[CALL TO ORDER]
[INVOCATION]
[00:00:08]
>> CALL OR MEETING TO ORDER. BLESS OUR MEETING HERE. >> DEAR LORD GOD THANKED US FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE HERE FOR TODAY. THANK YOU FOR THE DID CITIZENS THAT BROUGHT FORTH ISSUES WE THAT WE CAN BREW AND WORK TOGETHER IN THE CITY. TO CARE FOR MORE PEOPLE. TO TAKE CARE OF OUR NEIGHBORS. GOD, ASK YOU GIVE US WISDOM. GIVE US INSIGHTS. WE APPRECIATE THE CHANCE YOU HAVE GIVEN US. WE THANK YOU FOR THE RAIN AND COLD WEATHER THE LAST MONTH. ASKED THAT A CONTINUE. ASK BLESS OUR LOCAL FARMERS. WE ASK YOU TO WITH ANYBODY TRAVELING IN THE TOWN THIS WEEKEND. MAY YOU BLESS THOSE KIDS, FAMILIES, GRANDPARENTS THAT WILL TAKE PART IN ONE OF THE TRULY GREAT WEEKENDS IN ABILENE.
>> AS AN AGENDA ITEM Z 2,023 Ã 14. NOT ON THIS AGENDA ITEM. IT WILL NOT BE DISCUSSED TODAY.
IF YOU'RE HERE FOR Z 2023 Ã14. THAT WILL GET ON THE AGENDA FOR OUR NEXT MEETING, NEXT MONTH.
14 B, 2023 Ã14. THAT WILL BE NEXT MONTH'S MEETING.
PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION FINAL AUTHORITY FOR THE APPROVAL. RECOMMENDING BOARD OF THE CITY COUNCIL MATTERS OF ZONING. DECISIONS OF THIS BOARD MAY APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH THE OFFICE OF CITY SECRETARY NO LATER THAN 10 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS MEETING. ALL APPEALS MUST BE IN WRITING. PUBLIC INVITED TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM UNDER DISCUSSION ABOUT PLANNING COMMISSION AFTER RECEIVING RECOGNITION BY THE
[MINUTES]
CHAIR. THOSE WISHING TO BE HEARD SHALL BE APPROACHED THE PODIUM STATE YOUR NAME, AND LIMIT YOUR PRESENTATION FOR MORE NO MORE THAN FIVE MINUTES. ADDITIONAL TIME MAY BE AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIR. MINUTES IN OUR PACKET FROM THE PREVIOUS MEETING. ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES TO OUR MINUTES? JUST LOOK AT THEM.>> I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ANYONE OUT THERE WE LIKE TO ADDRESS ARE MINUTES FROM THE PREVIOUS MEETING? I SEE NO ONE I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO WE HAVE A
MOTION? >> MOTION TO APPROVE AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? >> I.
[PLATS]
>> NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA PLOT. AFTER DOING THAT. ANY?
>> GOOD AFTERNOON MY NAME IS ADAM FOR THE CITY OF ABILENE. I'LL BE PRESENTING FINAL PLAT 2623.
THIS PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE ARTICLE CHAPTER 3 ARTICLE 2 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. A MAN'S APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS CITY STAFF BE FURNISHED WITH TITLE OPINION. OR TITLE COMMITMENT LETTER. AS WELL AS ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. AND INSPECTED BY PUBLIC WORKS.
FURNISHED WITH THE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE TO SECURE THE OBLIGATION ALL IMPROVEMENTS
PRIOR TO INCLUDING. IT HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> ANY QUESTIONS FOR ADAM? >> OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING ANYONE OUT THERE LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS PLAT? I SEE NO ONE I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR A MOTION? MOTION
TO APPROVE. >> I WILL SECOND. >> MOTION TO SECOND.
>> MR. BARNETT, MRS. RUSSELL. >> YES. >> MS. FLEMING. >> YES. >> THE MOTION CARRIES.
[ZONING]
9.82 ACRES ALLOWED TRADE SCHOOL WITHIN THE GENERAL RETAIL ZONING. 3301 S. 14TH STREET.
>> HELLO I AND MASON PER PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF ABILENE TODAY LOOKING AT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2023 03. THE OWNER THE AGENT IS KATHLEEN. IT'S A CUP ALLOW FOR WITHIN JR ZONING.
23 ONE S. 14TH STREET SUITE 30 5A. ONE IN FAVOR AND ZERO OPPOSED.
HERE'S THE AERIAL LOCATION. ZONING MAP. THIS IS THE SUITE LOCATION MAP.
[00:05:04]
THERE ARE VIEWS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. SEND OUT NOTIFICATIONS AND A 200 FROM THE ENTIRE PROPERTY. WE GOT ONE IN FAVOR AND ZERO OPPOSED.PROPOSED REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SURROUNDED USES AND ZONING, GENERALLY ACCEPTED PLANNING PRINCIPLES AND THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL STAFF RECOMMENDS
APPROVAL. I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> MASON, I THINK WE RAN INTO THIS BEFORE. IT IS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE WHOLE SHOPPING CENTER? OR IS IT LIMITED TO SUITE NUMBER 30 5A. I THINK IT NEEDS TO BE LIMITED TO 30 5A. THE
WAY IT'S WORDED, IT LOOKS LIKE IT COULD GO ANYWHERE IN THE SHOPPING CENTER. >> IF I SAY THIS WRONG, PLEASE CORRECT ME. IT GOES WITH THE ZONING. IT WILL BE
LIKE GR WITH CUP. IT WILL SUPPLY TO THAT SUITE. >> INTO GR ZONING.
>> HAS A CUP APPLIED, IT'S JUST A THAT SUITE. >> JUST BE LIMITED TO 3301 S. 14TH STREET
NUMBER 30 5A? >> YES. >> OKAY. ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR MASON? THANK YOU. I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC
HEARING ANYBODY LIKE TO COME UP AND ADDRESS THIS CASE FOR US? >> I SEE NO ONE. I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. THE ONLY THING I WANT TO MAKE SURE IS IN THE MOTION THAT WE GET TO 30 5:00 A.M. THERE. 35 A IN THE MOTION, OKAY. I THINK IT'S A GOOD USE FOR THE PROPERTY. ONLY LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION MAKE SURE YOU
SHIRT 35 A AND THEN PER >> A MOTION TO APPROVE. WITH THE CONDITIONS OF 30 5A. 30 5A.
