[ CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:14] AT THIS TIME I WILL CALL THE JUNE THROUGH MAX, 2026 LEADING ORDER. THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK TODAY SYNDICATE CASE PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU SIGN IN AT THE DOOR AND IF [ MINUTES] ENOUGH DONE SO PLEASE DO SO AT THIS TIME. THE FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING. I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR DISCUSSION AND IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE MINUTES, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAM FOR THE RECORD. LEVEL CLOSE TO THE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE MINUTES AND OPENED THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION. >> PLEASE GOT MOTION BY MR. ALLRED AND A SECOND BY MR. TANKERSLEY. OF THE RESULT OF A HEARING IF THIS IS NOT DON PASSIVITY AND BUILDING OWNERS AND IN ANY CASE THE FORMER -- BUT THE OWNER FAILS TO END THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. ANY APPEAL MUST FOLLOW WITHIN 3 DAYS AND AFTER THE NOTICE, THE BOARD'S DECISION AND AT THE HEARINGS YOU SHOULD BE PREPARED TO PRESENT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION, SPECIFIC TIME FOR MOVIE TO COMPLETE REPAIRS AND SPECIFIC SCOPE OF REPAIR WORK T BE COMPLETED AND PROCESS OF WOR DONE BY A BONDING CONTRACTOR SUCH AS ELECTRICAL PLUMBING OUR HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING CONTRACTORS. YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY AND OF RIGHT TO INSPECT THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY AT DEVELOPIN NEW SERVICES AND THE RIGHT TO REQUEST THE PRESENCE OF THE CIT STAFF FOR THE PRESENCE OF QUESTION AT THE HEARING. >> ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK TODAY, PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. THE TESTIMONIAL ROD SAY IS THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? ALL RIGHT. NOW WE START THE FIRST. DISCUSSED GOOD MORNING, BOARD BORED TO THE MAINTENANCE OF SPECTRA FOR THE CITY AND WE WIL SEE PRECISELY SEVEN CASES TODAY. HERE IS THE PUBLIC KNOWS THAT WAS SENT OUT AND POSTED TO THE [A. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #24-001274: 742 N 13th St (W105 W140 S100 201 2 W1/2 C MC NAIRY OT ABL, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Dela Garza Jessica T] FIRST CASE IS GOING TO BE CASED TO FORECAST 001274 OKAY TO THAT 742 NORTH 13TH STREET AND THIS WAS TABLED AT THE LAST MEETING. THE CHECKLIST SHOWS THE UTILITIES HAS BEEN ENACTED SINC JULY 72023 AND THE SEARCH REVEALS JESSICA DELA GARZA. >> WE NEED TO UN- TABLE IT. >> LET'S GET A MOTION TO UN- TABLE. SECOND-PERIOD. >> I WILL SECOND THAT MOTION BY MR. MCNEILL AND SECOND BY MR. WYATT. ROLL CALL PLEASE. >> >> THIS WAS NOT PUBLISHED PUBLI NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED. THE REAR AND NORTHSIDE. AT EASTSIDE AND WESTSIDE. INADEQUATE SANITATION, STRUCTURAL HAZARDS, NUISANCE, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING AND HAZARDOUS PLUMBING, HESITANCE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND FAULTY BROTHER PROTECTION. HERE IS SOME OF THE STRUCTURAL AND PLUMBING ISSUES. HAS UP HIS ELECTRICAL. INADEQUATE SANITATION. TIMELINE APRIL 24 OF 2024, AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS [00:05:01] RECORDED BY THE COUNTY CLERK AN MAY 1 OF 2020 FLOORS, NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE OWNER AND DECEMBER 30TH 25 EMILY RECEIVED A COMPLAINT OF A BREAK-IN FOR JANUARY JANUARY 526 , INSPECT THE PROPERTY AND RATINGS SECTION OF EIGHT WAS FOUND INSIDE THE HOME AND HE FLASK WHILE REPLACING AN WE CLEAR THE HOUSE AND SECURED THE DOOR AND STORM SHELTER. NEIGHBOR STOPPED BY AND TOLD US THERE'D BEEN SEVERAL BASEMENTS STAYING THING IN THE HOUSE THAN IN THE YARD JANUARY 20TH 2026, THE CITY SECURE THE FRONT DOOR OF THE HOUSE IS JANUARY 22 OF 2 FROM THE FRONT DOOR WAS OPEN AGAIN AND EXECUTED A CODE INSPECTION 4 AT THE RISK EVIDENCE OF ACTIVITY FOUND INSIDE OF THE RESECURED FRONT DOOR AGAIN AND FEDERALLY SORT O 26 FROM THE BOARD ORDERED A 306 ENOUGH TO THE HEARING IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE PROPERTY IS ZONED HEAVY COMMERCIAL GOOD THE OWNER WAS IMMEDIATELY INFORMED THAT HE WOULD NEED TO BRING THE PROPERTY FOR THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR APPROVAL TO CONTINUE HE RESETS RESIDENTIAL AND PROVIDE A CONTACT FOR ZONIN SO THEY COULD START THE PROCESS TO GO TO THE BOARD MARCH 2ND OF 2026 FROM THE PROPERTY WAS UNSECURED AGAIN IN ORDERS FOR NOTIFIED IN PROXIMITY SECURED B THE OWNERS TWO WEEKS LATER. MARCH 4 THEY COMPLETED THE PLAN OF ACTION AND OWNERS WHAT NOTIFIED AND MAY 6, THEY ORDERE IT TABLED AND GAVE THE OWNERS ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY OPPORTUNITY TO APPLY TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS. MAY 6 US 2026, OWNER SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION FOR THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AT OWNER'S INTENT FO THE APPLICATION IS TO TURN