[00:00:01]
SHE WAS LIKE, ARE YOU READY? ALL RIGHT. IT IS 130.
[CALL TO ORDER]
WE WILL CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IS THE FINAL AUTHORITY FOR THE APPROVAL OF PLATS.HOWEVER, IT ACTS ONLY AS A RECOMMENDING BOARD TO CITY COUNCIL ON MATTERS OF ZONING.
THE DECISIONS OF THIS COMMISSION MAY BE APPEALED TO THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH THE OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY, NO LATER THAN TEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS MEETING.
THOSE WISHING TO BE HEARD SHALL APPROACH THE PODIUM AND STATE THEIR NAME AND THEIR PURPOSE FOR APPEARING. EACH SPEAKER IS REQUESTED TO LIMIT THEIR PRESENTATION TO NO MORE THAN THREE MINUTES. ADDITIONAL TIME MAY BE GRANTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIR.
KEVIN, WOULD YOU LEAD US IN OPENING INVOCATION. LORI, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS DAY AND THE OPPORTUNITY THAT WE HAVE TO BE HERE TO CONSIDER THE BUSINESS OF THE CITY. WE ASK THAT YOU GIVE US WISDOM AS WE CONSIDER ALL THE THINGS ON OUR AGENDA AND MAKE FAIR AND AND WISE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE COUNCIL. PRAY FOR EVERYONE PRESENTING TODAY THAT YOU'D GIVE THEM CLARITY OF THOUGHT AND HELP US TO HEAR THEM WELL.
THANK YOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO MOVE OUR CITY FORWARD AND TO TO BLESS THE FUTURE.
[MINUTES]
COMMISSIONERS, HAS EVERYONE HAD A CHANCE TO LOOK OVER THOSE MINUTES? ANY EDITS OR SUGGESTIONS? OKAY, WE WILL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO COME UP AND ADDRESS THE MINUTES FROM THE PREVIOUS MEETING? SEEING NONE, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ENTERTAIN A MOTION RELATED TO THE MINUTES. MOTION TO APPROVE KEVIN WITH THE APPROVAL.
SECOND WITH SHANTI. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
AYE. ANYONE OPPOSED? SEEING NO ONE. WE'LL MOVE ON TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2020 602. RECEIVE A REPORT, HOLD A DISCUSSION AND PUBLIC HEARING.
LOCATED AT 309 ARNOLD BOULEVARD. CHAIRMAN. YES, SIR.
NOT TO CORRECT YOU, BUT THE NEXT BUSINESS IS THE ELECTION OF A PRO-TEM.
YOU'RE CORRECT, CHAIRMAN PRO TEM. SORRY ABOUT THAT. NO.
THAT'S FINE. YES, SIR. WITH YEAH, IT WAS IN ALL CAPS, SO I DIDN'T SEE IT.
IT WAS TOO BIG FOR ME TO PAY ATTENTION TO. YEAH.
[ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN PRO TEM]
SO UNDER OUR MINUTES, OUR NEXT AGENDA ITEM WITH MITCH BARNETT ROTATING OFF, WHICH WE FORGOT TO TELL HIM.THANK YOU WHEN HE WAS ROTATING OFF. BUT THANK YOU FOR HIS SIX YEARS THAT HE SERVED.
WE HAVE A OPEN POSITION FOR THE ELECTION OF THE CHAIRMAN PRO TEM.
ANY NOMINATIONS FOR THAT POSITION AMONGST THE COMMISSION? ANYBODY? BASICALLY, THIS PERSON WOULD STEP IN TO BE CHAIR IF I'M EVER CONFLICTED OUT OR UNABLE TO BE HERE.
SO I NOMINATE KEVIN. NOMINATE KEVIN. EXACTLY WHAT I WAS THINKING.
OKAY, THEN I'LL TAKE THAT AS A WILL. WE NEED TO HAVE AN ADDITIONAL APPOINTMENT OF A.