>> I WILL SECOND. >> AND A SECOND.
>> MR. BARNETT, MRS. RUSSELL. >> YES. >> MS. FLEMING. >> YES. >> MR. ROSEN. >> YES.
CARRIES. >> CP 2022. ZONE AGRICULTURE OPEN MPD D 42 ALLOW AN RV PARK IN THE PORTION OF THE LOT ZONE AGRICULTURE OPEN. AT 4501 W. LAKE ROAD.
>> HEIGHT HI I'M MASON WITH THE CITY OF ABILENE. TODAY LOOKING AT CUP 2023 04. THE OWNER AND THE AGENT IS MARLA WITH RV LLC. REQUEST IS TO APPLY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ON A SITE ZONE AGRICULTURAL OPEN MPD D 42 ALLOW AN RV PARK WITHIN THE PORTION OF THE LAW ZONE AGRICULTURE. LOCATION AT 4051 W. LAKE ROAD. NO IN FAVOR, NO OPPOSED.
HERE'S THE AERIAL LOCATION MAP.
HERE WE HAVE THE SITE LAYOUT. THERE ARE SOME VIEWS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. WE SENT OUT NOTICES TO A 200 BUFFER ALONG THE PROPERTY LINES PER B GOT ZERO IN FAVOR, ZERO OPPOSED. PROPOSED REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
PROPOSED USE HAS DESIGNED HOWEVER, NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPOSED USE AND ZONING OF THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST. GENERALLY ACCEPTED PLANNING PRINCIPLES. IN THE CRITERIA FOR PEOPLE IN THE LDC.
STAFF CAN ONLY RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. THE RV PARK SHOULD OPERATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBMITTED PLAN OF OPERATIONS. A TYPE A BUFFER YARD TO BE REQUIRED ON THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE. THE WITH DESIGN IN EACH. THE WITH DESIGN IN EACH TURNING RADIUS THROUGH THE INTERNAL ROAD SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC WORKS AND FIRE MARSHAL APPROVAL. SURFACING OF THE INTERNAL RING ROAD TO EACH PARKING PACK SHALL BE REQUIRED. IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT AGREEABLE WITH THE CONDITION
STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND DENIAL. I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> SO, LOOK IN THE CODE OF ORDINANCE. LOOK FOR CONDITIONAL USE. CONDITIONAL USE REQUIRES A CYCLE AND TO ME THIS REALLY DOES NOT MEAN THE CRITERIA FOR A CYCLE AND. THE QUESTION HERE IS, IS STAFF
[00:10:13]
COMFORTABLE WITH THIS WITH THOSE CONDITIONS. I THINK WE NEED TO ADD A FEW MORE THINGS TO IT. OR DO WE NEED A FORM OF SITE PLAN THAT MEETS THE CONDITIONAL USE REQUIREMENTS INOUR CODE OF ORDINANCES? >> WE HAVE AN INITIAL SITE PLAN THAT WE TOLD HER LIKE THIS WAS NOT GOING TO BE EFFICIENT ENOUGH TO WE SENT HER THE CRITERIA FOR A SITE PLAN. THEN WE CAME BACK WITH THE ONE THAT WE TOUCHED HERE.
ESSENTIALLY ALL OF WHAT IS REQUIRED WAS ON HERE. IT WILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH A FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW ONCE THE CUP IS APPROVED.
>> LET ME GIVE YOU A FOR INSTANCE. IF YOU LOOK IN. IF YOU LOOK IN OUR PACKET. LOOKED DOWN IN THE APPLICATION. DOWN IN THE APPLICATION IT SAYS 20 RV SPOTS ON THREE ACRES. CAN THEY GET 20 RV SPOTS ON THREE ACRES? IS THIS THREE ACRES, OR IS THIS FOR 6.7 ACRES THAT ZONE
A, OR WHAT IS THIS? >> ASSUMING I WOULD ASSUME THAT THIS IS JUST ON THE A THAT IS WHAT THEY SAID IT WAS. I THINK SHE MIGHT BE HERE.
WE CAN GET HER TO ANSWER THAT. >> YOU COULD SEE THE QUESTION. THE REASON FOR THE SITE PLAN.
WERE ASKING FOR A CONDITIONAL USE. TO NARROW IT DOWN CONDITIONAL USE BUT CANNOT GO
ANYWHERE ELSE. THE CONDITIONAL USE NEEDS TO BE NOT THAT IT NEEDS TO BE IDENTIFIED. >>) >>
LIKE THE PREVIOUS ONE MAJOR WE HAD SUITE NUMBER 30 5A. >> KIND OF THE SAME THING. >> LOOK AT THE NOTICE. LIMITED TO A PORTION OF THE LOT ZONE A. THE FIRST PART OF THE PROPERTY 'S ZONE PD. NOT PERTAIN TO THE THREE ACRE -ISH PART OF THE PROPERTY.
JUST THE AERIAL PORTION OF IT. >> YES, BUT THE AO PORTION IS BIGGER THAN THE PD PORTION.
LOOKS LIKE THE AO PORTION AROUND SIX OR SO. THOSE OOKS TO BE THREE ACRES OUT OF THE SIX ACRES ACCORDING TO THE APPLICATION THAT WAS MADE. YOU COULD SEE MY QUESTION. TO ME IT'S NOT IDENTIFIED. BUT WE WANTED TO BE IDENTIFIED FOR CONDITIONAL USE. WE HAVE TO SIT HERE BUT SOME CONDITIONS AROUND MORE THAN WHAT YOU LIMITED IT TO. ORGAN HAVE TO
AT THE END. >> YOU'RE SAYING THAT THIS CAN BE OVERLAID ANYWHERE?
>> YEAH. >> IF IT'S THREE ACRES I DON'T KNOW WHETHER IT'S THREE ACRES OR NOT.
