[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:19]
IT IS CONDITIONS CAN BE APPEALED . PLEASE STATE YOUR NA AND ADDRESS AT THE PODIUM AND YOUR PURPOSE. EACH IS REQUESTED TO LIMIT THE PRESENTATION TO NO MORE THAN THREE MINUTES.
ADDITIONAL TIME COULD BE GRANTED AT THE DISCRETION OF
THE CHAIR. >> WE THANK YOU FOR THIS DAY AND OPPORTUNITY AND NEW YEAR. AS WE HEAR THESE CASES THAT WE WOULD MAKE WISE DECISIONS THAT ARE CONSISTENT AND FAIR. IN OUR NATION, AND OUR CITY AND THOSE WILL BE BLESSED TODAY BY THE RECLAMATION NATIONS THAT WE MAKE TO THE COUNCIL. I PRAY FOR
[MINUTES]
GUIDANCE AND WISDOM AS WE EMBARK ON THAT EVER - ENDEAVOR.>> THE FIRST ITEM IS THE MINUTES FROM LAST MEETING. THE MEMBERS THAT WERE PART OF THE LAST MEETING, DID YOU HAVE A CHANCE TO REVIEW THOSE? OR ANY EDITS OR CHANGES ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO TALK ABOUT? LET ME OPEN THESE FOR PUBLIC HEARING. DOES ANYBODY FROM THE PUBLIC WANTS TO ADDRESS THE MINUTES? IS IT DONE, WE WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES.
SECOND. . ALL LEWIS , CAN A SECOND THOSE AND ALL IN FAVOR.
[ZONING]
OUR SECOND IS CONDITIONAL PERMANENT 2025. 01 RECEIVE A REPORT, HOLD A DISCUSSION AND PUBLIC HEARING, AND TAKE ACTION ON A REQUEST FROM THE OWNER, TO APPLY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO APPROXIMATELY 91.21 ACRES TO ALLOW A 150' TALL MONOPOLE TOWER WITHIN AGRICULTURE OPEN. LOCATED AT 1602 LOOP 322. LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS TAYLOR COUNTY EXPO CENTER SUBDIVISION,ABILENE, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS. >> TODAY I AM PRESENTING 2025, THE AGENT IS GALLOWAY. IT IS A CONDITION PERMIT.AND THE AGRICULTURAL OPEN ZONING LOCATED AT THE 1602 LOOP 322.
WE HAVE THE AERIAL LOCATION MAP HERE. HERE IS THE PROPOSED SITE TO THE LOCATION. THE SITE PLAN. THE ZONING MAP. THESE ARE THE USES PERMITTED IN AGRICULTURAL OPEN. HERE ARE SOME VIEWS OF THE PROPERTY. HERE IS A FEW MORE VIEWS OF THE PROPERTY.
NOTIFICATIONS WERE SENT OUT IN A BUFFER AND WE RECEIVED A ZERO IN FAVOR AND ZERO IN OPPOSITION. THE PROPOSE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE USES, ZONING AND THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL. THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL TO SUBJECT THE TOWER HEIGHT AND LOCATION AND THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN. QUESTIONS? CONDITIONS?
>> YES. >> I HAVE NO QUESTIONS. ANYONE
ELSE? >> THANK YOU. WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER.