AND THEN WE'LL MOVE THAT. WE'LL MOVE THAT NEXT.
SO DO YOU HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO THAT, KEVIN? NO.
I'D ACCEPT. OKAY. SHONTAE WITH A FIRST TO ELECT KEVIN.
CHAIRMAN PRO TEM. KRISTEN WITH A SECOND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
AYE. ANYONE OPPOSED? HEARING NO ONE. KEVIN PREVIOUSLY HELD THE SERGEANT OF ARMS POSITION.
SO NOW WE WILL TAKE A NOMINATION FOR SOMEONE TO FILL THAT NOW VACANT POSITION OF SERGEANT OF ARMS. I'M HONESTLY NOT EVEN SURE WHAT THAT POSITION DOES.
I THINK YOU'RE IN CHARGE OF FIGHTING SOMEBODY IF THEY COME IN TO ATTACK THE COMMISSION.
IN THE PAST, ALEX RUSSELL HELD THIS POSITION BEFORE.
KEVIN. I THINK SHANTI WOULD DO A GREAT JOB AS A SERGEANT OF ARMS. I WOULD TRUST HER. A MOTION TO NOMINATE SHANTAY.
OKAY. SECOND. ALL RIGHT. TYSON WITH THE FIRST AND KEVIN WITH THE SECOND.
ALL THOSE SHANTAY WOULD YOU ACCEPT IF WE WERE TO MOVE FORWARD? YES. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF SHANTAY AS OUR SERGEANT OF ARMS SAY? AYE. ANYONE OPPOSED? NO. I'M NOT. I'M NOT OPPOSED.
I'M NOT OPPOSED. BUT I WAS THE SECRETARY. SO NOW WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE TO NOMINATE.
ALL RIGHT. OKAY. NOW WE'RE GOING OUT. NOW WE'RE GOING DOWN ANOTHER RABBIT HOLE.
SO NOW WE HAVE AN OPEN POSITION FOR A SECRETARY.
I WISH YOU WOULD HAVE THOUGHT OF THAT. ANYONE ANY IDEAS FOR SECRETARY? I THINK ZACH WOULD BE OUR MOST SENIOR PERSON, APART FROM THE FOUR OF US.
SO WOULD ANYONE NOT LIKE TO NOMINATE ZACH? ZACH IS.
YEAH. OKAY, SO I'LL SECOND THAT. ALL RIGHT, SO KRISTEN WITH THE NOMINATION FOR ZACH.
KEVIN WITH A SECOND. ZACH, WOULD YOU BE OKAY WITH THAT? I ACCEPT ANOTHER ROLE, WHICH I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE ASKED TO DO, BUT IF YOU ARE, YOU'RE READY. PLEASE. YES. YES, YES. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF ZACK FOR OUR SECRETARY POSITION SAY AYE.
[00:05:08]
ANYONE OPPOSED? ALL RIGHT. I THINK WE HAVE A FULL SLATE OF OFFICERS.[ZONING]
WE WILL NOW MOVE TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO. A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2020 602.RECEIVE A REPORT, HOLD A DISCUSSION AND PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE REQUEST FROM THE OWNER.
TO APPLY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO A PROPERTY TO ALLOW RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK ON AGRICULTURE.
OPEN AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING. LOCATED AT 309 ARNOLD BOULEVARD.
KYRA. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS KYRA. I'M A PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF ABILENE.
TODAY I'M REPRESENTING CASE CUP 2020 602. THE OWNER IS TYLER WILSON.
THE REQUEST IS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN RV PARK IN AGRICULTURE.
OPEN AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING. LOCATED AT 309 ARNOLD BOULEVARD.
HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL MAP. THE ZONING MAP. THE USES IN AGRICULTURE OPEN, WHICH YOU CAN SEE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR AN RV PARK.
AND USES IN GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING. AGAIN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR AN RV PARK.
HERE ARE SOME VIEWS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. VIEWS OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
THIS IS THE CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE RV PARK. IT IS.