>> THE APPLICATION. AS POSTED ON THE AGENDA. FOR 11.16 ACRES. IS THAT STILL WHAT
THEY'RE ASKING FOR? >> NOTICE IS FOR THE WHOLE PROPERTY. THAT'S WHAT WE WERE GIVEN HAD TO REFERENCE ALL OF IT. IF YOU LOOK AT THE NOTICE IT SAYS GO BACK TO THAT FIRST LIGHT. IT'S
KIND OF LIKE THEY REFERENCE THE WHOLE PROPERTY. THEY LIMITED IT TO THAT. >> EVERYONE IS
LIMITED. ON THE AGENDA TO 30 5A. >> PROPERTY ZONE AO. >> IT IS THE BACK PORTION.
>> YOU GOT THAT ZONING. JUST LIMITED TO THE HIGHLIGHTED GREEN PORTION.
I UNDERSTOOD IT THAT WAY. >> YES SIR.
>> ANYBODY HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR MASON? >> DOES THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED MEET
THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PULLING A PERMIT AND GETTING THE PROJECT APPROVED? >> UPON APPROVAL WILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE SITE PLAN REVIEW. SHE COULD SUBMIT THIS. DEPENDING ON WHAT THE OTHER DEPARTMENTS WILL NEED MORE INFORMATION LIKE THE TRASH, THE WATER, ALL THAT STUFF. SHE WOULD HAVE A LOT OF COMMENTS GOING BACK REQUIRING MORE INFORMATION IF SHE
SUBMITTED THIS. >> ANY CONDITIONAL USE. REQUIRE READY FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW. LIKE SOMETHING THAT KIND OF TIED DOWN. OTHER QUESTION IS SINCE ARE DEALING WITH THREE ACRES IN
[00:15:03]
THEIR PLAN. WE HAVE SIX APPROVED, ARE THEY FREE TO EXPAND THIS IN THE FUTURE? ARE WE APPROVING THIS FOR THE SIX ACRES PER THAN THEY CAN EXPAND, WILL NEED TO COME BACK BY US IFTHEY EXPAND THAT? >> IT WOULD JUST BE WITHIN THE AO. THEY'RE LIMITING THIS TO JUST THE THREE, CUP WILL APPLY TO ALL OF THE AO. DEPENDING ON THE EXPANSION SIZE MOST LIKELY STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH A DRC SITE PLAN REVIEW. THE CITY WANTS HIM TO BE ABLE TO PUT THIS THERE SITE PLAN ON ANY PART OF THE SIX ACRES THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO PUT IT ON. IF YOU ARE OKAY WITH US CLEARING THIS. IN SAYING YOU'RE FREE TO DO WHAT YOU LIKE AND THAT SIX ACRES ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN.
YES, IT WOULD STILL HAVE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS WITH THE AO FOR LIKE THE SETBACKS, THE BUFFERING, AND LANDSCAPING. AGAINST THE PD TOWARD THE EAST.
THEN THE MOBILE HOMES MOVING TO THE SOUTH. IT WOULD HAVE LIKE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AND ALL THAT STUFF. THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH. THE CODE ON THE FRONT THREE ACRES, OR
THE BACK THREE ACRES. >> THAT IS NOT CORRECT. IF THE PROPERTY IS APPROVED FOR
A SITE PLAN THAT SHOWN. THERE LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PROPOSED. >> CAN BE 20. IF THEY WANT 21, 25, 30. THAT'S AN AMENDMENT OF THE CUP. TO ALLOW
ADDITIONAL EXPANSION. >> IT IS. >> I'M NOT SURE 20 WILL FIT. IT'S JUST BASED ON THE CRITERIA AND PUT ON THEIR WITH THE RADIUS AND ALL THE OTHERS UPPER DO NOT KNOW 20 WILL FIT.
ANYWAYS, OKAY. >> YOU ARE RIGHT BEFORE. THE SITE PLAN FOR A CUP MORE EXCEPTIONAL IN NATURE. I WOULD LIKE A LITTLE BIT MORE THAN WHAT WE HAVE ON THIS SITE PLAN.
A LITTLE MORE INFORMATION. >> CURIOUS ON THE SITE LAYOUT. NUMBER ON THE LEFT SIDE SHOWS THE WIDTH TO BE 30,000 FEET. THEN THE LINK TO BE 573 FEET. LIKE 17 MILLION FEET.
>> THERE IS A DECIBEL IN THERE.
WE DON'T KNOW THE RELATIONSHIP TO THE AOP OF PROPERTY. I'M NOT SURE HOW BIG THE AOP PIECE OF PROPERTY IS. TO BE HAVE A BREAKDOWN. I'M SURE THE PD D 42 SAYS X ACRES. THAT WILL LEAVE THE REMAINDER TO BE THIS. NOT SURE WHETHER THE APPROPRIATE ACREAGE IS FOR
THIS. >> DO NOT HAVE THAT NUMBER TO GIVE YOU EITHER. IT'S NOT DIVIDED OUT BY A SURVEY. OR THING THAT WE CAN FIGURE.
>> ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR MASON? >> THANK YOU.
I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ANYBODY LIKE TO COME UP AND ADDRESS OUR DISCUSSIONS HERE?
PLEASE. >> ON THIS. >> MA'AM, STATE YOUR NAME. >> MARLA. >> THANK YOU.
>> TURNED INTO DIFFERENT THINGS ON THIS. ONE OF THEM IS NOT SHOWING.
IT SHOWED HOW FAR FROM THE ROAD WE WERE. HOW FAR FROM THE BUILDING THAT'S ON THE PDD.
THEN HOW FAR FROM THE NORTH SIDE IN THE EAST AS WELL. >> THIS IS SHEET TWO OF TWO. >> IT SHOW HOW WIDE THE ROADS WERE. AND WHERE THE ROADS WERE COMING AROUND.
THIS IS THE BACK NORTHEAST CORNER BASICALLY IS WHAT THIS IS SHOWING.
>> LOOKING TO SEE. >> HAVE THE DIMENSIONS ON EVERYTHING HOW FAR OUT IT WAS. WHAT WOULD
FALL IN THAT AQUACULTURAL SECTION. >> LOOKING AT THE PLAN THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT SHOWS TWO OF TWO. THE LINE ON THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE IS AT THE
PROPERTY LINE? THE DARK LINE? >> YES. >> ARE USING THE ON THERE? OKAY.