>> GOOD AFTERNOON, I AM ESTHER GALLOWAY. I AM REPRESENTING TAYLOR COUNTY WITH THE EXPO AND TITAN TOWERS, AS WELL. WE WOULD LIKE TO PUT A POLL - IT IS THE GATE THREE LOCATION IF IT MAKES ANY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SHOTWELL AND THE OLD HORSE BARN. THAT IS THE LOCATION ON IT. ADDRESSING WHAT SHE HAD SAID, WE HAVE FILED WITH THE FAA TO DO A AERIAL STUDY . THEY HAVE ALREADY APPROVED US TO 154 FEET WITH A DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD FOR AIR TRAFFIC. WE ARE ALREADY GOOD THERE . I WILL GET THEM ON A SITE PLAN WHATEVER WE NEED TO DO. THIS IS PART OF AT&T ONGOING INCREASING COVERAGE . MORE IMPORTANTLY,
[00:05:05]
INCREASING THEIR CAPACITY BECAUSE WE'VE ALL BEEN THERE WHERE YOU HAVE ONE OR TWO BARS. THIS IS AN AREA LIKE THAT. WHEN I SPOKE TO RUSSELL JOHNSON, THE GENERAL MANAGER. SHE WELCOMES IT BECAUSE FOR THE BIG EVENTS SHE HAS TO ASK THE CARRIERS TO BRING IN TEMPORARY ANTENNAS TO HELP OUT WITH THE CAPACITY.THAT IS ONE OF THE BIG THINGS. ALSO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND FURTHER SOUTH ALSO HAVE POOR COVERAGE RIGHT NOW ESPECIALLY INSIDE. THIS SHOULD HELP OUT WITH THAT . THAT IS KIND OF WHERE WE ARE. I DID NOT KNOW IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS.
>> IT SEEMS LIKE A NATURAL SPOT FOR IT. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE? WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANY DISCUSSION ON ITEM 2? IF NOT ANY MOTIONS? A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS. A MOTION WITH THE CONDITIONS.
>> CUP-2025-02: RECEIVE A REPORT, HOLD A DISCUSSION AND PUBLIC HEARING, AND TAKE ACTION ON A REQUEST FROM THE OWNER, TO APPLY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO APPROXIMATELY 0.57 ACRES TO ALLOW A DRIVE-THRU LANE. LOCATED AT 3210 ANTILLEY ROAD.
>> GOOD AFTERNOON, I AM CLARISSA WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR THE CITY OF ABILENE. WE ARE LOOKING AT 2025 - 02 THE REQUEST IS TO APPLY A PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A DRIVE-THROUGH LANE LOCATED AT 3210 ANTILLEY ROAD. IT IS NEXT TO ANOTHER MEDICAL OFFICE IN BETWEEN NEIGHBORHOODS. IT IS PLANNING DEVELOPMENT FOUR . HERE, YOU CAN SEE THE PROPOSAL FOR THE DRIVE-THROUGH LANE TO GO AROUND THE BUILDING . IT GIVES YOU SOME DIMENSIONS WITH THREE STACKING SPACES AND THE WIDTH IS 10 FEET. ALSO WITH 20 FEET OF AREA BEHIND THE BUILDING. THIS IS WHAT WOULD PHYSICALLY LOOK LIKE AND WHAT IT DOES LOOK LIKE. HERE ARE SOME VIEWS OF THE NEIGHBORING AREAS WITH A PROPERTY RIGHT NEXT THAT IS VACANT. THERE ARE RESIDENTIAL AND A MEDICAL OFFICE . WE SENT THE NOTIFICATION AND WE RECEIVED ONE IN FAVOR AND WE RECEIVED ONE IN PROPOSED. THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH THE SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING.
WITH THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL. THE STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO THE SUBMITTED CONCEPT PLAN AND THE PLAN OF OPERATION. I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. I WENT OUT THERE AND DROVE IT .
>> WILL THAT BE LIMITED TO JUST A MEDICAL OFFICE OR IF IT TURNED ANSWER TO ANOTHER OWNERSHIP? WOULD THAT
CONDITIONAL USE BE EXTENDED? >> IF IT WERE TO BE ABANDONED, THE CONDITIONAL USE COULD BE CONTINUED . BUT IF IT WAS EVER ABANDONED, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE REAPPLIED FOR.