I BELIEVE IT WAS 85 SPACES. NOTIFICATIONS WERE SENT OUT IN A 200 FOOT BUFFER.
ZERO RECEIVED IN FAVOR OR OPPOSITION. THE PROPOSED REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING, GENERALLY ACCEPTED PLANNING PRINCIPLES, AND THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL IN THE LDC.
STAFF. STAFF RECOMMENDATION. APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONCEPT PLAN AND THE PLAN OF OPERATION.
BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ON THE CONCEPT PLAN THEY SUBMITTED.
IS IT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORDINANCE THAT WAS RECENTLY PASSED? YES, SIR. OKAY, SO IT WILL HAVE ALL THE PAVING AND EXTRA SPOTS AND RETAINING WATER AND EVERYTHING.
YES, SIR. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR KYRA? THIS. HOW MUCH OF THIS IS IN THE FLOODWAY? NOT THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN.
THERE'S QUITE A BIT IN THE BACK TOWARDS ELM CREEK THAT IS IN THE FLOODWAY.
SO ACTUAL SITES ARE GOING TO BE IN PAVED AREA.
WILL BE IN THE FLOODWAY. THE SITES WON'T BE IN THE FLOODWAY.
WHERE YOU CAN SEE THE LIGHTER GREEN IS IN THE FLOODWAY.
I BELIEVE IT'S THE FIVE 100 YEAR FLOOD WAY THAT THE REST OF IT IS IN.
OKAY, SO THERE'S NO PROPOSED NO PROPOSED NEW PAVED SURFACE GOING IN THE FLOODWAY.
CORRECT? OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR KYRA? THANK YOU. WE'LL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO.
ANY DISCUSSION AMONG THE COMMISSIONERS OR MOTIONS? I THINK THIS IS A GREAT LOCATION FOR THIS PROPOSED PROJECT.
YEAH. AND WITH THE NEW ORDINANCE, I'M NOT AS CONCERNED ABOUT, YOU KNOW, THE WATER RUNOFF.
I MEAN, IF ANYTHING, IT COULD BE AN APPROVAL TO A NEW PIECE OF LAND RIGHT THERE.
YEAH. SO, KEVIN, IS THAT A MOTION WITH THE CONDITIONS? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE, SUBJECT TO THE CONCEPT PLAN AND THE PLAN OF OPERATION.
I'LL SECOND. ZACH WITH A SECOND. MR. STRASSER? YES, MR. HOWARD? YES, MISS. KIKER? YES, MR. HALLIBURTON.
YES, MISS LEWIS. YES. MR. SEITZ? YES. AND MR. BENHAM. YES. AND THE MOTION CARRIES AGENDA. ITEM NUMBER THREE IS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2020 603.
RECEIVE A REPORT, HOLD A DISCUSSION AND PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON A REQUEST FROM AN OWNER TO APPLY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO A PROPERTY TO ALLOW AN RV PARK AN AGRICULTURAL, OPEN AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHIN 239.86 ACRES LOCATED AT 3799 NORTH DANVILLE DRIVE.
ADAM. YOU'RE NOT CLARISSA. ADAM. CORRECT. GOOD AFTERNOON.
MY NAME IS ADAM HOLLAND. I'M A PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF ABILENE. THIS IS CASEY CUP 2020 603.
REPRESENTED BY THE OWNER. AND THE AGENT IS CLINT TAYLOR.
THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.
HERE AT THIS LOCATION YOU CAN SEE HERE IS THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE PROPERTY.
HERE ARE SOME OF THE SOME OF THE VIEWS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS WELL AS ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
THE PROPOSED CUP FOR THE VACATION TRAVEL TRAILER PARK IS PROPOSED TO HAVE 147 UNITS.
[00:10:07]
HERE'S A CONCEPT PLAN SHOWING THE PROPERTIES ITSELF.THE ENTIRE RV PARK SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE ZONED PROPERTY SHOWN BY THIS CONCEPT PLAN. WE DID RECEIVE ONE NOTIFICATION IN OPPOSITION.