THAT IS THE EAST PROPERTY LINE IN THE LINE ON THE TOP THAT WOULD BE THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE. IT'S TUCKED INTO THE NORTHEAST CORNER. MASON, CAN YOU PUT THE LIST OF THINGS THAT YOU HAD. SO MARLA, HAVE YOU SEEN THOSE.
HAVE YOU SEEN THIS? AT THE BACK,
[00:20:06]
SUBJECT TO PUBLIC WORKS, HARD SURFACE OF THE ENTIRE RAILROAD?>> NO, WE WERE GOING FROM THE ORDINANCE ON THE RV PARKS. IT SAID THAT THE ROADS COULD BE COMPACTED. HOW DID THE WORD THAT? THAT IT HAD TO BE UP TO THE OFFICE. THEN THE ROADS CAN
BE A COMPACTED THAT WAS THE WORDING. >> OKAY.
>> TO BE KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THAT? OUR ISSUE IS THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION TO THE EAST. EVEN IF THE ORDINANCE DOES SAY LIKE YOU JUST MENTIONED, THROUGH THE CUP PROCESS HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE SURE THAT THE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WE WOULD BE CONCERNED WITH DUST AND MAKING SURE THERE IS NOT ANY EROSION THAT CREATED OFF OF THE BASE SURFACE THAT WOULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT. THE WATER ALL RUNS TO THE NORTHEAST AND THE EAST FROM THIS PROPERTY. WE ARE ABLE TO IMPOSE THE HIGHER STANDARD MIGHT BE ABLE TO REQUIRE ELSEWHERE IN THE ORDINANCE.
BECAUSE IT IS A CUP. >> ONLY APPROVE THE AND EVERYTHING. >> YES. THAT PD TO THE EAST
WAS THAT BIG DEAL FROM MAYBE SIX MONTHS AGO. >> WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WAS ALREADY CLEARED.
>> THROUGH THE PRELIMINARY PLAT 880 ACRES. IF APPROVED FINAL PLAT WOULD BE PHASE 1.
>> SO, WHAT RANDY IS REFERENCING THAT BECAUSE IT IS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO PUT SOME EXTRA THINGS ON IT. THAT'S WHAT THE STAFF IS RECOMMENDED. THE RECOMMENDING
A HARD SURFACE. >> THE REST OF THE ORDINANCE WITH A SET UP FOR THE RV PARK.
>> YES. THIS STEP WILL BE ON TOP WHICH NORMALLY REQUIRED. OKAY.
DID YOU UNDERSTAND THE DISCUSSION WHAT WE ARE KIND OF PER NORMALLY THIS IS NOT WHAT WE WOULD SEE AS FAR AS A SITE PLAN. SEE MORE OF A DEFINITIVE SITE PLAN. MAYBE A SHEET ONE OF TWO LITTLE MORE DEFINITIVE OF THAT.
WE CAN HAVE SOME DISCUSSION IN A MINUTE. IF I NEED YOU. THANK YOU.
ANYBODY ELSE? >> MY NAME IS JOHN. I'M HERE TO REPRESENT WEST TEXAS LAND DIES. GUYS WHERE THE GROUP THAT OWNS THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST OF THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. WERE NOT HERE TO FORMALLY OPPOSE IT.
I REALIZE SOME OF THE REQUIREMENTS WERE SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT WE HAVE PRAYER WE JUST WANT TO ADDRESS THOSE. DUST, NOISE, AND BUFFER ZONE.
KIND OF THE MAIN CONCERNS FOR US AS FAR AS MOVING FORWARD. THE SUBDIVISION IN THE AREA.
JUST LIKE ALL THOSE THINGS NEED TO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION.
WHICH THE STAFF HAS FOR THE MOST PART. >> BUT THE CONDITIONS PROPOSES THAT SEEM
APPROPRIATE? >> IT ADDRESSES THE DUST IN THE BUFFER ZONE. I'M NOT SURE ABOUT LIGHTING IF THE LIGHTING WILL GO THROUGH. HAVE SOME BACKYARD SET BACK UP TO THAT.
>> HAVE TO MEET A STANDARD. IT WILL ADDRESS SPILLOVER AND ALL OF THAT. >> AND THEN THE NOISE LEVEL. A LITTLE CONCERN DEPENDING AND AND A HALF ROTATING COMING IN AND OUT OF THERE.
>> MY NAME IS FLORENCE. I GUESS WHAT I'M ASKING IS IT'S NOT GONNA BE A TRAILER PARK
[00:25:09]
RIGHT THERE, WHERE MY TRAILER IS WITHOUT BE A COMMERCIAL NOW? THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE PLANNING ON DOING?>> IT'S AN RV PARK. LIKE YOU SEE OUT ON THE INTERSTATE OUT THERE. THAT'S WHAT. IT WILL BE RVS COMING IN AND OUT.
>> THAT WILL BE THE WHOLE LAST. THAT WOULD BE. >> I THINK THE SAME THING WERE SAYING IS UP ON THE SCREEN. IT'S A GREEN PART ACROSS THE BACK. SAME THE SAME THING WE ARE SEEING. THE FUN PART SAYS PD ON IT. THE BACK PART 40, 51. THAT'S THE GREEN PART OF THE BACK WHAT WERE TALKING ABOUT. ANYBODY ELSE? THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH. I'M GETTING CLOSE TO PUBLIC HEARING.
MY MIND IT'S REALLY CAN WE KIND OF EXCEPT THE SITE PLAN THE WAY IT IS, ALTHOUGH IT DOESN'T NECESSARILY CONFORM TO OUR LANGUAGE IN A CONDITIONAL USE. I'M KIND OF TO THE POINT I THINK IF WE LIMIT IT TO 20 RV SPOTS LIKE WE'VE GOT HERE. THEY SHOW 20. BUT THOSE OTHER USES ON IT. TO ME IT KINDA SATISFIES MY PARAMETERS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE. IF WE LIMIT
IT TO 20 RV SPOTS. I CAN CERTAINLY. >> I AGREE. >> WITH THIS CONDITIONS OF THE CITY LIMITING IT TO 20 SPOTS. HAVING TO GO THROUGH MORE STRENUOUS SITE PLAN PROCESS BUT A LOT OF THE CONCERNS POTENTIALLY SHE WOULD HAVE ASSERTED OUT.