>> ANY QUESTIONS? >> WHAT WAS THE STATED
OBJECTION FOR THE OPPOSITION? >> IT WAS JUST A RESPONSE ,
THERE WAS NOTHING ATTACHED. >> I ALSO WANTED TO MENTION THAT WE HAVE THE APPLICANT HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AND THE FIRE MARSHAL IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
>> THANK YOU. WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS. WOULD ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT WHO IS HERE? WE WILL CLOSE THE
[00:10:03]
PUBLIC HEARING. ANY DISCUSSION? >> I WOULD MAKE A MOTION TO
APPROVE. >> I WAS GOING TO ASK .
>> WE CAN OPEN IT BACK UP. >> CLARISSA, I SHOULD'VE ASKED THIS A MOMENT AGO. THE WEST FOOT 10 FEET SEEMS TIGHT.
>> IT IS TIGHT. THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TELLS YOU ABOUT THE SPACES BEING 10. IT TELLS YOU THEY HAVE TO HAVE ENOUGH AND HOW MUCH. ONE THING IS THAT I DID REACH OUT TO STEVE KEITH IN PUBLIC'S WORKS . HE DID SPECIFY THAT FOR A DRIVING LINE , THE MINIMUM IS 12 FEET. THAT IS SOMETHING THAT I RECEIVED AFTER THE STAFF REPORT . I DID NOTICE THAT IT
WAS A LITTLE BIT TIGHT. >> EVERYWHERE ELSE ON THE EAST SIDE AND TO THE NORTH SIDE BUT THE WEST SIDE IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO GET MY TRUCK IN THAT LANE.
>> ESPECIALLY WITH THE DEVELOPMENT, AND YOU CAN
IMAGINE JUST ONE INCH. >> DOES THE 10 FEET INCLUDE THE
>> WELL, WHILE WE HAVE YOU BACK UP HERE THIS HAS BEEN AN OPERATIONS DRIVE-THROUGH FOR HOW LONG?
>> I'M NOT SURE OF THE EXACT DATE WHEN THE WINDOWS SERVICE BECAME AVAILABLE BUT IT IS SOMETHING THAT CAME TO BE THIS YEAR. THEY PURCHASED AND DID A REMODEL THIS PAST YEAR.
>> IS THERE ANY INDICATION OF A PROBLEM WITH TRAFFIC?
>> WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY COMPLAINTS FROM CARS STACKING UP FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. I DID NOT CHECK
WITH ANY OTHER DIVISION. >> THANK YOU. WE WILL LEAVE THIS DISCUSSION OPEN IF ANYBODY HAS ANYTHING ELSE.
>> CLIENT ROSENBAUM, I AM REPRESENTING LAUREN. AND IT IS DIFFERENT OUT HERE AND CONGRATULATIONS. SO IT IS A TIGHT . IT IS TIGHT TO GET AROUND WITH MY TRUCK. AND AN 18 TRUCK IS ALSO 20. IT CAN MAKE A TURN BUT IT IS TIGHT. BY THE WAY, THEY WENT INTO OPERATION DECEMBER 4TH, 2023. IT HAS BEEN IN OPERATION FOR NEARLY ONE YEAR. NOBODY REALLY COMPLAINED
OTHER THAN IT IS TIGHT. >> IT IS JUST A CONVENIENCE, IT
IS NOT AS IF IT IS A STARBUCKS. >> THEY CALLED AHEAD SO THE PICKUP IS READY FOR THEM. THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU. >> I AM NOT OPPOSED JUST TO BE
CLEAR. >> YOU COULD BE MORE OF AN ISSUE DEPENDING ON HOW CLOSE THE NEIGHBOR IS IF THEY ARE PARTICULAR ABOUT THE PROPERTY LINE. ANYONE ELSE?
>> I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY AS YOUR MOTION TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS AS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT.
>> KEVIN HAS A MOTION TO APPROVE AS STATED. SHANTE WITH A SECOND. .