THE HOUSE BACK INTO A RENTAL PROPERTY HERE AT MAY 14 OF 26, NOTICE OF A JUNE HEARING WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE AND MAY 16 OF 26, NOTICED THAT THE HEARING FACET TO THE OWNER IN MAY 18, THE OWNER DECIDED THAT THE PROPERTY REZONED RATHER THA APPLYING FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTIO TO CURRENT ZONING AND THE OWNER PRESENT AN APPLICATION FOR COMMISSION AND ON MAY 20 PLAN, THE OWNER REQUESTED CASE BE REMOVED FROM THE PART OF ADJUSTMENTS AGENDA JUNE 126 COM APPLICATION APPLICATION TO PERSONAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED AND PLAN OF ACTION HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED. AND THAT IS STILL THE SAME. THAT NOT APPLIED TO THE ZONING BOARD ARE TURNED IN A PLAN OF ACTION TO SPARE RECOMMENDATION IS TO FIND THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE JOURNEY'S END T THE HEALTH AND SAFETY INVOLVE HER AND APPEARS THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE AND SMALL GROUP OF THE OWNER TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER TO DISTRICT COURTS WITHIN 30 DAYS OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. AND I CAN TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. >> OTHER THAN WHAT WE HAVE READ HERE THAT YOU HAVE STATED, HAD ANY OTHER MEDICATIONS WITH THEM ON THAT PROPERTY-SINCE THE LAST MEETING, NOW LOCATED JUST A DAY OF THE MEETING THAT APPLIED FOR THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND THEY HAVE WITHDRAWN THAT THEY WERE GIVEN THE INFORMATION HOW TO APPLY FOR THE STONY SONY AND THEY'VE NOT DONE SO. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. >> AT THIS TIME I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE NUMBER 240-0127 FOR ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD PETE SEEING NO ONE, WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING O 24-001274. AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION OR MOTION. >> SECOND-PERIOD. >> FEE GOT EMOTIONS BY MR. ALLRED AND THE SECOND BY MR. MCNEILL. ROLL CALL PLEASE. >> MOTION PASSED. >> THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLISH WITHIN 30 DAYS OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. SECOND-PERIOD. >> WE'VE GOT A MOTION FOR THE ORDER AND THE SECOND BY MR. MC NEILL. [B. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #25-002556: 825 Nelson Dr. (MEADOWBROOK ADDN, BLOCK 2, LOT 33, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Maston, Desirae ​Et Al] NEXT NEXT CASE, PLEASE. >> IN THIS CASE IS GOING TO BE CASE TO FIGHT-002556 AT 825 NELSON DRIVE. CHECKLIST SHOWS THAT THE UTILITIES HAVE BEEN INACTIVE SINCE OCTOBER 32020 FOR THE SEARCH REVEALS DESIRAE MASTON [00:10:04] AND OTHERS TO BE THE OWNERS. HERE IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED. 'S UPFRONT WESTSIDE. REAR EASTSIDE. NORTHSIDE. AND SOUTHSIDE. SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS, INADEQUATE SANITATION, STRUCTURAL HAZARDS, NUISANCE, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING, HAZARDOUS PLUMBING, HAZARDOUS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND FAULTY BROTHER PROTECTION. HERE ARE SOME OF THE EXTERIOR DILAPIDATION. INTERIOR DILAPIDATION. TIMELINE, JUNE THE 30TH 25, THE AFFIDAVIT WAS FILED WITH COUNTY CLERK AND I SPOKE OF THE BROTHER OF THE OWNER AND SKILLETS OWNER IS SEIZED INSTEA WOULD DISCUSS THE PROPERTY WITH THE FAMILY AND WHO WOULD BE THE POINT OF CONTACT FOR THE CONDEMNATION. JULY 8, SPOKE WITH THE STEPDAUGHTER OF THE OWNER SHE SAID SHE WOULD BE THE POINT OF CONTACT FOR THE FAMILY AND CONDEMNATION NOTICE AND PLAN OF ACTION WERE SENT TO HER IF SHE' FORM A SHEEP WOULD TRY TO GET THE PROPERTY PUT INTO HER NAME JULY 24TH 25 COUPLES CLOSE TO AN INDIVIDUAL THAT THAT HER DAUGHTER IS THE HEIR TO THE PROPERTY AND SHE WOULD FOUL AN AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP WITH THE COUNTIES THAT LIST THE OWNERS AND THE THREE DAUGHTERS AS THE AYERS SPUTUM OCTOBER 2020 -- THE AFFIDAVIT WAS FILED WITH TH COUNTY CLERK IN OCTOBER 20 MINU 25, RECEIVED ADDRESSES FOR THE OWNER'S THREE DAUGHTERS ON THE AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND NOTICES WERE SENT TO ALL HEIRS. ORDER -- DECEMBER 11 OF 25 BUT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL CLIP THE PLAN OF ACTION AND I ADVISE THE OWNE SHE CAN APPLY FOR THE ALTERATIO PERMIT HERE AS OF APRIL 20, 202 TO BUT THERE'S NO PROGRESS ON THIS PROPERTY ANY ALTERATION PERMIT WAS NEVER APPLIED FOR PICK SPOKE WITH THE SHOULDER SH SAID IT FOR TRYING TO COME UP WITH THE FUNDS TO START PREPARING THE HOUSE SPEE'S ADVISOR SHE NEEDED TO APPLY FOR THE ALTERATION PERMIT AND START SHOWING SOME PROGRESS ARE FREQUENTLY TAKING THE PROPERTY BACK TO GORDON JUDE AND AS OF MAY 13, 2056, STILL NO PROGRESS AND NO PERMIT APPLIED FOR MAY 1 AT 2026, MENTALIST OF THE JUNE HEARING WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE HAD MAY 15 AT 2026, NOTICE OF THE JUNE HEARING WAS SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND I STILL HAVE NOT HEARD BACK FRO