OWNER WILLING TO ACCEPT THOSE CONDITIONS, THE HARD SURFACE ROADS. WHICH THEY ARE ANTICIPATING. IF THE CITY IS COMFORTABLE WITH AS A RECOMMENDATION I THINK THAT IS A I FEEL LIKE IN THE END SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD BE COMFORTABLE WITH.
WOULD BE ACCOMPLISHMENT TO GO THROUGH THAT NEXT SITE PLAN.
>> TYPE A BUFFER TO THE EAST. WE HAVE ADEQUATE ROOM WITH THIS PLAN THAT'S GIVEN TO US TO DO A TYPE A BUFFER ON THE EAST?
>> WE DON'T KNOW. IT CAN BE FOR THEM TO FIGURE OUT. WE DON'T KNOW WHETHER THEY CAN MAKE ALL THE TURNING RADIUS IS. THAT'S WHY THE SITE PLAN IS MORE APPROPRIATE WAY. THEY CAN KNOW WHETHER THEY COULD DO THIS OR NOT BUT I THINK THAT THEY PROBABLY CAN. I DO NOT KNOW
FOR SURE. >> OTHER QUESTION I'M WONDERING IS WHY WE DON'T HAVE A BUFFER BETWEEN THE
PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH? >> I THINK THERE IS A BUILT IN BUFFER IF YOU LOOK AT MASON'S EMAIL. I THINK THOSE ALREADY BUILT IN BUFFER WITH THE MOBILE HOME PARK THERE. IT LOOKS TO
ME LIKE THERE IS. >> THERE IS AN ALLEY.
>> YEAH. >> I DO SEE THE ALLEY.
THAT ITSELF IS A BUFFER. >> TYPE A BUFFER. >> IT'S 20 POINTS OR 25 POINTS. TYPE A.
>> I THINK IT'S 25. THEN THE LANDSCAPING CAN GET YOU SO MANY POINTS TO GET THE LOT 25.
THAT'S MOST STRINGENT. >> LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE THE MAKINGS OF A BUFFER THERE. >> THE OTHER ITEM IN ALL OF THIS. YOU MIGHT HAVE A SUGGESTION HERE IS WE NEED TO PUT SOME PARAMETERS ON THE AO PORTION OF THIS. I THINK THE PARAMETERS ARE X ACRES OUT OF 11.18 ACRES. WHAT WERE TALKING ABOUT IS 11.18 LESS THE PD ACREAGE. ALL BEAUTY PROBABLY IS HOPEFULLY GO BACK TO THE PDD 42. FIGURE OUT WHAT THE ACREAGE WAS ON THAT REZONING THEN YOU CAN BACK THAT ACREAGE OUT OF THE TOTAL TO COME UP WITH A NUMBER OF APPROXIMATE NUMBER. WHICH IS
[00:30:02]
NOT A SURVEY. IT'S CLOSER THAN WHAT WE HAVE RIGHT NOW. CAN ADD TO CONDITIONS. YOUR GUYS CONDITIONS. 11.18 ACRES LESS ACREAGE OUT OF THE PD. AS WHAT WERE TALKING ABOUT HERE. THENTHE SECOND IS GOING TO BE TO 20 RV SPOTS. THEN ADD THAT TO THE PLANNING GROUPS. >> NOT TO EXCEED 20 SPOTS.
18 TO CREATE THE BUFFER. GIVES MORE FLEXIBILITY.
>> JUST TO CONFIRM TWO OF THE POINTS BY THE WEST TEXAS GUYS. OUR ORDINANCE DOES REGULATE LIGHTING. IT WOULD HAVE TO BE A CUT OFF PICTURE. TOWARDS THE RV PARK.
OUR ORDINANCE DOES ACCOMMODATE THAT. ON THE OUTDOOR NOISE.
PRETTY HARD TO REGULATE EACH INDIVIDUAL OWNER. WANT TO PLAY THEIR STEREO THEY CAN. NO
AMPLIFIED OUTDOOR SOUNDS. >> WE DON'T HAVE ANY MECHANISMS IN THE ORDINANCE THAT WILL COVER NOISE. UNLESS YOU WANT TO COVER IT IN A WAY WHERE THE RV CAN PROJECT THE STEREO OUT
THERE. IN GENERAL. >> THERE CITY ORDINANCES FOR NOISE. >> HAVE THAT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOISES PER LIKE A DAWN TO DUSK. WHEN THEY START, WHEN THEY
FINISH. >> THERE IS PROVISIONS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE FOR NOISE.
IT'S ENFORCED BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. IT'S NOT RELATED TO
CONSTRUCTION ONLY. THERE IS A SEPARATE SECTION. >> I THINK THAT COVERS A BIT. CANNOT
CONTROL THE NOISE. >> THAT WAS MY THINKING TO. LET'S NOT PUT A RESTRICTION ON THIS THAT WE
THAT WE DIDN'T PUT ON THE OTHER NEIGHBORS. >> MIGHT BE WISE IF YOU'RE COMFORTABLE IS TO SPECIFIES THE NORTHEAST CORNER THREE ACRES. THE THREE ACRES LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF THE AGRICULTURAL OPEN-SPACE PARCEL. OR PORTION OF THE PARCEL. >> I THINK THEY'RE GONNA HAVE TROUBLE MAKING THAT. I'D RATHER LEAVE IT WIDE OPEN TO THE THING. EVERYTHING OTHER THAN THE PD IS ACREAGE. IF THEY DECIDE I COULD STICK 30 ON THE ORGAN HAVE TO COME BACK AND ASK FOR ANOTHER 10.
>> IDEALLY IT WOULD BE NICE IF WE COULD KEEP IT AWAY FROM THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE. SO THEY DON'T GET POTENTIAL NEGATIVE EFFECTS FROM NOISE ON THAT COMMUNITY. SLIDE IT TO GET MORE SPACE TO THE WEST, THAT'S A GOOD
THING PROBABLY. >> WANT TO GIVE THE OWNER AN OPPORTUNITY TO DIVERT RESPOND TO IT. >>
OPEN TO THAT. THAT IS WHAT IS IN THERE SO. >> I THINK I'M GONNA DO THIS HERE. LOST BETWEEN THOUGHT TRY TO GET BACK TO.
