THANK YOU, SIR. ALL RIGHT. I'LL CALL THE FEBRUARY BOARD OF BUILDING STANDARDS MEETING.
[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:06]
IF YOU ARE WISHING TO SPEAK AT ANY OF THE CASES TODAY, PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU SIGN IN AT THE DOOR.IF YOU'LL RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, WE'LL GET YOU SWORN IN.
DO YOU AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU GIVE TODAY WILL BE THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? ALL RIGHT. SO WITH THAT WE'LL CALL TO ORDER THE WE'LL NEED APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES.
[MINUTES]
IS THERE ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK ON THE MINUTES FROM LAST MEETING? NO.I GET A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. I MOVE THAT WE ACCEPT THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED.
IS THERE A SECOND? I SECOND THE MOTION. ROLL CALL PLEASE.
MR. WYATT? YES. MR. ALLRED? YES. MR. TANKERSLEY.
YES. MR. MCNEIL. ABSTAIN, MR. TURNER. ABSTAIN, MR. DUGGAR. OH, HE'S NOT HERE. NOT HERE. SORRY. AND MR. MCBRAYER? YES. MOTION PASSED. ALL RIGHT. AS A STATEMENT OF POLICY IN ALL CASES EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE, BUILDINGS MUST BE SECURE AND THE LOT CLEAN AND MOWED BY THE OWNER WITHIN TEN DAYS OF RECEIPT OF NOTICE OF RESULTS OF THIS HEARING.
IF THIS IS NOT DONE, THE CITY MAY DO SO AND BILL THE OWNER.
IN ANY CASE, WHERE THE BOARD ORDERS THE ORDER TO DEMOLISH THE STRUCTURE OR STRUCTURES BUT THE OWNER FAILS TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE BOARD'S ORDER, THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. ANY APPEAL MUST BE FILED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS.
30 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE AGGRIEVED PARTY RECEIVES NOTICE OF THE BOARD'S DECISION AT THE HEARING, YOU SHOULD BE PREPARED TO PRESENT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. SPECIFIC TIME FRAME NEEDED TO COMPLETE REPAIRS.
SPECIFIC SCOPE OF REPAIR WORK TO BE COMPLETED.
COST ESTIMATES FOR WORK TO BE DONE BY LICENSED BONDED CONTRACTORS SUCH AS ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, OR HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING CONTRACTORS. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT YOU AT THE HEARING, THE RIGHT TO INSPECT THE FILE ON THE PROPERTY AT THE OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRIOR TO THE HEARING, AND THE RIGHT TO REQUEST THE PRESENCE OF CITY STAFF FOR THE PURPOSE OF QUESTIONING AT THE HEARING. SO WITH THAT, WE'LL START OUR FIRST CASE.
[A. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case# 24-000052: 300 Wall St (AUTOMATION INDUSTRIES, LOT 1-3 REP & STREET, ACRES 18.7561, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: 300 Wall St LLC]
GOOD MORNING. I'M ROBERT MARSH, PROPERTY MAINTENANCE INSPECTOR FOR THE CITY OF ABILENE. WE'RE GOING TO PRESENT EIGHT PROPERTIES TO YOU TODAY. THIS IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS PUBLISHED FOR THIS HEARING. WE'RE GOING TO START WITH CASE NUMBER 20 4-000052 LOCATED AT 300 WALL STREET.THIS IS THE CHECKLIST FOR THE RECORD SEARCH. IT SHOWS THE UTILITY RECORDS.
THIS PHOTO IS FROM JANUARY 21ST THIS YEAR. FRONT.
EAST SIDE. REAR. WEST SIDE. THE NORTH SIDE.
IS A LITTLE LAG ON THE COMPUTER. IN THE SOUTH SIDE.
IT'S WAITING ON THE SLIDES TO CATCH UP. WE'RE WE'RE LOOKING AT THE TOP HIGHLIGHTED BUILDING, 300 WALL STREET.
THESE ARE THE SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS THAT WERE FOUND.
INADEQUATE SANITATION, STRUCTURAL HAZARD, NUISANCE, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING, HAZARDOUS PLUMBING, HAZARDOUS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.
THESE PHOTOS ARE FROM JANUARY 21ST THIS YEAR THAT SHOW THEY'RE STILL BROKEN EXTERIOR GLASS.
YOU'VE GOT A FLAGPOLE ON THE FRONT THAT'S BEEN SITTING THERE FOR A COUPLE OF MONTHS DETACHED.
THAT SHOWS THE NEGLECT OF THE BUILDING. HERE WE SEE THAT THE FENCE IS STILL UNSECURED.
THIS IS THE CONDITION OF THE MAIN AREA. THESE PHOTOS ARE FROM JUNE OF 2025.
AFTER THEY DID A BIT OF CLEAN OUT OF THE BUILDING.
WE'VE GOT OPENINGS IN THE ROOF WHICH WERE PRESENT WHEN WE DID A WALK THROUGH IN NOVEMBER.
WE'VE GOT VANDALISM THAT WERE STILL PRESENT WHEN WE DID A WALK THROUGH IN NOVEMBER.
APRIL 3RD OF 24. THE BOARD ORDERED THE 30 60 OCTOBER 2ND OF 24.
[00:05:03]
THE BOARD ORDERED CIVIL PENALTIES AND ASSESSED.WE ASSESSED A LIEN IN THE AMOUNT OF $74,500. WHICH WAS RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK.
AND THAT LIEN REMAINS UNPAID. MARCH 5TH OF 25.
THE BOARD ORDERED CIVIL PENALTIES. THERE WAS A LIEN IN THE AMOUNT OF $77,000 RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK, AND THAT LIEN ALSO REMAINS UNPAID. JUNE 12TH OF 25.
JULY 2ND OF 25. THE BOARD ORDERED A COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT.
AUGUST 15TH, 2025. THE OWNER NEVER CONTACTED CITY STAFF TO DISCUSS THE COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT, SO WE DRAFTED ONE AND SENT IT TO HIM. THE AGREEMENT WAS TO MAKE MINIMAL REPAIRS NECESSARY TO REMOVE THE BUILDING FROM CONDEMNATION.
WE PLACED A COPY OF THAT COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT IN YOUR FOLDERS.
AND IF YOU WANT TO LOOK ON PAGE TWO, NUMBER FOUR, YOU CAN SEE WHAT THE CITY IS REQUIRING TO BE DONE AND HOW MINIMAL AND REASONABLE WE'RE BEING WITH THE OWNER. THE OWNER DID NOT EVER ENTER INTO A COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT AS ORDERED BY THE BOARD.
I'LL GIVE YOU A MINUTE TO LOOK AT THAT AGREEMENT.
ON SEPTEMBER 3RD OF 2025, THE BOARD ORDERED CIVIL PENALTIES.
OCTOBER 30TH OF 2025, WE WERE CONTACTED BY A REALTY COMPANY AND ASKED IF WE WOULD ACCOMPANY A PROSPECTIVE TENANT THROUGH THE BUILDING TO EXPLAIN THE CITY'S REPAIR REQUIREMENTS SO THE TENANT COULD MAKE THE REPAIRS, WHICH WERE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED REPAIRS NEEDED TO BE ABLE TO USE THE BUILDING FOR STORAGE.
NOVEMBER 3RD OF 25 THE TENANT WALKED THROUGH WAS COMPLETED.
ALL CITY REQUIREMENTS WERE EXPLAINED AND AGREED UPON.
THE TENANT'S NEXT STEP WAS TO SIGN A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE OWNER, SUBMIT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS TO THE CITY, AND PULL A PERMIT. THEY WANTED TO START USING THE BUILDING IMMEDIATELY IN NOVEMBER, AND IT WAS TO BE USED FOR STORAGE.
THIS WAS THE LAST CONTACT WE HAD WITH THAT COMPANY.
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO ORDER. THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO PAY CIVIL PENALTIES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE OF THE BOARD'S ORDER ON JULY 2ND, 2025, IN THE AMOUNT OF $500 FOR EACH DAY OF NONCOMPLIANCE AND THE PERIOD OF NONCOMPLIANCE FOR THE CIVIL PENALTIES TO BE ASSESSED IS STARTING ON THE DAY AFTER THE PREVIOUS PERIOD OF NONCOMPLIANCE. CIVIL PENALTIES TO BE ASSESSED TODAY ARE FOR THE NONCOMPLIANCE PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER 3RD, 2025 THROUGH FEBRUARY 3RD, 2026. TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS OF NONCOMPLIANCE IS 154 DAYS.
