[00:00:01]
AT THIS TIME. I WILL OPEN THE JANUARY 7TH, 2026 ABILENE BOARD OF BUILDING STANDARDS TO ORDER. THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK TO ANY CASE TODAY SHALL HAVE SIGNED IN AT THE DOOR.
IF YOU HAVE NOT DONE SO, PLEASE DO SO AT THIS TIME.
FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS THE APPROVAL OF THE DECEMBER 3RD MINUTES.
[MINUTES]
ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS? AT THIS TIME, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MINUTES.ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THE DECEMBER 3RD MINUTES, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. SEEING NO ONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MINUTES AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR A MOTION.
I MOVE THAT WE ACCEPT THEM AS PRESENTED.
MOTION BY MR. ALLRED THAT THE SECOND BY MR. DUGGER, THAT THE MINUTES BE ACCEPTED AS WRITTEN.
MR.. BROSIG. YES. MR. DUGGER YES.
AND MR. BEARD. YES. MOTION PASS.
AS A STATEMENT OF POLICY FOR ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TODAY, IN ALL CASES EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE, BUILDINGS MUST BE SECURED AND THE LOT CLEAN AND MOWED BY THE OWNER WITHIN TEN DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE OF THE RESULTS OF THIS HEARING.
IF THIS IS NOT DONE, THE CITY MAY DO SO AND BILL THE OWNER.
IN ANY CASE, WHERE THE BOARD ORDERS THE OWNER TO DEMOLISH A STRUCTURE OR STRUCTURES, BUT THE OWNER FAILS TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE BOARD'S ORDER.
ANY APPEAL MUST BE FILED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 CALENDAR DAYS, AFTER THE AGGRIEVED PARTY RECEIVES NOTICE OF THIS BOARD'S DECISION AT THE HEARING, YOU SHOULD BE PREPARED TO PRESENT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION.
SPECIFIC TIME FRAME NEEDED TO COMPLETE REPAIRS.
SPECIFIC SCOPE OF REPAIR WORK TO BE COMPLETED AND COST ESTIMATES FOR WORK TO BE DONE BY LICENSED BONDED CONTRACTORS SUCH AS ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, AND HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING.
YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT YOU AT THE HEARING.
THE RIGHT TO INSPECT THE FILE ON THE PROPERTY AT THE OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRIOR TO THE HEARING, AND THE RIGHT TO REQUEST THE PRESENCE OF CITY STAFF FOR THE PURPOSES OF QUESTIONING AT THE HEARING.
WITH THAT BEING SAID, ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TODAY, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
DO YOU SWEAR? DO YOU SWEAR AND AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU SHALL GIVE TODAY IS THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.
YES. THANK YOU. WITH THAT, MR.
[A. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #24-000572: 1218 Matador St (J B COLLINS OF B AUSTIN, BLOCK 2, LOT 1 & S46 OF 2, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Smith, Brian & Jackie]
WRIGHT, WE'RE READY FOR OUR FIRST CASE.GOOD MORNING. BOARD RICKY WRIGHT, PROPERTY MAINTENANCE INSPECTOR WITH THE CITY OF ABILENE. WE WILL BE PRESENTING SEVEN CASES TODAY.
THIS IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE FOR THE MEETING TODAY.
THE FIRST CASE IS GOING TO BE CASE NUMBER 24000572 AT 1218 MATADOR STREET.
CHECKLIST SHOWS THAT THE UTILITIES HAVE BEEN OFF SINCE JANUARY 19TH OF 2017, AND IT ALSO SHOWS THAT BRIAN AND JACKIE SMITH ARE THE OWNERS.
THIS IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED.
WEST SIDE. NORTH SIDE AND SOUTH SIDE.
HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.
THIS IS SOME OF THE EXTERIOR DILAPIDATION.
THERE WAS A FIRE AT THE BACK OF THIS HOUSE.
[00:05:05]
IT WAS BEING USED TO STORE ALL KINDS OF OFFICE FURNITURE AND REFRIGERATORS.THIS GARAGE HAS SINCE BEEN DEMOLISHED AND SOMEWHAT REMOVED.
THERE IS STILL SOME DEBRIS LEFT BEHIND.
MARCH 8TH OF 24 AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS RECORDED AT THE COUNTY CLERK.
THERE WAS A STRUCTURE FIRE AT THIS PROPERTY THAT AFFECTED THE SOUTHWEST PORTION OF THE HOUSE, WHICH HAS BEEN BOARDED UP.
MARCH 14TH OF 24 CONDEMNATION NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE OWNER.
MAY 1ST OF 24 SPOKE TO THE OWNER BY PHONE.
EXPLAINED CONDEMNATION PROCESS.
ASKED THAT HE ADDRESSED THE FALLING GARAGE IMMEDIATELY SINCE IT POSES A HAZARD.
HE TOLD US HE WOULD GET RIGHT TO WORK ON DEMO OF THE DETACHED GARAGE AND A PLAN OF ACTION FOR THE HOUSE. OCTOBER 8TH OF 24 SPOKE TO THE OWNER AND HIS DAUGHTER BY PHONE AND EXPLAINED THE CONDEMNATION PROCESS AGAIN.
WE RESENT CONDEMNATION NOTICES AND A PLAN OF ACTION TO THE OWNER'S DAUGHTER.