IT OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. A LITTLE REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARINGS HE COULD COME UP.
HERE'S WHAT WE COULD DO. HEARD THE DISCUSSION AND KIND OF HEARD WHAT WE THINK WE WILL DO APPEAR. THE OTHER OPTION WE COULD TABLE THIS, OKAY. INTO NEXT MONTH AND THEN YOU CAN WORK WITH THE STAFF OVER THE NEXT MONTH AND BRING IT BACK NEXT MONTH.
ADD THIS TO THE STAFF CONDITIONS HERE. NUMBER KIND OF AN AGREEABLE PROBABLY MOVE THAT FORWARD. WE COULD TABLE IS GIVE US MORE TIME TO WORK WITH STAFF AND FIGURE THINGS
OUT. BRING IT BACK NEXT MONTH. YOU HAVE ANOTHER OPTION. >> I THINK WERE OKAY WITH THE
OPTIONS THAT YOU ALL ARE THROWING OUT THERE. >> THANK YOU. >> OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR ANYBODY ELSE LIKE TO COME UP AND ADDRESS OUR CONVERSATION HERE? I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. TO BE HAVE A MOTION CAN 70 PUT
THAT INTO MOTION? >> MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. WITH CONDITIONS LISTED BY THE STAFF.
[00:35:08]
AND ALSO FOR THE SPOTS NOT TO EXCEED 20 SPACES. >> WROTE IT DOWN OVER THERE.
>> FOR THE CUP TO BE LIMITED TO THE PORTION THAT IS CURRENTLY ZONE A. THAT'S APPROXIMATELY
SIX ACRES OF THE 11 ACRES. >> AND FOR THE CUP TO BE LIMITED TO THE PORTION THAT IS CURRENTLY AO.
>> MOTION AND A SECOND. >> LIKE FOR ME TO REPEAT THAT? I'M LIKE SLOWER THAN NORMAL.
>> I THINK WE ARE GOOD. >> MR. BARNETT,
MRS. RUSSELL. >> YES. >> MS. FLEMING. >> YES. >> MR. ROSENBAUM.
>> YES. THE MOTION CARRIES. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR BEING WITH US ON THIS DISCUSSION. AND WILL TRY TO COMPLICATE THE NEXT ONE. FIVE AND NINE ARE RELATED ON OUR AGENDA ITEM 5 IN AUTUMN NINE ARE RELATED ON THE AGENDA.
I'M GOING TO I'VE GOT A QUESTION IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TWO. I WANT TO MAKE SURE KNOW THE ANSWER. I'M GOING TO READ BOTH OF THEM HERE. THE 2023 Ã15 CHANGE ZONING APPROXIMATE 1.26 ACRES FROM RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO MULTIFAMILY LOCATED 900 BLOCK. NINE 2023 Ã03. TO ABANDON APPROVED STREET BETWEEN HALEY STREET AND MONDAY STREET.
BECAUSE THESE TWO ARE IN A RELATED KIND OF GIVE YOU THAT. THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST OF THE STREET CLOSURE. IN THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST STREET CLOSURE OWNED BY THE SAME GROUP. THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS ALREADY ZONED MULTIFAMILY.
THERE'S TWO QUESTIONS HERE. ONE THERE ASKING TO REZONE THIS FROM RS SIX TO MULTIFAMILY.
ASKING THE CLOSED MANILA. MY QUESTION IS, WHEN WE CLOSED MANILA THEY CAN PLAT BOTH PROPERTIES TO THE CENTER BUT THEY CAN PLOT OVER THE WHOLE THING. DO THEY DO WE NEED TO REZONE MANILA STREET? OR WHEN THE. MY QUESTION FOR MY QUESTION IS DO
WE NEED TO CLOSE THE THIRD AND THEN INCLUDED IN THE MULTIFAMILY ZONING? >> NO, SIR. OUR ORDINANCE READS THAT ZONING EXTENDS TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE STREET.
THERE IS CURRENTLY MULTIFAMILY ZONING TO THE CENTER OF MANILA STREET. IF WE REZONE THIS
PROPERTY. EXTEND. >> PERFECT. I THINK I'VE ALREADY READ Z 20
2315. YOU WANT TO TAKE ON THAT ONE FIRST, ADAM? >> ADAM PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF ABILENE. TODAY APPEARED PRESENTING THE 20 2315.
IWS TO LLC. REPRESENTED BY JACOB.
HERE IS A LOCATION MAP KIND OF SHOWING THE AREA. THIS IS JUST NORTH OF CRAIG MIDDLE SCHOOL.
HERE'S THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE CURRENT PROPERTIES IN SUBJECT PROPERTY AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES. HEAVY INDUSTRIAL JUST TO THE NORTH OF THE PROPERTY. HERE OTHER PERMITTED USES IN RS ZONING. THE PERMITTED USES. FAIRLY SIMILAR. HERE ARE SOME SUBJECT USE OF THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY IT IS VACANT LAND.
AS WELL AS THE ADJACENT TO IT. SEND OUT NOTIFICATIONS TO ALL THE PROPERTIES. WE'VE RECEIVED NO RESPONSES.
WE HAVE FOUND THAT THIS REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CONFERENCE OF PLAN.
SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING GENERALLY ACCEPTED PLANNING AND THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. ANY QUESTIONS? >> ANY QUESTIONS FOR ADAM? THANKS.
[00:40:04]
I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ANYONE THAT WANTS TO COME UP AND ADDRESS THIS? WE GOT A QUESTION ANSWERED. ADAM DID A GOOD JOB OF ANSWERING HER QUESTIONS.>> BILLING AGENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. THIS REQUEST TO SUPPORT EMILY DEVELOPMENT.
