS6 TO THE EAST.
THAT'S ACROSS OLD ANSON ROAD. HERE ARE THE PERMITTED USES IN AO ZONING. HERE ARE THE PERMITTED USES WITHIN MF ZONING. HERE ARE VIEWS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES AROUND THESE SUBJECT PROPERTIES. CURRENTLY THERE IS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE PROPERTY AND ANOTHER SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
HERE ARE THE OPPOSITIONS OF -- WE HAVE A 27.64% OPPOSITION WITHIN THE NOTIFICATION BUFFER. THIS PROPOSED REQUEST HAS BEEN FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SURROUNDING USES, IN ZONING AND ACCEPTED PRINCIPALS AND THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL WITHIN THE LDC. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
I'D BE HAPPY TO AEPBGS ANY QUESTIONS YOU -- TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS YOU HAVE FOR ME. >> ANY QUESTIONS FOR ADAM? DID ANY OF THE PEOPLE OBJECTED SUBMIT WRITTEN STATEMENTS?
>> YES, THEY DID. MOST OF THEIR CONCERNS WERE ABOUT TRASH AND THE IMPACT OF ANOTHER MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT BEHIND THEIR HOUSE OR NEXT TO IT.
>> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU, ADAM.
>> I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
[00:15:01]
IS THERE ANYBODY THAT WOULD LIKE TO COME UP AND TALK TO US ABOUT THE ZONING CASE? THANK YOU.I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ADAM, COME BACK UP.
THIS CASE BOTHERS ME QUITE A BIT.
I WISH ONE OF THE PROPONENTS -- OR ONE OF THE OTHER PEOPLE WOULD HAVE BEEN HERE TO TALK ABOUT IT. DID YOU LOOK BACK -- I MEAN, I HAVE DONE A LITTLE RESEARCH. THE MULTI-FAMILY, IF YOU LOOK AT THE TAN SHADING HERE WITH THE MULTI-FAMILY, THAT'S MULTI-FAMILY ALL THE WAY AROUND IT.
THEY BUILT THOSE APARTMENTS IN 2005 AND 2006.
I'M ASSUMING THE MULTI-FAMILY, THAT PROPERTY WAS DONE THAT WAY IN 2005 AND 2006. IT WAS ZONED FROM AO OR SOME OTHER ZONING TO MULTI-FAMILY BACK THEN.
IT WASN'T MULTI-FAMILY I'M SURE. DID YOU HAPPEN TO SEE ANY HISTORY OR DISCUSSION OR ANYTHING ABOUT HOW THAT GOT THAT
WAY TO START WITH? >> I HAVE NOT SEEN ANY HISTORY BASED ON THEM REZONING IT FROM ITS PREVIOUS ZONING.
THEY BROUGHT UP THAT THE OWNERS IN OPPOSITION DID BRING UP THAT THEY WERE UNHAPPY WITH THE REZONING.
I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE PREVIOUS HISTORY HAD ACTUALLY BEEN.
>> IT LOOKS LIKE THE OWNER IN 2028 WAS THERE.
IT LOOKED LIKE HE OWNED THE PROPERTY IN 2004, 2005, SIX, SOMEWHERE IN THAT TIME FRAME. I WAS HOPING TO HAVE DISCUSSION
ON THAT. >> I WAS INTERESTED IN WHY THE MULTI-FAMILY OBJECTION ON YOUR MAP OF THE REDS.
>> IT WAS ACROSS. IT WAS BELOW THE SOUTH.
>> CAN YOU GO BACK TO THAT? >> YES.
>> THAT RED DOT TO THE SOUTH, THAT'S MR. WESTBROOK'S HOUSE.
>> SO, YOU KNOW, IN 2006 IT LOOKED -- OR IN 2005 WHEN IT WAS ZONED THAT WAY IT WAS BUTTED UP AGAINST THE PROPERTIES.
AT THAT TIME IT WAS ACCEPTABLE TO ZONE THAT MULTI-FAMILY.
WE HAD A LOT OF DISCUSSIONS ON MULTI-FAMILY HERE OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS. THIS IS KIND OF AN ODDITY TO ME.
I WOULD BE HAPPY FOR ANY OTHER INPUT THAT YOU GUYS MIGHT HAVE.
SO WITH THE 27.64% IT HAS TO HAVE A SUPER MAJORITY IN
>> SO IT WILL TAKE US 6-1? >> I'M NOT ENTIRE LEISURE WHAT
>> 6-1. SO IT WILL TAKE A 6-PERSON VOTE IN COUNCIL TO APPROVE IT. YOU KNOW, I GUESS CONTINUING MY LINE OF THOUGHT, THE MULTI-FAMILY WAS ALREADY THERE, THE 2910 WAS MULTI-FAMILY AND THEY ARE ASKING FOR THE OTHER.
TO ME IT SEEMS NATURAL TO GO AHEAD AND BLEND THE REST OF IT IN THE WAY IT IS. IT IS ALREADY SURROUNDED THAT
WAY. >> I AGREE WITH APPROVING IT, BUT I DO HOPE IF PEOPLE HAVE OBJECTIONS THEY COME TO COUNCIL, ESPECIALLY 27% ARE OBJECTING. I WILL MOVE TO APPROVE.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. >> SECOND.
>> AND A SECOND. >> MR. BARNETTE.
>> YES. >> THE MOTION TO APPROVE
CARRIES. >> I THABL -- I BELIEVE THAT TAKES CARE OF OUR AGENDA FOR TODAY.
THANKS, GUYS. THANK YOU FOR COMING.
THANK YOU FOR COMING AND
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.