THE TOTAL CIVIL PENALTIES TO BE ASSESSED IS $77,000.
DO NOT TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. I KNOW THE TIMELINE STARTED AT JANUARY 11TH OF 2024.
[00:10:03]
YES, SIR. HAVE THERE BEEN OTHER SITUATIONS WITH THIS PROPERTY THAT THIS COMMITTEE OR THE CITY HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN? JUST NUISANCE. COMPLAINTS? OKAY. MOWINGS AND SUCH SECUREMENT OF THE BUILDING.THANK YOU. THESE ARE CIVIL PENALTIES THAT WERE ASSESSED AT THESE VARIOUS TIMES.
IT LOOKED LIKE THAT ADDS UP TO ABOUT $180,000, BUT I'M SEEING 77.
THEN IN ADDITION TO THAT, THOSE PREVIOUS PENALTIES OR.
YEAH, THESE ARE EACH SEPARATE FINES. IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE ASKING? YES. THEY'RE THEY'RE SEPARATE FINES AND THEY'RE ALL APPLICABLE THEN.
IS THAT RIGHT? RIGHT. CORRECT. OKAY, SO THEY'RE UP OVER $200,000 THEN? YES, SIR. I DIDN'T ADD THEM UP, BUT THAT SOUNDS CORRECT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. MARSH? ALL RIGHT, I WILL OPEN CASE NUMBER 24000052 FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION. ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK TO THE CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD.
STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE NUMBER 24000052 AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR A MOTION.
THESE FIRST THREE CASES AND THAT'S IN YOUR FOLDER.
IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THEY'VE DONE A WHOLE LOT OF WHAT WE'VE ASKED TO BEGIN WITH.
RIGHT? NO, SIR. THEY DID CLEAN OUT OF SOME OF THE BUILDING THE MAIN AREAS AND TAKEN OFF SOME GRAFFITI ON THE WALLS, CLEANED OUT SOME BROKEN GLASS, AND THAT'S PRETTY MUCH THE EXTENT THEY DID SOME MOWING ON THE OUTSIDE.
THEY HAVEN'T SECURED PART OF THE FENCE THAT'S BROKEN, LIKE WE'VE BEEN ASKING FOR QUITE A WHILE.
THEY DID CHAIN UP THE THE GATES. BUT LIKE YOU SAW THAT THE BUILDING REMAINS UNSECURED.
YOU COULD WALK THROUGH THE THE FRONT AT THE BROKEN GLASS.
AND I GUESS THIS NEW LETTER IS FROM SOMEBODY NEW.
HE'S HIRED TO TAKE OVER. THAT'S CORRECT.
WELL, I'VE MENTIONED BEFORE, IT LOOKS LIKE THAT WE ARE JUST PROLONGING THE SITUATION BY GETTING THESE CIVIL PENALTIES, AND WE'RE NOT GETTING ANYWHERE.
I DON'T KNOW WHAT. I DON'T KNOW WHAT OUR RESPONSIBILITY IS ON THIS, BUT SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION. I BELIEVE ONCE THE CIVIL PENALTIES GET TO A CERTAIN AMOUNT IN THE CITY HAS MORE LEVERAGE.
SO IT'S KIND OF I THINK THAT'S THEIR THAT'S THE PLAY HERE.
TRY TO GET THEM TO DO SOMETHING. I MOVE, WE ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. ALL RIGHT, WE GOT A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. GO AHEAD. ALL RIGHT. I'VE GOT A MOTION AND A SECOND TO ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
ROLL CALL PLEASE. MR. WYATT? YES. MR.. YES. MR. TANKERSLEY. YES. MR. MCNEIL. YES. MR.. TURNER.
YES. AND MR. MCBRAYER. YES. MOTION PASSED. BRIAN, CLOSE THE CASE.
2400052 AND GO TO THE SECOND NEXT ONE. THE NEXT
[B. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #24-000054: 5502 N 1st St. (ABILENE PLAZA SEC 1, BLOCK 12, LOTE250, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: 300 Wall St LLC A Delaware LLC]
[C. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #24-000055: 5512 N 1st St (ABILENE PLAZA SEC 1, BLOCK 12, LOT W205 OF E455, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: 300 Wall St LLC A Delaware LLC]
PROPERTY ON THE AGENDA. CASE NUMBER 24, DASH 000054 AND 20 4-000055.LOCATED AT 250 502 5512 NORTH FIRST STREET. THIS IS THE SAME BUILDING.
IT JUST HAS TWO DIFFERENT LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS THAT SPLIT DOWN THE MIDDLE.
THAT'S WHY THEY'RE COMBINED IN ONE CASE. CHECKLIST FOR RECORD SEARCH SHOW THAT THE UTILITY RECORDS HAVE BEEN INACTIVE SINCE 2019, AND IT REVEALS THAT 300 WALL STREET LLC IS THE OWNER.
THIS IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE FOR THIS HEARING THAT WAS POSTED ON THE BUILDING. THIS IS THE FRONT.
[00:15:03]
SOUTH SIDE. THE REAR. NORTH SIDE.BUILDING ON THE SLIDES TO CATCH UP.
SORRY, THE COMPUTER DOESN'T USUALLY GO THIS SLOW.
NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT THE THE BUILDING HIGHLIGHTED ON THE BOTTOM, THE SMALL BUILDING.
THE SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS THAT WERE FOUND ARE INADEQUATE SANITATION, STRUCTURAL HAZARD, NUISANCE, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING, HAZARDOUS PLUMBING, HAZARDOUS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION. THESE PHOTOS ARE FROM MARCH OF 2024 SHOWING INADEQUATE SANITATION. WE'VE HAD NO INDICATION THAT ANY WORK HAS BEEN DONE ON THIS BUILDING TO SHOW IMPROVEMENT OR CLEAN OUT.
WE WENT THERE SERVED A WARRANT, A DAY OF A STORM, AND YOU COULD SEE ALL THE THE RAIN POURING INSIDE.
HERE ARE THE THE CHEMICAL VATS ON THE LEFT AND SLIMY SUBSTANCE ON THE FLOOR ON THE RIGHT.
SO IT'S A HAZARDOUS BUILDING. THE TIMELINE OF EVENTS JANUARY 11TH OF 24 IS WHEN THE AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS RECORDED AT THE COUNTY CLERK. APRIL 3RD OF 24. THE BOARD ORDERED A 30 60 OCTOBER 2ND OF 24.
THE BOARD ORDERED CIVIL PENALTIES. LEAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,900 FOR 5502 NORTH FIRST AND $14,900 FOR 5512 NORTH FIRST WERE RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK, AND THOSE LIENS REMAIN UNPAID.
FEBRUARY 27TH OF 25 WE RECEIVED A CALL FROM THE OWNER'S REAL ESTATE ADVISOR, AND HE LET US KNOW THAT THE THE THE OWNER INTENDS TO SELL THE BUILDING AS IS MARCH 5TH OF 25. THE BOARD ORDERED CIVIL PENALTIES, THE LIENS IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,400 FOR 5502 NORTH FIRST AND $15,400 FOR 5512 NORTH FIRST WERE RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK, AND THOSE LIENS REMAIN UNPAID.
THE BOARD ORDERED A COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT AUGUST 15TH OF 25.
THE OWNER DID NOT GET IN CONTACT WITH THE CITY STAFF TO DISCUSS THE COMPLIANCE AGREEMENTS.
THE OWNER DID NOT ENTER INTO A COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT AS ORDERED BY THE BOARD.
SEPTEMBER 3RD 25 THE BOARD ORDERED CIVIL PENALTIES LEANS IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,750 FOR 5502 NORTH FIRST AND $55,750 FOR 5512 NORTH FIRST WERE RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK, AND THOSE LIENS REMAIN UNPAID.
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR CASE NUMBER 20 4-000054 FOR 5502 NORTH FIRST STREET.
THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO PAY CIVIL PENALTIES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE OF THE BOARD'S ORDER ON JULY 2ND, 2025, IN THE AMOUNT OF $250 PER DAY FOR EACH DAY OF NONCOMPLIANCE.
[00:20:02]
THE CIVIL PENALTIES TO BE ASSESSED TODAY ARE FOR NONCOMPLIANCE PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER 3RD, 25 THROUGH FEBRUARY 3RD OF 26.THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS OF NONCOMPLIANCE IS 154 DAYS.
THE TOTAL CIVIL PENALTIES TO BE ASSESSED IS $38,500.
FOR CASE NUMBER 24 000055 FOR 5512 NORTH FIRST.