NOT ONLY OF THE PROPERTY THAT WERE ASKING TO REZONE ON THE EAST SIDE OF MANILA, ALSO THE WEST SIDE EXISTING MULTIFAMILY TO THE WEST LOOKING TO EXTEND ALL THE WAY TO THE CHURCH PROPERTY TO THE EAST. STAFF OUTLINED HEAVY INDUSTRIAL TO THE NORTH. I THINK THIS IS APPROPRIATE, IT MAKES SENSE. ESPECIALLY WHEN HE GOT IT FROM A TRANSITIONAL USE FORGOT SINGLE-FAMILY TO THE SOUTH, TO THE SOUTH OF THAT. I THINK IT'S A GOOD FIT. OBVIOUSLY REQUEST COMING UP. I'LL GO AHEAD AND COVER THAT AS WELL.
THERE ARE NO EXISTING UTILITIES ON MANILA. IF YOU BEEN OUT THERE THERE IS NO ROAD THERE.
NOT SURE I COULD TELL YOU WHY THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTS. HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED. I THINK FROM EVERY ELEMENT OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES MAKES SENSE TO ABANDON THE RIGHT OF WAY. MY CLIENTS ATTEMPT TO DEVELOP MULTIFAMILY UNITS FACING HALEY STREET TO THE NORTH. ALSO FACING THE STREET TO THE SOUTH. BOTH REQUEST I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS. >> ANY QUESTIONS? APPRECIATE YOU COMING. >> AND KEEP HER >> ANYBODY ELSE LIKE TO VISIT WITH US? I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. I THINK IT'S A GOOD USE. IT MAKES A
LOT OF SENSE TO DO THAT. >> MOMENT TO APPROVE. >> SECOND. >> MOTION TO APPROVE AND A
SECOND. >> MR. BARNETT,. YES. >> MS. RUSSELL. BUT YES. >> MS. FLEMING. >> MR. ROSENBAUM.
>> YES. >> MOTION CARRIES. AMANDA MANILA STREET FROM HEAVY STREET TO I THINK WE COVERED A GOOD AMOUNT.
2023 03. ALSO BEEN PROPOSED BY IWS TO LLC REPRESENTED BY JACOB MARTIN.
REQUEST TO ABANDON MANILA STREET BETWEEN MONDAY STREET. HERE'S THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AS YOU CAN SEE UNIMPROVED RIGHT OF WAY.
PROPERTY WAS PREVIOUSLY PLOTTED AND NEVER IMPROVE. AFTER PLODDING.
HERE'S THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE PROPERTIES ADJACENT. HEAVY INDUSTRIAL TO THE NORTH.
HALEY STREET IS A LOCAL STREET. HERE IS THE SITE EXHIBIT OF SUBMITTED TO US BY JACOB MARTIN. SHOWING WHAT IS INTENDED TO BE ABANDONED. AGREE TO A MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT. HERE ARE SOME VIEWS OF THE PROPERTY. AS YOU CAN SEE THIS IS A PREFILLED RIGHT-OF-WAY. AS WELL AS THE NEIGHBOR ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR HALEY STREET. WE SENT OUT NOTIFICATIONS AND RECEIVED NO RESPONSES IN FAVOR OR OPPOSED. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE SUBJECT RIGHT-OF-WAY ALL ADJOINING PROPERTIES SHOULD BE PLOTTED WITH THEM WHEN IN ONE YEAR OF APPROVED ORDINANCE. IF A REPLY IS NOT RECORDED IN WITH THE WITHIN ONE YEAR SHOULD BE AVOIDED. ANY UTILITIES LOCATED IN THE SUBJECT SHALL BE COVERED.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> ANY QUESTIONS FOR ADAM? THANKS ADAM.
I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANYBODY LIKE TO COME UP AND ADDRESS THIS?
I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. WE HAVE A MOTION. >> MOTION TO APPROVE WITH
CONDITIONS AS STATED. >> SECOND. >> A MOTION AND A SECOND PAIR >> MR. BARNETT,
MS. RUSSELL. >> YES. >> MS. FLEMING. >> YES. >> MR. ROSENBAUM. >> YES. >> THE
MOTION CARRIES. >> 2023 Ã17. THE 2023 Ã17.
ZONING APPROXIMATELY 0.08 ACRES FOR AGRICULTURAL HEAVY COMMERCIAL STANFORD STREET.
>> MASON PLANNING FOR THE CITY OF ABILENE. LOOKING AT 2023 Ã 17. OWNER IS MIKE AND BUFFY.
[00:45:09]
THE AGENT IS MAX. REQUEST IS TO REZONE FROM AO. EAST STANFORD STREET SENT OUT NOTIFICATIONS TO GET ANY IN FAVOR OR OPPOSED. AN AERIAL IMAGE OF LOCATION FOR REZONING.THERE ARE SOME VIEWS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
PERMITTED USES IN AO ZONING. PERMITTED USES IN HC ZONING. PROPERTY OWNER NOTICES WITHIN A 200 FOOT BUFFER OF THE PROPERTY FOR REZONING. WE GOT NO IN FAVOR IN NOAH POST.
PROPOSED REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, SURROUNDING USES IN ZONING.
PLANNING PRINCIPLES AND CRITERIA. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. >> DID THEY NOT HAVE ENOUGH ROOM
FOR THE TURNOUTS? >> YES SIR. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MASON? THANK YOU.
HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ANYBODY LIKE TO COME UP AND ADDRESS THIS CASE?
>> HOW ARE YOU ALL DOING? MY NAME IS MATT. PAUL ASSISTANT. REPRESENTING YELLOW HOUSE. AS WELL AS BUFFY.
YOU HAVE TO GET A BOUT A.08. 3000 SQUARE FEET.
TO MAKE IT ACCEPTABLE. >> RIGHT. >> I HAVE SOME DRAWINGS. THEY SENT ME A MOCKUP OF WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO. THE INFORMATION EVERYTHING OVER THERE.
>> ANY QUESTIONS FOR MATT? THANKS MATT.
ANYBODY ELSE? I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> APPROVED. >> SECOND PAIR >> A MOTION AND A SECOND. >> MR. BARNETT. YES. >> MS. RUSSELL.
>> YES. >> MS. FLEMING. >> YES. >> YES.