AND THEIR CONCERNS WERE BASED AT THEY WERE DIRECTLY LOCATED BEHIND THE PROPOSED RV PARK.
AND THEY WERE CONCERNED ABOUT USE MITIGATION AND STUFF ALONG THOSE LINES.
THE PROPOSED REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING, GENERALLY ACCEPTED PLANNING PRINCIPLES, AND THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL IN THE LDC.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONCEPT PLAN AND THE PLAN OF OPERATION.
I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE FOR ME. I'LL ASK THE SAME QUESTIONS FROM PREVIOUS.
IT WILL FOLLOW THE ORDINANCES RELATED TO CEMENT UPGRADES AND EVERYTHING LIKE THAT.
CORRECT. AND THEN WITH KEVIN'S QUESTION, HOW DOES THIS ONE FALL IN THE FLOODPLAIN AREA? I THINK THAT WAS IN OUR LARGER PACKET. I DON'T THINK IT'S ON THIS PRESENTATION. IT IS NOT WITHIN THIS PACKET.
BUT I BELIEVE THIS THIS DOES NOT LIE WITHIN THE FLOODWAY.
NONE OF THE PROPOSED SPACES WILL LIE WITHIN THE FLOODWAY.
OKAY. HAS THIS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE CITY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH FLOODWAY REGULATIONS? THAT THAT PROCESS IS SEPARATE AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN AND PLANNING.
OKAY. I SUSPECT WE'RE GOING TO SEE SOME ISSUES THERE WHEN THAT'S REVIEWED, BUT A FLOODWAY DEVELOPMENT PERMIT OR FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED AT THAT TIME. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR ADAM? AS LONG AS IT DOESN'T CAUSE RUNOFF AND PROBLEMS FOR THE PEOPLE AROUND THEM.
I MEAN, IT'S STILL ALL RVS AROUND THEIR MOBILE HOMES.
SO IT'S PROBABLY A DECENT LOCATION FOR IT. AS LONG AS THAT'S NOT GOING TO CAUSE RUNOFF SOMEWHERE ELSE, IT WON'T BE ALLOWED TO. SO IT'LL THEY'LL FIND A WAY TO ADDRESS THAT, I'M SURE.
WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO COME UP AND ADDRESS THIS MATTER? CLINT ROSENBAUM, ROSENBAUM ENGINEERING.
SORRY, GUYS, I JUST GOT A QUESTION ABOUT THE CONDITIONAL USE.
WE'RE PUTTING A CONDITIONAL USE ON A LOT BIGGER PIECE OF PROPERTY THAN THAN JUST THE TRAILER PARK.
SO IF THEY WANT TO EXPAND THE TRAILER PARK, DON'T THEY HAVE TO COME BACK AND REDO THE CONDITIONAL USE? I THINK THEY'D HAVE TO COME BACK AND SUBMIT A NEW SITE PLAN AT LEAST.
THAT'S CORRECT. SO THEY'D HAVE TO COME BACK AND ASK FOR SAME WAY ON THE PREVIOUS ONE, BECAUSE THERE WAS A LOT BIGGER PIECE OF PROPERTY THAN WHAT. OKAY. THAT'S CORRECT. I ANTICIPATE THE MOTION WILL INCLUDE SUBJECT TO THE CONCEPT PLAN.
YEAH, BUT YOU STILL HAVE TO HAVE A SITE PLAN WITH THE CONDITIONAL USE. SO IF YOU CHANGE THE SITE PLAN YOU GOT TO COME BACK AND ASK FOR CONDITIONAL USE. AND I SUSPECT AND THE REASON I ASK THE QUESTION I DID ABOUT THE FLOODWAY, I THINK THIS IS SITTING YEAH, DEAD CENTER IN THAT FLOODWAY TOO ON THE PREVIOUS ONE.