THAT'S THE SAME ORDER OWNER'S ORDER TO PAY CIVIL PENALTIES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE OF THE BOARD'S ORDER ON JULY 2ND 25, AND THE AMOUNT OF $250 FOR EACH DAY OF NONCOMPLIANCE CIVIL PENALTIES TO BE ASSESSED TODAY OR FOR THE NONCOMPLIANCE PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER 3RD, 25 THROUGH FEBRUARY 3RD 26TH. THE TOTAL DAYS OF NONCOMPLIANCE IS 154 DAYS, AND THE TOTAL CIVIL PENALTIES TO BE ASSESSED IS $38,500.
AND I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. ROBERT, I HAVE A QUESTION ON THIS POWERPOINT.
THE FIRST. LET'S SEE. AND I'M NOT COUNTING UP THE DAYS I BELIEVE IS IS YOUR RECOMMENDATION INCLUDING THAT FIRST SENTENCE OR IS DOES IT START WITH THAT SECOND SENTENCE? I'M NOT GETTING WHAT YOU'RE ASKING ME BECAUSE THIS IS GOING BACK TO I THINK THE PREVIOUSLY WE'VE DONE CIVIL PENALTIES FROM THE JULY DATE.
BUT SEE, THIS IS WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. I WAS THINKING YOUR RECOMMENDATION WOULD START HERE.
THEY START AFTER THIS ONE. SEPTEMBER 3RD ENDS, AND WE START THE NEW ONE.
RIGHT? SO THIS SENTENCE RIGHT HERE, JULY 2ND.
LET'S SEE. WHAT IS THIS? THAT'S THE DAY OF THE ORDER.
OKAY, I GOT IT. THE ORDER. THE ORDER ON JULY 2ND.
AND THIS IS THE THE CONTINUED NONCOMPLIANCE OKAY.
OKAY. YES. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. I WILL OPEN CASE NUMBER 2400054. AND CASE NUMBER 2400055 FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION.
ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK TO THESE CASES, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NUMBER 2400054 AND 24-00055 AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR MOTION. I MOVE THAT WE JUST GO WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. MOTION AND SECOND. ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
MR. WYATT? YES. MR. ALLRED. YES. MR. TANKERSLEY.
YES. MR. MCNEIL. YES. MR. TURNER. YES. AND MR. MCBRAYER. YES. MOTION PASS. NEXT CASE, PLEASE.
AND THEN, IF YOU WANT TO VOTE ON THE 50. OH, YEAH.
AND THEN SO WE'VE GOT THE THE MOTION FOR THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION, AND THEN WE HAVE AN ORDER TO IMPOSE THE CIVIL PENALTIES. IS THAT CORRECT? YEAH, IT'S THE SAME AS THE LAST.
IT'S JUST TWO DIFFERENT CASE NUMBERS. OKAY, WE CAN'T COMBINE THOSE.
WELL, I MEAN, IT'S TWO CASE NUMBERS. THERE'S TWO DIFFERENT LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE PROPERTIES. THAT'S WHY THEY'RE BROKEN UP. ALRIGHT, THEN WE HAVE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE NUMBER 2400055.
ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE? SEEING NO ONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE 2400055 AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR A MOTION. I MOVE, WE FOLLOW THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
SECOND. ALL RIGHT. WE GOT A MOTION AND A SECOND FOR THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
ROLL CALL, PLEASE. MR. WYATT? YES, MR. ALLRED? YES. MR. TANKERSLEY. YES. MR. MCNEIL. YES. MR. TURNER. YES. AND MR. MCBRAYER. YES. MOTION PASS.
THE NEXT CASE ON THE AGENDA IS CASE NUMBER 20 4-001274, LOCATED AT 742 NORTH 13TH STREET.
[D. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #24-001274: 742 N 13th St (W105 W140 S100 201 2 W1/2 C MC NAIRY OT ABL, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Dela Garza Jessica T]
THE CHECKLIST FOR RECORD SEARCH SHOWS THE UTILITY RECORDS OF THE MUNICIPALITY.SHOW THEY'VE BEEN INACTIVE SINCE JULY 7TH OF 2023.
[00:25:01]
AND SHOWS THAT JESSICA T DELAGARZA TO BE THE OWNER.THIS IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE FOR THIS HEARING THAT WAS POSTED ON THE HOUSE.
THIS IS THE FRONT. SOUTH SIDE. THE REAR. NORTH SIDE.
THE EAST SIDE. IN THE WEST SIDE.
THESE ARE THE SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS THAT WERE FOUND.
INADEQUATE SANITATION. STRUCTURAL HAZARDS. NUISANCE HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING.
SOME OF THE INADEQUATE SANITATION. HAZARDOUS MECHANICAL.
ADDITIONAL INADEQUATE SANITATION.
IN THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT. PICTURE ON THE LEFT SHOWS QUITE A BIT OF VAGRANT ACTIVITY HAPPENING IN THIS HOUSE. TIMELINE OF EVENTS. APRIL 24TH OF 24 IS WHEN THE AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS RECORDED AT THE COUNTY CLERK.
MAY 1ST OF 24 THE CONDEMNATION NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE OWNER.
DECEMBER 30TH OF 25 WE RECEIVED A COMPLAINT OF A BREAK IN.
JANUARY 5TH OF 26 WE INSPECTED THE PROPERTY. DURING THAT INSPECTION, WE FOUND A VAGRANT INSIDE.
ONE AREA OF THE HOUSE LOOKED TO BE PARTIALLY BURNED.
PLUMBING IS MISSING AND LACKS PROPER SANITATION.
JANUARY 16TH OF 26 RECEIVED A PHONE CALL FROM THE OWNER.
HE WAS UNSURE WHETHER THEY WANT TO REPAIR OR SELL THE PROPERTY, AND WE SENT THE OWNER A 30 60 PLAN OF ACTION WORKSHEET, WHICH WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED BACK. JANUARY 20TH OF 26.
THE CITY SECURED THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE ON JANUARY 22ND OF 26.
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO ORDER THE OWNER TO REPAIR 30 DAYS TO PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION, INCLUDING A TIME FRAME FOR REPAIR AND COST ESTIMATES AND OBTAINING PERMITS, AND IF THIS IS DONE, 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN ROOFING INSPECTIONS, AND IF THIS IS DONE, ALL FINAL INSPECTION SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE EXPIRATION OF ALL PERMITS.
AND I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. I WILL OPEN CASE NUMBER 24001274 FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION.
ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK, PLEASE COME UP. PLEASE COME UP HERE AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD, SIR. MA'AM? JOHN DIAZ AND JESSICA DE LA GARZA.
JESSICA DELAGARZA. I'M THE PROPERTY OWNER. OWNER.
IT'S UNDER MY NAME. SO WE DO HAVE THE NOTICES, EVERYTHING.
SO WE JUST HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS SO WE KNOW HOW TO MOVE FORWARD BECAUSE THIS IS NEW TO US.
WE WERE WANTING TO REMODEL THE HOUSE, USE IT FOR VACATION HOME OR WEEKEND HOME.
THOUGHT ABOUT MAKING AN AIRBNB WITH ALL THE WORK IN DUBLIN.
AND FROM DAY ONE IT'S BEEN A STRUGGLE WITH THE SQUATTERS.
WITH THE VAGRANTS. YEAH, WE'LL CALL IT IN OR WE'LL CALL IT IN.
BOARDED IT UP. WE'VE DONE IT. CLEANED OUT. WE DO MAINTAIN THE PROPERTY.
THE TRASH. I KNOW THEY LOOK BACK IN THEIR FILES.
THERE WAS LOTS OF PICTURES THAT THEY USED TO STACK TRASH THERE.
OLD CARS. WE TOOK CARE OF ALL THAT. THAT WAS THE FIRST PORTION OF THIS.
AND THEN WE HAD THE HOUSE LIVABLE. AND THEN ABOUT 12 SQUATTERS WERE IN THERE.
SO WE TALKED TO I DON'T REMEMBER THE GENTLEMAN'S NAME, BUT THE COUNCIL.
AND WE TOLD HIM, WHAT ARE WE WHAT'S OUR NEXT MOVE? HE SAID, WELL, YOU CAN CONDEMN IT.
[00:30:02]
THAT'LL BUY YOU SOME TIME. AND THAT WAS IN 24, I THINK.AND NOW WITH THE LATEST PICTURES, WE HAD IT ALL CLEANED OUT, AND NOW IT'S FULL OF TRASH AGAIN.
THEY'VE BROKEN IN AGAIN AND PULLED OFF THE PLYWOOD OFF THE FRONT DOOR.