THEM IN THE LAST. STAFF REGULATIONS DEFINED THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE IDENTIFY HAZARDS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND WELFARE AND REPAIR THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE AND ORDERED THE OWNERS TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT AIDS CITY COURT OR CITY MAY DEMOLISH. I WILL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. >> WHO WAS REPRESENTING THE FAMILY, THE STEPDAUGHTER'S? THERE IS THREE DAUGHTERS. SO THEY ARE ALL SCUM OF THE STEPDAUGHTER IS HE ALL BUT I BELIEVE IT IS JUST US THREE DAUGHTERS OF THE OWNER THAT ARE NOW LISTED AS THE OWNERS. >> AT THIS TIME I WILL OPEN THE CASE TO FIVE DATA 002556, PUBLI INCOME ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD. SEEING NO ONE, WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 25 DATA 002556. DISCUSSION OR MOTION? >> WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. JOGGER AND IS SECOND BY MR. TANKERSLEY TO ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. >> MOTION PASSED. >> TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL DID -- TO DISTRICT COURT OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. IS THERE A SECOND? >> GOT A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE ORDER. MR. DOCKER AND HIS SECOND BY MR. TURNER. ALL CALL, PLEASE. >> I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY AND MR. DUGGER CLARIFIED IT. [C. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #25-004020: 302 Willow St (OT ABILENE, BLOCK 60, LOT 1, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Ford, Jeremy Jerome] [00:15:02] 'S EXPLANATION CASE IS GOING TO BE CASE 25-004020 AD 302 WILLOW STREET. THIS WAS ALSO TABLED. IS THERE MOTION TO FUND A BULK CASE 25-004020. MOTION TO FUND TABLE. CASE 25 DATA 004--- SECOND BY MR. HIATT. ROLL CALL. SITE. VHS POSTS FOR THIS HOUSE SHOWS THAT UTILITIES HAVE BEEN INACTIVE SINCE JANUARY 23, 2010 AND THE SEARCH REVEALS JEREMY JEROME FORWARDED TO BE THE OWNER 'S THIS IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED. THE FRONT AND EASTSIDE REAR WESTSIDE AND NORTHSIDE. AND SOUTHSIDE. INADEQUATE SANITATION, STRUCTURAL HAZARDS, NUISANCE, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION FOR THIS IS THE INITIAL CONDITION WHEN WE FIRST LOOKED AT IT. HERE IS THE CURRENT CONDITIONS. AND YOU CAN SEE THE ROOF WORK AND A LOT OF THE OUTSIDE ELECTRICAL BOX IN THIS INTERIOR WELCOME ALL THIS WAS DONE WITHOUT ANY PERMITS WHATSOEVER THAT WERE SUPPOSED TO BE APPLIE FOR. TIMELINE AUGUST 27TH 2025, AFFIDAVIT WAS RECORDED AT THE COUNTY CLERK STEERS NOTICES WER SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER AND PRIOR TO CONDEMNATION THE OWNER WAS INSTRUCTED TO REACH OUT TO PLANNING AND ZONING TO ASK WHETHER HE COULD GET A SPECIAL EXCEPTION MCBEE TO RENOVATE HIS STRUCTURE SINCE IT IS LOCATED I AN AREA ZONE FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PIERCE SEPTEMBER 11 TH 2025, IN SPITE OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS SOCIAL WHILE HE DOES NOT HAVE A PERMIT OCTOBER 24TH 20 OR 25 THE BOARD APPROVED A SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR NONCONFORMING USE TO A NONRESIDENTIAL USE AND OVE 50% OF THE HOMES TAXABLE BALKE. DECEMBER 3 OF 2020 SIZED ON THE BOARD ORDERED STATES 30-60 AND SOMETHING THAT HAD MULTIPLE CONTACTS WITH THE OWNER TO REMIND HIM WHAT HE NEEDS TO DO TO PULL A PERMIT KID FEBRUARY 20 TH 2026, THE PROPERTY IS OVERRUN BY MATERIAL AND VEHICLES UNDERGOING UNAUTHORIZED MECHANICAL WORK IN AN RV THAT APPEARS TO BE LIVED IN HERE APRIL 9 OF 2026, INSPECTED THE PROPERTY AND REQUESTED ENTRY TO THE HOUSE FO INSPECTION AND WE WERE DENIED ENTRY INTERIOR INSPECTION SCHEDULED FOR THE FOLLOWING WEE WITH THE OWNER. APRIL 15 OF 2026, WE COMPLETED WALK-THROUGH OF THE PROPERTY WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER AND FOUND BENEATH ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING WORK COMPLETED AND EXPLAINED THE PLANTS AS ACTION PROCESS AGAIN. ME 4 OF 2026, WE WERE INFORMED BY ZONING THAT THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION GRANTED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO CONTINUE TO US AS A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE THAT EXPIRED ON APRIL 12 AT 2026 AND THERE IS NO PERMIT OR PERMIT REQUEST FOR RENOVATION OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH WAS THE CONDITION OF THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION MAY 15 OF 20 PRACTICE EXAM OF THE NOTICE OF THE JUNE HEARING% OF THE PROPERTY OWNER AND LIENHOLDER AND POSTED ON TH STRUCTURAL. A 26 AT 2026, THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOURTH OF JUNE 9 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING. THE STAFF RECORDATIONS DEFINED THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND THAT IS A THE HESITANCE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND WELFARE AND REPAIR O THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE AND THE OWNERS ORDER TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL FOR THE DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH B JUST A FOLLOW-UP ON THAT, THE SENSE THAT THE CITY STATES OF THE BOARDS ARE TWO COMPLETELY SEPARATE BOARDS, OR TO RISK [00:20:02] TODAY HAS NOTHING TO PUT UP A A PART OF ADJUSTMENT SAYS COMING UP AND IT WOULD BE UP TO THE OWNER TO DO WHATEVER HE NEEDS T DO WITH YOUR DECISION TODAY. I CAN TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. >> SO IT IS GOING TO THE OTHER BOARD ON THE NINTH. >> CORRECT. >> ANY PERMITS? >> WE CANNOT GIVE A PERMIT BASE ON THAT AND WE HAVE THAT SEVEN MONTH TIMEFRAME BEFOREHAND TO GET ALL THAT DATA NOTHING WAS EVER DONE. WORK WAS DONE WITHOUT THE CROSS -- PERMIT. SINCE OUR LAST MEETING TO MEES NOT BEEN ABLE TO MAKE ANY PROGRESS. >> CORRECT PEDIATRIC WEIGHT AT THIS POINT WE CAN'T DO THE PERMITS OR ANYTHING UNTIL THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS MAKES A DECISION. >> SO HE WAS IN A LITTLE BIT OF A LAG PERIOD UNTIL THE ADJUSTMENTS MAKES THE DECISION. >> SINCE THE LAST MEETING, THE LAST SEVEN MONTHS PRIOR TO THAT WHEN HE HAD ALL THE TIME TO DO THAT. >> I THINK THAT WE WERE TABLING BASS. DOES THAT SOUND RIGHT? >> IF WE TABLE IT, IT ALLOWS TH ORDER NOT TO HAVE TO GO TO DISTRICT COURT. THAT MAKES SENSE. AFTER SEVEN MONTHS, THE TRACK RECORD IS JUST KINDA FORCE THE ACTION. IS THAT YOUR RECOLLECTION? >> I WOULD SAY IT MAKES SENSE T WAIT UNTIL AFTER JUNE 9 DOOCY PUT THE BUILDING STANDARDS ARE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SAYS. ANYMORE QUESTIONS HERE? GO AHEAD. >> I'M ASKING IF YOU'VE GOT ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME. >> IFILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARIN FOR CASE 25-004020. PLEASE STEP FORWARD. >> RAISED YOUR BRIGHT HAND. TO USE FOR THE TESTIMONY YOU AR ABOUT TO SAY IS THE TRUTH AND NOTHING ABOUT THE TRUTH. >> I YET JEREMY FORD OWNER. HAVE YOU DONE ANYTHING FROM A PREPARATION STANDPOINT? >> PREPARATION STANDPOINT, YES. I HAD TO GET EVERYTHING GOING. I'M UNABLE TO MOVE FORWARD AND DO ANYTHING UNTIL AFTER THE APPROVAL OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS. IT WAS ZONED. I PURRED PURDY WAS SEWN BY INDUSTRIAL BUT ORIGINALLY IT WA RESIDENTIAL. SO I WAS APPROVED THE FIRST TIM FOR RESIDENTIAL. AND I TOOK SEVEN MONTHS TO THE DONE AND UP WASN'T ABLE TO -- I AM UNAWARE OF HOW THIS WORKS, AS YOU CAN SEE. THERE WAS IMPROVEMENTS BEING DONE. ONE SECOND I'M THINKING I CAN D TO STOP IN ONE SECOND THINKING CAN'T. AND THEN I'M NOT SUPPOSED TO SO I DON'T. SO I'M JUST NOT SO SURE OF THE PROCESS OF WHICH WAY TO GO, BUT YES, SINCE THE LAST MEETING, I AM -- WHEN I COME BACK, PERMITS OR WHATEVER I NEED TO GET, IT SHOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> AT THIS TIME I WILL CLOSE TH HEARING FOR CASE NUMBER 25- 004020 AND OPEN THE FLOOR FOR DISCUSSION. >> MR. CHAIRMAN, IF I MAY, I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY, THE CLARIFICATION IS THE DECISIONS OF OTHER BOARDS HAS NO BEARING ON THE DECISION OF THIS BOARD, IS THAT CORRECT? >> THAT IS CORRECT. IT IS WHAT MR. DUGGER ALREADY SAID. IF YOU THINK THIS IS BAD ENOUGH THAT DISTRICT DECISION AND YOU CAN DO THAT. IF YOU PREFER TO WAIT AND SEE I THE HOMEOWNER CAN AGAIN OBTAIN THE ABILITY TO PULL PERMITS LIK [00:25:02] HE HAD BEFORE, THEN YOU HAVE TH DISCRETION TO TAPE UP THIS AND SEE IF HE HAS THAT ABILITY BUT WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT IS NOT THE ZONING. EUROPE LOOKING AT THE STRUCTURE AND HAD DETERIORATED THE STRUCTURE IS. >> MY PERSPECTIVE IS THAT WE TABLE AT TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS AN IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE FOR US TO -- WE SHOULD HAVE FAITH THAT DECISIONS. IT JUST DOESN'T SEEM LIKE THE RIGHT DECISION SO MY SUGGESTION WOULD BE TO TABLE IT AND SEE WHAT THAT DOES BUT ALSO AFTER H GETS BLESSED HER UNBLESSED, THA MAY MAKE THE DECISION FOR US BU IF THE PERMIT IS NOT PULLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER, NOTHING IS GOING TO HAPPEN. NOT ONLY THAT PERMIT BEING PULLED. >> HE HAS HAD SEVEN MONTHS TO THINK ABOUT IT WE SHOULD HAVE MADE THAT DECISION THE LAST TIME . HE HAS KINDA BEEN HANDCUFFED SINCE THE LAST TWO. IT SEEMS LIKE HE IS NOW TRYING TO GET GOING. HE GOT INTO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS. CAN WE BRING MR. FORD BACK UP. >> IFILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARIN FOR CASE NUMBER CASE NUMBER 25- 004020. MUST MR. FORD, CAN YOU COME BAC UP HERE. SPEAK ABOUT THE PLANS AND THE FINANCIAL ABILITY TO EXECUTE WHAT YOU'VE DONE TO THIS POINT. JUST LIKE YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE GETTING INTO PARADISE THINK WE CAN EMPATHIZE WITH YOUR PLAY. ARE THE PRICE WE JUST NEED TO MAKE SOME PROGRESS. >> OBVIOUSLY I PURCHASED THE HOME SO THE PLAN IS TO FIX THE HOUSE AND MAKE IT HABITABLE. I WAS UNSURE OF HOW THINGS WORK. AS YOU CAN SEE I WAS WORKING ON THE HOME AND DOING THE THINGS I WAS TOLD I COULD DO FROM MY FORMER LEGAL STANDPOINT AND WHA I HOMEOWNER CAN DO AND I FOUND TALKING ABOUT THE PERMITS, I JUST WASN'T SURE BECAUSE IT IS DIFFERENT HERE. THROUGHOUT THOSE SEVEN MONTHS, LIFE HAPPENED AND PERSONAL THINGS HAPPEN SO I WAS NOT ABLE TO GET THE PERMITS BUT I WAS ALSO UNSURE AND I WAS GOING TO DRYWALL AND STUFF THAT I CAN'T DEAL AND THEN IT SAYS I GOT A LETTER THAT SAID I CAN'T DO THOSE THINGS SO IT HAS BEEN OF WORK IN PROGRESS. AMENDMENT WEEK I HAD TO PAY AND COME UP AND GET INTO THAT AND WHEN I LEFT HERE ON WEDNESDAY T FRIDAY, I HAD TO PAY TO BE ON THE UPCOMING MEETING. SO THE IDEA IS TO GET STUCK COM IT WAS APPROVED THE FIRST TIME AND GET IT REAPPROVED FOR RESIDENTIAL PRECEDENTIAL AND THEN QUICKLY FOR THOSE, SO THINGS CAN GET DON. 