>> 4. Z-2025-01: RECEIVE A REPORT, HOLD A DISCUSSION AND PUBLIC HEARING, AND TAKE ACTION ON A REQUEST FROM THE OWNER TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 2.00 ACRES FROM GENERAL RETAIL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING. LOCATED ON THE 6600 BLOCK OF BUFFALO GAP ROAD. Z-2025-01: RECEIVE A
REPORT, >> HERE IS A LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY AS IT EXISTS. THIS IS BETWEEN THE DOLLAR GENERAL ON BUFFALO GAP ROAD. IT IS ON THE 6600 BLOCK OF BUFFALO GAP
[00:15:13]
ROAD. HERE IS THE CURRENT ZONING MAP SHOWING THE PROPERTIES. IT IS ZONED FOR GENERAL RETAIL WITH PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO IT WITH SOME RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY TO THE SOUTH AND ALSO ZONING TO THE EAST AND THE WEST. THOSE ARE MAINLY JUST EASEMENTS FOR UTILITIES . THEY ARE REQUESTING TO THIS TO BE CHANGED TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL. HERE ARE THE GENERAL PERMITTED USES FOR GENERAL ZONING. FOLLOWED BY THE ALLOWED USES IN GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING. HERE ARE SOME PROPERTY VIEWS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. CURRENTLY IT IS VACANT WITH ADJACENT USING BEING THE DOLLAR GENERAL AS WELL AS AN ELECTRICAL EASEMENT, AS WELL. WE SENT NOTIFICATIONS WITHIN THE 200 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. WE DID RECEIVE ONE IN OPPOSITION NEAR HILLSIDE COURT. THE STAFF HAS FOUND THIS REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH SURROUNDED USES IN GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND THE CRITERIA FOR STAFF RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANYQUESTIONS. >> WHAT IS PROPOSED FOR THIS
SITE ? >> I BELIEVE IT IS A MECHANICS
SHOP THEY ARE PROPOSING. >> DO YOU KNOW IF IT IS MAJOR,
LARGE TRUCK MECHANICS ? >> I DO NOT KNOW THE DETAILS OF IT BUT I THINK IT IS AUTOMOBILES AND TRUCKS.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU, ADAM. WE WILL OPEN THE FLOOR FOR PUBLIC HEARING IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS
THIS MATTER. >> GOOD AFTERNOON. 464 BAYHILL WHICH IS ACROSS THE ALLEY FROM SOME LAND THAT TACO CASA OWNS BUT IT IS ADJACENT TO THIS LAND PROPOSAL. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT SOME OF THE USES FOR GENERAL COMMERCIAL ARE SORT OF OUT OF LINE WITH GENERAL RETAIL. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT KEPT AS A GENERAL RETAIL FOR IT TO BE MORE CONSISTENT WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND MORE APPROPRIATE FOR THAT AREA.
ACROSS THE STREET AND NEARBY IS A STRIP CENTER THAT IS TOTALLY RETAIL. SOME OF THE USES OF GENERAL COMMERCIAL ARE FAIRLY SEVERE IN MY OPINION FROM THIS LOCATION. I LOOKED AT INFORMATION THAT SOMEBODY FROM THE CITY SENT . I COULD NOT DETERMINE THE ACTUAL USE FOR THE PROPERTY. IT LOOKED LIKE IT WAS A SMALL STRIP CENTER LAYOUT . THAT, I DO NOT KNOW . AGAIN, SOME OF THESE GENERAL COMMERCIAL ITEMS ARE A LITTLE SEVERE IN MY OPINION. THIS IS ADJACENT TO A VERY NICE NEIGHBORHOOD . I JUST DO NOT THINK A MECHANICS USE IS APPROPRIATE AND NOT IN LINE WITH THE GENERAL RETAIL IN MY