>> THE MOTION CARRIES. >> THE 2023 Ã19 CHANGE ZONING OF PROXIMALLY .8 ACRES FROM AGRICULTURE BASED MOBILE HOME LOCATED 350
COMANCHE TRAIL. >> ONCE AGAIN AUTUMN ADAM. REQUEST FROM ANTONIO AND ELIZABETH GONZALES. REPRESENT BY GEOTECH. REQUEST TO REZONE SMALL PORTION FROM AO TO MOBILE HOME. WILL WILL HIM MANUFACTURED HOME ZONING. HERE'S A LOCATION MAP SHOWING WHERE THE PROPERTY IS. JUST NORTH OF THE CEMETERY. HERE IS THE CURRENT ZONING PROPERTIES NEARBY. THERE'S SOME MOBILE HOME ZONING. JUST EAST OF THIS PROPERTY. WITH THE REMAINDER OF IT BEING AO ZONING. PERMITTED USES IN AO ZONING. HERE ARE THE PERMITTED USE THOSEUSES. AS YOU CAN SEE HERE ARE THE WEST NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. OTHER SUBJECT PROPERTIES VIEWS OF THE PROPERTY ITSELF.
WE SENT OUT NOTIFICATIONS RECEIVED DONE IN FAVOR OR OPPOSED. HIS REQUEST HAS BEEN FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SURROUNDING ZONINGS. GENERALLY ACCEPTED PLANNING AND CRITERIA. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. ANY QUESTIONS?
>> ANY QUESTIONS FOR ADAM? >> THANKS. >> OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ANYONE LIKE TO COME UP AND ADDRESS THIS? I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION, OR A MOTION?
>> A MOVE TO APPROVE. >> SECOND. >> MOTION TO APPROVE. >> SECOND. >> MR. BARNETT. >>
MR. BENHAM. >> YES. >> MS. RUSSELL. >> YES. >> MS. FLEMING. >> MR. ROSENBAUM. >>
[00:50:02]
>> CHANGE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY .32 ACRES FROM HEAVY COMMERCIAL. LOCATED 1317.
>> ADAM, CITY OF ABILENE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE FROM HEAVY COMMERCIAL.
THERE IS A LOCATION MAP SHOWING THE AREA. THIS IS AT 1317 MESQUITE STREET.
THIS IS TO ALLOW A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE TO BE PLACED ON THIS LOT. HERE'S THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE PROPERTY. AS YOU CAN SEE THERE'S A LOT OF HEAVY COMMERCIAL ZONING NEARBY.
THERE ARE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON THIS AREA. AS WELL AS TYPICAL ADOPTED ZONING. HERE OTHER PERMITTED USES AND HEAVY COMMERCIAL ZONING. HERE ARE THE PERMITTED USES IN OUR SIX ZONING. HERE ARE SOME SUBJECT VIEWS OF THE PROPERTY. WEST OF THE PROPERTY IS A VACANT LOT. SOUTH BEING A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE. NORTH BEING ANOTHER VACANT LOT. WE SENT OUT NOTICES TO NEIGHBORS AND RECEIVED NONE. IN FAVOR OR OPPOSED. THIS PROPOSED REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SURROUNDING USES OF ZONINGS. GENERALLY ACCEPTED PLANNING PRINCIPLES CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME?
>> ANY QUESTIONS FOR ADAM? >> THANK YOU ALL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANYBODY OUT THERE
LIKE TO TALK TO US? >> YES MA'AM. >> >> MY NAME IS MARY FROM ALL BILLING. MY FAMILY LOCATES THE PROPERTY AT 1233 MESQUITE. MY QUESTION WANTS TO ASK IF HE'S ALLOWED TO MAKE THAT RESIDENTIAL, WILL THAT ALLEVIATE OUR RIGHTS TO HOW HEAVY COMMERCIAL?
>> 1233 IN THE ADJACENT PROPERTY? >> GO BACK TO THE RED AND YELLOW.
>> DOWN THERE BEFORE BLUE. >> MA'AM. >> WERE RIGHT ON THE CORNER. >> ARE ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF 13TH THERE. NO MA'AM YOU ARE SO HEAVY COMMERCIAL THERE. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH.
>> MY NAME IS PETRA ORTIZ 1317 MESQUITE.
I NEVER KNEW THAT IT HAD SWITCH TO COMMERCIAL. I FOUND THAT OUT I WANTED TO BE RESIDENTIAL.
BECAUSE THERE IS HOMES EVEN THOUGH THERE SOME EMPTY LOTS AROUND THERE. I WOULD LIKE FOR
THAT TO BE RESIDENTIAL. >> YES MA'AM. >> DO NOT WANT TO GO ANYWHERE ELSE. >> I THINK WE ARE FINDING UP AND DOWN 13 WHEN THEY DID SOME OF THAT ZONING CHANGE. WAY BACK IN THE DAY.
THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THIS IS KIND OF COME UP. WE UNDERSTAND. NEED TO UNDERSTAND WHAT'S GOING ON.
>> NOW WANTED TO DO SOMETHING ON THE PROPERTY. NOW IT'S AN ISSUE. WE WILL GET IT FIXED.
>> IT'S NOT BECAUSE OF THAT. I NEVER REALLY KNEW THE CITIZEN LETTERS WHAT HAPPENED TO MY LETTER? I BEEN THERE SINCE 2005. I BOUGHT THE PROPERTY I NEVER KNEW THAT. WHY DID THEY
CHANGE IT? I DID NOT KNOW. I LIKE THE AREA. >> YES MA'AM. >> I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW THEY WOULD JUST CHANGE IT. AND SAY OKAY, WHAT? I NEED TO KNOW
WHAT'S GOING ON. >> THANK YOU. SORRY ABOUT THAT. WE APPRECIATE YOU BEARING WITH US.
>> THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYBODY ELSE? I WILL CLOSE
THE PUBLIC HEARING A MOTION? >> A MOTION TO APPROVE. >> I CAN. >> A MOTION AND A SECOND.
>> MR. BARNETT. MR. BENHAM. >> YES. >> MS.
RUSSELL. >> ASKED MS. FLEMING. >> YES. >> MR. ROSENBAUM. >> YES. >> THE MOTION CARRIES.
>> THANK YOU FOR COMING AND STICKING WITH US ON OUR DISCUSSIONS
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.