JANUARY 28TH OF 25 DISCOVERED THE DETACHED GARAGE HAD BEEN DEMOLISHED.
DEMO DEBRIS WAS STILL LEFT ON SITE.
REAR DOOR OF THE HOUSE HAD BEEN BROKEN INTO.
WE LET THE OWNER KNOW WHAT WE HAD FOUND.
THEY SAID THEY WOULD SECURE THE HOUSE.
DECEMBER 12TH OF 25. NOTICE OF THE JANUARY HEARING WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE AND SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
AT THIS TIME, WE'RE RECOMMENDING THE ORDER THE OWNER TO REPAIR 30 DAYS TO PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION, INCLUDING A TIME FRAME FOR REPAIR AND COST ESTIMATES, AND OBTAIN ALL PERMITS.
IF THIS IS DONE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN ROOFING INSPECTIONS, AND IF THIS IS DONE, ALL FINAL INSPECTION SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE EXPIRATION OF ALL PERMITS, AND I CAN TAKE ANY QUESTIONS.
ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. WRIGHT? I PRESUME THIS RECOMMENDATION IS BASED ON THE FIRST.
CORRECT. FIRST TIME WE'RE BRINGING IT.
THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS, MR. WRIGHT? THANK YOU, MR. WRIGHT. AT THIS TIME, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 24 000572. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 24 000572.
OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR A MOTION.
I MOVE THAT WE GO WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
MOTION BY MR. ALLRED THAT THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO REPAIR 30 DAYS TO PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION, INCLUDING A TIME FRAME FOR REPAIR AND COST ESTIMATES, AND OBTAIN ALL PERMITS IF THIS IS DONE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN ROOFING INSPECTIONS.
AND IF THIS IS DONE, ALL FINAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE EXPIRATION OF ALL PERMITS. IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY MR. WYATT AND MR. DUGGER? ROLL CALL PLEASE.
MR. WYATT? YES, MR. ALLRED? YES. MR. MCBRAYER. YES.
MOTION. PASS. THE NEXT CASE IS GOING TO BE CASE
[B. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #24-001094: 2317 Crown Pl (CROWN PLACE SEC 1, BLOCK H, LOT 11, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Landowner: Havner, Tara, Mobile home owner: Domer, John]
NUMBER 24001094 AT 2317 CROWN PLACE.CHECKLIST SHOWS THAT THE UTILITIES HAVE BEEN OFF SINCE APRIL 30TH OF 2024, AND THE SEARCH REVEALS THAT TARA HAFNER IS THE LANDOWNER AND JOHN DOMER IS THE MOBILE HOMEOWNER. THIS IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED.
ANOTHER PICTURE OF THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH SIDE.
HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.
HERE'S SOME OF THE INTERIOR DILAPIDATION.
IT'S MISSING MOST OF THE FLOORING.
[00:10:02]
TIMELINE. APRIL 11TH OF 24.AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS RECORDED AT THE COUNTY CLERK DISCOVERED DURING INSPECTION.
POSSIBLE REMODEL WAS STARTED WITHOUT A PERMIT.
NO WORK CURRENTLY TAKING PLACE.
SPOKE TO A RELATIVE OF THE PROPERTY OWNER DURING THE INSPECTION.
DISCUSSED THE CONDEMNATION AND PROCESS FOR OBTAINING THE PERMIT.
APRIL 16TH OF 24 CONDEMNATION NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
NOVEMBER 17TH OF 25 SPOKE WITH BOTH THE LANDOWNER AND THE MOBILE HOMEOWNER.
THE MOBILE HOME OWNER BELIEVED HE HAD SOLD THE MOBILE HOME WITH THE LAND.
HOWEVER, HE IS STILL LISTED AS THE REGISTERED OWNER.
HE SAID HE WANTS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MOBILE HOME.
DECEMBER 8TH OF 25. THE MOBILE HOMEOWNER SAID HE WAS OPEN TO DO A CONSENTED DEMO IF THE LANDOWNER WILL NOT REMOVE THE TRAILER.
DECEMBER 12TH OF 25 NOTICE OF THE JANUARY HEARING WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE AND SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER AND MOBILE HOME OWNER.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO FIND THAT THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE, AND THAT IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, AND REPAIR OF THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE AND ORDER.
THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS, OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH AND I WILL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS.
ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. WRIGHT? HAVE WE SEEN THIS BEFORE? WE HAVE NOT. NO. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME.
I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 20 4-001094.
ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 20 4-001094 AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR MOTION.
I MOVE, WE TAKE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION BY MR. DUGGER THAT THE PROPERTY IS DECLARED A PUBLIC NUISANCE IN THAT IS THAT IN THAT IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE AND REPAIR OF THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE.
IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY MR. ALLRED? ROLL CALL PLEASE.
MR. WYATT? YES. MR. ALLRED? YES. MR. MCBRAYER. YES.
MR. BRASIG. YES. MR. DUGGAR? YES. AND MR. BEARD. YES.
ORDERED THE OWNER TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS.
MOTION BY MR. DUGGAR THAT THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS, OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH.
SECOND MOTION. SECOND BY MR. ALLRED. MR. WYATT. YES.
MR. ALLRED? YES. MR. MCBRAYER.
YES. MR. BROSIG. YES. MR. DUGGAR? YES. AND MR. BEARD.