SO THANK YOU ALL. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE TO ADDRESS THIS MATTER? SEEING NO ONE. WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
PAVING IN THE FLOODWAY IS GOING TO BE A CHALLENGE.
SO I THINK WE CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH APPROVING THIS TODAY.
AND IT LOOKED LIKE FROM THE THICKER PACKAGE THAT IT WAS, IT DOES SO.
SO I DON'T KNOW IF THE OWNER IS HERE TODAY AND WOULD BE WILLING TO ENTERTAIN A TABLE UNTIL THAT'S REVIEWED OR, OR THEY WANT TO GET THE INITIAL APPROVAL TO TAKE ON THE MORE EXPENSIVE PROCESS OF THE FURTHER DEVELOPMENT.
BUT THEY MAY NEED TO COME BACK AGAINST US, BACK BEFORE US ANYWAY WITH THE ADJUSTED SITE PLAN.
SO ANYONE ELSE? I WAS JUST TRYING TO SAVE THEM THE COST OF REAPPLYING.
YES, SIR. OH, WAIT. WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC OR WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
[00:15:04]
YEAH. THANK YOU. AS FAR AS THE FLOODPLAIN AND FLOODWAY GOES NONE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN THE FLOODWAY, BUT THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN FLOODPLAIN. FROM PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS WITH THE CITY OF ABILENE, YOU KNOW, WE'D BE REQUIRED TO RAISE BRING IN, FILL TO BRING THAT ONE FOOT ABOVE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION.IT WAS BEFORE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WERE IMPLEMENTED.
OKAY. THAT JUST WASN'T ON THIS PLAN. LIKE SHOWING WHERE THAT FLOODPLAIN WOULD BE.
SO WE HAVE ADDITIONAL GRAPHICS. I DON'T THINK THEY'RE ON THIS.
BUT IT SHOWS WHERE THE 500 YEAR, 100 YEAR AND FLOODWAY ARE.
IT JUST DOES NOT LOOK LIKE IT'S ON THIS ONE. OKAY.
WELL, I YEAH, AS LONG AS YOU'RE AWARE OF THAT.
THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION AMONG THE COMMISSIONERS OR MOTIONS? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE, SUBJECT TO THE CONCEPT PLAN AND THE PLAN OF OPERATIONS BEFORE US.
I SECOND THAT, KEVIN WITH THE FIRST. CRYSTAL WITH THE SECOND.
MR. STRASSER? YES, MR. HOUSE? YES, MISS. KIKER? YES, MR. HALLIBURTON. YES, MISS LEWIS. YES. MR. SEITZ YES. AND MR. BENHAM. YES. AND THE MOTION CARRIES.
I BELIEVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOUR WAS TABLED IN OUR PREVIOUS HEARING.
IS THAT IS THAT CORRECT, TIM? IS THAT. NO, THIS IS A ONE ON JAMIESON.
WE ACTED ON THE ONE WE PREVIOUSLY BECAUSE IT STATED THE ONE LOT.
SO YOU DIDN'T NEED TO TABLE IT. OKAY. IT ONLY AFFECTED THE ONE.
ALL RIGHT. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOUR. ZONING CASE 2020 602 RECEIVER REPORT.
HOLD A DISCUSSION AND PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON REQUEST FROM OWNER TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 3.65 ACRES FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PD 116 TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL. ADAM. GOOD AFTERNOON ONCE AGAIN.
MY NAME IS ADAM HOLLAND, PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF ABILENE. THIS CASE, Z 2020 602 IS OWNED BY HIP VENTURES, LLC. THIS IS A REQUEST TO CHANGE APPROXIMATELY 3.65 ACRES FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL LOCATED AT 2002 JAMESON STREET. HERE IS THE LOCATION MAP KIND OF SHOWING THE AREA.
THIS USED TO BE A SCHOOL. THIS IS RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO THE QTY OFF OF OLD ANSON ROAD.
THIS IS SPECIFICALLY TO ALLOW FOR A MUSEUM AND OTHER RELATED TYPES OF USES.