AND WE WENT BY THIS MORNING. AND THE ONLY REASON IT'S CLOSED NOW.
THEY SECURED IT. THEY SECURED IT SO WE CAN. YEAH.
SO WE WANT TO KEEP SECURING IT. SO OUR PLAN IS TO REMODEL THE HOME.
OR WE THOUGHT WE'D DEMO IT AND START NEW WITH WHAT WE'RE ALLOWED TO DO WITH IT.
IF IT'S COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL, CAN WE PUT TRAILERS? CAN WE PUT A DUPLEX? WHAT CAN WE DO? WE HAVE TO FIND THAT OUT. RIGHT NOW, WE DO JUST NEED MORE TIME.
AND THEN THE QUESTION IS, WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT THE SQUATTERS AND VAGRANTS, OR WHAT? WHAT IS EVERYBODY DOING ABOUT THAT? OR HOW DO WE HELP? IF WE MAKE AN IMPROVEMENT, THEY DAMAGE IT WITHIN A MONTH OR TWO.
THE VAGRANTS MESSED UP AND HE GOT IT FIXED AND GOT IT RENTED.
SO IT'S WORKING RIGHT NOW. HE SAYS HE'S BEEN DOING THIS FOR THREE YEARS. AND THEY JUST IT'S A FIGHT BETWEEN THESE VAGRANTS THAT IF IT HAPPENS TO BE EMPTY, EVEN FOR A MONTH OR TWO, IT'S THEN THEY'RE IN THERE.
WE'RE HOW DO WE DEAL WITH THAT OR HOW DO WE SO WHAT CAN WE DO AS A BOARD.
WE CAN'T REALLY GIVE YOU ADVICE ON THAT. THAT FRONT. RIGHT.
I THINK THE CITY WOULD BE ABLE TO HELP YOU A LITTLE BIT MORE WITH THAT. LIKE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OR WHATEVER, YOU KNOW? YES, SIR. WE CAN TALK AFTER THE HEARING. OKAY.
YEAH. BUT WE DID START THE PROCESS TO THE GENTLEMAN TOLD US TO WORK ON.
WE HAVE A SKETCH AND A LIST OF ALL OF OUR REPAIRS THAT WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON.
SLOWLY. AND THEN BACK TO THE BEGINNING AGAIN.
BACK TO SQUARE ONE. WE DID GET AN ESTIMATE FROM A BONDING COMPANY.
BUT TO DEMO IT. BUT THAT'S, YOU KNOW, WE DON'T WANT TO DEMOLISH THE HOUSE, REALLY, BUT WE KIND OF WANT TO LOOK INTO THE PLANS OF THE THAT AREA IN THE CITY AND, YOU KNOW, MAYBE WHAT'S THE NEXT BEST MOVE TO DO? SO WE JUST NEED TIME. OKAY. WELL, RIGHT NOW THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS, IS YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO TO GET A PLAN OF ACTION TOGETHER.
RIGHT. ONCE YOU GET THAT AND THE CITY APPROVES IT AND THEN THEN YOU START PULLING PERMITS AND YOU GET ANOTHER 60 DAYS TO START GETTING INSPECTIONS, PERMITS. THIS PLAN OR A PLAN. RIGHT. OKAY. YEAH.
AND IF YOU'RE FINE WITH THAT, THAT'S THAT'S WHAT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS. AND THAT ULTIMATELY GIVES YOU 90 DAYS TO REALLY GET GOING. YOU JUST HAVE TO GET THAT 30 DAYS FIRST AND THEN YOU GET ANOTHER 60. OKAY. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE TO ASK OKAY.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU FOR COMING IN.
AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION. YES. THANK YOU.
MOTION TO TAKE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. WE HAVE A MOTION ON STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
WE HAVE A SECOND. SECOND. ALL RIGHT. FIRST AND SECOND.
ROLL CALL PLEASE, MR. WYATT. YES. MR. ALLRED? YES. MR. TANKERSLEY. YES. MR. MCNEIL. YES. MR. TURNER. YES. AND MR. MCBRAYER. YES. MOTION PASS.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU ALL FOR COMING IN. ALL RIGHT, NEXT CASE, PLEASE.
THE NEXT CASE ON THE AGENDA IS CASE NUMBER 25 005504, LOCATED AT 1633 SANDIFER STREET.
[E. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #25-005504: 1633 Sandefer St (DARBY OF NORTH PARK, BLOCK B, LOT E/2 OF 6 & W37.5 OF 5, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Petty Mary Jo]
CHECKLIST FOR RECORD SEARCH SHOW. MARY JO PETTY TO BE THE OWNER.THE REAR. SOUTH SIDE. THE EAST SIDE.
AND THE WEST SIDE. THESE ARE THE SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS THAT WERE FOUND.
INADEQUATE SANITATION. STRUCTURAL HAZARDS. NUISANCE.
HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING. HAZARDOUS PLUMBING. HAZARDOUS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION. SOME OF THE EXTERIOR DILAPIDATION THAT'S PRESENT FROM A FIRE THAT HAPPENED TO A AN ATTACHED GARAGE DWELLING UNIT.
SOME OF THE EXTERIOR DILAPIDATION. THIS IS THE EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR OF THE SOUTH SIDE. THESE ARE THE INTERIOR CONDITIONS AS SEEN FROM THE FRONT DOOR.
[00:35:05]
A TIMELINE OF EVENTS. NOVEMBER 17TH OF 25 IS WHEN THE AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS RECORDED AT THE COUNTY CLERK.THE PROPERTY REQUIRED FURTHER DEMO BY BY OUR DEPARTMENT.
WE WERE UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHETHER THEY HAD PERMISSION TO BE THERE OR NOT FROM THE OWNER.
NOTICES OF VIOLATION WERE SENT TO THE HOMEOWNER TO GET THE HOUSE CLEARED OF POSSIBLE UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS, AND TO ADDRESS A HAZARDOUS FALLING CARPORT. WHEN NO ACTION WAS TAKEN BY THE OWNER TO ADDRESS THE VIOLATIONS, CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS WERE FILED WITH MUNICIPAL COURT. NOVEMBER 19TH OF 19TH OF 25.
THE CONDEMNATION NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE OWNER. THE HOMEOWNER HAS REACHED OUT SEVERAL TIMES BY LETTER, BUT THE LETTERS WERE VERY DIFFICULT TO READ. SO WE CALLED CALL THE NURSING HOME.
THE CITY HAS BEEN IN CONTACT WITH HARDIN-SIMMONS, AND THEY SAID THEY HAVE NO FORMAL AGREEMENT ON THE PROPERTY, BUT THEY ANTICIPATE GETTING THE PROPERTY AND WILL DEMO ONCE THEY GET IT.
JANUARY 14TH OF 26. THE NOTICE OF THE FEBRUARY HEARING WAS SENT TO THE OWNER AND POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE, AND HARDIN-SIMMONS WAS ALSO MADE AWARE OF THIS HEARING. THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO FIND THAT THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE, AND THAT IT'S A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, AND REPAIR OF THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE. IN ORDER, THE OWNERS ORDERED TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS, OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH.
AND I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. THERE'S NOT BEEN FURTHER DISCUSSIONS WITH HARDIN-SIMMONS ON IT.
NO, SIR. NO, SIR. THEY DIDN'T HAVE ANY INPUTS FOR ME TO PROVIDE TO YOU TODAY.
BUT IT'S THEIR INTENT TO BUY IT. WHEN THE OWNER PASSES, THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO GET IT.
OH, IT'S LIKE A IN THEIR WILL. I'M NOT SURE EXACTLY THE DEAL THAT THEY HAVE.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. MARSH? ALL RIGHT.
I WILL OPEN CASE NUMBER 25005504 FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION.
ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS, PLEASE STEP FORWARD. STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE NUMBER 25005504 AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR MOTION.
I MOVE THAT WE GO WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
WE HAVE A MOTION FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION. WE HAVE A SECOND.
SECOND. SECOND. ALL RIGHT. ROLL CALL PLEASE. MR..
WYATT? YES. MR.. ALREADY? YES. MR.. TANKERSLEY.
YES. MR.. MCNEIL. YES. MR.. TURNER. YES. AND MR. MCBRAYER. YES. MOTION PASS. ALSO, WE ASK THE OWNER IS THE ORDER, IS THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS, OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH.
MOTION FOR THE ORDER. THE OWNER IS ORDERED. DEMOLISH.
APPEALED THE ORDER DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH.
SECOND. WE HAVE A SECOND. ROLL CALL PLEASE. MR. WYATT? YES. MR. ALLRED? YES. MR. TANKERSLEY. YES.