[C. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #25-002507: 1218 Butternut St (BUTTERNUT ADDN, BLOCK 8, LOT S40 OF 3 & N5 OF 4, SAYLES & HUGHES 1-4, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Cortez, Blanca]
CASE IS GOING TO BE CASE NUMBER 25002507 AT 1218 BUTTERNUT STREET.CHECKLIST SHOWS THAT THE UTILITIES HAVE NO RECORD OF SERVICE, AND THE SEARCH REVEALS THAT BLANCA CORTEZ IS THE OWNER.
THIS IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED.
HOWEVER, THE SECTION WE'RE ASKING IS JUST WHAT YOU SEE IN BLUE.
SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS, INADEQUATE SANITATION.
STRUCTURAL HAZARDS. NUISANCE HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING, HAZARDOUS PLUMBING, AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.
HERE'S SOME OF THE FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION AND STRUCTURAL HAZARDS.
THIS IS ON THE INSIDE WHERE THE ROOF IS COMPLETELY CAVING IN.
[00:15:03]
THIS IS IN THE BACKSIDE, THE ALLEY SIDE OF IT WHERE WE ENTERED THE BUILDING. TIMELINE JUNE 17TH AT 25, AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS RECORDED AT.THE COUNTY CLERK DISCOVERED THE PROPERTY WAS UNSECURED AND THE ROOF HAD FALLEN IN.
THE ATTACHED BUSINESS OWNER INFORMED US OF FREQUENT VAGRANT ACTIVITY IN THE BUILDING THAT HAD BECOME A PROBLEM.
JUNE 18TH OF 25 THE PROPERTY WAS SECURED BY THE CITY JUNE 18 TO 25.
ALSO, THE CONDEMNATION NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
DECEMBER 8TH OF 25 FOUND THE BUILDING UNSECURED AND ACCUMULATING JUNK AND DEBRIS ON THE ALLEY SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
DECEMBER 12TH OF 25. THE NOTICE OF THE JANUARY HEARING WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE AND SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
DECEMBER 18TH OF 25, EXECUTED A CODE INSPECTION WARRANT AND COMPLETED A THOROUGH INTERIOR INSPECTION. FOUND EXTENSIVE STRUCTURAL DAMAGE AS WELL AS AN EXCESS OF JUNK AND DEBRIS INSIDE.
SPOKE TO THE OWNER OF THE ATTACHED BUILDING.
HE LET US KNOW THAT THE CONDITION OF THIS BUILDING IS ALLOWING RAINWATER TO GET INTO HIS BUILDING. THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO FIND THAT THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE, AND THAT IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, AND REPAIR OF THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE AND ORDER.
THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS, OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. WRIGHT? I NEED A LITTLE BIT MORE BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE ATTACHED BUILDING VERSUS THE BUILDING.
SO DO WE HAVE A BUILDING THAT IS OKAY, AND THERE'S A BUILDING ATTACHED TO IT THAT IS NOT CORRECT. SO IT'S ALL ONE BUILDING.
HOWEVER, IT'S SEPARATED BY A WALL FIREWALL.
IT'S A FIREWALL, YES. IT'S A IT'S A BRICK.
THERE'S ACTUALLY TWO WALLS THAT ARE ADJACENT TO EACH OTHER.
THE BUILDING TO THE NORTH HAS A PARAPET ALL THE WAY AROUND, AND IT'S STRUCTURALLY SOUND.
WHEN WHEN I TALK TO THE TENANT HE'S SAYING THAT RAINWATER IS COMING.
NOT FROM ABOVE, BUT SEEPING BELOW.
SO THAT GIVES ME THE IDEA THAT IT'S IT'S FALLING IN BETWEEN THOSE TWO WALLS, AND THEN GETTING ON THE CONCRETE AND COMING UP UNDERNEATH HIS WALL.
SO AND THEN THE STRUCTURAL, OBVIOUSLY, AS YOU CAN SEE, THE ROOF IS, IS TOTALLY DONE AND NEEDS TO BE NEEDS TO COME DOWN.
DO WE HAVE PRECEDENT ON ON CONDEMNING PART OF A BUILDING BEFORE? I MEAN, BECAUSE REALLY, IT'S ONE BUILDING FROM A LEGAL POINT OF VIEW, CORRECT? NO IT'S NOT. IT'S.
YES, IT'S TWO SEPARATE BUILDINGS.
OKAY. YEAH. TWO SEPARATE, SEPARATE PROPERTY IDS.
YEAH. CORRECT. THANK YOU. HAVE WE DONE ANY STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS ON THE ABILITY TO TAKE THE COMPROMISED BUILDING DOWN AND DEPENDENCY? YOU KNOW, DUE TO ADJACENCY, WE WOULD HAVE TO SPEAK WITH THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO GET ADVICE ON HOW TO DO THAT.
TYPICALLY THE IF YOU GO BACK TO THAT PICTURE.
SO TYPICALLY THE, THE WALLS ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE WOULD BE STAIR STEPPED AND MAINTAINED JUST A SHORT DISTANCE, PROBABLY TEN, MAYBE TEN FEET. AND THEN STAIR STEP BACK AND THEN EVERYTHING ELSE COMES DOWN.
BUT WE WOULD OBVIOUSLY NEED A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO TAKE A LOOK AND MAKE SURE THAT WOULD WORK. TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, MR. WHITE, WE DO HAVE A PRESIDENT ON ONE OF THESE DEALS, AND THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WAS INVOLVED FOR BOTH OF YOU.