IT'S VERY LIMITING. PD AND THE OWNER WOULD LIKE TO CHANGE IT TO ALLOW FOR MORE COMMERCIAL TYPE USES.
HERE ARE SOME VIEWS OF THE PROPERTY ITSELF. YOU CAN SEE IT WAS PREVIOUSLY A SCHOOL AT ONE POINT.
THERE ARE THERE ARE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY.
AND THE HIGHWAY JUST TO THE NORTH IN A CHURCH JUST TO THE EAST OF THE PROPERTY AS WELL.
HERE ARE THE PERMITTED USES IN GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING.
WE RECEIVED NO NOTIFICATIONS IN FAVOR OR OPPOSED IN THE TIME ALLOWED TO PLACE IT ON THIS AGENDA.
REQUEST HAS BEEN FOUND CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE FOR ME.
CORRECT? CORRECT. OKAY. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. WHAT IS THE BASE ZONING OF THE EXISTING PD? IT IS SORT OF COMMERCIAL. I DON'T BELIEVE THIS PD HAD A BASE ZONING IN IT.
IT ONLY HAD ALLOWED PERMITTED USES SUCH AS THE MUSEUM AND A RESTAURANT WITHIN THE MUSEUM ITSELF.
THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR ADAM? THANK YOU.
WE'LL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER. WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO ADDRESS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOUR? SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. DISCUSSION AMONG THE COMMISSIONERS OR MOTION.
I THINK THIS MAKES SENSE, AND I'D LIKE TO MOVE AWAY FROM PDS WHENEVER WE CAN.
[00:20:02]
I'LL SECOND THAT. YEAH. SO SO, ZACH, IS THAT A MOTION? MOTION TO APPROVE. AND A SECOND. KRISTEN WITH A SECOND.MR. STRASSER? YES, MR. HOUSE? YES, MISS. KIKER.
YES. MR. HALLIBURTON. YES, MISS. LEWIS. YES, MR. SEITZ. YES. MR. BENHAM? YES. MOTION CARRIES AGENDA.
ITEM NUMBER FIVE IS ZONING CASE 2020 605, RECEIVER REPORT.
HOLD A DISCUSSION AND PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE REQUEST FROM THE OWNER TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 1.54 ACRES FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO GENERAL RETAIL ZONING. LOCATED AT 4541 CATCLAW DRIVE. GOOD AFTERNOON.
MY NAME IS KIRA. I'M A PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF ABILENE.
TODAY I'M REPRESENTING CASE Z 2020 605. THE AGENT IS ALEX WITTEN.
REQUEST HAS CHANGED THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 1.54 ACRES FROM PLAN TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT TO GENERAL RETAIL, LOCATED AT 4541 CATCLAW DRIVE. HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL LOCATION MAP.
THE ZONING MAP. VIEWS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
VIEWS OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY. THE CURRENT PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE PD IS OFFICE ZONING, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE TRADE RETAIL USES. PERMITTED USES IN GENERAL.
RETAIL ZONING. NOTIFICATIONS WERE SENT OUT IN A 200 FOOT BUFFER.
TWO WERE RECEIVED IN FAVOR. THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING, GENERALLY ACCEPTED PLANNING PRINCIPLES, AND THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL IN THE LDC. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL.
I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. DO YOU KNOW WHAT THEY'RE PLANNING TO DO? I DO NOT. OKAY. IS THE IS IT? YES. WE'LL OPEN UP IN JUST A SECOND.
ISN'T THE CURRENT PLACE. WOULDN'T THAT ALMOST BE CONSIDERED RETAIL, THE GOLD STORE? LIKE, WHAT IS THAT? THE GOLD IS WOULD FALL UNDER THE RETAIL SALES PLACE.
WAS THERE ANY CONSIDERATION OR DISCUSSION ABOUT NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL TO, TO CURTAIL THE HOURS WITH IT BACKING UP TO A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD? THERE WAS NOT. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR KIARA? THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU. WE'LL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER. WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO COME UP AND ADDRESS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FIVE.