'S SIZE TRYING TO GET THE ESTIMATES FOR WHAT I NEEDED TO PULL THE PERMITS AND MOVE FORWARD TO GET WORK DONE TO FINISH THE PROPERTY AND THAT IS THE PLAN. I HAVE SHOWED UP TO EVERY MEETING TO JUST MAKE SURE YOU KNEW THAT I AM SERIOUS ABOUT WORKING ON THE HOUSE. I'VE BEEN GETTING ESTIMATES AND IT HAS BEEN A LITTLEFINICKYTOLD [00:30:02] PLUMBING AND THEN THE PLUMBING PERSON COMES AND SAYS WE DON'T DO PLUMBING ESTIMATES OR A PERMIT FOR PLUMBING AND THAT I WOULD SAY THAT I DON'T AND HE SAYS THEY HAVE TO WRITE A TEST. I'M JUST CONFUSED. I AM AWARE AND AM WORKING DILIGENTLY TO GET THINGS TOGETHER AS HE SAYS I NEED THEM TO BE ABLE TO COME TO THE NEXT MEETING AND HAVE PERMITS POLLS. >> DO YOU HAVE FIRM NUMBERS UP AT THE COST WILL BE? >> YES. SUPPLEMENT COULD NOT GIVE ME AN ESTIMATES BECAUSE THEY HAVE A PRESSURE TEST COLLIDED WHICH IS HUNDRED $50 AND I'VE BEEN TOLD HERE'S THE ESTIMATE FOR THAT AN HE SAID HAVE THEM DO IT AND THE I THOUGHT THEY COULDN'T DO IT S I DID NOT PAY THEM TO DO IT BIT IT IS JUST NOT ME UNDERSTANDING THIS SYSTEM. I AM AWARE OF WHAT IT COST TO GET THINGS TOGETHER AND DONE. SO BY THE NEXT TIME I BELIEVE I COME HERE I HAVE TO HAVE THE ESTIMATES THAT HE SAID ON A SHE AND SO YOU WILL KNOW HOW I AM MOVING FORWARD. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> AT THIS TIME I WILL CLOSE TH PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NUMBER 25 -004020 AND OPEN IT TO THE FLOOR FOR A MOTION. YOU HAVE A TO TABLE CASE CASE NUMBER 25-004020. >> PULLED UP BE TABLED TO A CERTAIN MONTH? >> I PUTS A TABLE TO PUT THEM U WOULD BE A LITTLE BIT LESS THAN A MONTH. TABLE TO JULY BUT WOULD YOU LIK TO AMEND THAT MOTION? >> YES IT I WOULD LIKE TO TABLE TO JULY. FOR CLARIFICATION, SO IF HE SEE PROGRESS, HE DOES NOT BRING IT TO US, IS THAT CORRECT? >> IT WILL STILL COME BACK TO MATTER WHAT. >> HE'S LOOKING FOR DIRECTION FROM YOU. WE COULD DO 36. AND THAT WOULD GO TO THE CITY AND WE MAY NOT EVER SEE IT AGAIN . >> IF YOU HAVE A 30-60 OR, LET' SAY HE WOULD GO TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, I BELIEVE HE COULD STILL PULL PERMITS WITHIN THAT TIME PERIOD AND IF HE IS IN COMPLIANCE, THEY WOULD HAVE TO BRING IT BACK. IS THAT CORRECT? HE BECAUSE TO THE JUNE 9 MEETING AND THEY APPROVE HIS ABILITY TO PULL PERMITS, HE GET A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO HAVE A RESIDENTIAL IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BELIEVE HE WOULD HAV TIME TO PULL A PERMIT BECAUSE YOU PUT STILL HAVE -- HE COULD GO JUNE 10. AND I DON'T THINK WE DO 30-90. I THINK HE HAS SEVEN MONTHS AND GIVE HIM TO NEXT MONTH TO SHOW PROGRESS. IF WE GET TO THE JULY MEETING O PERMITS ARE NOT PULLED, IT IS TIME TO TAKE ACTION. WE HAVE A MOTION TO TAPE CASE O A SECOND AND A MOTION BY MR. TANKERSLEY. [D. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #26-000200: 401 Delaware Rd (FOSTER COX SUBD SEC 1, BLOCK 1, LOT 2, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Brokerage House Inc] THE NEXT CASE WILL BE CASED TO 6 -000200 AT 401 DELAWARE ROAD. CHECK SHOWS THAT THE UTILITIES HAVE BEEN INACTIVE SINCE SEPTEMBER 18, 2021 AND THE SEARCH WITH FIELDS BROKERAGE HOUSE INC. TO BE THE OWNERS. AND THERE'S A PUBLIC NOTICE THA WAS POSTED IN THE FRONT AND WES SIDE, REAR AND EAST SIDE. [00:35:03] , NORTHSIDE. AND SOUTHSIDE. SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS AND INADEQUATE SANITATION AND STRUCTURAL HAZARD, NUISANCE, HA ITS ELECTRICAL WIRING AND FAULT FLUTTER PRODUCTION HERE ARE SOM EXTERIOR DILAPIDATION. STRUCTURAL HAZARDS INTERIOR DILAPIDATION. TIMELINE JANUARY 13 OF 26, AN AFFIDAVIT WAS FILED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK AND NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE OWNER AND FEBRUARY 526, SPOKE WITH THE OWNER ABOUT THE PROPERTIES SHE STATED SHE WANTED TO USE IT FOR RETAIL OR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND ADVISED HER IT WOULD HAVE TO BE REZONED IN MARCH 19 OF 2026 FROM THE OWNER STATED SHE WOULD PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION BY THE END OF THE MONTH IN MARCH 27 FROM 6 OF THE OWNER STATED SHE'S WAITING FOR AN ESTIMATE FROM NORTH AMERICAN ANALYTICAL AS SHE MAY DECIDE TO DEMOLISH THE BUILDING AND SHE LATER PROVIDED AN ESTIMATE FOR THE TESTING FOR ASBESTOS SHE STATED SHE WAS GOING TO DECIDE SOON WHAT TO DO ON MAY 14 ' 6 T WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE AND MAKE -- AND NOTICE FOR SOMETHING AND LIENHOLDER. AND RECORDATION AT THIS TIME IS TO ORDER FOR ORNER TO PREPARE A 30 DAYS TO PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION INCLUDING THE TIMEFRAME FOR PREPARING COST ESTIMATE AND RETAIN ALL PERMITS FOR THIS IS DONE 60 DAYS TO ATTAIN ROOFING INSPECTIONS THAT THIS IS DONE, ALL FINAL INSPECTION SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE EXPLORATION OF ALL PERMITS. AND I CAN TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. >> SHE HAS HAD MULTIPLE OPINION OF WHAT SHE WAS GOING TO DO SO WE ARE NOT SURE EXACTLY WHAT TH PLAN IS. >> WHAT WOULD BE THEIR PRESIDENTIAL OPTION. >> I DON'T BELIEVE SO. CARE CARA MIGHT BE ABLE TO ANSELL -- ANSWER THAT BETTER. >> IT IS A 12 UNIT AND ACRE ZONING. THAT IS THE MAXIMUM. IT COULD BE TWO OR COULD BE ONE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? AT THIS TIME I OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR TUESDAY 6-000200 IF ANYBODY WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE PETE PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. >> I'VE BEEN TALKING TO CARRY AND SHE IS ONE THAT HAS BEEN GUIDING ME THROUGH ALL OF THIS. I HAD SOME THOUGHTS OF WHAT TO DO WITH THE BUILDING IN THAT BUILDING WAS OKAY FOR SEVERAL YEARS AND WE'VE USED OFFICE THERE AND AFTER WE DIDN'T OFFIC THERE ANYMORE, WE USED IT FOR STORAGE, BUT SIMPLY KEEPS GOING AROUND THERE AND VANDALIZING AN BREAKING OUT THE WINDOWS AND EVERYTHING AND THAT IS WHY IT GOT AT THIS POINT EXCEPT THAT I WAS TALKING TO TERRY AND I'M TRYING TO DO THOSE I GOT THE PEOPLE FROM THE ASBESTOS -- ASBESTOS TWO AT AETNA GAVE ME A IDEA OF WHAT IT WOULD COST TO GET IT DONE PICK MY MAMA FIXED INCOME SO I DON'T HAVE A LOT OF MONEY TO DO OTHER REPAIRS OF TH ELECTRICAL REPAIR CAME IN AT ABOUT 32,000 AT AT THE TIME I'M THINKING WE COULD DO SOMETHING [00:40:05] FAR OFF PARENTAL OR MULTIPLE UNITS AND THEN I THOUGHT MAYBE DO SOME KIND OF RETAIL OR SOMETHING BUT IT DOES ZONING PROBABLY, THAT WOULD NOT WORK BUT SO'S YOU CAN SEE, THE STRUCTURE OF THE CEILING HAS COME DOWN AND I WANTED TO CLEAR THE THING UP AND CLEANED IT UP FIRST TOLD ME NOT TO BECAUSE TH ASBESTOS COME UNTIL THEY DDS JUSTICE TESTING, AGAIN, FINANCIALLY THAT IS A PROBLEM RIGHT THERE THAT IS MY POINT I' THINKING WHAT IF WE JUST DEMOLISH IT IS THERE SUCH A THING AS YOU CAN DEMOLISHED AS PART OF THE BUILDING BECAUSE TH WORST PART IS THE FRONT PART THAT IS OUTSIDE AND PART OF IT IS OKAY. IT IS JUST A LOT OF DEBRIS AND STUFF THAT THEY HAD BROKEN IT AND I THINK AT THIS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUT IS THERE SUCH THING THAT YOU CAN JUST DEMOLIS PART OF THE BUILDING. >> TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION BUT THAT IS SOMETHING YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO GO BACK TO MYSTERIO OR TO THOSE GUYS. I AM LIKE MR. FORD. MY HUSBAND USED TO TAKE CARE OF ALL THE STUFF AND HE DIED FIVE YEARS AGO AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT I'M DOING. SEE THAT BUILDING. OUT THAT IS ALL OF THE OFFICE B AT AS THAT IS WHERE THE OFFICES IF WE JUST UPGRADED THAT PART AND THEN THE OTHER PARTY DOES LIKE L SHAPE AND THE YOUNGER PART DOES THE LONGER PART IS PRETTY MUCH OKAY. AND WE HAD SOMEBODY GO BOARDED UP. YOU GO TO THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION? 51 UNDERSTAND THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF SAYING YOU HAVE 30 DAYS TO HAVE A PLAN OF ACTION FLEX. >> WHEN I WAS TALKING TO TERRY, SHE KIND OF WENT THROUGH THAT. I WAS HAVING TROUBLE GETTING CONTRACTORS AND THE OTHER WHEN GOT WAS THE ELECTRICAL. ALL DUPLICATE FRY CAN. EP 30 DAYS TO START THE PROCESS FOR THE CITY. >> DO YOU HAVE THAT PERMITS QUICK. >> THAT WILL GIVE YOU TIME TO GET YOUR PROCESS TO GET IN YOUR PLAN OF ACTION AND THEN AT THAT TIME AND THEN YOU CAN START GETTING PERMITS OR WHATEVER ELS YOU HAVE TO DO. FOR SOMEBODY NOT IN THIS BUSINESS, IT CAN BE OVERWHELMIN AND CONFUSING. THIS RECOMMENDATION WOULD GIVE YOU 30 DAYS. >> THEN YOU CAN DECIDE IF THIS IS SOMETHING YOU EVEN WANT TO VIEW. >> I'M HAVING A HARD TIME GETTING CONTRACTORS OUT THERE. HAVE YOU THOUGHT ABOUT LOOKING AT AN INVESTOR TO HELP YOU WITH THAT LIKE. >> THERE IS AN AGENT THAT I'VE BEEN TALKING WITH AND HE'S HELPING WITH MY OTHER PROPERTY. AND HE IS GUIDING ME THROUGH IT ALSO. >> THAT 30 DAYS WILL GO BY VERY FAST. I KNOW. >> SAYS OBTAIN ALL PERMITS SO S MR. WYATT SAID SOMETHING ABOUT THE ZONING BUT DID YOU SAY IT WAS? MULTIPLE ZONING, MULTIPLE RESIDENTS? >> STAFF CAN HELP YOU ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS AND WE JUST WAN TO MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND THE RECOMMENDATION I HAVE DONE NO I IT IS SOWN SO I CAN KNOW WHAT I'M GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO FOR MY PLAN. >> STAFF WILL HELP YOU WITH THAT . [00:45:02] TERRY WILL GO OVER THAT WITH YOU . THANK YOU. ANY OTHERS WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD. >> I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 26 DAD 000200 AND OPENED IT UP FOR DISCUSSION OR MOTION. >> WE HAVE GOT A MOTION BY MR. DR. ENNIS SECOND BY MR. MC NEIL TO ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND 30 DAYS TO PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION FOR PREPARING COST ESTIMATES AND OBTAIN ALL PERMITS AND 60 DAYS TO OBTAIN ROXANNE INSPECTIONS AND ALL INSPECTIONS SHOULD BE COMPLETED BY THE EXPIRATION OF ALL PERMITS. >> ROLLCALL PLEASE. >> >> MOTION PASSED. THE NEXT CASE WILL BE CASED TO 6 [E. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #26-001721: 5502 N 9th St (HOLIDAY HILLS SEC 1 CONT, BLOCK H, LOT 8, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Trevino Fernando] -001721 AT 5502 NORTH NINTH STREET FIT CHECKLIST SHOWS THAT UTILITIES HAVE BEEN INACTIVE SINCE APRIL 13, 2018 AND A SEARCH REVEALS TREVINO FERNANDO TO BE THE OWNER AND THIS IS A PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED SIX UPFRONT SOUTHSIDE. THE REAR NORTHSIDE. EAST EASTSIDE. AND WESTSIDE. SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS AND INADEQUATE SANITATION AND STRUCTURAL HAZARD, NUISANCE, HAZARDOUS ELECTRICAL WIRING AND MULTI-WEATHER PROTECTION. HERE ARE SOME OF THE EXTERIOR DILAPIDATION. MULTI-WEATHER PROTECTION. FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION. TIMELINE APRIL 30TH 2026, AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS RECORDED AT THE COUNTY CLERK IN THE PROPERTY WAS BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION DUE TO IT BEING UNSECURED AND REQUIRED MOWING VICE CITY CONTRACTOR AND THE CITY NEEDED TO CONTRACT AND REMOVE A LARGE BEEHIVE LOCATED IN THE BACK OF THE HOUSE. WE DISCOVERED OWNER IS DECEASED AND NOTICE OF CONDEMNATION WAS SENT TO THE ADDRESS OF RECORD O THE PROPERTY OWNER AND NO SPARE HAVE BEEN LOCATED TO SEND NOTICES TO END MAY 14 AT, THE NOTICE OF THE HEARING WAS POSTE ON THE STRUCTURE AND MAKE 15 OF 2026, NOTICE OF THE JUNE HEARIN WAS SENT TO THE ADDRESS OF RECORD OF THE PROPERTY OWNER APPEARS AND I DID AN INSPECTION POINT IN THIS AND THAT'S HOW I GOT SOME INTERIOR PICTURES YOU SEE AND YOU HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO LOCATE ANY ERRORS WHATSOEVER OR ANY ANY THAT WOULD OWN UP TO THIS PROPERTY IN THE CITY HAS HAD MULTIPLE ABATEMENTS ALREADY IN THE MOWING ABATEMENTS AND UP TO BE A SEPARATE COME FORWARD FOR THIS PROPERTY. IT IS PRETTY ROUGH. STEP FOR QUOTATION IS DEFINED THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AN WELFARE AND REPAIR OF THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE OR THE OWNERS TO DEMOLISH WITHI 30 DAYS OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH . I CAN TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. >> IN THE INSTANCE OF THE DECEASED AIR DOES. >> AS LONG AS STAFF FOLLOWS ALL OF THE DUE DILIGENCE REQUIRED T FOLLOW, AND HE HAS DONE THAT, THAT IS WHAT WE ARE REQUIRED TO DO. AND SO THAT IS WHY WE DO THAT, WE MAKE SURE WE SEND NOTICES EVERYWHERE WE ARE LEGALLY REQUIRED TO SEND IT AND DEFINED NUMBERS THROUGH OUR RESEARCH AS REQUIRED. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? AT THIS TIME IBOOKS OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CASE 26 DAD 001721. ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK, PLEAS STEP FORWARD I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE 26-001721 . [00:50:03] WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. TANKERSLEY'S AND A SECOND BY MR. ALLRED TO ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND THAT IT'S A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND REPAIR OF THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE UNREASONABLE ROLL CALL, PLEASE. >> MOTION PASSED. WE HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE ORDER. THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLIS WITHIN 30 DAYS OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. >> MOTION PASSED. THE NEXT CASE IS CASE 26-001751 [F. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #26-001751: 5333 Llano St (BAKER HEIGHTS ADDN SEC 1, BLOCK 4, LOT 12, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Weinald Cheryl Dean c/o Henry Thibodeaux] AT 5333 LLANO STREET. THE SEARCH WOULD BE OLD CHERYL DEAN WEINALD TO BE THE OWNER AN HERE IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED PICK THE FRONT END NORTHSIDE. BUT THE REAR SOUTHSIDE. , EASTSIDE. AND WESTSIDE. SUBSTANDARD CODE VIOLATIONS AND INADEQUATE SANITATION, NUISANCE UNHESITANTLY WIRY WYRICK AND FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION. HERE IS SOME OF THE EXTERIOR DILAPIDATION. AND THAT IS A SMALL HOLE MAC THAT YOU SEE IN THE ROOF. INADEQUATE SANITATION. TIMELINE OF EVENTS COME APRIL 30 TH 2026, THE AFFIDAVIT OF CONDEMNATION WAS RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY PARK AND MAY 1, CONDEMNATION OF THE SPLIT WAS SENT TO THE ADDRESS OF RECORDS OF THE OWNER AND AN ADDRESS THA IS LISTED IN THE CARE AND IT WA DISCOVERED THAT THE OWNER IS DECEASED AS WELL AS THE PERSON LISTED AS THE -- AND WE WERE UNABLE TO FIND ANYTHING