BUT ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? HAVE YOU HAD ANY COMMUNICATIONS AT ALL WITH MISS CORTEZ? NO, SIR. OKAY. THANK YOU.
AT THIS TIME, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 20 5-002507.
ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 20 5-002507 AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR MOTION OR FURTHER DISCUSSION.
[00:20:05]
I MOVE, WE TAKE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. MOTION BY MR. DUGGER. THE PROPERTY IS DECLARED A PUBLIC NUISANCE IN THAT IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, AND REPAIR OF THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE. SECOND. SECOND.BY MR. ALLRED. ROLL CALL PLEASE.
MR. WYATT. YES. MR. ALLRED? YES. MR. MCBRAYER. YES.
MR. BRASIG. YES. MR. DUGGER? YES. AND MR. BEARD. YES.
MOTION PASSED. FURTHER MOVE TO ORDER THE OWNER TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS, OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH.
MOTION BY MR. DUGGER, THE OWNER, IS ORDERED TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS, OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH.
SECOND. SECOND BY MR. ALLRED, MR. WYATT. YES. MR. ALLRED.
MOTION PASSED. THE NEXT CASE IS GOING TO BE CASE
[D. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #24-003876: 849 Green St (WESTERN HEIGHTS REP, BLOCK N, LOT 1, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Casas for All, LLC]
NUMBER 24003876 AT 849 GREEN STREET CHECKLIST SHOWS THAT THE UTILITIES HAVE BEEN INACTIVE SINCE JUNE 10TH OF 2021, AND THE SEARCH REVEALS CAUSES FOR ALL.LLC IS THE OWNER. HOWEVER, THEY ARE NOW GOING BY THE NAME S.W.
HOMES LLC. THIS IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED.
AND SOUTH SIDE. THIS IS A TOP VIEW TO SHOW HOW CLOSE IT IS TO ABILENE HIGH SCHOOL.
AND THE BASEBALL FIELD AND FOOTBALL FIELD.
INADEQUATE SANITATION NUISANCE.
HAZARDOUS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.
THESE WERE PICTURES TAKEN PRIOR TO THE CITY CLEANING THIS UP.
THIS IS WHAT ORIGINALLY BROUGHT OUR ATTENTION AND IT WAS ALSO PUT ON THE NEWS.
THE NEIGHBOR HAD CALLED IN AND THE NEWS WENT OUT AND DID A LITTLE STORY.
THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT, YOU SEE, AT THAT TIME, THERE WAS A LITTLE MAKESHIFT SHACK BUILT THERE THAT SOMEBODY WAS STAYING IN.
THIS IS PRIOR TO THE SECOND CLEANUP.
SECOND CLEANUP. WE DID HAVE TO DO A SECOND CLEANUP.
AUGUST 14TH OF 24. WE EXECUTED AN ADMINISTRATIVE SEARCH WARRANT AND INSPECTED THE FULL INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF THE PROPERTY, FOUND DEPLORABLE CONDITIONS, INCLUDING INSECT INFESTATION AND EXPOSED HUMAN WASTE. WE OBSERVED A CARPORT THAT WAS BEING USED AS A LIVING QUARTERS.
UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS INSIDE THE HOUSE AND ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL LIVING IN A TENT IN THE BACKYARD. THERE WAS A TERRIBLE ODOR EMANATING FROM THE INSIDE OF THE HOUSE AS WELL AS THE BACKYARD. WE FOUND A BOX IN THE BACKYARD WITH UNKNOWN CONTENTS COVERED IN FLIES AND MAGGOTS. THERE WAS HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS OF THE HOUSE WHILE POWER WAS ACTIVE. AT THAT POINT, ACCUMULATION IN THE BACKYARD GOT TO A POINT WHERE IT WAS ENTERING INTO THE ALLEY.
ONE OFFICER THAT DAY THAT WAS WITH US ENDED UP GOING HOME FEELING SICK AFTER WE WERE IN THE HOUSE. AUGUST 20TH OF 24.
AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS RECORDED AT THE COUNTY CLERK.
CONDEMNATION NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE OWNING LLC AND REGISTERED AGENT.
AUGUST 27TH OF 24. CONTACTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER.
THEY REQUESTED PHOTOS OF THE PROPERTY WHICH WERE SENT TO THEM.
WE ALSO SENT THEM A PLAN OF ACTION WORKSHEET.
SEPTEMBER 9TH AT 24. UPON ARRIVAL AT THE PROPERTY, FOUND A SHERIFF'S DEPUTY WAS COMPLETING A WRIT OF POSSESSION.
VAGRANTS AND ALL OF THEIR BELONGINGS WERE BEING REMOVED.
[00:25:04]
APRIL 7TH OF 25 DISCOVERED THE HOUSE HAD BEEN BROKEN INTO AND WAS ACCUMULATING JUNK.THE CITY SECURED THE HOUSE AND ABATED ALL JUNK, DEBRIS AND FALLEN FENCE PANELS.
PRIOR TO SECUREMENT IT, IT WAS NOTICED THE INTERIOR OF THE HOUSE WAS STILL EXTREMELY UNSANITARY AND DILAPIDATED.