HI, ALEX. I'M THE AGENT ON THIS. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONTRACT TO BE PURCHASED, ACTUALLY, BY THE GOLD EXCHANGE. OKAY. HE'S WANTING A BIGGER, NEWER BUILDING, BUT WANTS TO STAY WHERE HE IS.
OKAY. THAT MAKES SENSE. GOT IT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.
ANYONE ELSE TO ADDRESS THIS MATTER? SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ANY DISCUSSION AMONG THE COMMISSIONERS OR MOTIONS? IT'S NOT REALLY A CHANGE OF USE IN THIS CASE, I DON'T THINK.
NO, I THINK IT'S ACTUALLY JUST CLEARING UP SOME ZONING.
I MOTION TO APPROVE SHAUN WITH THE FIRST SECOND.
GARY WITH THE SECOND. MR. STRASSER? YES. MR. HOUSE.
MISS KYKER. YES. MR. HALLIBURTON? YES. MISS LEWIS? YES. MR. SEITZ? YES. AND MR. BENHAM. YES. AND THE MOTION CARRIES AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SIX.
RECEIVE A REPORT OR ZONING CASE 2020 606 RECEIVER REPORT.
LOCATED AT THE 1500 BLOCK OF WILDLIFE TRAILS PARKWAY.
ADAM, GOOD AFTERNOON ONCE AGAIN. ADAM HOLLAND, PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF ABILENE, KS 2020 606.
SINGLE FAMILY IS LOCATED AT 1512 WILDLIFE TRAIL.
HERE'S THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY. YOU CAN SEE THIS IS A CURRENTLY A DRAINAGE POND.
FOR THIS PROPERTY THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST INTENDS TO BUILD A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE.
BUT DUE TO PLATTING, THE PROPERTY NEEDS TO REZONE THIS PROPERTY IN ORDER TO CREATE A CONFORMING LOT TO SUBDIVIDE OFF OF THIS. SO HERE'S THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE PROPERTY.
THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED A MINIMUM LOT SIZE IN AGRICULTURAL OPEN ZONING IS FIVE ACRES.
[00:25:03]
SO THE LOT IS BEING REZONED TO ALLOW A SMALLER LOT SIZE.HERE ARE THE PERMITTED USES IN AGRICULTURAL OPEN ZONING.
HERE ARE THE PERMITTED USES IN RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY ZONING.
HERE ARE SOME VIEWS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
YOU CAN SEE THIS IS PART OF GRIFFITH LAKE OR AN ADJACENT DRAINAGE POND.
WE RECEIVED ONE IN FAVOR AS FAR AS NOTIFICATIONS WITHIN TIME TO PLACE ON THIS AGENDA.
THIS REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING.
GENERALLY ACCEPTED PLANNING PRINCIPLES AND THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL IN THE LDC.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE FOR ME.
I APPRECIATE YOUR EXPLANATION. GOING THROUGH THE PACKET, I WAS LIKE, IS THIS IS THIS A HOUSEBOAT? LIKE WHAT? WHAT WHAT DO WE THINK? SO THE AS SOON AS YOU SAID IT, EVERYBODY UP HERE WAS LIKE, OH OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WELL ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR ADAM? AWESOME. THANK YOU. ABSOLUTELY. WE WILL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SIX.
WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO ADDRESS IT? BJ PRITCHARD REPRESENTING THE OWNER, MR. YANDELL. REALLY? IN TRUTH, THIS IS JUST JUMPING THROUGH ALL OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE MANDATED STEPS TO BUILD A HOUSE ON ONE SMALL CORNER OF THAT PROPERTY, WHICH WE DID ACTUALLY SPEND A GOOD AMOUNT OF TIME TO GO THROUGH AND FIGURE OUT IF IT WOULD WORK. SO YEAH.