OPINION. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE ON
THIS MATTER? >> I-68002 HILLSIDE COURT RIGHT BEHIND WHERE IT IS BEING PROPOSED. I AM IN AGREEMENT WITH HIM. IT SEEMS LIKE THIS IS MORE OF A HEAVY DUTY INDUSTRIAL REQUEST. AS A GENERAL CONTRACTOR AREA, THE RETAIL
[00:20:07]
AREA CAN BE ANNOYING ENOUGH FOR SOME OF US. WE GET DUMP TRUCKS AT 5:00 A.M. THAT IS WHAT WE DEAL WITH. BUT GETTING REZONED FOR THIS, WE ARE WORRIED ABOUT SOUND POLLUTION THERE IS GOING TO BE FROM THIS. IT IS ALSO ON AN INCLINE. I DO NOT KNOW IF THEY PLAN ON DOING ANY EXCAVATING AND HOW THAT WILL IMPACT THE GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD OF EVERYBODY AROUND THERE. I AM IN AGREEMENT AND I FEEL THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT FIT FOR A GARAGE.RETAIL IN THIS AREA SEEMS PERFECTLY FINE. BUT AS A RESIDENT RIGHT BEHIND THERE, THERE IS GOING TO BE EXTRA NOISE POLLUTION. WE ARE CONCERNED IF IT IS GOING TO BE A GARAGE. THERE COULD BE CONNOTATIONS SUCH AS JUNK IN THE AREA WHICH IS A CONCERN FOR US. THAT IS ALL I HAVE, THANK
>> ANYONE ELSE ON THIS MATTER? SEEING NO ONE, WE WILL CLOSE
THE PUBLIC HEARING. DISCUSSION? >> I AM NOT CLEAR ON WHY CHANGING OF ZONING IS REQUIRED. IT IS ALLOWED IN GENERAL RETAIL. THE ONLY REASON I WOULD SEE IF IT IS A REPAIR FACILITY IF IT IS GOING TO BE CHANGED FOR A MAJOR AUTO MALE - AUTOMOBILE REPAIR. BUT I DID AGREE WITH THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE SPOKEN. IT IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THIS AREA.
>> IT IS LIKE SPOT ZONING WITH THE AMOUNT OF RETAIL THAT HAS BEEN GOING ON AROUND THERE. TO ME, THAT WOULD STILL BE RETAIL IF IT IS JUST AN OIL CHANGE SHOP. ANY THOUGHTS OR
CONVERSATIONS? >> I WOULD THINK WE WOULD NEED MORE INSIGHT INTO WHAT IT IS GOING TO BE. THAT IS PART OF IT, IF WE ARE APPROVING ALL OF THESE ADDITIONAL USES WITHOUT KNOWING SPECIFICALLY. WHETHER OR NOT WE APPROVE SOMETHING SPECIFIC NOW, IT COULD BE SOLD AND CHANGED FOR AN INDUSTRIAL USE IN THE FUTURE. FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE HERE , IF YOU'RE THE APPLICANT WATCHING. WE ARE RECOMMENDING BODY WHEN IT COMES TO THESE CASES. WHETHER OR NOT THIS IS MOVING FORWARD, WE VOTED DOWN, THERE IS A CHANCE THEY WILL APPEAL AS WELL AND MOVE FORWARD. THERE ARE TWO TIMES WHEN THIS MATTER WILL COME BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL. NO MATTER OF WHAT WE DO TODAY SO I WOULD ENCOURAGE ANYONE . IF THEY AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE DECISION THAT IS MADE BY THIS COMMISSION AND HEARD TODAY TO MAKE SURE THEIR PRESENCE IS HEARD AT CITY COUNCIL TO DISCUSS THIS FURTHER AND ASK QUESTIONS. MOST PEOPLE ONLY COME HERE ONCE AND THAT IS THE NEXT STEP IN THIS PROCESS. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION RELATED TO THIS OR ANY MOTION?
>> I DO NOT HAVE A MOTION TO DENY. SO I WOULD MAKE A MOTION TO DENY. SECOND..
CARIES. >> THERE IS A CHANCE THAT IT COULD BE APPEALED AND TAKEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE TWO HEARINGS AT CITY COUNCIL AS WELL. TV GUIDE - THANK YOU.