JUNE 6TH OF 25, THE CITY MOWED THE HIGH GRASS AND WEEDS IN THE BACKYARD THAT WERE OVER FOUR FEET TALL. DECEMBER 5TH OF 25 CONTACTED THE OWNER BY EMAIL AND INFORMED THEM OF THE JANUARY BOARD HEARING AND SENT THEM A NEW PLAN OF ACTION WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO COMPLETE IT. ALSO INFORM THEM THAT THE HOUSE IS UNSECURED AGAIN AND MORE FENCE PANELS HAVE FALLEN. DECEMBER 12TH OF 25 NOTICE OF THE JANUARY HEARING WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE AND SENT TO THE OWNER.
OWNING LLC HAS REACHED OUT SEVERAL TIMES TO KEEP US UPDATED ON THEIR PROGRESS.
COMPLETING THE PLAN OF ACTION, AND AS OF NOW, WE'VE GOTTEN AN INCOMPLETE PLAN OF ACTION WITH AN ELECTRICAL ESTIMATE.
BUT THAT'S ABOUT IT. THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AT THIS TIME IS TO ORDER THE OWNER TO REPAIR 30 DAYS TO PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION, INCLUDING A TIME FRAME FOR REPAIR AND COST ESTIMATES, AND OBTAIN ALL PERMITS.
IF THIS IS DONE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN ROOFING INSPECTIONS AND IF THIS IS DONE, ALL FINAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE EXPIRATION OF ALL PERMITS.
ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. WRIGHT? THANK YOU. I PRESUME THE OWNERS FROM OUT OF TOWN? THEY ARE? YES. NO LOCAL SUPERVISION OF THE PROPERTY.
WE'RE TOLD THAT THERE IS AND WE'VE HAD ANOTHER PROPERTY THAT WE ACTUALLY JUST DEMOLISHED. THAT THEY WERE THE OWNERS OF, THAT THEY STARTED WORKING ON.
AND I HAD ACTUALLY SPOKEN TO THAT INDIVIDUAL AND TOLD THEM THAT ONE HAD ALREADY BEEN ORDERED DEMO. THEY NEEDED TO STOP WORKING ON THAT AND START WORKING ON THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY. ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. WRIGHT? DO YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH THEY WILL DO SOMETHING WITHIN 30 DAYS.
I THINK THEY WILL. WE'RE HOPING TO GIVE THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT THAT THEY DID START WORKING ON THE OTHER ONE, EVEN THOUGH IT WAS LATE, BUT HOPEFULLY IT TRANSFERS OVER TO THIS ONE.
AT THIS TIME, I'LL OPEN THE HEARING ON CASE NUMBER 24 003876.
ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 24 003876. OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR MOTION.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION. WE ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
THE OWNER IS ORDERED THERE 30 DAYS TO PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION, INCLUDING A TIME FRAME FOR REPAIR AND COST ESTIMATES, AND OBTAIN ALL PERMITS.
IF THIS IS DONE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN ROUGH AND INSPECTIONS, AND IF THIS IS DONE, ALL FINAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE EXPIRATION OF ALL PERMITS. I SECOND IT. SECOND BY MR. ROSEN. ROLL CALL PLEASE.
MR. BROSIG. YES. MR. DUGGER? YES. AND MR. BEARD. YES.
THE NEXT CASE IS GOING TO BE CASE NUMBER 23-002935 AT 850 VINE STREET.
[E. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, of Civil Penalties - Case #23-002935: 850 Vine St (ALTA VISTA, BLOCK 3, LOT 1, 2 & N19 OF 3, CONT, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Hernandez, Osvaldo Sr & Krista Ortiz]
CHECKLIST SHOWS THAT THE UTILITIES HAVE BEEN INACTIVE SINCE JUNE 23RD OF 2023, AND THE SEARCH REVEALS THAT KRYSTA ORTIZ HERNANDEZ AND OSVALDO HERNANDEZ SENIOR ARE THE OWNERS. THIS IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED.WEST SIDE. NORTH SIDE AND SOUTH SIDE.
NUISANCE. HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING.
HAZARDOUS PLUMBING AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.
HERE ARE SOME OF THE EXTERIOR DILAPIDATION.
SOME FOUNDATION WORK WAS COMPLETED.
[00:30:04]
THIS IS THE CURRENT INTERIOR CONDITIONS.TIMELINE OF EVENTS JULY 5TH OF 23 AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS RECORDED AT THE COUNTY CLERK AFTER DISCOVERING A VACANT HOUSE THAT WAS TORN APART BY THE PREVIOUS OWNER OCCUPANT. MARCH 6TH OF 24.
THE BOARD ORDERED A 30 60 DECEMBER 6TH OF 24, THE PROPERTY CHANGED OWNERSHIP TO A RELATIVE OF THE DECEASED OWNER SO THAT IT COULD BE SOLD ON JULY 3RD OF 24.
THE BOARD ORDERED ANOTHER 30 60 SINCE THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY WAS PENDING.
DECEMBER 6TH OF 24, THE PROPERTY CHANGED OWNERSHIP.
JANUARY 29TH OF 25 AN ALTERATION PERMIT WAS ISSUED.
NO INSPECTIONS WERE SCHEDULED OR EVER COMPLETED.
FEBRUARY 4TH OF 25 THE OWNER OBTAINED A PERMIT TO DEMO THE DILAPIDATED SUBSTRUCTURE ON THE PROPERTY. THE DEMO WAS COMPLETED ON FEBRUARY 7TH.