SO I WILL HAPPILY ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
I DON'T HAVE ANY. ANYBODY. THANK YOU SIR. THANKS.
ANYONE ELSE TO ADDRESS THIS MATTER? SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ANY DISCUSSION AMONG THE COMMISSIONERS OR MOTIONS? IT SAYS THE GUY WOULD HAVE CALLED TO ASK ABOUT THIS IF I.
IF I NEEDED MORE CLARITY. SO I'D. I'D MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
SECOND. KEVIN WITH THE FIRST. SHANTI WITH THE SECOND. MR. STRASSER? YES, MR. HOUSE? YES, MISS. KIKER. YES, MR. HALLIBURTON. YES, MISS. LEWIS. YES. MR. SEITZ.
YES. AND MR. BENHAM. YES. AND THE MOTION CARRIES AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN IS ZONING CASE 2020 607, RECEIVER REPORT. HOLD A DISCUSSION, PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE ACTION ON THE REQUEST FROM THE OWNER TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 3.87 ACRES FROM GENERAL RETAIL TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, LOCATED AT 5601 MEMORIAL DRIVE. CLARISSA.
THE AGENT IS CLINT ROSENBAUM. THE REQUEST IS TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 3.87 ACRES FROM GENERAL RETAIL TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, LOCATED AT 5401 MEMORIAL DRIVE. HERE WE HAVE THE AERIAL LOCATION MAP.
USE OF PROPERTY VIEWS. PERMITTED USES IN GENERAL.
RETAIL ZONING. PERMITTED USES IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING.
THEY DID NOT SPECIFY WHY THEY WERE IN OPPOSITION.
THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING, GENERALLY ACCEPTED PLANNING PRINCIPLES, AND THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL IN THE LDC. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL.
YES. AND THEN THIS ONE WILL BE FAST TRACKED. SO IT ENDS UP LIKE TWO WEEKS BEHIND.
YES, SIR. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR KYRA? SORRY I CALLED YOU.
CLARISSA, I WAS IN THE MODE OF JUST READING, SO.
THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER.
WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO ADDRESS IT? YEAH. CLINT ROSENBAUM, AGENT FOR THE FOR THE OWNER.
AND THAT WAS MY CLARIFICATION. I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT WE'RE WE'RE NOT OUT OF SYNC ON THIS, THAT WE'RE GOING TO MAKE THE 12TH ON THE FIRST READING FOR THIS ONE, RIGHT? YEAH. BECAUSE THE OTHER ONES, THE OTHER HALF'S ALREADY HAD THE FIRST READING, SO IT'LL GO TO THE SECOND READING ON THE 12TH. SO WE, WE HOPEFULLY IF EVERYTHING MOVES FORWARD WITH CITY COUNCIL'S VOTE TWO WEEKS BEHIND, BUT STILL BEFORE THE DATE THAT Y'ALL ARE WORRIED ABOUT, THAT'S THE WAY WE TALKED ABOUT IT. THAT'S THE WAY IT'S SUPPOSED TO. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE ALL IN GOOD SHAPE. YES, SIR. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANKS, GUYS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR CLINT BEFORE HE SITS DOWN? THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE TO ADDRESS THIS MATTER?
[00:30:06]
I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. WE'LL OPEN IT UP FOR DISCUSSION OR MOTION WITH THE FIRST THROUGH ANYONE.WITH A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. EVEN THOUGH I'M HOGGING ALL THE MOTIONS.
KEVIN. WITH A SECOND, MR. STRASSER. YES, MR. HOUSE? YES, MISS. KIKER. YES, MR. HALLIBURTON. YES, MISS LEWIS.
YES, MR. SEITZ. YES. AND MR. BYNUM. YES. AND THE MOTION CARRIES.
THAT IS ALL WE HAVE FOR TODAY. WE ARE ADJOURNED.
30 MINUTES, 30 MINUTES. AND FIVE OF IT WAS US JUST ELECTING NEW PEOPLE.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.