MR. MCNEIL. YES. MR. TURNER. YES. AND MR. MCBRAYER.
THE NEXT CASE ON THE AGENDA IS CASE NUMBER 20 4-000130, LOCATED AT 2970 SOUTH SIXTH STREET.
[F. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case# 24-000130: 2970 S 6th St. (FAIR PARK ACRES OUTLOT 3, BLOCK 3, LOT 4, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Armstrong Electrical Supply Inc]
CHECKLIST FOR RECORD SEARCH. THE UTILITY RECORDS MUNICIPALITY SHOW THAT UTILITIES HAVE BEEN OFF SINCE 2006, AND SEARCH REVEALS THE ARMSTRONG ELECTRICAL SUPPLY COMPANY TO BE THE OWNER.THIS IS THE NOTICE FOR THIS HEARING THAT WAS POSTED ON THE BUILDING. THIS IS THE FRONT.
SOUTH SIDE. THE REAR. NORTH SIDE. THE EAST SIDE. AND THE WEST SIDE. THESE ARE THE SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS THAT WERE FOUND.
INADEQUATE SANITATION. STRUCTURAL HAZARD. NUISANCE.
[00:40:03]
SOME OF THE EXTERIOR DILAPIDATION FOUND AS OF FEBRUARY 2ND OF 26.THERE'S A BIG OPENING ON THE DOOR THAT I WITNESSED AN ANIMAL GO THROUGH WHILE I WAS THERE. PICTURE ON THE RIGHT SHOWS A BROKEN WINDOW, WHICH THERE'S QUITE A FEW. THERE'S A BROKEN WINDOW HERE ON THE LEFT ABOVE THE DOOR.
FALLING CONDUIT. A HAZARDOUS BALCONY. OR FIRE ESCAPE.
SOME OF THE INTERIOR ISSUES. THERE WAS A FIRE SOME TIME AGO.
A BIT OF VANDALISM INSIDE. AND ACCUMULATION OF RAINWATER IN THE BASEMENT. THE TIMELINE OF EVENTS.
JANUARY 29TH OF 24. THE AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS RECORDED AT THE COUNTY CLERK.
MAY 1ST OF 24 THE BOARD ORDERED OF THE 30 60 SEPTEMBER 4TH OF 24.
THE BOARD ASSESSED CIVIL PENALTIES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE OF THE MAY 1ST 24 BOARD ORDER.
MARCH 5TH OF 25 THE BOARD ASSESSED CIVIL PENALTIES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE OF THE MAY 1ST 24 BOARD ORDER.
MARCH 31ST OF 25 THE OWNER SUBMITTED A PLAN OF ACTION AND THE BUILDING OFFICIAL REQUESTED MR. ARMSTRONG ALSO SUBMIT PLANS TO SHOW LOCATIONS OF ELECTRICAL FIXTURES AND THE LOCATION OF A RESTROOM THAT WAS TO BE RENOVATED JUNE 20TH OF 25.
JULY 21ST OF 25 REQUESTED MR. ARMSTRONG ADDRESS THE ISSUES ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, SUCH AS THE GRAFFITI, THE DAMAGE TO ELECTRICAL CONDUIT AND THE WINDOWS.
MOST OF THE GRAFFITI WAS WAS ADDRESSED AND SOME OF THE FALLEN CONDUIT, BUT THE CITY HAS BEEN ATTEMPTING TO HAVE THE OWNERS MAKE THE EXTERIOR REPAIRS SINCE OCTOBER OF 2021, BEFORE THE CONDEMNATION. AUGUST 30TH OF 25 APD RECEIVED A CALL FOR A THEFT IN PROGRESS AT THE BUILDING.
WE WERE NOT ABLE TO DETECT ANY PROGRESS DRAWINGS FOR THE LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL FIXTURES AND THE RESTROOM HAS STILL NOT BEEN SUBMITTED, AND DUE TO THIS, THE OWNER HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED TO APPLY FOR THE PERMIT.
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO ORDER OWNER'S ORDER TO PAY CIVIL PENALTIES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE BOARD'S ORDER ON MAY 1ST OF 24, AND THE AMOUNT OF $50 PER DAY FOR THE PERIOD OF NONCOMPLIANCE BEING MARCH 5TH 25 THROUGH FEBRUARY 3RD 26TH, WHICH IS A TOTAL OF 336 DAYS. TOTAL CIVIL PENALTIES TO BE ASSESSED IS $16,800.
AND I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. MARSH? NO. ALL RIGHT. THAT I WILL OPEN CASE NUMBER 24000130 FOR PUBLIC HEARING. ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
NICE. BROOKS. ARMSTRONG. AND, YEAH, WE GOT THE BILL.
I'VE GOT A GUY. ADAPTIVE CONSTRUCTORS THAT IS GOING TO HELP ME GET THIS CLEANED UP.
AND THEN, OF COURSE, WE'LL THEY'RE GOING TO CLEAN UP THE TOP WITH ALL THE FIRE DAMAGE.
AND HIS PLAN IS TO PUT A LITTLE MINI EXCAVATOR UP THERE.
I'M NOT SURE. I GUESS HE'D GO UP THE STAIRS WITH IT, BUT.
BUT MY PLAN IS I JUST GOT THIS, AND SO I'LL TURN MY PLAN OF ACTION YOU KNOW, WITHIN A WEEK, AND AND, OF COURSE, WE'LL GET IT TO, YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, CLEANED OUT AND, AND THEY'LL HAVE TO GET THE WINDOWS
[00:45:05]
REPAIRED. I GOT A COUPLE OF THEM THAT WE'RE JUST GOING TO FILL THEM IN BECAUSE THEY'RE JUST I MEAN, THE WAY THEY ARE, THEY'RE JUST AWKWARD. THAT ONE THAT'S ON THE EAST SIDE.I HAVE TO GET A LIFT TO GET UP THERE AND REPAIR IT AND ALL THAT, AND ANYWAY, WE'LL FILL THOSE IN.
THERE'S NO NEED HAVING THAT WINDOW THERE, BUT THE OTHER WINDOWS, YOU KNOW, WE CAN GET THEM GLAZED AND PUT IN, SO. AND BUT THAT'S, THAT'S THE PLAN. AND I SAID I'VE GOT THE DEAL HERE ON IT, SO.
AND OKAY. YOU PLAN ON STARTING THAT PRETTY SOON? DO YOU HAVE A TIME FRAME? YEAH, I'M ACTUAL WORK RIGHT AWAY.
AND I'M JUST, YOU KNOW, WHICH IS NICE. I MEAN, HE'S A GENERAL CONTRACTOR, SO I, YOU KNOW, I'LL BE ABLE TO HE'LL BE ABLE TO ORGANIZE THE TRADES AND, AND THEN, YOU KNOW.
YEAH. ALL RIGHT. SO THAT'S YEAH. AND I, WE WE'VE HAD SOME PROBLEMS WITH HELP UP AT WORK, SO I, YOU KNOW, I DON'T HAVE THE FREE TIME, UNFORTUNATELY.
YEAH. GO OVER THERE AND WORK ON WEEKENDS, BUT THAT'S NOT ENOUGH.
AND. RIGHT. SO. UNDERSTOOD. YEAH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. ARMSTRONG? WELL. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. OKAY. ANY OTHERS WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE? ALL RIGHT. I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NUMBER 24000130 AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR MOTION.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO ASSESS THE CIVIL PENALTIES AND AROUND $16,800.
SOUNDS LIKE HE'S STARTING TO GET WORK GOING. I MOVE, WE FOLLOW THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
GOT A MOTION TO FOLLOW. STAFF RECOMMENDATION THAT THE OWNER'S ORDERED TO PAY CIVIL PENALTIES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE BOARD'S ORDER ON MAY 1ST, 2024, AND THE AMOUNT OF $50 PER DAY FOR THE PERIOD OF NONCOMPLIANCE BEING MARCH 5TH, 2025 THROUGH FEBRUARY 3RD, 2026, WHICH IS A TOTAL OF 336 DAYS TOTAL CIVIL PENALTIES TO BE ASSESSED AS 16,800.
IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND? WE HAVE A SECOND ROLL CALL, PLEASE, MR. WYATT. ABSTAIN. MR.. ALLRED. ABSTAIN. MR. TANKERSLEY.
ABSTAIN. MR. MCNEIL. YES. MR. TURNER? YES. MR. MCBRAYER? YES. WHAT IS THAT? WHERE DOES THAT LEAVE US? THERE'S THREE UPSTAIRS. YEAH, WE HAD 3 OR 4 YESES.