Z-2025-02: RECEIVE A REPORT, HOLD A DISCUSSION AND PUBLIC HEARING, AND TAKE ACTION ON A REQUEST FROM THE OWNER TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 0.48 ACRES FROM CENTRAL BUSINESS TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PDD-192.
LOCATED AT 1066 S. 2ND STREET. >> I WILL BE PRESENTING THIS CASE. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY .48 ACRES FROM
[00:25:03]
THE CENTRAL BUSINESS TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A DISTILLERY WITHIN THE ZONING LOCATED AT 1066 SOUTH SECOND STREET. HERE IS THE AERIAL LOCATION MAP AND WE HAVE A ZONING MAP . WE HAVE SOME SUBJECT PROPERTY VIEWS AND SOME SURROUNDING PROPERTY VIEWS. THERE IS A PARKING LOT, VACANT LOT AND A PARTS STORE.HERE ARE THE USES IN CENTRAL BUSINESS ZONING . WE SENT OUT NOTIFICATIONS WITHIN A 200 FEET BUFFER AND WE RECEIVED ONE IN FAVOR AND ZERO IN OPPOSITION. THE ONE IN FAVOR WAS THE PROPERTY OWNER. THE PROPOSED REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE SURROUNDED USES IN ZONING AND THE GENERAL ACCEPTED PRINCIPLES AND THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL .
THE STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE OPERATION PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT. I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS. >> IS THIS FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING OR JUST FOR THE ONE SECTION?
>> IT IS FOR THE BRICK BUILDING AND THE ONE-STORY BUILDING THAT
IS ATTACHED TO IT. >> I DROVE BY .
>> IT DOES HAVE A COUPLE OF ADDRESSES BUT IT IS APPLYING TO
ALL OF IT. >> OKAY. THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU, MASON. >> WE WILL OPEN THE FLOOR FOR PUBLIC HEARING IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS MATTER.
>> LARRY SANDERS, 802 GREEN VALLEY , CITY OF ABILENE. I'M THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER FOR WEST TEXAS SPIRITS. I SIMPLY WANTED TO MAKE MYSELF AVAILABLE IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE INTENDED RENTAL OF THIS PROPERTY FOR THE PRODUCTION OF SPIRITS AND IN ENTERTAINMENT AREA AS WELL AND SEVERAL OTHER ACTIVITIES THAT WILL OCCUR ON THIS PROPERTY IF
THE ZONING CHANGE OCCURS. >> YOU CURRENTLY HAVE A
LOCATION ON WALNUT? >> OUR FORMER LOCATION WAS SIX THE - 630 EAST STREET BUT WE DID GO TO THE SAME ZONING CHANGES TO FACILITATE THE CREATION OF OUR BUSINESS FOUR YEARS AGO. IT WAS A VERY SUCCESSFUL OPPORTUNITY AND THE NEIGHBORS FEEL GOOD ABOUT THAT. WE FEEL THERE WILL BE A SIMILAR ATTITUDE ABOUT THE ZONING CHANGE ON THIS LOCATION, AS
>> GOOD LUCK TO YOU. >> THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE ON THIS MATTER? SEEING NO ONE, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANY DISCUSSION?
>> IT IS A GREAT USE OF THAT FACILITY AND THAT AREA. IT IS A GOOD FIT FOR THE BUILDING. TO HAVE IT CHANGED FOR ACTIVE SPACES. IT HAS BEEN A FEW DIFFERENT THINGS .
>> I REMEMBER WHEN IT WAS A CLUB. I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS. SECOND.
THE MOTION CARRIES. THAT IS ALL THE AGENDA ITEMS. MR. HOUSE IS A LOCAL BUILDER THAT IT IS SOME COMMERCIAL REMODELING. WE ARE APPRECIATIVE OF HIS EXPERTISE OF BRINGING FUTURE MATTERS.
HOPEFULLY ALL OF OUR MEETINGS WILL BE THIS SHORT AND EASY.
GOOD LUCK. WE ARE ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.