ANY MAY 14, AND MAY MA 15 OF 2026, NOTICE OF THE HEARING% OF THE ADDRESS OF RECORD TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND SENT TO PERSON LISTED AND SIMILAR TO THE PREVIOUS CASE, O THIS ONE AS WELL, THAT IS THE INSIDE PICTURES THAT WE SAW. WE WERE UNABLE TO ACCESS PART O THE HOUSE FROM SO MUCH STEP IN THE HOUSE AND WE'VE BEEN ABLE T FIND ANY HEIRS WHATSOEVER FOR THIS. THIS HAS GONE BACK SEVERAL YEAR NOW AS FAR AS CODE CASES GO AND WE HAVE DEALT WITH THIS AND WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO FIND NO ONE CONNECTED TO THE LIST OF PEOPLE THAT IS GOING TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE HOUSE AT ALL PIXELS STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO FIND THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND IT IS A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY AND WELFARE AND REPAIR WOULD BE UNPLEASING DOUBLE AND THE OWNER IS ORDERED TO DEMOLISH OR APPEA WITHIN 30 DAYS OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. I I WILL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. AT THIS TIME IT OPENS UP HEARIN FOR CASE 26-001751. I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE TO SIXTH AS 001751. >> WE HAD A MOTION AND A SECOND BY MR. MCNEIL SPEARED THE PUBLIC DOES THE PROPERTY IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND REPAIR THE STRUCTURE -- ROLL CALL, PLEASE. [00:55:12] OR APPEAL. THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH BEARDS. >> PIECE GOT A MOTION BY MR. ALLRED AND I'M SECOND BY MR. MCNEILL. ROLL CALL, PLEASE VOTE] MOTION PASSED. [G. Case for Rehabilitation, Demolition, or Civil Penalties - Case #26-001752: 1274 Portland Ave (CAREY PLACE ADDN, BLOCK 1, LOT 13, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS), Owner: Wright Sharon J & Meeks J E] IN THE LAST CASE TODAY WILL BE CASE 26-001752 AT 1270 FOR PORTLAND AVENUE. THE CHECKLIST SHOWS THAT THE UTILITIES HAVE BEEN INACTIVE SINCE JANUARY 24 OF 2025 AND TH SEARCH WE YELLS J. E. MEEKS AND SHARON J. WRIGHT TO BE THE OWNER 'S BEAUTY IS THE PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS POSTED. THE FRONT AND EASTSIDE. , THE REAR AND WESTSIDE. NORTHSIDE OF THE INTERIOR CONDITIONS. TIMELINE APRIL 30, RECORDED AT THE COUNTY CLERK ON THE PROPERT WAS CONDEMNED AFTER EXECUTION O A CODE INSPECTION 1, WE'VE GOT THE PICTURES. SIMILAR TO USE THE PREVIOUS WAS CLUTTERED SO MUCH WE COULD NOT ACCESS A LOT OF THE HOUSE THERE MAY 1, 2026, CONDEMNATION NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE APPLICANT RECORD ON THE PROPERT OWNERS INTO THE AIR THAT THAT H PUT ACCEPT NOTICES AND PROVIDED HIS ADDRESS. LISTED OWNERS ARE DECEASED AND THERE ARE THREE HEIRS TO THE PROPERTY IN ALL THREE STATED THAT THEY DO NOT WANT ANYTHING TO DO THE PROPERTY AND DO NOT WANT TO PERCEIVE NOTICES, INCLUDING THE AIR THAT PROVIDED HIS ADDRESS. ALSO SAID THAT WOULD NOT BE PUTTING THE HOUSE INTO THEIR NAME. NONE OF THE HEIRS THAT ALL THRE AGREED TO THE HOUSE SHOULD BE DEMOLISHED. MAY 14 AT 2026, NOTICE OF THE JUNE HEARING% OF THE ADDRESS OF RECORD AND THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND MAY 15TH 2026, THE PUBLIC NOTICE OF THE JUNE HEARING WAS POSTED ON THE STRUCTURE AND FOR FOLLOW-UP ON THAT, I'VE SPOKEN WITH THE ONE SON OF ONE OF THE OWNERS WHO HAVE FIRST SET GO AHEAD AND SEND THEM THE MAIL SOON SINCE HE'S BEEN GETTING TH MAIL FROM HIS NOT TO GET ANYTHING AND REITERATED THAT ANYBODY WANT ANYTHING TO DO WITHOUT THEM THE OPTION OF TRYING TO DO ANYTHING TO GET A PUT INTO THEIR NAME SO WE ARE JUST DEALING WITH DECEASED DONORS AND NOBODY WILL TAKE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY. THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS DEFINED AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AN A PUBLIC HAZARD TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY AND WELFARE AND REPAIR WOULD BE UNREASONABLE AN ORDERED THE OWNERS TO DEMOLISH OR APPEAL THE ORDER WITHIN 30 DAYS ARE OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. AND I WILL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. WE ARE GOOD. >> I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING PICK ANYBODY'S WISHING TO SPEAK TO THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAM FOR THE RECORD. HARRY NUNCA BUBBLE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 26-001752 AND OPEN THE FLOOR TO A MOTION. >> I MOTION A STAFF RECOMMENDATION. >> WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. TANKERSLEY AND A DOUBLE SECOND BY MR. MCBRAYER AND ALLRED. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. ORDER. WE HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE [01:00:03] ORDER AND A SECOND. WE WILL GIVE IT TO MR. ALLRED. THE OWNERS ARE -- OR THE CITY MAY DEMOLISH. ROLL CALL, PLEASE. >> MOTION PASSED BEARDS. >> THAT CONCLUDES OUR JUNE BOAR OF BUILDING STANDARDS MEETING. >> AT THE FRONT FORM THE BOARD THAT THIS WILL BE MYSTERIOUS DOLLARS LAST MEETING YOU CAN THINK HER HELP. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.