OCTOBER 22ND OF 25, THE PROPERTY CHANGED OWNERSHIP AGAIN.
THE OWNER WAS GIVEN A COPY OF THE 30 60 PLAN OF ACTION WORKSHEET.
NOTICES WERE ALSO MAILED TO THE NEW OWNER ON THAT DAY.
DECEMBER 12TH OF 25. THE NOTICE OF THE JANUARY HEARING WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE AND SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
AND JUST FOR INFO, WE HAVE RECEIVED THE PLAN OF ACTION AND ALMOST ALL THE PAPERWORK.
THEY JUST HAVE TO GIVE US AN UPDATED FLOOR PLAN BECAUSE THEY ARE DOING A LITTLE ADDITION. SO WE HAVE ASKED FOR THAT, BUT FOR THE MOST PART, WE ARE IN CONTACT WITH THE OWNER AND THEY ARE TURNING IN WHAT WE'RE ASKING, WHICH IS WHY WE'RE ASKING JUST FOR ANOTHER 3060 FOR THE NEW OWNER WHO APPEARS THAT THEY ARE GOING TO START WORKING ON THIS.
SO THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS A ORDER THE OWNER TO REPAIR 30 DAYS TO PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION, INCLUDING A TIME FRAME FOR REPAIR AND COST ESTIMATES, AND OBTAIN ALL PERMITS IF THIS IS DONE, 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN ROOFING INSPECTIONS, AND IF THIS IS DONE, ALL FINAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE EXPIRATION OF ALL PERMITS. AND I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU, MR. WRIGHT. AT THIS TIME, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 20 3-002935. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 23 002935 AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR A MOTION DISCUSSION.
I MOVE THAT WE ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
MOTION BY MR. WYATT THAT THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO REPAIR 30 DAYS TO PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION, INCLUDING A TIME FRAME FOR REPAIR AND COST ESTIMATES, AND OBTAIN ALL PERMITS IF THIS IS DONE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN ROUGHING INSPECTIONS AND IF THIS IS DONE, ALL FINAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE EXPIRATION OF ALL PERMITS.
SECOND MOTION. SECOND BY MR. ALLRED. MR. WYATT. YES.
MR. ALLRED? YES. MR. MCBRAYER.
YES. MR. BRASIG. YES. MR. DUGGER. YES. MR. BEARD.
THE NEXT CASE IS GOING TO BE CASE NUMBER 25002452 AT 5174 TWILIGHT TRAIL.
[F. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #25-002452: 5174 Twylight Trl (SOUTHERN SANDS ADDN SEC 1 CONT 1, BLOCK 5, LOT 3, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Land owner: Tijerina, David Timothy; Mobile home owner: King, Olga C.]
THE CHECKLIST SHOWS THAT THE UTILITIES HAVE BEEN INACTIVE SINCE MAY 28TH OF 2016.AND THE SEARCH REVEALS THAT DAVID TIMOTHY TIJERINA TO BE THE LANDOWNER AND OLGA KING TO BE THE MOBILE HOME OWNER.
SO THIS ONE'S SIMILAR TO THE PREVIOUS MOBILE HOME.
IT'S SEPARATE OWNERS FOR THE MOBILE HOME AND THE LAND.
THIS IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED.
REAR. NORTH SIDE. EAST SIDE AND WEST SIDE.
HAZARDOUS PLUMBING. HAZARDOUS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.
THIS IS SOME OF THE CURRENT CONDITIONS.
[00:35:17]
TIMELINE. ON JUNE 17TH OF 25, AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS RECORDED AT THE COUNTY CLERK. CONDEMNATION NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE LANDOWNER AS WELL AS THE MOBILE HOMEOWNER. JUNE 23RD OF 25 MOBILE HOME OWNER CAME TO CITY HALL AND REQUESTED CONTACT INFO FOR THE LANDOWNER THAT HER MOBILE HOME WAS ON.WE GOT AHOLD OF LANDOWNER AND HE SAID HE WOULD REACH OUT TO THE MOBILE HOMEOWNER.
JULY 8TH OF 25 THE MOBILE HOME OWNER CAME INTO CITY HALL AND LET US KNOW SHE WANTS TO REMOVE HER MOBILE HOME FROM THE LOT AND PUT A NEW MOBILE HOME ONTO THE LOT, BUT THE PROPERTY OWNER WOULD NOT LET HER.
AUGUST 11TH OF 25, SPOKE TO THE MOBILE HOME OWNER AND HER SON AT CITY HALL.
THE MOBILE HOME OWNER SAID SHE WANTS TO REPAIR THE MOBILE HOME AND LEAVE IT AT ITS CURRENT LOCATION. HOWEVER, SHE SAID THE PROPERTY OWNER WANTS THE MOBILE HOME TO BE REMOVED. THE SON EXPRESSED INTEREST IN MOVING THE MOBILE HOME TO ANOTHER LOCATION TO REPAIR IT AT A NEW PROPERTY.
SEPTEMBER 20TH 6 TO 25 MOBILE HOME OWNER CAME INTO CITY HALL AND WAS EXPLAINED THE 36 E PROCESS AGAIN. DECEMBER 12TH OF 25 A NOTICE OF THE JANUARY HEARING WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE AND SENT TO THE LAND AND MOBILE HOMEOWNER.