THREE. THREE. THREE. YEAH. WE NEED WE NEED A WE NEED ONE.
WE NEED ONE MORE. SO THE MOTION DOES NOT PASS.
MOTION NOT PASSED. OKAY. YEAH. MOTION FAILS. OKAY.
I GUESS THERE'S AN OPTION TO GIVE A 30 60. YEAH.
YOU HAVE ANY OF THE OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO YOU, OR DO WE.
DO WE TABLE THIS UNTIL NEXT MONTH? YOU CAN DO THAT AS WELL AND SEE WHAT PROGRESS HAS BEEN MADE.
NO. IS THAT A MOTION? I MOVE THAT WE TABLE THIS UNTIL NEXT MONTH'S.
SO DO WE DO NEXT MONTH. IS THAT. YES. I'LL TABLE IT FOR NEXT MONTH.
NEXT MONTH'S MEETING. MEETING? OKAY, I'LL SECOND THAT.
WE GOT A MOTION A SECOND TO TABLE IT FOR THE MARCH MEETING.
ROLL CALL PLEASE. OKAY. MR. WYATT. MR. ALLRED.
YES, YES. MR. TANKERSLEY. MR. MCNEIL. YES. MR. TURNER. YES. AND MR. MCBRAYER. YES. MOTION PASS.
ALL RIGHT. NEXT CASE. GET IT TO GO.
SLOW. YEAH. APPARENTLY, YOU GOT TO PUSH IT LIKE YOU MEAN IT.
[G. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #24-000771: 1857 Jeanette St (MEMORIAL PARK, BLOCK 4, LOT D, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Armstrong, Jerold R & Doris J]
[00:50:07]
CHECKLIST FOR RECORDS SHOW THAT THE OWNERS ARE GERALD AND DORIS ARMSTRONG.THE UTILITIES HAVE BEEN INACTIVE SINCE APRIL 11TH, 2024.
HERE'S THE PUBLIC NOTICE POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE.
THE FRONT. WEST SIDE. REAR. EAST SIDE. ANOTHER OF THE REAR.
EAST. THE NORTH. AND THE SOUTH.
SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS INCLUDE INADEQUATE SANITATION, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING, NUISANCE, HAZARDOUS PLUMBING, HAZARDOUS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.
SOME EXAMPLES OF THE EXTERIOR DILAPIDATION. SOME INTERIOR DILAPIDATION.
THEY DID, AFTER ONE BOARD MEETING. PULL A PERMIT AND REPLACE THE ROOF ON THE STRUCTURE.
CONDEMNATION NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
WE MET WITH THE OWNERS AND EXPLAINED THE CITY'S EXPECTATIONS.
IN SEPTEMBER OF 2024, THE BOARD ORDERED A 30 60.
THE ROOF PERMIT WAS ISSUED. THE INSPECTION WAS COMPLETED ON MARCH 28TH OF 2025.
DECEMBER 3RD, THE BOARD AGAIN ORDERED A 30 60.
THAT MEETING HAS NOT OCCURRED AND NO DOCUMENTATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED.
AND THEN JANUARY 14TH, THE NOTICE OF THE HEARING WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE.
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AT THIS TIME IS TO FIND THAT THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE, AND THAT IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, AND REPAIR THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE.
AND I'M HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. MILLER. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. WITH THAT, I WILL OPEN THE CASE 24000771 FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION. ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
BROOKS ARMSTRONG IS MY MOM, DORIS ARMSTRONG. WE'VE GOT THERE AGAIN.
I'VE GOT A BID TO CLEAN OUT THE INTERIOR AND WINDOWS AND HVAC AND EVERYTHING TO TOTALLY REDO IT. AND GUYS CAN GET AFTER THAT RIGHT AWAY, TOO.
SO IT'S A SMALL HOUSE. WE DID RUN INTO A PROBLEM.
THE THE CHIMNEY THERE. THE IT'S THERE'S STRUCTURES LEANING, SO IT'S GOT TO BE TAKEN DOWN.
SO THAT ONE FIREPLACE IS GOING TO BE TAKEN OUT.
AND IT'S A GUY THAT ORIGINALLY HAD THE HOUSE.
HE'D BUILT THAT ON THE PATIO, AND, YEAH, IT CRACKED THE PATIO, SO.
BUT WHAT THE THING IS, WE'LL TAKE THIS. GOT TILE RIGHT THERE IN FRONT OF IT.
IT'S SO. BUT I'VE GOT A ADAPTIVE CONSTRUCTORS ON WHICH I'LL TURN IN A PLAN OF ACTION AND AND ON IT TOO. SO. OKAY. IT'S A HE'S A GENERAL CONTRACTOR, SO JUST KIND OF TURN HIM LOOSE ON IT.
SO. ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANNA SAY, MOM? WELL, I JUST WANTED TO LET Y'ALL KNOW THAT I'M IN STAGE FOUR OF CANCER, AND. AND I'VE BEEN FIGHTING CANCER ALL THE TIME.
THIS THING'S BEEN GOING ON, SO. I MEAN, I'M SORRY IT TOOK SO LONG, BUT I'M ACTUALLY THE OWNER OF ALL THIS, AND AND IT IT'S JUST. I'M SORRY. YOU KNOW, IT JUST TAKES A WHILE.
[00:55:04]
IT TAKES ME FOREVER TO GET EVERYTHING DONE. YES, MA'AM.WE'RE GLAD YOU'RE HERE. AND THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE TODAY AND GETTING A PLAN OF ACTION TOGETHER.
THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT. YEAH, WE'LL GET THAT DONE.
SO I FEEL REAL GOOD ABOUT THEM. SO. OKAY. YOU SAID THEY'RE READY TO START PRETTY SOON.
YEAH. HE CAN DO IT. AND THAT'S THAT'S ALL THE PLUMBING IS IN LINE.
AND I MEAN, IT'S. WE HAD STARTED TO REDO THE HOUSE HERE A WHILE BACK, AND IT HAD STUFF IN IT.
YOU KNOW, THE AS YOU CAN SEE, SOME OF THE STUFF HAD ALREADY BEEN TORN OUT AND.
YEAH, AND TAKEN AND DONE. BUT THEN I SORT OF THREW A KINK AND STUFF.
SORRY ABOUT THAT. BUT THE ROOF HAS, IT'S GOT THE JOISTS ON THE DEALERS REAL NARROW.
SO IT TAKES A SKINNY PLUMBER, BUT WE'RE GOING TO REDO THE FLOOR.
SO THE GUY SAYS, OH, WE CUT THIS FLOOR OUT AND RUN THEIR PIPES.
SO YEAH, I MEAN, IT'S IT SHOULD WORK OUT REAL WELL.
SO. AND YOU DID REPLACE THE ROOF. CORRECT? RIGHT.
YEAH. MA DID THE ROOF AND AND THEN WHEN WE GOT TO THAT CHIMNEY, I CALLED A GUY AND I SAID, HEY THAT CHIMNEY'S LEAKING. I DON'T FLASH IT.
JUST KEEPING BUILDING. OF COURSE THEY'LL COME BACK OUT.
LOOKS PRETTY AND BUT IT'S SEPARATED AND, YOU KNOW, I JUST.
YEAH. OKAY. BUT ANYWAY. YES, SIR. ALL RIGHT. WELL THANK YOU.
THANK YOU. NOW, ANYBODY ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE? SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NUMBER 24000771 AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR MOTION.
SEEMS LIKE WE'RE GETTING READY TO WORK ON IT.
THEY REPLACED THE ROOF. WHEN WAS THE ROOF REPLACED? OH, THAT WAS LIKE A SLIDE OR TWO BACK. SEPTEMBER 24TH.
YEAH. BECAUSE WE'VE SEEN THIS BEFORE AND THE ROOF WASN'T DONE AT THAT POINT. THIS ISN'T THE FIRST TIME IT'S BEEN. I MOVE, WE GO WITH A STAFF RECOMMENDATION. WE HAVE A MOTION TO GO WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION THAT THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE, AND THAT IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY, HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE.
AND REPAIR THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE.
NO. SECOND. THE MOTION DIES. IS THERE ANOTHER MOTION OR MORE DISCUSSION? ARE WE GOOD? DO WE NEED TO CONSIDER TABLING THIS AS WE DID THAT PREVIOUS CASE AND SEE HOW THEY PROGRESSED TILL NEXT TO THAT IS AN OPTION.
YEAH. OKAY. THAT'D BE MY MOTION THAT JUST BE TABLED TILL THE NEXT BOARD MEETING.