AT THIS TIME, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO ORDER THE OWNER TO REPAIR 30 DAYS TO PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION, INCLUDING A TIME FRAME FOR REPAIR AND COST ESTIMATES, AND OBTAIN ALL PERMITS IF THIS IS DONE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN RUFFIN INSPECTIONS AND IF THIS IS DONE, ALL FINAL INSPECTION SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE EXPIRATION OF ALL PERMITS.
ANY QUESTIONS, MR. WRIGHT? THANK YOU, MR. WRIGHT.
AT THIS TIME, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 25 002452.
ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 25 002452 AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR MOTION.
I MOVE, WE TAKE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
MOTION BY MR. DUGGER. THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO REPAIR 30 DAYS TO PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION, INCLUDING A TIME FRAME FOR REPAIR AND COST ESTIMATES, AND OBTAIN ALL PERMITS IF THIS IS DONE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN ROOFING INSPECTIONS AND IF THIS IS DONE, ALL FINAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE EXPIRATION OF ALL PERMITS.
SECOND. SECOND. BY MR. MCBRAYER. MR. WYATT. ABSTAIN.
MR. ALLRED. YES. MR. MCBRAYER.
MR. DUGGER. YES. AND MR. BEARD. YES. MOTION PASSED.
I NEED TO GET A CHAIR CLOSER TO MIKE.
I KNOW, THE LAST CASE TODAY IS GOING TO BE CASE NUMBER
[G. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #25-003241: 4817 Mary Lou Ln (BUTTON WILLOW PARKWAY SEC 2, BLOCK 6, LOT 3, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Schronk, Robert V. & Gay]
25003241 AT 4817 MARY LOU LANE.CHECKLIST SHOWS THAT THE UTILITIES HAVE BEEN INACTIVE SINCE JULY 23RD OF 2025.
AND THE SEARCH REVEALS ROBERT AND GAY SHRUNK TO BE THE OWNERS.
THIS IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED.
AND SOUTH SIDE. SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS.
HAZARDOUS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.
SOME OF THE EXTERIOR DILAPIDATION.
THAT IS A HOLE IN THE ROOF AND YOU ARE SEEING A CAT GOING THROUGH.
THEY DID OBTAIN A ROOF PERMIT AT ONE POINT.
IT EXPIRED. AND THAT'S THE EXTENT OF THE ROOF WORK THAT WAS DONE.
THAT IS ANOTHER HOLE IN THE ROOF BACK IN A CLOSET THAT WE COULDN'T GET ANY CLOSER TO.
[00:40:13]
TIMELINE JULY 17TH TO 25.THE AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS RECORDED AT THE COUNTY CLERK.
JULY 22ND OF 25 CONDEMNATION NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
JULY 24TH OF 25 WENT OVER CONDEMNATION PROCESS WITH THE OWNER AND THEN AGAIN WITH A FAMILY MEMBER. JULY 25TH OF 25 OWNER CALLED AND HAD US SEND CONDEMNATION PAPERWORK TO HIS CONTRACTOR. JULY 29TH OF 25.
THE ROOF PERMIT THAT WAS ISSUED ON JANUARY 31ST OF 25 PRIOR TO THE CONDEMNATION HAD EXPIRED. THE FINAL INSPECTION NEVER SCHEDULED OR COMPLETED AND THE ROOF REPAIR WAS NEVER COMPLETED. DECEMBER 12TH OF 25.
NO NOTIFICATION OF THE JANUARY HEARING WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE AND SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. AT THIS TIME, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO ORDER THE OWNER TO REPAIR 30 DAYS TO PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION, INCLUDING A TIME FRAME FOR REPAIR AND COST ESTIMATES, AND OBTAIN ALL PERMITS IF THIS IS DONE 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN ROOFING INSPECTIONS AND IF THIS IS DONE, ALL FINAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE EXPIRATION OF ALL PERMITS.
ANY QUESTIONS, MR. WRIGHT? THANK YOU, MR. WRIGHT.
AT THIS TIME I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 20 5-003241.
ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. OKAY.
COULD WE TAKE THE MIC TO HIM? RIGHT NOW, WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF WORKING WITH A INVESTOR.
WHAT IS YOUR NAME, SIR? ROBERT SCHRUNK. OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO JUST. WE DECIDED TO GO AHEAD AND SELL A PROPERTY.
I JUST PUT MY MY WIFE IN MEMORY, CARE ABOUT AUGUST THE 15TH.
AND A LOT OF THE STUFF THAT HAS HAPPENED HAS BEEN BECAUSE OF HER HEALTH CONDITION, AND I KNOW IT'S MY RESPONSIBILITY.
I'M AT FAULT. BUT EVERY TIME WE WOULD DRIVE PAST THE HOUSE, IT WOULD SET HER OFF. AND THE BEST THING TO DO WAS JUST TO STAY AWAY FROM IT.
SO I'VE BEEN DEALING WITH THAT FOR THE LAST WELL, SINCE AUGUST OF 25, WHEN SHE WHEN SHE HAD A STROKE.
BUT I TALKED TO MR. BRETT STEWART, AND HE SAID HE'S HE'S WILLING TO BY THE HOUSE. I WAS JUST SAVING IT FOR FOR THE GRANDKIDS AND STUFF LIKE THAT, BUT IT'S ALL I GOTTA SAY.
ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. SCHRUNK? THANK YOU, SIR. YEAH. I'M ALL RIGHT.
ANY OTHERS WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE? PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 25 003241.
OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR MOTION.
MR. CHAIRMAN. WOULD THIS BE BETTER TO TABLE IT FOR A MONTH TO SEE ABOUT THE SALE? IS THAT YOUR MOTION? I'M ASKING ASKING YOU A QUESTION.
THAT'S THAT'S AN OPTION AVAILABLE TO US.
YES, SIR. I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION.
I'LL SECOND THAT. I WAS GOING TO SAY JUST PRIOR TO THAT FOR FOLLOW UP.
THE PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER IS HERE TODAY AS WELL.
SO IT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED THAT THEY ARE IN THE NEGOTIATIONS TO SELL.
OKAY. SO EITHER WAY, THE 30 60 COULD TRANSFER OVER.
[00:45:04]
OKAY. MOTIONS ON THE FLOOR FROM MR. ALLRED AND A SECOND BY MR. BOSSY THAT WE TABLE THIS UNTIL FEBRUARY MEETING.IS THERE FURTHER DISCUSSION? ROLL CALL PLEASE. MR. WYATT? YES. MR. ALLRED? YES. MR. MCBRAYER. YES. MR. BROSIG.
YES. MR. DUGGER YES. AND MR. BEARD. YES. MOTION PASS.
GOOD LUCK SIR. NEXT ORDER ON THE AGENDA IS ELECTION OF SOME NEW
[H. Discussion and possible election of Officers for the Board of Building Standards.]
OFFICERS FOR THE BOARD OF BUILDING STANDARDS.I GUESS WE'LL OPEN THE FLOOR FOR FIRST FOR CHAIRMAN, FOR ANY NOMINATIONS. I'LL MOVE.
MAKE A MOTION FOR DAVID BAIRD TO BE OUR CHAIRMAN.
THAT'S NOT THE. THAT'S NOT AN OPTION.
BEING ON THE BOARD OF BUILDING STANDARDS SHOULD NOT BE A CAREER.
AND I'M BORDERLINE. SO THANK YOU.
BUT THEY. AND OTHER NOMINATIONS.
WHAT DO WE DO? I MEAN, YOU TABLE IT TILL NEXT MEETING.
ARE YOU. ARE YOU REALLY DECLINING OR DECLINING? I MEAN, WE CAN. PARDON ME.
ARE YOU ARE YOU REALLY INTENDING TO DECLINE OR.
YES, YES. OKAY. KELLY, I DON'T KNOW HOW IT WORKS, BUT WE HAVE SPOKEN WITH MR. MCBRAYER, AND HE IS ON BOARD WITH BECOMING THE NEW CHAIR.
WELL, MAYBE. MAYBE WE CAN JUST SEE IF WE HAVE ANOTHER MOTION.
OKAY, IF. BECAUSE I DON'T THINK THERE WAS A THERE WAS ONE NOMINATION.
AND I GUESS IF WE WANT TO SEE IF THERE ARE ANY MORE NOMINATIONS BEFORE WE ARE THERE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? YEAH, THAT'S A GOOD IDEA.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION. MR. MCBRAYER CHAIRMAN.
MR. MCBRAYER, IS THAT ALL RIGHT? OKAY. DO WE NEED A ROLL CALL? I THINK WE CAN JUST DO A VOICE VOTE.
AND IF YOU'RE REMOVING YOURSELF, YOU'RE DECLINING.
WE REALLY ONLY HAVE ONE CANDIDATE, SO.
YOU CAN OR YOU CAN DO A ROLL CALL.
ROLL CALL PLEASE. MR. WYATT? YES. MR. ALLRED? YES. MR. MCBRAYER. YES. MR. BROSIG.
YES, MR. DUGGER? YES, MR. BEARD? ABSOLUTELY. MOTION PASSED.
VICE CHAIR. DO WE HAVE NOMINATIONS FOR VICE CHAIR? WHO WAS THE OLD VICE CHAIR? WAS THAT? OKAY. OKAY. DO YOU WANT TO NOMINATE WILL? CAN WE CAN WE TALK ABOUT WHO THE INCOMING AND WHAT THE BOARD COMPOSITION IS? LOOKING FORWARD? I THINK SO.
I BELIEVE IT'S YOU. CORRECT. THAT IS COMING ON AT THIS TIME.
SO, CASH. TANKERSLEY WILL BE TAKING MR. BEARD'S SPOT. AND THEN FROM THERE.
I GUESS IT'S FINDING A NEW VICE.
AND YOU CAN ELECT. WE CAN DO THAT NEXT.
NEXT MEETING. RIGHT. THAT COULD BE DONE AT ANY TIME.
OKAY. ARE THERE ANY NOMINATIONS FOR A VICE CHAIR? IF NOT, WAIT TILL NEXT TIME.
I JUST WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU FROM US TO MR. BEARD FOR YOUR TIME. I KNOW IT'S.
THIS BOARD HAS RUN REALLY SMOOTH, AND IT'S GOTTEN MORE SMOOTH OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS. THANK YOU.
SO THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR TIME.
THANK YOU. WITH THAT, WE'RE ADJOURNED.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE. I THINK WE NEED A
ROUND OF APPLAUSE FOR MR..
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.