OKAY. WE HAVE ANOTHER MOTION IS TO TABLE IT TO THE MARCH MEETING.
WE HAVE A SECOND ROLL CALL, PLEASE, MR. WYATT.
ABSTAIN. MR. ALLRED. NO. MR. TANKERSLEY. YES.
MR. MCNEIL. YES. MR. TURNER. YES. AND MR. MCBRAYER.
OKAY. THE NEXT TWO CASES ARE AS LIKE EARLIER.
[H. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #24-004628 & 24- 005247: 3317 S. 1st St (SCOTT HIGHWAY PLACE, BLOCK 19, LOT 5 & 6, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: RD Unity Properties, LLC]
IT'S ONE BUILDING. WE HAD TO CONDEMN IT ON TWO SEPARATE OCCASIONS BECAUSE SOMEONE WAS OCCUPYING ONE OF THE SUITES.SO THE FIRST CASE IS 24 004628. THE SECOND ONE IS 24 005247.
AT 3317 SOUTH FIRST STREET. THE CHECKLIST FOR RECORDS SHOW THAT THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY RD UNITY PROPERTIES, AND THE UTILITIES HAVE BEEN INACTIVE SINCE DECEMBER 31ST OF 2024.
THIS IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE ON THE FRONT OF THE STRUCTURE.
THE FRONT. NORTH SIDE. THE REAR. SOUTH SIDE. EXCUSE ME.
[01:00:02]
THE EAST SIDE. AND THE WEST SIDE. SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS SHOWED INADEQUATE SANITATION. STRUCTURAL HAZARDS.NUISANCE. HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING. HAZARDOUS PLUMBING.
EXCUSE ME. HAZARDOUS MECHANICAL AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.
THERE WAS A PARTIAL DEMO COMPLETED. I'LL GIVE A TIMELINE ON THAT HERE IN A MOMENT.
EXTERIOR DILAPIDATION. FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION AND STRUCTURAL HAZARDS.
MORE EXTERIOR DILAPIDATION. ELECTRICAL ISSUES AND FAIRLY CONSISTENT VAGRANT ACTIVITY.
WE EXECUTED A SEARCH WARRANT ON SEPTEMBER 19TH.
AND HERE ARE SOME INTERIOR PICTURES. I'M SORRY.
THE SEARCH WARRANT WAS IN 2024.
THE BOARD ORDERED A 30. 60. NOVEMBER 5TH. THE BOARD ORDERED A DEMOLITION.
JANUARY 14TH. NOTICE OF FEBRUARY HEARING WAS SENT TO THE PROPERTY.
THE OWNER PULLED A DEMOLITION PERMIT AND STARTED IT IN AUGUST OF 25.
THEY WEREN'T USING PROPER PROTOCOLS. SO THAT'S WHEN WE BROUGHT IT BACK TO BOB'S.
SO THAT'S WHERE WE'RE AT WITH THIS ONE. THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO ORDER THE OWNER TO PAY CIVIL PENALTIES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE OF THE BOARD'S ORDER ON NOVEMBER 5TH, 2025, IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY EACH DAY OF NONCOMPLIANCE.
THE PERIOD OF NONCOMPLIANCE IS DECEMBER 5TH THROUGH FEBRUARY 3RD OF 2026.
AND I'M HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
SINCE THE TIME OF THE ASBESTOS ABATEMENT ISSUE CAME UP, THERE'S BEEN NO PROGRESS.
YOU'RE NOT AWARE THAT THEY'RE DEALING WITH THE STATE? ABSOLUTELY NO CONTACT FROM THE OWNER.
I HAVE SPOKEN TO THE STATE AGENT. AND AND HE OF COURSE, IS IS REQUIRING THERE BE ASBESTOS ABATEMENT FOR THE REST OF THE DEMOLITION? THERE'S BEEN NO PROGRESS ON THAT FRONT. NOT AT ALL.
NO, SIR. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MISS DOLLAR? SO THE OWNER HAS ALREADY BEEN DIRECTED TO DEMO THE ENTIRE PROPERTY? YES, SIR. AND THEY'VE DONE A PORTION OR THE CITY HAS DONE A PORTION. YES, SIR.
SO IF IT'S IS IT, IS IT DO YOU KNOW IF IT'S TOO DANGEROUS TO ABATE? IT WOULD JUST REQUIRE AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT, AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT AND DEMOLITION.
PROBABLY A WET DEMO, RIGHT. SO IT WOULD BE IT WOULD BE A WET DEMO.
LIKE THEY CAN'T GO IN AND ACTUALLY ABATE DUE TO PROBABLY THE HAZARD OF STRUCTURE.
MAYBE. I'M NOT REALLY SURE I'M QUALIFIED TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION.
I'M SORRY. AT THIS POINT, IT WOULD PROBABLY JUST BE A WET DEMO, RIGHT? BECAUSE WE THERE HAS BEEN A DEMOLITION STARTED WHICH HAS ALTERED THE STRUCTURAL ASPECTS OF IT, AND WE PROBABLY DON'T WANT ANYBODY IN THERE.
AND THE OWNER'S BEEN DIRECTED BY THE STATE TO DO SOMETHING RELATED TO ASBESTOS, BUT.
RIGHT. AND THERE'S BEEN NO ACTION. CORRECT. YEAH.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IS THERE AN OPTION FOR THE CITY TO WET DEMO IT LIKE THEY DEMOED ORIGINALLY? WE WOULD PREFER NOT TO. WE WOULD PREFER THE OWNER TAKE RESPONSIBILITY.
OKAY. THANK YOU. YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, I WILL
[01:05:09]
OPEN CASE NUMBER 24004628 AND 005247 FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION.ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE TODAY, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. SEEING NO ONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE NUMBER 24004628 AND 24005247 AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR MOTION.
MOTION STAFF RECOMMENDATION. WE HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
THE ORDER IS THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO PAY CIVIL PENALTIES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE BOARD'S ORDER ON NOVEMBER 5TH, 2025, IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 FOR EACH DAY OF NONCOMPLIANCE.
PERIOD OF NONCOMPLIANCE IS DECEMBER 5TH, 2025 THROUGH FEBRUARY 3RD, 2026.
TOTAL NUMBER OF DAYS OF NONCOMPLIANCE IS 61 DAYS.
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTIES TO BE ASSESSED AS $6,100.
SECOND, AND WE HAVE A SECOND ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
MR. WYATT? YES. MR. ALLRED? YES. MR. TANKERSLEY.
YES. MR. MCNEIL? YES. MR. TURNER? YES. AND MR. MCBRAYER? YES. MOTION PASSED.
OKAY. AND I BELIEVE THIS IS OUR LAST ONE FOR TODAY. IT'S CASE 25 003241 AT 4817 MARY LOU LANE.
[I. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #25-003241: 4817 Mary Lou Ln (BUTTON WILLOW PARKWAY SEC 2, BLOCK 6, LOT 3, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Schronk, Robert V. & Gay]
THIS WAS TABLED AT OUR LAST MEETING PENDING THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY.ALL RIGHT. I'LL NEED A MOTION TO UNTABLE CASE NUMBER.
TABLET. ALL RIGHT. WE GOT A MOTION. SECOND, THE MOTION.
SECOND TO UNTABLE. CASE NUMBER 25003241. DO WE HAVE A ROLL CALL THAT MR. WYATT? YES. MR. ALLRED. YES. MR. TANKERSLEY. YES.
MR. MCNEIL. YES. MR. TURNER YES. AND MR. MCBRAYER.
YES. MOTION PASS CASE IS UNLABELED AND READY TO GO.
OKAY. A CHECKLIST FOR RECORDS SHOW THE OWNERS TO BE ROBERT AND GAY SCHRUNK.
AND THE UTILITIES HAVE BEEN ENACTED SINCE JULY 23RD OF 2025.
THIS IS THE NOTICE OF TODAY'S MEETING. THIS IS THE FRONT.
WEST SIDE. THE REAR. EAST SIDE. THE NORTH SIDE.
AND THE SOUTH SIDE. SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS INCLUDE INADEQUATE SANITATION, STRUCTURAL HAZARDS, NUISANCE HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING, HAZARDOUS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION.
SOME SIGNS OF EXTERIOR DILAPIDATION. THE ROOF.
INADEQUATE SANITATION. EXCUSE ME? THE INTERIOR CONDITIONS.
OUR TIMELINE OF EVENTS STARTED JULY 17TH, 2025, WHEN THE AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS RECORDED AT THE COUNTY CLERK ON JULY 22ND, THE NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. JULY 24TH, WENT OVER THE PROCESS WITH THE OWNER AND THEN AGAIN WITH ANOTHER FAMILY MEMBER.
ON JULY 29TH, THE ROOF PERMIT WAS ISSUED PRIOR TO THE.
THE ROOF PERMIT THAT WAS ISSUED PRIOR TO THE CONDEMNATION HAD EXPIRED.
THE FINAL INSPECTION WAS NEVER SCHEDULED, AND OBVIOUSLY THE ROOF REPAIR WAS NEVER COMPLETED.
ON JANUARY 7TH, THE BOARD ORDERED THE CASE TO BE TABLED PENDING A SALE.
SO WE DO EXTEND OUR CONDOLENCES TO THE FAMILY.
I BELIEVE THE BUYER OR BUYER'S AGENT IS HERE TODAY TO SPEAK TO IT.
SO THAT'S WHERE WE ARE RIGHT NOW WITH THIS PROPERTY. THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS JUST TO ORDER A REPAIR, 30 DAYS TO PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION, INCLUDING A TIMELINE FOR REPAIR AND COST ESTIMATES, AND OBTAIN ALL PERMITS.
AND IF THIS IS DONE, 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN A ROUGH END INSPECTION.
IF THIS IS DONE, ALL FINAL INSPECTION SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE EXPIRATION OF ALL PERMITS.
AND I'M HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. IS THE PROPERTY OCCUPIED? NO, SIR. HAS IT BEEN OCCUPIED RECENTLY OR DO WE KNOW? NO, SIR. NOT. NOT SINCE I'VE BEEN AWARE OF IT.
30 DAYS STARTS TODAY. IT WOULD START FROM THE TIME THAT THEY RECEIVED NOTICE OF THIS HEARING.
IS LAST WEEK. I'LL MAIL THEM. I'LL MAIL THE ORDERS TO PROBABLY TODAY OR TOMORROW.
[01:10:05]
SO THEY'LL HAVE, LIKE THE MAIL TIME. AND THEN BEYOND THAT, AND OF COURSE, WITH SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES.YOU KNOW, I CAN'T I CAN GRANT EXTENSIONS IF THE SALE IS LIKE RIGHT THERE.
THEN THE NEW THE NEW OWNERS INHERIT THE TIMELINE AS WELL.
YES. OKAY. WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN? THE POWER OF ATTORNEY IS NOT ANY GOOD ANYMORE, SINCE THERE'S DEATH IN THE FAMILY SINCE THEY HAD DIED. WELL, FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND FROM THE CURRENT OWNER AND THE THE PERSON WHO IS PURCHASING THE PROPERTY ALSO REACHED OUT TO ME YESTERDAY.
I'M NOT SURE HOW THAT WORKS WITH TITLE. I'M NOT A TITLE EXPERT.
NO PROBLEM. WELL, AND I COULDN'T I COULD NOT UNDERSTAND.
AND SO OUR JOB IS TO DECIDE YOU KNOW, WHAT THE ORDER SHOULD BE FOR THE PROPERTY.
AND WHAT YOU DO RUNS WITH THE PROPERTY. AND IF AND OFTENTIMES IF THERE IS A NEW OWNER THAT, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES A SALE DOESN'T GO THROUGH FOR WHATEVER REASON.
AND YOU'VE SEEN THAT IN CASES BECAUSE OF WHATEVER THE SITUATION IS AND YOU WOULD BASE YOUR ORDERS LATER ON HOW YOU WANT TO REACT AT THE TIME WHEN THEY HAVE A NEW OWNER, YOU KNOW, YOU'VE YOU'VE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IF THERE IS A NEW OWNER BEFORE.
BUT WE CAN'T REALLY CONTROL WHAT HAPPENS WHETHER A SALE GOES THROUGH OR, A TRANSFER OF THE OWNERSHIP EVEN HAPPENS. BUT I'M SORRY, I DID NOT REALLY HEAR ALL OF YOUR QUESTION, BUT THAT WAS JUST KIND OF.
HE WAS ASKING IF POWER OF ATTORNEY GOES AWAY WHEN WHEN THE PERSON DIES.
MY ASSUMPTION IS NO. WELL, AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE DOES GO AWAY.
YEAH. YEAH. AND I'M SORRY I DIDN'T DIDN'T HEAR THAT, BUT I THINK IT WOULD JUST YOU'D HAVE TO EXAMINE THE DOCUMENT. AND I CAN'T SPEAK TO THAT BECAUSE I'M NOT INVOLVED IN THE CASE, SO I REALLY DON'T WANT TO SPEAK TO WHAT THEIR STATE WOULD BE.
RIGHT. AND I CAN'T SAY THAT I'VE ACTUALLY SEEN THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY.
I KNOW HE'S ARTICULATED SEVERAL TIMES THAT HE HAD BOTH MEDICAL AND JUST A STANDARD POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HIS WIFE, BECAUSE SHE, UNFORTUNATELY HAD BEEN ILL FOR A VERY LONG TIME.
SO AND I'M I'M GUESSING THAT THE CONCERN IS PROBATE TAKES A LONG TIME, AND I DON'T KNOW.
I SEE TWO MALES LISTED AS THE OWNERS. I'M WONDERING IF THAT AFFECTS THE OR IS THIS ART? WHICH ONE IS THIS? ROBERT AND ROBERT GAY SHRUNK? YEAH. GAY? YES. YEAH. HE'S PROBABLY THE WIFE.
OKAY. YES, SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MISS DOLLAR? NO. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. WITH THAT, I WILL OPEN CASE NUMBER 25003241 FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION.
ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. GOOD MORNING, I'M RIO ROMOLO. I WORK FOR THE INVESTOR. I'M JUST HERE TO CONVEY THAT THE PROPERTY IS UNDER CONTRACT.
AND JUST AT THIS TIME, WE'RE JUST WAITING FOR A TITLE TO DO THEIR PORTION.
THAT'S THE UPDATE THAT I HAVE. I JUST WANT TO BE ABLE TO JUST CONVEY THAT THAT WE ARE HAVING FORWARD PROGRESS ON THIS. WE'RE JUST WAITING ON TITLE COMPANY TO COMPLETE ITS PORTION FOR SOME OF THE QUESTIONS THAT Y'ALL WERE ASKING.
I DON'T HAVE ANSWERS FOR THAT RIGHT NOW, BUT FOR AS IT UNFOLDS, OF COURSE, WE'RE GOING TO BE COMMUNICATIVE WITH TERRY AND CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THIS CASE, BUT I JUST WANT TO BE ABLE TO CONVEY OUR INTEREST IN THIS, THAT WE ARE TRYING TO PROGRESS FORWARD IN THIS.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE? SEEING NO ONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE 25003241 AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR MOTION.
I DON'T KNOW THAT I'M TOTALLY COMFORTABLE WITH US DOING THIS DURING THE TIME THAT MR. SCHRUNK IS PLANNING HIS WIFE'S FUNERAL. I THINK WE MAY NEED TO PUSH THIS.
WE DON'T NEED TO BE CONDEMNING A HOUSE OF SOMEONE WHO'S PLANNING THEIR WIFE'S FUNERAL.
I THINK HE SHOULD BE PUSHED A MONTH, EVEN IF THERE'S A SALE IN PROGRESS.
THAT'S JUST MY OPINION. NOW, TO CLARIFY, THE PROPERTY IS CONDEMNED.
[01:15:01]
IT'S ALREADY CONDEMNED. WE DON'T NEED TO BE TAKING FURTHER ACTION. OKAY. OKAY. I THINK ANY FURTHER ACTION SHOULD BE DELAYED UNTIL THE FUNERAL.AND THIS IS JUST THE WRONG TIME TO DO IT. THAT'S JUST MY OPINION.
I THINK THAT YOU THINK I WOULD MAKE A MOTION THAT WE TABLE THIS TO NEXT MONTH? I SECOND THE MOTION. WE GOT A MOTION AND A SECOND TO TABLE.
CASE NUMBER 25003241 TO THE MARCH MEETING. ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
MR. WYATT? YES. MR. ALLRED? YES. MR. TANKERSLEY.
YES. MR. MCNEIL. YES. MR. TURNER? YES. AND MR. MCBRAYER. YES. MOTION PASS. THAT CONCLUDES OUR BOARD OF BUILDING STANDARDS MEETING FOR THIS MONTH.
THANK YOU. ADJOURNED. WE'RE NOT GOING TO EXECUTIVE SESSION.
I'M ASSUMING.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.